I am using spellchecker in the query part. Now my search time has become
more. say initiallly it was 1000ms now its 3000ms.I have data index of size
9GB.
My query http://localhost:8983/solr/spellCheckCompRH/?q=
Hi,
I want to do a quickdirt load testing - but all my results are cached.
I commented out all the Solr caches - but still everything is cached.
* Can the caching come from the 'Field Collapsing Cache'.
-- although I don't see this element in my config file.
( As the system now jumps from 1GB
Also take a look at debugQuery=on output. It takes a while to
decipher what this is telling you, but it'll let you know exactly.
Best
Erick
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 5:37 AM, Jason Brown jason.br...@sjp.co.uk wrote:
Can anyone tell me hoe the dismax score is computed? Is it the maximum
score
In our application we use dynamic fields and there can be about 50 of
them and there can be up to 100 million documents.
Are there any disadvantages having multivalued=true on all fields in
the schema? An admin of the application can specify dynamic fields and
if they should be indexed or stored.
I have about 30 million documents and with the exception of the Unique ID,
Type and a couple of date fields, every document is made of dynamic fields.
Now, I only have maybe 1 in 5 being multi-value, but search and facet
performance doesn't look appreciably different from a fixed schema solution.
Someone please correct me if I am wrong, but as far as I am aware index format
is identical in either case.
One benefit of allowing one to specify a field as single-valued is similar to
specifying that a field is required: Providing a safeguard that index data
conforms to requirements. So
Stijn Vanhoorelbeke [stijn.vanhoorelb...@gmail.com] wrote:
I want to do a quickdirt load testing - but all my results are cached.
I commented out all the Solr caches - but still everything is cached.
* Can the caching come from the 'Field Collapsing Cache'.
-- although I don't see this
I am aware of the power of the caches.
I do not want to completely remove the caches - I want them to be small.
- So I can launch a stress test with small amount of data.
( Some items may come from cache - some need to be searched up -
right now everything comes from the cache... )
2010/12/21
Hello.
Iam working with the shell-scripts for solr for performing a snapshot of the
index.
to do a snapshot is really easy and works fine. but how can i install a
snaposhot for multi-cores.
i wrote a little script wich install each snapshot for each core:
cd $HOME_DIR/solr/bin
./snapinstaller
On 12/21/2010 3:02 AM, Anurag wrote:
I am using spellchecker in the query part. Now my search time has become
more. say initiallly it was 1000ms now its 3000ms.I have data index of size
9GB.
My query http://localhost:8983/solr/spellCheckCompRH/?q=
You should be aware that the behavior of sorting on a multi-valued field is
undefined. After all, which of the multiple values should be used for
sorting?
So if you need sorting on the field, you shouldn't make it multi-valued.
Geert-Jan
2010/12/21 J.J. Larrea j...@panix.com
Someone please
Thanks you for the input. You might have seen my posts about doing a flexible
schema for derived objects. Sounds like dynamic fields might be the ticket.
We'll be ready to test the idea in about a month, mabye 3 weeks. I'll post a
comment about it whn it gets there.
I don't know if I would
Thanks a lot!
you mean i have to increase the resources.
1.Can the distributed search improve the speed.?
2.I have read from some thread that spellchecker takes time.Is spellchecker
is one of the curlprit for more response time?
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Shawn Heisey-4 [via Lucene]
: I am trying to do a facet search and sort the facet values too.
...
: Then I followed the sample example schema.xml, created a copyField of type
...
: fieldType name=alphaOnlySort class=solr.TextField
: sortMissingLast=true omitNorms=true
...
: But the
Dear all,
I have created an index with aprox. 1.1 billion of documents (around 500GB)
running on Solr 1.4.1. (64 bit JVM).
I want to enable faceted navigation on am int field, which contains around
250 unique values.
According to the wiki there are two methods:
facet.method=fc which uses field
Hoss, I think the use case being asked about is specifically doing a
facet.sort though, for cases where you actually do want to sort facet
values with facet.sort, not sort records -- while still presenting the
facet values with original case, but sorting them case insensitively.
The solutions
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Rok Rejc rokrej...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
I have created an index with aprox. 1.1 billion of documents (around 500GB)
running on Solr 1.4.1. (64 bit JVM).
I want to enable faceted navigation on am int field, which contains around
250 unique values.
I also noticed that when I run the config-reload command, the following
warning is thrown. I changed all my PK=id to see if that changed anything.
Anyone have any ideas why this is not working for me?
INFO: id is a required field in SolrSchema . But not found in DataConfig.
Regards,
Adm
On Mon,
All,
I've noticed that there are some RSS feeds that are slow to respond,
especially during high usage times throughout the day. Is there a way to set
the timeout to something really high or have it just wait until the feed is
returned? The entire thing stops working when the feed doesn't
(10/12/22 9:35), Adam Estrada wrote:
All,
I've noticed that there are some RSS feeds that are slow to respond,
especially during high usage times throughout the day. Is there a way to set
the timeout to something really high or have it just wait until the feed is
returned? The entire thing
Hello guys,
We at scribd.com have recently deployed our new search cluster based
on Dec 1st, 2010 branch_3x solr code and we're very happy about the
new features in brings.
Though looks like we have a weird problem here: once a day our servers
handling sharded search queries (frontend servers
How do I handle facet values that contain whitespace? Say I have a field
Product that I want to facet on. A value for Product could be Electric
Guitar. How should I handle the white space in Electric Guitar during
indexing? What about when I apply the constraint fq=Product:Electric Guitar?
If I put duplicate values into a multiValued field, would that cause any
issues?
For example I have a multiValued field Color. Some of my documents have
duplicate values for that field, such as: Green, Red, Blue, Green, Green.
Would the above (having 3 duplicate Green) be the same as having
23 matches
Mail list logo
