: BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC/NAD/TIP
Cc : softwire issue tracker;
draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multic...@tools.ietf.org;
sarik...@ieee.org; softwires@ietf.org
Objet : Re: [Softwires] [softwire] #10: Nothing in common with DS-Lite
Hi
On 7/27/2012 4:48 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
Dear all,
I
@ietf.org
Objet : Re: [Softwires] [softwire] #10: Nothing in common with DS-Lite
Hi
On 7/27/2012 4:48 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
Dear all,
I really don't understand this issue.
It is even misplaced to have this comment at this stage,
since this is a document which has been adopted
18:29
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC/NAD/TIP
Cc : softwire issue tracker;
draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multic...@tools.ietf.org;
sarik...@ieee.org; softwires@ietf.org
Objet : Re: [Softwires] [softwire] #10: Nothing in common with DS-Lite
Hi
On 7/27/2012 4:48 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote
Hi Behcet,
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
-Message d'origine-
De : Behcet Sarikaya [mailto:sarikaya2...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : vendredi 27 juillet 2012 18:48
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC/NAD/TIP
Cc : softwire issue tracker;
draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multic...@tools.ietf.org;
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 7:04 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
Hi Behcet,
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
-Message d'origine-
De : Behcet Sarikaya [mailto:sarikaya2...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : vendredi 27 juillet 2012 18:48
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC/NAD/TIP
Cc : softwire issue
Dear all,
I really don't understand this issue.
It is even misplaced to have this comment at this stage, since this is a
document which has been adopted by the WG and the solution it specifies is the
same as the one reviewed by the WG prior to its adoption (i.e., since April
2011).
Anyway,
Med,
the point is that the DS-Lite (CGN AFTR) solution is not necessary to be
deployed for the multicast solution described here to work.
As to how this ended up being charterd in Softwire I don't know and IMO it
doesn't make much sense.
Regards,
Woj.
On 27 July 2012 13:48,
: Nothing in common with DS-Lite
Med,
the point is that the DS-Lite (CGN AFTR) solution is not necessary to be
deployed for the multicast solution described here to work.
As to how this ended up being charterd in Softwire I don't know and IMO it
doesn't make much sense.
Regards,
Woj.
On 27 July
Hi
On 7/27/2012 4:48 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
Dear all,
I really don't understand this issue.
It is even misplaced to have this comment at this stage, since this is a
document which has been adopted by the WG and the solution it specifies is the
same as the one reviewed by the
Hi Med,
My comments below. Please do not take them personal. No offense.
Please, please.
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 6:48 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
Dear all,
I really don't understand this issue.
It is even misplaced to have this comment at this stage, since this is a
document
10 matches
Mail list logo