I'm in favor of adopting it as WG item. It's a nice piece of work and fits very
well to the deployment scenarios of mobile operators.
Kind regards
Olaf
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: softwires-boun...@ietf.org
[mailto:softwires-boun...@ietf.org] Im Auftrag von Alain Durand
Support with comments.
There is only on tunnel between B4 and AFTR in GI-DS-lite. In the cases,
which there are duplicated addresses for UEs, it needs to identify different
user. For plain IP-in-IP tunnel, there is no mean to identify user. Perhaps
it could be solved in the next version of
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Softwires Working Group of the IETF.
Title : IPv6 via IPv4 Service Provider Networks 6rd
Author(s) : M. Townsley, O. Troan
Filename:
Hi,
I have a quick review on this draft, and want to make sure
I am clear about the technical things in the first place.
1. I am confused why tunnel identifier is lacked in the
example translation table showcased in figure 2, as my
understanding, CID and tunnel ID should be combined
to be used
+1.
I am going to provide my technical comments later.
Regards,
Behcet
- Original Message
From: olaf.bonn...@telekom.de olaf.bonn...@telekom.de
To: adur...@juniper.net
Cc: softwires@ietf.org
Sent: Thu, May 6, 2010 2:02:50 AM
Subject: Re: [Softwires] GI-DS-lite as working group
On 5/6/10 4:52 PM, Templin, Fred L wrote:
Mark,
Not sure whether any changes are necessary,
Great. We have a whole section on MTU.
but in terms
of MTU the tunnel should try for more than 1280 if possible.
Otherwise, it may be difficult to configure other tunnels
(VPNs, etc.) over the
I support to adopt this a WG item.
On 5/5/10 5:57 PM, Alain Durand adur...@juniper.net wrote:
Dear WG,
At the 3GPP-IETF interim meeting, there was strong interest in GI DS-lite, and
the recommendation was the IETF should take on its standardization. There was
similar interest shown during
Hi Tina,
Question for you. When you said to identify the user, did you mean to
identify the user by IPv4 address or some other means like the GRE id?
The basic DS-lite always assumes no duplicate IPv4 addresses managed by one
B4. Can you elaborate the question?
Thanks,
Yiu
On 5/6/10 3:49 AM,
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 1:27 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange-ftgroup.com wrote:
Dear Alain, all,
GI-DS-Lite is one option among others to limit the effect the of the IPv4
address depletion. It introduces a tunnel between a PGW/GGSN and a CGN, this
has some impacts on the gateway. This tunnel
