[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated SOLR-1373:
---
Attachment: SOLR-1373.patch
Patch
Add filter query in solr/admin/form.jsp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated SOLR-1373:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.5)
1.4
Affects Version/s: (was:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1330?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Akshay K. Ukey updated SOLR-1330:
-
Attachment: SOLR-1330.patch
Same patch as previous one, in sync with trunk.
the details command
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1330?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Noble Paul updated SOLR-1330:
-
Attachment: SOLR-1330.patch
simplified and removed a few thread-unsafe operations
the details command
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12745373#action_12745373
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-1335:
--
bq.If it's something we know we're going to want to do,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-1275:
---
Attachment: SOLR-1275.patch
How about this much simpler test that's faster to execute, and should be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12745468#action_12745468
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1275:
Hmmm, it's harder to see in diff format... the test
Here's another interesting view of Solr issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:popularissues-panel
Most popular. Field collapsing is #1 by more than twice the next
one. I'm not proposing it for 1.4, but it certainly seems like we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12745516#action_12745516
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1362:
bq. Yonik, in this case I think existing gaps would
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12745520#action_12745520
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-1362:
---
ah, i see your point...
sounds right to me. i can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12745541#action_12745541
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1362:
bq. I assume it should be as an option for back
: + This page is to help a Solr committer create a new release (you need
: committer rights for some of the steps to create an official release). It
: does not reflect official release policy - many of the items may be
: optional, or may be modified as necessary.
: - ''This page is prepared
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man resolved SOLR-1371.
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 806289.
LukeRequestHandler/schema.jsp errors if schema has no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man resolved SOLR-1373.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Hoss Man
I'm generally opposed to a proliferation of params on the admin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12745582#action_12745582
]
Erik Hatcher commented on SOLR-1373:
Yeah, I kinda cringed with this one myself, but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12745602#action_12745602
]
Erik Hatcher commented on SOLR-1335:
Along the same lines as making master/searcher
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-914:
--
Attachment: SOLR-914.patch
revised patch with the improvements i mentioned earlier, also fixes a cut/paste
: OK - any suggestions on what field to use for our example docs? It
i changed it to be manufacturedate_dt since that fits with the existing
scheme ... the data is all made up, but so is all hte rest of our data.
-Hoss
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12745646#action_12745646
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on SOLR-1373:
Anything that's commonly used should be in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12745675#action_12745675
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1373:
bq. Anything that's commonly used should be in Solr's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12745678#action_12745678
]
Lance Norskog commented on SOLR-1335:
-
About the features for subsituting properties
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12745680#action_12745680
]
Lance Norskog commented on SOLR-1335:
-
About use cases for this feature:
I would like
: Shalin Shekhar Mangar updated SOLR-1366:
:
:
: Component/s: replication (java)
the issue seems broader then just replication ... i would change this back
to a generic search component, and open new related issue(s) for
replication (documentation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12745684#action_12745684
]
Lance Norskog commented on SOLR-1373:
-
Maybe there should be two 'Full Interface' pages?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley resolved SOLR-1368.
Resolution: Fixed
ms() function for date math
---
Key:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12745695#action_12745695
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1275:
Isn't it much simpler to just check that the
: So, it looks like it is trying to parse the - in the field name as an
: operator instead of as part of the field name. Is it bad form to include a
: hyphen in a field name... I've never had issues with it anywhere else in the
: past. FYI, I've confirmed this behavior on 1.4 nightly builds
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12745717#action_12745717
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on SOLR-1275:
Isn't it much simpler
Calling
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12745731#action_12745731
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on SOLR-1275:
I'll check in a new patch that's faster
When a test fails, display the test file in the console via ant junit
-
Key: SOLR-1374
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1374
Project: Solr
Issue Type:
BloomFilter on a field
--
Key: SOLR-1375
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1375
Project: Solr
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: update
Affects Versions: 1.4
Reporter: Jason
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated SOLR-1375:
---
Attachment: SOLR-1375.patch
Patch file
BloomFilter on a field
--
invalid links to solr indexes after a new index is created
--
Key: SOLR-1376
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1376
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Components:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
kiran sugana updated SOLR-1376:
---
Description:
After new index is created, it does not delete the links to the old indexes,
To
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12745766#action_12745766
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1376:
w/o more info, there is no actual evidence of a bug.
Should multiple values for facet.prefix be supported?
I have come across several use-cases on the user mailing list where such a
functionality could have helped (The latest one being -
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/2a9c44d4f015b5e5/facet_filtering).
I ran into one such use last
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 9:53 PM, Avlesh Singhavl...@gmail.com wrote:
Should multiple values for facet.prefix be supported?
I have come across several use-cases on the user mailing list where such a
functionality could have helped (The latest one being -
Or, may be just multiple facet.prefix values, Yonik; exactly the same as
facet.field works.
Cheers
Avlesh
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 7:39 AM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.comwrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 9:53 PM, Avlesh Singhavl...@gmail.com wrote:
Should multiple values for
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Avlesh Singhavl...@gmail.com wrote:
Or, may be just multiple facet.prefix values, Yonik; exactly the same as
facet.field works.
The problem then becomes labels.
facet.field=foo goes under the label foo
We already have a mechanism to re-label results, seems
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-780?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alex Baranov updated SOLR-780:
--
Attachment: SOLR-780.patch
Attached path with the fix.
Unit-test needs to be added.
Enhance
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-780?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12745773#action_12745773
]
Alex Baranov edited comment on SOLR-780 at 8/20/09 7:44 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12745774#action_12745774
]
Lance Norskog edited comment on SOLR-1375 at 8/20/09 8:04 PM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12745774#action_12745774
]
Lance Norskog commented on SOLR-1375:
-
At my previous job, we were attempting to add the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12745790#action_12745790
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-914:
-
I guess this should be enough.
Presence of finalize() in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated SOLR-1362:
--
Attachment: SOLR-1362_tests.txt
I started working on a patch, but found the existing behavior to be
: Or, may be just multiple facet.prefix values, Yonik; exactly the same as
: facet.field works.
:
: The problem then becomes labels.
: facet.field=foo goes under the label foo
:
: We already have a mechanism to re-label results, seems like we should use
that?
i think Avlesh is just
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:02 AM, Chris
Hostetterhossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: Or, may be just multiple facet.prefix values, Yonik; exactly the same as
: facet.field works.
:
: The problem then becomes labels.
: facet.field=foo goes under the label foo
:
: We already have a mechanism
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12745799#action_12745799
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-1335:
--
bq.would be nice to be able to conditionally
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12745800#action_12745800
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on SOLR-1375:
Lance,
Thanks for the info. BloomFilters
Yes the book was a ton of work; more than anticipated. Never again, though
maybe an updated edition some day maybe.
Thanks Hoss for clarification and the specific URLs you referenced. It's
awkward to have the site managed in this manner instead of using some sort
of online CMS/publishing
: Thanks Hoss for clarification and the specific URLs you referenced. It's
: awkward to have the site managed in this manner instead of using some sort
: of online CMS/publishing webapp.
one man's trash, ... every CMS i've ever used had me wishing i could just
edit text files and check them
: Ah, yeah... in this case the client would be able to determine which
: was which by the prefix of the label. But it brings up interesting
: points about ordering... should all of prefix A come before prefix
: B or should they be sorted by frequency. If it's the latter case,
i don't see why
Hmmm ... it went a long way than I thought :)
i think Avlesh is just suggesting that...
facet.field=foo f.foo.facet.prefix=a f.foo.facet.prefix=z
You are absolutely right, Hoss.
Until Yonik mentioned the sort behavior of facets, it never came into my
mind. My SQL analogy was .. select ...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated SOLR-1356:
--
Attachment: SOLR-1356.patch
factory for the filter, and schema.xml examples (maybe unnecessary, feel
Of course if you want the top 10 starting with A and the top 10
starting with B then they are logically different facets. It's not
equivalent to including a filter of (field:A* OR field:B*).
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
55 matches
Mail list logo
