Hi Alain, Yong,
We would like use 10 minutes to present draft-zhou-softwire-b4-nat, and another
10 minutes to for draft-deng-softwire-aplusp-experiment-results.
Much appreciated!
Xiaohong, on behalf of all the authors of the two I-Ds
Le 4 nov. 2011 à 13:26, Alain Durand a écrit :
If you want
Ole, all,
New agenda looks fine, with some comments and suggestions below.
|-Original Message-
|From: Ole Troan [mailto:otr...@employees.org]
|Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2011 3:28 PM
|To: Yong Cui; Alain Durand
|Cc: softwires@ietf.org; liziye
|Subject: Re: [Softwires] Softwire Interim
Hello Chairs,
I fully agree with Dan's proposal for bashing interim meeting agenda on
the following two regards, and thereby raising 3 questions towards
current agenda somewhere where against these two regards.
Regard 1: Promote stuffs that we can make educated and informed
decisions.
Q1: Why
Hello Chairs,
I fully agree with Dan's proposal for bashing interim meeting agenda on
the following two regards, and thereby raising 3 questions towards
current agenda somewhere where against these two regards.
Regard 1: Promote stuffs that we can make educated and informed
decisions.
Q1: Why
|As far as I am aware, the following algorithms have been
|officially proposed:
|
| a) Sequential method: port-set is a range of consecutive ports. (See
|I-D.matsuhira-sa46t-spec-03.)
|
| b) Modulo method: port-set for 1st CPE is (0, N, 2*N, ...),
|port-set for
|2nd CPE is (1, N+1,
+1, support adopting all.
Xiaohong
|-Original Message-
|From: Mingwei Xu [mailto:x...@cernet.edu.cn]
|Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 2:34 PM
|To: Yong Cui; softwires@ietf.org
|Cc: Yong Cui
|Subject: Re: [Softwires] New working group documents
|
|I support to adopt all.
|
|Mingwei
|
|
From: Qiong [mailto:bingxu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:29 AM
To: BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC-NAD-TIP
Cc: softwires@ietf.org;
draft-operators-softwire-stateless-4v6-motivat...@tools.ietf.org
Subject:
Hi all,
|-Original Message-
|From: Rémi Després [mailto:despres.r...@laposte.net]
|Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 12:28 AM
|To: Softwires-wg
|Cc: draft-operators-softwire-stateless-4v6-motivat...@tools.ietf.org
|Subject: Re: [Softwires]
|-Original Message-
|From: Simon Perreault [mailto:simon.perrea...@viagenie.ca]
|Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 9:22 PM
|To: DENG Xiaohong ESP/PEK
|Cc: raj...@cisco.com; despres.r...@laposte.net; softwires@ietf.org
|Subject: Re: [Softwires] Clarification of the
|stateles/stateful
Thanks Yiu, your suggestion makes a lot of sense, and I'm considering it.
Cheers,
Xiaohong
|-Original Message-
|From: Lee, Yiu [mailto:yiu_...@cable.comcast.com]
|Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 1:45 AM
|To: softwires@ietf.org
|Subject: Re: [Softwires] Clarification of the
Rajiv,
Thanks!
It's 'consecutive' port-set, and thanks for your proposal for testing
'scattered' port-set.
But I don't understand will the figure be different with 'scattered' port-set
NAT? To my knowledge, it's something todo with app's behaviours and NAT
type(EIM in our test).
Would you
Ole,
|-Original Message-
|From: Ole Troan [mailto:o...@cisco.com]
|Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 11:08 PM
|To: DENG Xiaohong ESP/PEK
|Cc: Tetsuya Murakami; Satoru Matsushima; Rémi Després; Dan Wing
|Subject: Re: Port allocation considerations for 4rd
|
|Xiaohong,
|
| Like I stated in
BTW, the high speed railway between Shanghai and Beijing takes 4 hours.
|-Original Message-
|From: DENG Xiaohong ESP/PEK
|Sent: Monday, August 08, 2011 11:50 AM
|To: Alain Durand; 'Mark Townsley'
|Cc: softwires@ietf.org list; Ralph Droms
|Subject: RE: [Softwires] Softwire Interim
Hi Yiu,all,
I see the first use case worth good value to work on, as the reason I
stated during meeting: operators would happy with it because otherwise
(the second case), means moving AFTR lower location, which ends up with
more CAPEX.
Xiaohong
but I
think that we should compare it with any other solutions proposed like
draft-qin-softwire-dslite-multicast-04
which requires every CE router or B4 of DS-Lite to have IGMP-MLD
translator with
all its complications.
It is well known fact that CE routers are the most difficult to
For example, no logging has been presented as a strong reason
to do sateless. However, no logging can be achieved
with static port allocation on a centralized NAT. On this
particular logging point, there are no obvious differences between the
Dear Chairs,
We'd like to present 2 drafts:
Xiaohong Deng, draft-zhou-softwire-b4-nat-02,
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-zhou-softwire-b4-nat-02.txt
Xiaohong Deng, draft-deng-v6ops-aplusp-experiment-results-01.txt,
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-deng-v6ops-aplusp-experiment-results-01.txt
5
+1
Cheers,
Xiaohong.
open source PCP Client,
open source A+P
http://opensourcev6transtechnologies.weebly.com/
|
|+1
|
|Tetsuya Murakami wrote:
| +1
|
| On 2011/07/06, at 8:23, GangChen wrote:
|
| +1
|
|
| 2011/7/6, Lee, Yiuyiu_...@cable.comcast.com:
| +1
|
| On 7/6/11 10:33 AM, Rajiv Asati
Dear all,
A new version of draft-zhou-softwire-b4-nat has been submitted.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhou-softwire-b4-nat-01
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhou-softwire-b4-nat-01
The Abstract of this I-D:
This document describes the behavior of the B4 when co-located with a
We have tested how applications behave when it has both DS-Lite IPv4 and NAT64
IPv6 (but not native IPv6). Firefox, IE, Skype, Google Earth v5.2.1, Live
Messenger, uTorrent, BitComet, were on our test list.
Despres,regarding your question ( maybe not answering your question exactly as
we
20 matches
Mail list logo
