On 12/1/06, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ooops, sent a bit too early -- meant "wow, I was really wrong about
this, good to know" and "cool, thanks for pointing it out" ;)...
So I was wrong about being wrong ;-)
Actually, in the case of Jetty, I think we should say something like
T
Ooops, sent a bit too early -- meant "wow, I was really wrong about
this, good to know" and "cool, thanks for pointing it out" ;)
Yoav
On 12/1/06, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wow, cool.
Yoav
On 12/1/06, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ahh, here's the pointer:
> http://ww
Wow, cool.
Yoav
On 12/1/06, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ahh, here's the pointer:
http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
'''
If A Distribution Contains Code Under Several Licenses, Should It
Contain Several License Files?
No - all license information should be contained in the LIC
Ahh, here's the pointer:
http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
'''
If A Distribution Contains Code Under Several Licenses, Should It
Contain Several License Files?
No - all license information should be contained in the LICENSE file.
When a distribution contains code under several licenses, th
On 12/1/06, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I thought this was exactly what the NOTICE file is for? Mention all
the code from other projects we use, including ASL code. LICENSE is
just for our own (Solr) stuff.
LICENSE needs to apply to everything in the distribution.
Solr's current L
On 12/1/06, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...I thought this was exactly what the NOTICE file is for? Mention all
the code from other projects we use, including ASL code. LICENSE is
just for our own (Solr) stuff...
Hmmm..you're right (it's Friday here, it's been a long week ;-)
-Be
Hi,
On 12/1/06, Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/1/06, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...Part of the problem is one can't look at other ASF project releases
> for much guidance since many would not pass the current scrutiny of
> the incubator
You're right...s
On 12/1/06, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...Part of the problem is one can't look at other ASF project releases
for much guidance since many would not pass the current scrutiny of
the incubator
You're right...so maybe we could mention AL-licensed code that we use
in LICENSE.txt?
On 12/1/06, Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/30/06, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...I'm not sure if we need to note anything about Jetty in LICENSE or
> NOTICE or not... it already uses the ASL 2.0 license, but does seem to
> contain other licenses within it
On 11/30/06, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...I'm not sure if we need to note anything about Jetty in LICENSE or
NOTICE or not... it already uses the ASL 2.0 license, but does seem to
contain other licenses within it
How about creating a "legal" directory with copies of Jetty's (
Here is the output of the RAT tool, with ASL and JDOC lines removed to
make it smaller.
I'm not sure if we need to note anything about Jetty in LICENSE or
NOTICE or not... it already uses the ASL 2.0 license, but does seem to
contain other licenses within it.
-Yonik
Analysing Documents...
*
11 matches
Mail list logo
