|-----Original Message----- |From: Simon Perreault [mailto:simon.perrea...@viagenie.ca] |Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 9:22 PM |To: DENG Xiaohong ESP/PEK |Cc: raj...@cisco.com; despres.r...@laposte.net; softwires@ietf.org |Subject: Re: [Softwires] Clarification of the |stateles/stateful discussion | |Initially I wrote a long email with a point-by-point reply, |but then I found what I think could be the source of our |misunderstanding: | |On 2011-08-12 08:32, xiaohong.d...@orange-ftgroup.com wrote: |> BitTorrent and Skype are definitely cases that show othersiwse. |> |> As the detailed analysis I stated in the previous email, but don't |> mind to explain again: |> |> When BT Client initiates a downloading it first uses the same source |> port to connect to the different destinations (destination IP and |> port) therefore a source port multiplexing different sessions. Data |> shows maxium port usuage reaches 160, while session usuage |continously stays above 450. |> |> Skype is another example that uses a source port to multiplex |> different sessions thereby introducing less source port than |sessions on NAT. |> Data shows less than a couple of ports achieve more than a |hundred sessions! | |In your experiments, do you measure port and session usage on |the NAT, on the internal host, or both? It's not clear to me |when reading your experiment results at |http://opensourcev6transtechnologies.weebly.com/experiments-res |ults.html
The data shows there are only the port and session usage on the NAT. Cheers, Xiaohong | |Thanks, |Simon |-- |DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca |NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca |STUN/TURN server --> http://numb.viagenie.ca | _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list Softwires@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
