Bingo. The way of the future, ha?
Thanks!
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 1:11:14 AM
Subject: Re: QueryResponseTest failure
Hey,
2008/5/21 Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
: I'd tend to disagree: committing the patches to trunk allows widespread
: testing and the chance for wider review of the code to see if it does
: what it should. Only when the code is part of a release is there any
: obligation to a proper
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lars Kotthoff updated SOLR-556:
---
Attachment: solr-highlight-multivalued.patch
Attaching new patch which checks the fragments returned
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lars Kotthoff updated SOLR-556:
---
Attachment: (was: solr-highlight-multivalued.patch)
Highlighting of multi-valued fields returns
On 22-May-08, at 12:13 AM, Andrew Savory wrote:
Sure, Commit-Then-Review vs. Review-Then-Commit ... but I don't
actually think RTC is going to ensure significantly more widespread
review since the time burden on other developers to find the issue in
JIRA, download the patch, apply the patch,
See http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Solr-trunk/448/changes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lars Kotthoff updated SOLR-556:
---
Attachment: solr-highlight-multivalued.patch
Sorry for all the noise. Attaching yet another new
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lars Kotthoff updated SOLR-556:
---
Attachment: (was: solr-highlight-multivalued.patch)
Highlighting of multi-valued fields returns
Hi Mike,
2008/5/22 Mike Klaas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
(btw, if you want a one-line equivalent to svn up, try something like:
$ wget
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12381498/SOLR-563.patch -O -
| patch -p0
Reverting is also one line:
$ svn revert -R .
Although this leaves
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-579?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12598948#action_12598948
]
Andrew Savory commented on SOLR-579:
Hoss,
You're right - people probably won't have XML
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12598951#action_12598951
]
Thomas Peuss commented on SOLR-505:
---
I don't think that is a good idea to include the patch
On May 11, 2008, at 9:31 AM, Jason Rutherglen wrote:
It would be best to merge the Ocean code into Solr.
+1. Looks like an interesting and needed idea, and no sense in
duplicating efforts, if you're willing to help out here (which it
seems you already are!)
-Grant
On May 22, 2008, at 2:16 AM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Bingo. The way of the future, ha?
:-)
Yeah, one should remove $ANT_HOME/lib/junit.jar as it gets in the way.
Thanks!
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: Chris
SOLR-560. ;-)
SOLR-502.
On May 21, 2008, at 7:45 PM, Mike Klaas wrote:
There seems to be some sort of consensus building that there should
be a 1.3 release in the near future. The first step is to figure
out what we want to finish before it gets released.
The list of JIRA issues
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-583?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12599009#action_12599009
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on SOLR-583:
---
Discussions needs to refer to an issue to be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Sekiguchi resolved SOLR-510.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 659125.
client source needs to be included in releases
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12599060#action_12599060
]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on SOLR-505:
---
Thomas - very much fine with me. I, too, was
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Otis Gospodnetic updated SOLR-554:
--
Component/s: web gui
Didn't try this, so I don't know what this looks like from a LF
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Otis Gospodnetic reassigned SOLR-236:
-
Assignee: Otis Gospodnetic
Field collapsing
Key:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12599072#action_12599072
]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on SOLR-502:
---
Sean, do you think you can remove the changes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12599085#action_12599085
]
Sean Timm commented on SOLR-502:
Otis, I'd be happy to do so. Is there a way to generate a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12599091#action_12599091
]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on SOLR-502:
---
I think it's a manual thing, but super simple
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll reassigned SOLR-572:
Assignee: Grant Ingersoll
Spell Checker as a Search Component
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Work on SOLR-572 started by Grant Ingersoll.
Spell Checker as a Search Component
---
Key: SOLR-572
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man resolved SOLR-514.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.3
Assignee: Hoss Man
I fixed this both for luke.xsl as well
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12599166#action_12599166
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-572:
--
OK, I'm working on this.
Some thoughts:
1.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12599166#action_12599166
]
gsingers edited comment on SOLR-572 at 5/22/08 1:04 PM:
---
OK,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12599168#action_12599168
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-572:
Grant, please hold on a bit. I'm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12599170#action_12599170
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-572:
--
OK. Kind of too late, but no worries, I will
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12599170#action_12599170
]
gsingers edited comment on SOLR-572 at 5/22/08 1:13 PM:
---
OK.
: SOLR-567 is simple enough to add to the list.
I can't speak for anyone else, but SOLR-567 certianly doesn't meet my
definition of simple ... this one line, by itself, opens up a lot of
potential maintenence considerations and requires some serious API
review/discussion...
-public
Please explain the maintenence considerations.
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
: SOLR-567 is simple enough to add to the list.
I can't speak for anyone else, but SOLR-567 certianly doesn't meet my
definition of simple ... this one line, by itself,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12599201#action_12599201
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-506:
---
Assuming some form of SOLR-505 is committed the most
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12599202#action_12599202
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-572:
Otis -- Sorry, I missed your post
I agree. Lots of what Jason is doing looks good, but like I pointed the other
day, needs a lot more explanation, at least for dense people like moi. My
guess is, if we want to be aggressive with 1.3, that none of Jason's stuff will
make it because the changes are too radical, unless somebody
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12599208#action_12599208
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-506:
Why didn't I think of that? :)
Yes,
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 7:45 PM, Mike Klaas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There seems to be some sort of consensus building that there should be a 1.3
release in the near future. The first step is to figure out what we want to
finish before it gets released.
+1
(I've been away from my email for a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sean Timm updated SOLR-554:
---
Attachment: SOLR-554.patch
Patch format this time. Added using the solr-admin.css to help the LF.
Includes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12599217#action_12599217
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-502:
---
whew... that's a lot of changes for timeouts (flag on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12599222#action_12599222
]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on SOLR-572:
---
Shalin -- I think you are right. I looked at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man resolved SOLR-518.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.3
Assignee: Hoss Man
Committed revision 659287.
i also
: I give to Solr document to index which UniqueKey Field is based on the Url
: and the Time at which the croawler downloaded it so UniqueKey is a digit
: obtained like that MyAlgo(Url+Time); the problem occur at searching time
: solr return me the result which contain duplication it means for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man resolved SOLR-581.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.3
Assignee: Hoss Man
thanks for catching this Patrick
43 matches
Mail list logo
