Chairs, ADs,
I regret this decision. *Whatever* the results of the poll, your text below
explicitly suggests a discrimination between voters.
Basically, you seem to distinguish between people who are entitled to vote
because they have supposedly participated to the stateless specification
Dear all,
I personally regret this decision and reject the justifications provided. If
you don't want people to contribute and express their opinion, it is easy: make
it a close community.
If you insist to ignore what expressed the majority of individuals who
participated to the poll, may I
Because of the history of MAP and 4rd-U, we will designate independent teams
of volunteer reviewers to advise the working group about the state of the
document sets. Each set will be reviewed by an independent team who are not
authors of the MAP and 4rd-U documents. Each review team will
I'm new to the group, but I made my vote because I have studied both
solutions. I was unable to find any running code for 4rd-U that I could
test and verify, while I was able to do that with MAP.
I voted based on the quote about the IETF from David Clark: We reject
kings, presidents and voting.
On 4/26/12 11:50 AM, Mark Townsley wrote:
Perhaps we would have been better off with the coin toss.
+1
bingo.
Cheers, Jan
P.S: I'll not waste more bits on this topic as it's apparently a waste
of bandwidth :)
P.P.S: Should we deprecate RFC6346?
Hi Jan,
P.P.S: Should we deprecate RFC6346?
A+P is in MAP T, MAP E and 4rd-U. I don't understand why you are
worried about it?
Having said that I for one think that A+P should be restricted to the CPEs.
Otherwise you are creating another NAT.
Regards,
Behcet
If I may, it seems to me that several of these replies miss some
important points in the message from the chairs.
1) It became clear during the WG poll that the documents were not
complete. This is not a bad thing. We need to finish them.
2) The poll did indicate that there is interest in
the problems here are:
1. a lot of people were hurt by the chairs, IMHO, disparaging
language. wording like inflate generate noise is unfair and impolite.
2. it has been well known that documents were not complete. it was not
needed to make a poll to indicate it. they are not complete != they are
