On 4/1/12 3:24 AM, Fuyu (Eleven) wrote:
Agree. I think we shouldn't drop other stateless solutions as:
draft-cui-softwire-b4-translated-ds-lite-05
draft-penno-softwire-sdnat-02
They are all belong to stateless scope and with the same network
architecture of IPv4 traffic across IPv6 access
Dear Sun,
It seems that you have missed some statements in the draft. In section 4.3,
there are some lines clarifying 3 principles for IPv4 interface selection, just
above the words you quoted:
1. IPv6 transport is preferred over any other.
2. Less address translation occurrences is
After the meeting, I've figured out that 4rd-u define new type of transport,
since it adds several new semantics in its packet format with V-octet as a
helper of packet format distinguisher. That kind of work is of course out of
scope of Softwire working group. I therefore suggest to the 4rd-u
On 2012/04/02, at 3:02, Satoru Matsushima wrote:
After the meeting, I've figured out that 4rd-u define new type of transport,
since it adds several new semantics in its packet format with V-octet as a
helper of packet format distinguisher. That kind of work is of course out of
scope of
