+1. I am going to provide my technical comments later.
Regards, Behcet ----- Original Message ---- > From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Sent: Thu, May 6, 2010 2:02:50 AM > Subject: Re: [Softwires] GI-DS-lite as working group item? > > I'm in favor of adopting it as WG item. It's a nice piece of work and fits > very > well to the deployment scenarios of mobile operators. Kind > regards Olaf > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: > ymailto="mailto:[email protected]"; > href="mailto:[email protected]";>[email protected] > > [mailto:> > href="mailto:[email protected]";>[email protected]] Im > Auftrag von Alain Durand > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. Mai 2010 23:57 > > An: > href="mailto:[email protected]";>[email protected] > Betreff: > [Softwires] GI-DS-lite as working group item? > > Dear WG, > > > At the 3GPP-IETF interim meeting, there was strong interest > in > GI DS-lite, and the recommendation was the IETF should > take on its > standardization. There was similar interest shown > during the last IETF > meeting and an informal show of hands > demonstrated large support to > take GI DS-lite as a working group item. > This of course need to be > confirmed on the list, and unless > we hear otherwise, we, Softwires > chairs, will work with our > ADs to add GI-DS-lite on our > charter. > > - Alain, softwires co-chair. > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing > list > > href="mailto:[email protected]";>[email protected] > > href="https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires"; target=_blank > >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > > _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing > list > href="mailto:[email protected]";>[email protected] > href="https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires"; target=_blank > >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
