On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 11:09 +0100, rubdabadub wrote:
Hi:
Are there relatively stand-alone crawler that are
suitable/customizable for Solr? has anyone done any trials.. I have
seen some discussion about coocon crawler.. was that successfull?
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrForrest
I am
Thorsten:
Thank you very much for the update.
On 2/7/07, Thorsten Scherler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 11:09 +0100, rubdabadub wrote:
Hi:
Are there relatively stand-alone crawler that are
suitable/customizable for Solr? has anyone done any trials.. I have
seen some
Any suggestions on how to optimize the loading of facets? My index is
roughly 35,000 and I am asking solr to return 6 six facet fields on
every query. On large result sets with facet params set to false
searching is zippy, but when set to true, and facet fields designated,
it takes some time to
Hi:
Just want to say that my tiny experiment with Sami's Solr/Nutch
integration worked :-!) Super thanks for the pointer. Which leads me
to write the following..
It would be great if I could use this in my current project. This way
I can eliminate my current python based aggregator/crawler
On 2/7/07, Gunther, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes most all terms are multi-valued which I can't avoid.
Since the data is coming from a library catalogue I am translating a
subject field to make a subject facet. That facet alone is the biggest,
hovering near 39k. If I remove this
: Andrew, I haven't yet found a successful way to implement the SOLR
: faceting for library catalog data. I developed my own system, so for
Just to clarify: the out of hte box faceting support Solr has at the
moment is very deliberately refered to as SimpleFacets ... it's intended
to solve
7 feb 2007 kl. 19.04 skrev Erik Hatcher:
I'm interested in improving my existing custom cache warming by
being selective about what updates rather than rebuilding completely.
I know it is not Solr, but I've made great progress on my cache that
updates affected results only, on insert and
On 2/7/07, Gunther, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any suggestions on how to optimize the loading of facets? My index is
roughly 35,000
35,000 documents? That's not that big.
and I am asking solr to return 6 six facet fields on
every query. On large result sets with facet params set to
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 18:03 +0200, Sami Siren wrote:
rubdabadub wrote:
Hi:
Are there relatively stand-alone crawler that are
suitable/customizable for Solr? has anyone done any trials.. I have
seen some discussion about coocon crawler.. was that successfull?
There's also integration
Are there any simple automatic test we can run to see what fields
would support fast faceting?
Is it just that the cache size needs to be bigger then the number of
distinct values for a field?
If so, it would be nice to add an /admin page that lists each field,
the distinct value count and a
: Is it just that the cache size needs to be bigger then the number of
: distinct values for a field?
basically yes, but the cache is going to be used for all filters -- not
just those for a single facet (so your cache might be big enough that
faceting on fieldA or fieldB is fine, but if you
In the library subject heading context, I wonder if a layered approach
would bring performance into the acceptable range. Since Library of
Congress Subject Headings break into standard parts, you could have
first-tier facets representing the main heading, second-tier facets with
the main heading
On 2/7/07, Binkley, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the library subject heading context, I wonder if a layered approach
would bring performance into the acceptable range. Since Library of
Congress Subject Headings break into standard parts, you could have
first-tier facets representing the
Yonik - I like the way you think
Yeah!
It's turtles (err, trees) all the way down.
Erik
/me Pulling the Algorithms book off my shelf so I can vaguely follow
along.
On Feb 7, 2007, at 8:22 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On 2/7/07, Binkley, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the
On 2/7/07, Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yonik - I like the way you think
Yeah!
It's turtles (err, trees) all the way down.
Heh...
I'm still thinking/brainstorming about it... it only helps if you can
effectively prune though.
Each node in the tree could also keep the max
15 matches
Mail list logo
