Support with comments.
There is only on tunnel between B4 and AFTR in GI-DS-lite. In the cases,
which there are duplicated addresses for UEs, it needs to identify different
user. For plain IP-in-IP tunnel, there is no mean to identify user. Perhaps
it could be solved in the next version of GI-DS-lite draft.
B. R.
Tina
http://tinatsou.weebly.com/contact.html
----- Original Message -----
From: <olaf.bonn...@telekom.de>
To: <adur...@juniper.net>
Cc: <softwires@ietf.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 3:02 PM
Subject: Re: [Softwires] GI-DS-lite as working group item?
I'm in favor of adopting it as WG item. It's a nice piece of work and fits
very well to the deployment scenarios of mobile operators.
Kind regards
Olaf
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: softwires-boun...@ietf.org
[mailto:softwires-boun...@ietf.org] Im Auftrag von Alain Durand
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. Mai 2010 23:57
An: softwires@ietf.org
Betreff: [Softwires] GI-DS-lite as working group item?
Dear WG,
At the 3GPP-IETF interim meeting, there was strong interest
in GI DS-lite, and the recommendation was the IETF should
take on its standardization. There was similar interest shown
during the last IETF meeting and an informal show of hands
demonstrated large support to take GI DS-lite as a working group item.
This of course need to be confirmed on the list, and unless
we hear otherwise, we, Softwires chairs, will work with our
ADs to add GI-DS-lite on our charter.
- Alain, softwires co-chair.
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
Softwires@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
Softwires@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
Softwires@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
