Hi Leaf,
Section 3 - If the DHCP server to which the DHCP Request message was sent
at time T1 has not responded, the DHCP client enters the REBINDING state
and attempts to contact any server.
Per the Figure 5 in RFC2131, the above 'T1' sounds 'T2'.
into the REBINDING state
and attempts to contact any possible server. '
Sheng,
As original author of this text, what do you think?
Thanks,
Roberta
-Original Message-
From: Leaf Yeh [mailto:leaf.yeh@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 2:58 PM
To: Maglione Roberta; i...@ietf.org
Cc: softwires
, October 03, 2012 9:24 AM
To: Maglione Roberta
Cc: w...@cisco.com
Subject: New Version Notification for
draft-maglione-softwire-map-t-scenarios-00.txt
A new version of I-D, draft-maglione-softwire-map-t-scenarios-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Roberta Maglione and posted to the
IETF
, there are other examples, I can
describe them in more details, if you think it could be useful.
Thanks and best regards
Roberta
From: Zhen Cao [zehn@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2012 5:03 PM
To: Maglione Roberta
Cc: GangChen; softwires
Subject: Re
Hello Gang,
I do see some difference between MAP-E and MAP-T regarding the application
of ACL.
Let's consider the following scenarios:
- when a destination is outside of the MAP domain in case of MAP-E the CE uses
as IPv6 destination the IPv6 address of the MAP BR while for MAP-T it uses the
Hello,
in my opinion the design team did a great job in creating the MAP draft as
a common baseline specification for MAP-T and MAP-E flavors and the
presentations we saw in Vancouver last week shown that implementations for both
MAP-T and MAP-E already exist and they just differs for few
Hi All,
As in order to get a visa for China we need to have the flight ticket, I was
wondering if it would be possible to finalize the dates for interim meeting.
Thanks,
Regards,
Roberta
-Original Message-
From: softwires-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:softwires-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf
Thanks for updating the slides based on the discussion we had on the mailing
list.
Best regards,
Roberta
From: 孙琼 [mailto:bingxu...@gmail.com]
Sent: mercoledì 13 aprile 2011 5.33
To: softwires@ietf.org; Maglione Roberta; Fred Baker; xiechf
Subject: [softwire
Hi Tina,
what is it that makes existing softwires mesh solutions unsuitable for
crossing the IPv4 only metro network? I'm thinking specifically on 6PE or BGP
tunnels.
Ole, thank you for asking. I didn't say that. IMHO, 6PE or BGP are more
appropriately used in core network. There are fewer
Dear All,
I object to the decision of removing the FQDN option, because this option
is crucial for supporting load balance and redundancy in our deployment
scenario.
If needed, I'm available to work with the authors in order to clarify both the
use case and the language in the draft in
From: mohamed.boucad...@orange-ftgroup.com
[mailto:mohamed.boucad...@orange-ftgroup.com]
Sent: venerdì 8 ottobre 2010 7.31
To: Tomasz Mrugalski; Softwires WG
Cc: draft-ietf-softwire-ds-lite-tunnel-opt...@tools.ietf.org; Softwire Chairs;
Ullio Mario; Jari Arkko; Ralph Droms; Maglione Roberta
Hello Med,
I have a question about the deployment scenario you have in mind for this
draft.
In the document you say: A service provider may want to deploy DS-lite without
using DHCP., but it is not completely clear to me what is the SLAAC only
scenario you are referring to.
I'm thinking
12 matches
Mail list logo
