Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] config-check log Service unavailable

Hello, On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 3:13 PM, RUIZ LOPEZ Noel wrote: > Hello Nicolas and Matthieu, > > > > *First of all, thanks for your response. It helps a lot* > > > > Well, I add a new rule to elk’s firewall http service, and now, the > message is a 404, so we advanced in that way. > > > > Anyway,

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] config-check log Service unavailable

Hello Noel, Sorry for the late response, I was unavailable last week. I'm re-adding the list, Matthieu and Nicolas to the thread. On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 10:12 AM, RUIZ LOPEZ Noel wrote: > Hello Fabien > > > > > > Yes, I can not contact to http://elk/logs &g

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] config-check log Service unavailable

response (to all, for all of them). If > you know a better way to solve this gerrit’s config-check log Access issue, > please enlighten me. > > > > Best regards, > > Noel > > > > > > *De:* Fabien Boucher [mailto:fbouc...@redhat.com] > *Enviado el:* lune

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] config-check log Service unavailable

gards, Fabien On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 6:02 PM, Fabien Boucher wrote: > Good to read it works now, still there is an issue somewhere it should > work out of the box, also correct mime type should have been set by Apache > to make the browser display it (like on our production env: > https:

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] config-check log Service unavailable

as good as always. Good Job. Thanks > > > > Best Regards > > Noel > -- > > > > > > *De:* Fabien Boucher [mailto:fbouc...@redhat.com] > *Enviado el:* martes, 15 de mayo de 2018 18:41 > > *Para:* RUIZ LOPEZ Noel > *CC:* softwarefacto

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] Help on zuulv3 and sfconfig

Hello Eli, On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 3:47 AM, 乔立勇(Eli Qiao) wrote: > Hi Fabien > > Thanks for you so quick response, I will try as your suggestions. > >> >> BTW, I get some issue when create a demo project with sf-config, it tells >>> that the newly created use is "Authentication Failed" >>> >>

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] Help on zuulv3 and sfconfig

Hello Eli, On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 5:11 AM, 乔立勇(Eli Qiao) wrote: > >> >>> but I sill have some questions: >>> 1. about OCI, where's the container running on the host ? (I have no >>> node pool at all) >>> >> >> Nodepool is required to run test in OCI containers, we bundle a 'not yet >> merged b

[Softwarefactory-dev] Sprint 2018-26 Review

Hello, Here is a summary of what the team did from June 14 to June 28. Sprint taskboard: https://tree.taiga.io/project/morucci-software-factory/taskboard/2018-26 Regarding Software Factory: * We upgraded sf-project.io to the 3.1 candidate version in preparation of rdoproject.org migration to z

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] Tech previews and upstream (zuul, nodepool)

What about maintaining an etherpad with the list of patches we carry in our packaging ? For instance, each patch line should include: - the upstream review - the current in-progress status (-1/0/+1/+2) - an explanation about why this patch is needed for us in SF. - maybe more ... Ide

[Softwarefactory-dev] Sprint 2018-42 review

Hello, Here is a summary of what the team did from October 08 to October 19. Sprint taskboard: https://tree.taiga.io/project/morucci-software-factory/taskboard/2018-42 Regarding our contributions to Zuul and Nodepool: - We merged and fixed some issues found with the new Zuul React web int

[Softwarefactory-dev] Sprint Oct 19 - Nov 7 2018

Here is a summary of what the team did during the last sprint. Regarding *openstack-infra*: - We worked on a Zuul's Pagure driver WIP - Some new RFE opened on Pagure https://review.openstack.org/#/c/604404/ - We updated the JWT spec. It should be reviewed after the Berlin summit -

[Softwarefactory-dev] Sprint Nov 8 - Nov 29

Here is a summary of what the team did during the last sprint. Regarding *openstack-infra*: - Progress on the Zuul/pagure driver https://review.openstack.org/#/c/604404/ RFE open

[Softwarefactory-dev] Sprint Nov 29 - Dec 19

Here is a summary of what the team did during the last sprint. Regarding *openstack-infra*: - We've prepared a test of zuul-jobs' upload-to-pypi role using devPI (standalone pypi deployment). What's left to do is to add it to upstream's third party CI. - We've answered comments to t

[Softwarefactory-dev] Sprint Dec 21 to Jan 09

Here is a summary of what the team did during the last sprint. Regarding *Zuul and Nodepool*: * We added upstream testing for upload-to-pypi, and submitted a patch to improve this role's compatibility with devPI: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/629018/ * We merged Kubernetes and OpenShift suppor

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] /srv/centos7 container: should we activate EPEL ?

Hello Matthieu, On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 5:20 PM Matthieu Huin wrote: > Hello, > > Going to the ML rather than IRC for asynchronous discussion. > > The title says it all: without EPEL the CentOS7 container defined in > /srv/centos7 on the oci node cannot be used for anything related to python, >

[Softwarefactory-dev] Sprint Jan 11 to Jan 30

Here is a summary of what the team did during the last sprint. Regarding *Zuul and Nodepool*: * freeze_job: worked on a new zuul-runner command line to be able to run a job locally. This rebased and fix the proposed implementation and added the execute sub-command as well as support for depends-o

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] TG-2069 sf-ci: convert tasks we use in our playbooks in roles

Hi, LGTM as well. Do you plan to create a role sfconfig for instance with role action like: install, setup, recover ? On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 9:12 PM Matthieu Huin wrote: > LGTM > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 8:09 PM Nicolas Hicher wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> We have a lot of tasks on sf-ci/playbook

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] Distro-jobs: integration of DLRN and rdopkg for new RPM based Zuul pipelines

Hi Tristan, Thanks for this great recap. I updated the related Taiga epic today according to the README TODO list. Then we now have 4 more stories to groom in : https://tree.taiga.io/project/morucci-software-factory/epic/2077 Cheers, Fabien On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 8:30 AM Tristan Cacqueray wrot

[Softwarefactory-dev] Sprint Feb 22 to Mar 13

Here is a summary of what the team did during the last sprint. Regarding Zuul and Nodepool: * We continued work on Zuul's tenant-scoped admin REST API.The spec got its first +1 \o/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/562321/. The patch chain reflects the latest version of the spec: https://review.op

[Softwarefactory-dev] Sprint 2019 Mar 15 to April 03 summary

Here is a summary of what the team did during the last sprint. Regarding Zuul and Nodepool: * Implemented a Elasticsearch reporter for Zuul https://review.openstack.org/644927/. * Move forward with the Zuul/Pagure driver https://review.openstack.org/604404/. * We made good progress on the authent

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] Zuul NODE FAILURE

Hi, Starting with 3.2 you should probably start with the minimal arch https://softwarefactory-project.io/cgit/software-factory/sf-config/tree/refarch/minimal.yaml Then add others components you need step by step. Regards, Fabien On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 12:26 PM Tristan Cacqueray wrote: > > On

[Softwarefactory-dev] Sprint 2019 April 04 to April 24 summary

Here is a summary of what the team did during the last sprint. Regarding our contributions to Zuul and Nodepool: * We proposed a Docker compose PoC upstream so that people can test out the authN/Z feature. A video was shared on the zuul-discuss ML. https://softwarefactory-project.io/static/zuul_j

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] [SF 3.3] AD/LDAP Authentication configuration support request

Hi, On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 9:53 AM Mourad Renai wrote: > Hello, > > > > I’m software integrator on a software development project at Veoneer > . > > We plan to setup a Continuous Integration engine based on your tool : > Software-Factory, as it groups several tools and

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] [SF 3.3] AD/LDAP Authentication configuration support request

ss*: Rue du Petit Albi Parc SILIC > > Batiment Le Cerynie > > 95800 Cergy-Pontoise > > France > > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/18452321/> > > <https://twitter.com/Veoneer1> > > <https://www.youtube.

[Softwarefactory-dev] Planned outage of softwarefactory-project.io: 2020-08-11 from 13:00 to 14:00 UTC

Hello folks, We plan to perform an upgrade of softwarefactory-project.io and review.rdoproject.org on 2020-08-11 from 13:00 to 14:00 UTC. Service interruption is expected, including: - Zuul CI not running jobs for gerrit, github or opendev. We expect that the interruption of services will be less

[Softwarefactory-dev] SF-3.5 has been released!

Hello everyone, We are pleased to announce the release of the 3.5 version of Software Factory. This release features: - - Update the zookeeper deployment to be compatible with the future releases of Zuul by enabling TLS client. - - Runc driver is no longer supported and the Nodepool and Zuul pack

[Softwarefactory-dev] Gerrit 3.4.3 update of softwarefactory-project.io: 2022-01-18 from 14:00 to 18:00 UTC

Hello folks, We plan to perform a Gerrit update of Software Factory deployments. The affected services will be: - softwarefactory-project.io Gerrit service. Regards, Fabien, on behalf of the Software Factory Operation Team ___ Softwarefactory-dev mailin

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] Gerrit 3.4.3 update of softwarefactory-project.io: 2022-01-18 from 14:00 to 18:00 UTC

Hello folks, The update is done. Please let us know if you experience any issues. Regards, Fabien, on behalf of the Software Factory Operation Team On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 3:48 PM Fabien Boucher wrote: > Hello folks, > > We plan to perform a Gerrit update of Software Factory de

[Softwarefactory-dev] Software Factory 3.7 has been released!

Hello everyone, We are pleased to announce the release of the 3.7 version of Software Factory. Read the announcement at: https://www.softwarefactory-project.io/software-factory-37-has-been-released.html Cheers ! The SF team ___ Softwarefactory-dev mail

[Softwarefactory-dev] SF-3.8 has been released!

Hello everyone, We are pleased to announce the release of the 3.8 version of Software Factory. See the release notes: https://www.softwarefactory-project.io/releases/3.8/ Best regards, The Software Factory Team ___ Softwarefactory-dev mailing list Soft

[Softwarefactory-dev] Software Factory services outage softwarefactory-project.io: Friday Aug 18 4-5pm EST

Hello folks, An upgrade operation is scheduled by our cloud provider that could affect Software Factory services. During that time some services might be unavailable. The affected services will be: - softwarefactory-project.io services. Regards, Fabien, on behalf of the Software Factory Operati

[Softwarefactory-dev] Why are we using downstream pygerrit?

Hi Aslam, I Choose the wrong one previously :D (Adding softwarefactory-dev@redhat.com as CC) It was related to a dependencies issue with the real pygerrit from here: https://github.com/sonyxperiadev/pygerrit/blob/master/requirements.txt I'm not so sure but maybe a conflict with requests 2.7.

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] pygerrit upstream

Hi, Le 29/01/2016 14:34, aslam a écrit : > > > Hi All, First about this one http://softwarefactory-project.io/r/#/c/2617/1. Please have a look to my comment. And you should maybe in addition fix the pysflib unit tests in the same patch if needed. > Regarding my patch on using upstream pygerr

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] pygerrit upstream

at > other patches depend on). > > - Original Message - >> From: "Fabien Boucher" >> To: softwarefactory-dev@redhat.com >> Sent: Friday, January 29, 2016 4:02:31 PM >> Subject: Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] pygerrit upstream >> >> Hi, >> &

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] Gitnetics integration, or how can we automate upstream changes polling

Hi, Le 02/02/2016 16:09, Gabriele Cerami a écrit : > Hi, > > first of all, I don't know how to sobscribe to this ml, or if it's the > right place to post this discussion. You can use mailman UI here, softwarefactory-dev is a public ML. https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/softwarefactory-dev

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] Gitnetics integration, or how can we automate upstream changes polling

03/02/2016 11:44, Gabriele Cerami a écrit : > On 03 Feb, Fabien Boucher wrote: >> >> So to summarize Gitnetic will help for such cases: >> - we have a *-patches branch with some "not yet/never" included upstream >> changes >> and where we want to cherry-

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] [Rdo-list] Gitnetics integration, or how can we automate upstream changes polling

Hi, Le 05/02/2016 15:06, Gabriele Cerami a écrit : > If the patches are never merged how do you know they don't create > conflicts, what is the merge base of the patches ? patches are never > rebased on each other but only to a common base ? In the RPM Factory context let's say we have a project

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] Artifact export for RPM factory in the Gate pipeline or the POST pipeline ?

Le 12/02/2016 01:07, Tristan Cacqueray a écrit : > Switching to softwarefactory-dev. > > On 02/11/2016 09:45 PM, Fabien Boucher wrote: >> Le 11/02/2016 21:40, Tristan Cacqueray a écrit : >>> On 02/11/2016 04:51 PM, Fabien Boucher wrote: >>>> Here is my exp

[Softwarefactory-dev] SAIO in SF

Hi, This mail to start a discussion about the integration of a SAIO within SF. I believe it can help for: - Adapt or internal tooling to "only" the swift API (for storage related stuff) - Be able to use the internal Swift instance when an SF operator can't access to a Swift cluster - Be able to h

[Softwarefactory-dev] RCIP Engineering - Cobra sprint 2016-11 status

Hi folks, During the sprint 2016-11, the Cobra team has been working on: * Continued to prepare the migration of RDO on rpmfactory * Continued to provision rpmfactory.beta.rdoproject.org * Installation and synchronization of the future prod node review.rdoproject.org (not used yet) * Implementa

[Softwarefactory-dev] sf-2.2.0 has been released!

Hello everyone, We are satisfied to announce the release of the 2.2.0 version of Software Factory. Please find the changelog, digests, and package diff below. Best Regards, Fabien Changelog New Features - Document how to use custom certificate such as letsencrypt. - Break down j

[Softwarefactory-dev] Upgrade of softwarefactory-project.io to 2.2.0

Hi there, We plan to upgrade softwarefactory-project.io to 2.2.0 on Wednesday around 2:00 PM (UTC). The downtime will be about 30 Minutes approximately. It may be possible some of your changes into Zuul need to be rechecked after the upgrade. Cheers, PCTT. _

[Softwarefactory-dev] Replication of git repo on Github

Hi, This mail to share my thoughts about the replication of the git repositories especially on Github. We recommend inside the SF documentation to use the deploy key feature of Github and due to the wait Github behaves we ask to the user: * to create an unique key pair for each repository to re

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] Replication of git repo on Github

Thanks Christian for your response. Le 11/05/2016 12:16, Christian Schwede a écrit : > Hi Fabien, > > thanks for sharing your ideas! > > On 11.05.16 11:53, Fabien Boucher wrote: >> * to create an unique key pair for each repository to replicate >> * to push the privat

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] Replication of git repo on Github

Hi, Thanks for your feedbacks here is a summary of what has been done, and what remains to be done: In SF, patches to manage replication.config in the config repository - http://softwarefactory-project.io/r/#/c/3689/ (Make sure the config auto generated change is merged before tests) - Work and

[Softwarefactory-dev] SF-2.2.1 has been released !

Hello everyone, We are satisfied to announce the release of the 2.2.1 version of Software Factory. Please find the changelog, digests, and package diff below. Best Regards, The Software Factory team The Release 2.2.1 changelog === New Features - Keep trac

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] SF-2.2.1 has been released !

istan Cacqueray a écrit : > On 05/24/2016 01:54 PM, Fabien Boucher wrote: >> Hello everyone, >> >> We are satisfied to announce the release of the 2.2.1 version of >> Software Factory. >> > > A quick feedback on sf-project.io update to 2.2.1: > > * node

[Softwarefactory-dev] Mini grooming

Hi, In the same spirit than the previous sprint, let's take 30 minutes right after the standup Wednesday this week to discuss about some stories. I propose we continue with the stories on that etherpad: http://softwarefactory-project.io/etherpad/p/mini_grooming Feel free to add other items to t

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] Mini grooming

Hi, I missed to remind about that :) Let's do it tomorrow then. I added that story to be groomed in the etherpad as fixing it seem quite urgent for rdo : http://softwarefactory-project.io/redmine/issues/1438 Cheers, Fabien Le 06/06/2016 à 16:04, Fabien Boucher a écrit : > Hi, > &g

[Softwarefactory-dev] More info about the SF preprod

Hi, About the job periodic sf-integration-tests-latest (that we call the "preprod") we wanted to share some useful information about it: - The job is run every night and take by default the last master image of SF to deploy a SF where heath-check tests are run (zuul + nodepool). http://softw

[Softwarefactory-dev] Production Chain Tool Team - Software Factory - sprint 2016-24 status

Hello everyone, On the software-factory side, the team did: * Worked on adding group management via the SF API * Better Zuul/Nodepool testing with real workflow (generated by ansible) https://www.redhat.com/archives/softwarefactory-dev/2016-June/msg4.html * Added Gerritbot testing * Added API

[Softwarefactory-dev] SF upgrade and upgrade path proposal

Hi, I wanted to share we you my thoughts about the upgrade. We used to test one upgrade path in our CI at each submitted patchset (N-1 -> MASTER) mainly because we suppose that other SF operators follow the last SF version closely, and even it they don't, we suppose they will perform an upgrade

[Softwarefactory-dev] SF-2.2.2 has been released !

Hello everyone, We are satisfied to announce the release of the 2.2.2 version of Software Factory. Please find the changelog, digests, and package diff below. Best Regards, The Software Factory team The Release 2.2.2 changelog === New Features - Add comm

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] Use config-repo to manage projects too

try point for the configuration will be only the config repo. IMO using the config repo "only" clarifies the functional configuration of SF and by the way reduce the amount of work for to us to maintain a REST API, a CLI, and a UI ... For the UI

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] Using storyboard to manage product backlog and sprint

Hi Tristan, Thx for this follow up about using Storyboard for our sprints. Few inlines comments. Le 27/06/2016 à 23:09, Tristan Cacqueray a écrit : > Hello folks, > > I'd like to propose/discuss a new workflow to manage our backlog. > The two main improvements will be: > * create tasks attached

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] Using storyboard to manage product backlog and sprint

ed a (on shot) tool to move the content. Or could this be done manually ? And finally once we migrated, we can I guess safely remove definitely Redmine from SF ? WDYT ? > - Original Message - >> From: "Fabien Boucher" >> To: softwarefactory-dev@redhat.com >&g

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] Using storyboard to manage product backlog and sprint

Le 29/06/2016 à 14:55, Tristan Cacqueray a écrit : > On 06/29/2016 12:28 PM, Matthieu Huin wrote: >> So we don't use redmine at all ? > > Well, in my opinion it's still a trial. We should expect major > difficulties when using this new service and we should be ready to > remove it. > > I propo

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] Mirror tooling to provide swift cache for CI instances

Hi, > Today, the story suggests to use mirror2swift[2], but I'm afraid this > tool doesn't address the repodata creation, it only mirrors > the rpm packages when available (and it doesn't work with elasticsearch > http mirror where rpm files are not web listed). Does it deserves an improvement of

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] Sprint 2016-28: Backlog grooming

Hi, Thanks for that mail Tristan. Le 07/07/2016 à 16:47, Tristan Cacqueray a écrit : > Greeting folks, > > I'd like to schedule a backlog grooming next Monday after the daily > standup. Please reply to this thread with the story you'd like to be > implemented for the next sprint. > > Here is my

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] Sprint 2016-28: Backlog grooming

Le 11/07/2016 à 10:51, Fabien Boucher a écrit : > Hi, > > Thanks for that mail Tristan. > > Le 07/07/2016 à 16:47, Tristan Cacqueray a écrit : >> Greeting folks, >> >> I'd like to schedule a backlog grooming next Monday after the daily >> standup

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] SF upgrade and upgrade path proposal

Hi Tristan, >> >> In order to do that we can have two jobs: >> - upgrade test from N-2 >> - upgrade test from N-1 >> >> Furthermore I think we should remove SF_PREVIOUS_VER from the role_config.rc >> and >> compute it based on tags detection. Upgrade CI jobs will be then able to >> easily comput

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] Regarding API key auth patches

Hi, +1 Agree with you. Le 22/07/2016 à 10:31, Matthieu Huin a écrit : > +1 > > As long as the CLI covers everything I feel we can live with a minimal GUI > that could > be limited to the top menu and a user settings page for now. > > Let's discuss it at today's grooming ! > > - Original M

[Softwarefactory-dev] Today grooming subject

Hi there, This email to define the subject of the backlog grooming of today. I would like to review the validity of the pre-selected stories of each categories of our backlog. As a reminder the pre-selected are the ones above the the stories named: '8<--- Story below are not groomed

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] Today grooming subject

ts" category. Let me know if that program fit for you. Furthermore if you want to discuss important new stories before the planning that's the moment then add the story IDs to that thread. Cheers, Fabien Le 10/08/2016 à 11:38, Fabien Boucher a écrit : > Hi there, > > This ema

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] Use config-repo to manage projects too

tracker: ... git-replica: ... - namespace: DCI - git-repo: dci-control-server name: ... description: ... ... I think this format could be a good starting point. Let me know what do you think. Fabien Le 24/06/2016 à 11:09, Fabien Boucher a écrit : >

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] Use config-repo to manage projects too

Le 12/08/2016 à 14:35, Tristan Cacqueray a écrit : > Thank you for the update, > my notes based on the grooming we had: > > On 08/12/2016 10:52 AM, Fabien Boucher wrote: >> Hi, >> >> A follow up on that. For the current sprint we decided to deal with the &

[Softwarefactory-dev] Production Chain Tool Team - Software Factory - sprint 2016-32 status

Hello everyone, On the software-factory side, the team did: - Implemented a 'gerrit_connections' option to enable Zuul third-party-CI use case in SF. - Improved image build to better use rpm mirror2swift cache. - Upgraded softwarefactory-project.io to 2.2.3 and activated storyboard as an initia

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] A review dashboard

Hi, Le 14/09/2016 à 11:17, Tristan Cacqueray a écrit : > Hello folks, > > to follow up the discussion about using an etherpad to track needed > review I looked into using a gerrit native dashboard... Turns out > Christian already created a dashboard sometime ago and I don't think we > really used

[Softwarefactory-dev] Skip test jobs if "Skip CI" string appears in the commit msg

Hi, Just an idea and wanted to know if we should create a story for that. When working on something that just a WIP and you want to push on Gerrit to not lose your work in case of local outage you are usually not interested by the CI test results. So instead of consuming resources for nothing it i

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] Skip test jobs if "Skip CI" string appears in the commit msg

" is not in the commit message. > - Original Message - >> From: "Fabien Boucher" >> To: softwarefactory-dev@redhat.com >> Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 2:55:11 PM >> Subject: [Softwarefactory-dev] Skip test jobs if "Skip CI" strin

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] Skip test jobs if "Skip CI" string appears in the commit msg

;hb=HEAD#l27) --> Someone put +2CR +1W --> Patch enter the gate pipeline ... But what about having the same condition about the witness when evaluating the gate pipeline ? >> - Original Message - >>> From: "Fabien Boucher" >>> To: softwarefactory-dev@re

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] Skip test jobs if "Skip CI" string appears in the commit msg

Le 14/09/2016 à 16:48, Tristan Cacqueray a écrit : > On 09/14/2016 12:55 PM, Fabien Boucher wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Just an idea and wanted to know if we should create a story for that. >> When working on something that just a WIP and you want to push on Gerrit >>

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] A review dashboard

Exact :) ! Thanks Christian for the tips ! Le 19/09/2016 à 09:05, Christian Schwede a écrit : > Hey everyone, > > On 14.09.16 11:57, Fabien Boucher wrote: >> Just a note that you can save the dashboard link in: >> http://softwarefactory-project.io/r/#/settings/preferences &g

[Softwarefactory-dev] Wanted to share an idea about the credentials storage in SF

Hi, Today we use the credential binding plugin of Jenkins but as we are going to remove Jenkins in a relatively near future we then need to find an alternative solution. Matthieu shared the idea to let a SF user define himself credentials via the managesf REST api but continue to use the CB to

[Softwarefactory-dev] Production Chain Tool Team - Software Factory - sprint 2016-38 status

Hello everyone, On the software-factory side, the team did: * Record a demo how to deploy and create a project: https://bluejeans.com/s/OFnAs/ * Improved the enforce_ssl option * POC on declaring/creating projects/groups/acls via a the config GIT repo on SF this way: http://softwarefactory-

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] Enforce_ssl is activated by default

Hi, Thanks Tristan for this useful information. The patch has been +2CR and +1V. Let's see how it behave. Fabien Le 22/10/2016 à 17:01, Tristan Cacqueray a écrit : > Hello folks, > > Since http://softwarefactory-project.io/r/5077 is merged, development > deployment (sftests.com) will use (and f

[Softwarefactory-dev] Resources git style request for review

Hi, As this is a bunch of code for the resource GIT style I don't want we wait to much before having them reviewed and hopefully approved. Please have a look : In the order of merge priority: - http://softwarefactory-project.io/r/#/c/4608/ (CR+2 by Tristan) waiting for another one or let me kn

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] Resources git style request for review

s: page-path and deploy-key: (pub key). -> Will require something to authorize only the deploy key to push files under a specific directory (apache-root/pages//.) Cheers, Have a good WE. Fabien Le 24/10/2016 à 16:53, Fabien Boucher a écrit : > Hi, > > As this is a bunch of

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] [Softwarefactory] Problemlem: Reconfiguration failed

Hi. Thanks for reporting the issue. Tristan had a deeper look at it and it turns out that the Zuul service was not restarted after the reconfiguration case. So a simple: systemctl restart zuul after the sfconfig.sh run should fix the issue. The futur 2.2.6 of SF will contains that patch that fix

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] Notes on connecting 2 SF for third-party CI testing.

Hi, What do you think about planning a story for the next sprint including: - the merge of the patches you worked on - extending the documentation of the feature - a functional tests ? Le 16/11/2016 à 08:52, Tristan Cacqueray a écrit : > Hello folks, > > doing a 3rd party CI simulation is quite

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] Managesf API v2

Hi, Thanks for bringing that subject. Le 21/11/2016 à 03:29, Tristan Cacqueray a écrit : > Hello Folks, > > with the resources management in place, it's a good time to think about > the API V2 of managesf. Here is a review of the current controllers and > some proposition to improve them. > > #

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] metrics solutions and architecture

Hi, Thanks Nicolas looking at the different possibilities. Le 22/11/2016 à 16:28, Nicolas Hicher a écrit : > Hello guys, > > After investigate to find an architecture to have the following metrics on > SF, we have 3 solutions: > > What we need: > > The goal of this story is to collect and rep

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] A review dashboard

Hi, Yes a story to start a simple integration may be nice ! Also the query you generated is by far more user friendly that the previous one. So I suggest we all base our daily work on that dashboard to know the patches status on SF. Until the proposed feature is implemented in SF we can use the "

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] [grooming] Exploit & test newest features on the preprod

Hi, Le 24/11/2016 à 10:57, Matthieu Huin a écrit : > Hello, > > Now that the preprod is great again (c) it should also be up to date again > and expose the recent new features. I've created a story on SB: > https://softwarefactory-project.io/storyboard/#!/story/26 \o/ > I see 3 main areas for

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] Managesf API v2

Hi, Le 21/11/2016 à 10:49, Matthieu Huin a écrit : > Thanks for bringing that up, I wanted to talk about that as well ! > Comments in line. > > - Original Message - >> From: "Tristan Cacqueray" >> To: softwarefactory-dev@redhat.com >> Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 3:29:54 AM >> Subject

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] Zuul may be randomly missing ref-updated event.

Hi Tristan ! Thanks investigating that. It is pretty clear now there is an issue in Zuul catching that ref-updated event. I suspected that too since I saw sometime (rarely) in dev env the config-updated not executed (or if I remember well executed but after a long delay, by far after the event).

[Softwarefactory-dev] Unify term and url for gerrit comments link

Hi, Just to start the discussion after I seen that change: https://softwarefactory-project.io/r/#/c/5488 IMO the link to the issue tracker and the term to match should be the same whatever the issue/story tracker is. Maybe we can groom a story here on that subject ? Cheers, Fabien signature.

[Softwarefactory-dev] Production Chain Tool Team - Software Factory - sprint 2016-47 status

Hello everyone, On the software-factory side, the team did: - Continue the migration from puppet to ansible to manage sf services - Integrated repoXplorer in SF - Going prod on sf-project.io with the resources engine raised some unexpected issues (fixed) - Upgrade review.rodproject.org to SF 2.2

[Softwarefactory-dev] CI/Release workflow for a RPM packaged version of SF

Hi, I'm thinking about it since yesterday so and I wanted to share my thoughts here. The idea is to have a sf-master target in Koji which is a "pot commun" where all packages built during the CI will land. We need to have a magic tool that know how to manage rpm(s) build/runtime dependencies acco

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] CI/Release workflow for a RPM packaged version of SF

Le 09/12/2016 à 11:19, Matthieu Huin a écrit : > > > - Original Message - >> From: "Fabien Boucher" >> To: softwarefactory-dev@redhat.com >> Sent: Friday, December 9, 2016 11:00:55 AM >> Subject: [Softwarefactory-dev] CI/Release workflow

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] CI/Release workflow for a RPM packaged version of SF

en via a parent task in Zuul. > ----- Original Message - >> From: "Matthieu Huin" >> To: "Fabien Boucher" >> Cc: softwarefactory-dev@redhat.com >> Sent: Friday, December 9, 2016 11:19:08 AM >> Subject: Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] CI/Release

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] CI/Release workflow for a RPM packaged version of SF

Le 09/12/2016 à 12:39, Fabien Boucher a écrit : > > > Le 09/12/2016 à 12:05, Matthieu Huin a écrit : >> Some additional shower thoughts: >> >> I'm thinking we could add a "smoke" pipeline prior to the "check" one. It >> would launch on

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] CI/Release workflow for a RPM packaged version of SF

Hi, Le 09/12/2016 à 17:54, Nicolas Hicher a écrit : > Hi, > > > On 09/12/16 05:00 AM, Fabien Boucher wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm thinking about it since yesterday so and I wanted to share my thoughts >> here. >> >> The idea is to have a s

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] CI/Release workflow for a RPM packaged version of SF

ll of them then it compute the packages list that need to land in that new RPM repo, (maybe a last functional test may run (we never know)) and make them land. (The koji "add-pkg to tag" action if we use Koji). Cheers, Fabien Le 09/12/2016 à 11:00, Fabien Boucher a écrit : > Hi, > &g

[Softwarefactory-dev] sf-project.io jobs to build RPM via koji

Hi, You'll be able to find the jobs to build against Koji there https://softwarefactory-project.io/r/gitweb?p=config.git;a=blob;f=jobs/koji.yaml;h=9fbaa83bf0cba0693f9595dd99078ffc87bb0673;hb=HEAD The Koji is accessible there: http://46.231.133.231/koji Unfortunately the web authentication is brok

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] CI/Release workflow for a RPM packaged version of SF

ne that already exist in the master RPM repo. * Fast moving source where there is a need to package (by commit) to detect packaging issues earlier: IMO here it seems better to rely on DLRN to handle this case. Cheers, Fabien Le 10/12/2016 à 00:05, Fabien Boucher a écrit : > Hi, Thinking again

[Softwarefactory-dev] A quick status of using the resource engine in the functional tests

Hi, Code in those file has not been changed as it rely a lot on : - the ACLs provided by the managesf V1 API project - the assumption that project on the issue tracker is created along with the git repo (not yet the case with the resource engine) test_acls.py test_groups.py test_project_membersh

[Softwarefactory-dev] Production Chain Tool Team - Software Factory - sprint 2017-01 status

Hello everyone, On the software-factory side, the team did: * Continued work on the nodes API * Worked to decouple the Ansible role to make them more generic * Worked on an integration between the resources engine and Storyboard * Continued to think and design a generic RPM packaging workflow aro

Re: [Softwarefactory-dev] It's 2.3.0 test day

Hi, Le 24/01/2017 à 13:19, Tristan Cacqueray a écrit : > On 01/24/2017 05:01 AM, Tristan Cacqueray wrote: >> Hello folks, >> >> The last image (softwarefactory-C7.0-2.3.0.img.qcow2 - >> 0ae188834fd62985fbf0865047055ed9) has been deployed: >> >> ip: 46.231.133.130 >> url: https://23rc0.com >> >

[Softwarefactory-dev] SF-2.3.0 has been released!

Hello everyone, We are pleased to announce the release of the 2.3.0 version of Software Factory. Please find the changelog, digests and packages diff below. Best regards, The Software Factory Team 2.3.0 CHANGELOG === New Features - A new jobs API is available to manage

  1   2   >