Please explain the maintenence considerations. On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> : SOLR-567 is simple enough to add to the list.
>
> I can't speak for anyone else, but SOLR-567 certianly doesn't meet my
> definition of "simple" ... this one line, by itself, opens up a lot of
> potential maintenence considerations and requires some serious API
> review/discussion...
>
> -public final class SolrCore {
> +public class SolrCore {
>
>
>
> -Hoss
>
>
