Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 07:59:32 +0300
From: Andrew Prostrelov <prostre...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Preserve UV methods after PolygonMesh.Set()
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
I guess i will try to establish ports connections through the night on 1
january.
Maybe some christmas miracle h
I guess i will try to establish ports connections through the night on 1
january.
Maybe some christmas miracle helps.
By the way maybe you know this one also: "how should i create "internal"
clusters" ?
Here is an example of internal cluster that does not shown in Modeling
stack.
ubject: Re: Preserve UV methods after PolygonMesh.Set()
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
X
Dear Santa,
I've been good all year.
Most of the time.
Once in a while, never mind.
All year i spent my work and free time to make XSI modelling
X
Dear Santa,
I've been good all year.
Most of the time.
Once in a while, never mind.
All year i spent my work and free time to make XSI modelling tools
more interactive and usable.
Somehow i manage to finish about 3 tools in
Hi, Matt!
I wrote simple testing topo operator and have same problem as Andrew.
Cluster properties not updated. Testing UV operator create new edge as
split tool. I tested this operator on simple plane with 4 vertices. This
code is not universal and does not generate the algorithms, but shows the
at.
Matt
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 17:40:56 +0300
From: Andrew Prostrelov <prostre...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Preserve UV methods after PolygonMesh.Set()
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Ok i tried all over again. Tried different type of clusters and different
type of port connecti
Ok i tried all over again. Tried different type of clusters and different
type of port connection configurations.
Clusters still do not updates components amount even if this clusters were
'always complete'.
If you add new components (verts,edges, polys etc) via PolygonMesh.Set()
they do not
Ok. I would try it all over again. Maybe i forgot something.
But .To be sure that i didn't do something wrong here are a couple of
additional details.
this is how i get CRefs and connect ports:
http://take.ms/bkaXi
http://take.ms/VZUAk
here is the modelling stack with cluster after we apply our
ut corners,
you'll likely run into issues.
Matt
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 20:08:33 +0300
From: Andrew Prostrelov <prostre...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Preserve UV methods after PolygonMesh.Set()
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Thanks Matt now the structure and dependencies is more obvious f
Thanks Matt now the structure and dependencies is more obvious for me.
But still i confused about behaviour of "Sample" cluster attached to
CustomOperator.
That's how i connected in & out ports of CustomOperator:
http://take.ms/saEYZ
After i change geometry (add one additional edge) this cluster
and write the entire data set to make
updates, so make sure you minimize the number of Gets and Sets.
Matt
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2016 09:01:13 +0300
From: Andrew Prostrelov <prostre...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Preserve UV methods after PolygonMesh.Set()
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
I gue
I guess PolygonMesh.Set() works as it should. Have no problem with that.
The friend of mine suggest me to attach a UV_Cluster to CustomOperator Port
to prevent it from changes.
When we use "AddEdge Op" or "SplitEdge Op" they also have uv_cluster
attached at one of input ports.
But we never would
First, let's correctly identify the problem. The issue was the
AddPointInteriorToPolygon() command had a bug, not PolygonMesh.Set(). If
PolygonMesh.Set() didn't work, it would display problems on all polygon mesh
operations, not just with AddPointInteriorToPolygon().
As for PolygonNode data,
13 matches
Mail list logo
