We construct our query by Lucene API
before, as BooleanQuery, TermQuery
those kind of things.
Okey, it seems that your field are not analyzed and you don't do any analysis
while construction of your query by Lucene API. Correct?
Then you can use your existing Java code directly inside a
Where do you get your Lucene/Solr downloads from?
[] ASF Mirrors (linked in our release announcements or via the Lucene website)
[X] Maven repository (whether you use Maven, Ant+Ivy, Buildr, etc.)
[X] I/we build them from source via an SVN/Git checkout.
[] Other (someone in your company
Thanks a lot for your reply.That was very helpful.
We construct our lucene query after certain analysis(ex : words
segmentation, category identification). Do you mean we plugin those analysis
logic and query construction part onto solr, and solr takes the very
beginning input.
Kun
2011/1/20
Thanks Jack!
I will give it a try, even though I finally have a Nutch configuration
that does exactly what I want it to do (except keeping an eye on updated
and deleted documents).
Erlend
On 19.01.11 16.52, Jack Krupansky wrote:
Take a look at Apache ManifoldCF (incubating, close to 0.1
Hasnain,
there is no need for any _additional_ looping? Of course, you have to loop
over initially, to get the results - but this should be enough.
use result/doc/[@name=id] to check if lst[@name=highlighting]/lst[@name=$id]
exists, and if so .. replace the original content w/ the highlighted
Did i write wt? Oh dear. The q and w are too close =)
Markus,
Its not wt its qt, wt for response type,
Also qt is not for Query Parser its for Request Handler ,In solrconfig.xml
there are many Request Handlers can be Defined using dismax Query Parser
Or Using lucene Query Parser.
If you
Ok,
I tryed to use nested queries this way:
wt=jsonindent=truefl=qFRq=sarkozy
_query_:{!tag=test}chiracfacet=truefacet.field={!ex=test}studyDescriptionId
It resulted in this error:
facet_counts:{
facet_queries:{},
exception:java.lang.NullPointerException\n\tat
Hello list,
I got a theoretical question about a Multicore-Situation:
I got two cores: active, inactive
The active core serves all the queries.
The inactive core is the tricky thing:
I create an optimized index outside the environment and want to insert that
optimized index 1 to 1 into the
Hi David,
if your transaction id will be handled at document level, you can just add a
field in your schema named transaction_id - that's it. All you have to do
is to insert that transaction_id everytime you do an update (Solr does not
generate an transaction_id by default and I don't know of
Hi all,
we have implemented a Solr based search in our web application. We have one
master server that maintains the index which is replicated to the slaves using
the built-in Solr replication.
This has been working fine so far, but suddenly the replication does not send
the modified files
Hallo..
I have create multicore search and will search in more then one Core!
Now i have done:
http://192.168.105.59:8080/solr/mail/select?wt=phpsq=*:*shards=192.168.105.59:8080/solr/mail,192.168.105.59:8080/solr/mail11
But Error...
HTTP Status 500 - Map size must not be negative
That looks like this issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2278
On Thursday 20 January 2011 13:02:41 Jörg Agatz wrote:
Hallo..
I have create multicore search and will search in more then one Core!
Now i have done:
Since it seems to be no voodoo available I did it on the client side.
I send a first request to get the facets and a second to get the documents and
their highlighting.
It works well but requires more processing.
From: Xavier SCHEPLER
On which events did you configure master to perform replication? replicateAfter
Regards,
Stevo.
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Thomas Kellerer spam_ea...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi all,
we have implemented a Solr based search in our web application. We have one
master server that maintains the
I will be looking into JConsole.
One more question regarding caching. When we talk about warm-up queries does
that mean that some of the complex queries (esp those which require high I/O
e.g. phrase queries) will really be very slow (on lets say an index of
200GB) if they are not cached? I am
Here is our configuration:
lst name=master
str name=enabletrue/str
str name=replicateAftercommit/str
str name=replicateAfterstartup/str
str
name=confFilesstopwords.txt,stopwords_de.txt,stopwords_en.txt,synonyms.txt/str
/lst
Stevo Slavić, 20.01.2011 13:26:
On which events did you
Thanks guys. I read (and actually digested this time) how multivalued fields
work and now realize my question came from a 'structured language/dbms'
background. The multivalued field is stored basically as a single value with
extra spacing between terms (the positionIncrementGap previously
Is that it? Of all the strange, esoteric, little understood configuration
settings available in solrconfig.xml, the only thing that affects Index
Speed vs Query Speed is turning on/off the Query Cache and RamBufferSize?
And for the latter, why wouldn't RamBufferSize be the same for both...that
Thomas Kellerer, 20.01.2011 12:53:
Hi all,
we have implemented a Solr based search in our web application. We
have one master server that maintains the index which is replicated
to the slaves using the built-in Solr replication.
This has been working fine so far, but suddenly the replication
So if on startup index gets replicated, then commit probably isn't
being called anywhere on master.
Is that index configured to autocommit on master, or do you commit
from application code? If you commit from application code, check if
commit actually gets issued to the slave.
Regards,
Stevo.
Stevo Slavić, 20.01.2011 15:42:
So if on startup index gets replicated, then commit probably isn't
being called anywhere on master.
No, the index is not replicated on startup (same behaviour: no files to
download)
Is that index configured to autocommit on master, or do you commit
from
On 1/20/2011 1:42 AM, kun xiong wrote:
Thar example string means our query is BooleanQuery containing
BooleanQuerys.
I am wondering how to write a complicated BooleanQuery for dismax, like (A
or B or C) and (D or E)
Or I have to use Lucene query parser.
You can't do it with dismax. You might
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 4:59 AM, Xavier SCHEPLER
xavier.schep...@sciences-po.fr wrote:
Ok,
I tryed to use nested queries this way:
wt=jsonindent=truefl=qFRq=sarkozy
_query_:{!tag=test}chiracfacet=truefacet.field={!ex=test}studyDescriptionId
It resulted in this error:
facet_counts:{
Hi,
I am building a social networking site.For searching profiles, i am trying
to implement solr.
But here i am facing a problem.As a social networking site, the data base is
going to get more updates/inserts frequently.That means,the search is going
to be in real time.How can we achieve this
I want to provide a list of facets to my visitors order alphabetically, for
example, for the 'features' facet I have:
data-config.xml:
entity name=location_feature query=select featureid from
location_features where locationid='${location.id}'
entity name=feature query=select title from
Hi,
I am building tag cloud for products by using facets.I made tag names as
facets and i am taking facets count as reference to display tag cloud.Each
product has tags with their own weightage.Let us say,
For example
prod1 has tag called “Light Weight” with weightage 20,
prod2 has tag called
We construct our lucene query after certain analysis(ex :
words
segmentation, category identification).
By analysis, I referring charfilter(s)+tokenizer+tokenfilter(s) combination.
Do you mean we
plugin those analysis
logic and query construction part onto solr, and solr takes
the very
Salman,
Yeah, that first cache is too small. Double it and evictions may go away.
Re warm-up queries - yes, they'll be slower than when executed later when they
get pulled out of the cache. Plus if these are warm-up queries, the relevant
parts of the index may not be in the OS buffer cache.
But this doesnt give me the facets in an alphabetical
order.
Besides the features facet, I also have some other facets
that ALSO need to
be shown in alphabetical order. How to approach this?
facet.sort=false
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters#facet.sort
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.orgwrote:
As devs of Lucene/Solr, due to the way ASF mirrors, etc. works, we really
don't have a good sense of how people get Lucene and Solr for use in their
application. Because of this, there has been some talk of dropping
If you are using Lucene's trunk (to be 4.0) builds, read on...
I just committed LUCENE-2872, which is a hard break on the index file format.
If you are living on Lucene's trunk then you have to remove any
previously created indices and re-index, after updating.
The change cuts over to a faster
Hi, I have a little problem regarding indexing, that i don't know
how to solve, i need to index the same data in different ways
into the same field. The problem is a normalization problem, and
here is an example:
I have a special character \uA732, which i need to normalize in
two different ways
Are you showing the facets with facet parameters in your request?
Then you can ask for the facets to be returned sorted by byte-order with
facet.sort=index.
Got nothing to do with your schema, let alone your DIH import
configuration that you showed us. Just a matter of how you ask Solr for
Maybe?: Just keep the 'weightages' in an external store of some kind
(rdbms, nosql like mongodb, just a straight text config file that your
app loads into a hash internally, whatever), rather than Solr, and have
your app look them up for each facet value to be displayed, after your
app fetches
Hi all,
I have an index containing a couple of million documents.
Documents are grouped into groups, each group contains from 1000-2
documents.
The problem:
Each group has defined permission settings. It can be viewed by public,
viewed by registred users, or viewed by a list of users (each
Hey there,
I'm looking for an analyzer configuration for Solr 1.4 that
accomplishes the following:
Given the input abc xyz foo I would like to add at least the following
token combinations to the index:
abc
abc xyz
abc xyz foo
abc foo
xyz
xyz foo
Why do you want to do this, what is it meant to accomplish? There might
be a better way to accomplish what it is you are trying to do; I can't
think of anything (which doesn't mean it doesn't exist) that what you're
actually trying to do would be required in order to do. What sorts of
Does Solr support the Opensearch format? If so could someone point me
to the correct documentation?
Thanks - Tod
On 20.01.11 22:19, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
On 1/20/2011 4:03 PM, Martin Jansen wrote:
I'm looking for ananalyzer configuration for Solr 1.4 that
accomplishes the following:
Given the input abc xyz foo I would like to add at least the following
token combinations to the index:
abc
Aha, I have no idea if there actually is a better way of achieving that,
auto-completion with Solr is always tricky and I personally have not
been happy with any of the designs I've seen suggested for it. But I'm
also not entirely sure your design will actually work, but neither am I
sure it
No, not exactly. In general, people don't expose their Solr API direct
to the world -- they front Solr with some software that is exposed to
the world. (If you do expose your Solr API directly to the world, you
will need to think carefully about security, and make sure you aren't
letting
Hi Martin,
The co-occurrence filter I'm working on at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2749 would do what you want (among
other things). Still vaporware at this point, as I've only put a couple of
hours into it, so don't hold your breath :)
Steve
-Original Message-
You might also see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2143
On Jan 20, 2011, at 4:50 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
No, not exactly. In general, people don't expose their Solr API direct to the
world -- they front Solr with some software that is exposed to the world. (If
you do expose
Hi,
One of the things about Document Security is that it never involves
just one thing. There are a lot of things to consider, and
unfortunately, they're generally non-trivial.
Deciding how to store/hold/retrieve permissions is certainly one of
those things, and you're right, you should avoid
Okey, thanks very much.
2011/1/21 Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com
We construct our lucene query after certain analysis(ex :
words
segmentation, category identification).
By analysis, I referring charfilter(s)+tokenizer+tokenfilter(s)
combination.
Do you mean we
plugin those analysis
I'm not sure how you COULD do searching without having the permissions in the
documents. I mentally use the model of unix filesystems, as a starter. Simple,
but powerful. If I needed a separate table for permissions, or index, I'd have
to do queries, with GINORMOUS amounts of OR statements.
I
I'm thinking of using something like this:
http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2006/08/16/how-to-build-role-based-access-control-in-sql/
http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2006/08/18/role-based-access-control-in-sql-part-2/
- Original Message
From: Dennis Gearon gear...@sbcglobal.net
To:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 4:08 PM, shm s...@dbc.dk wrote:
Hi, I have a little problem regarding indexing, that i don't know
how to solve, i need to index the same data in different ways
into the same field. The problem is a normalization problem, and
here is an example:
I have a special
(apologies for the cross posting)
*** PLEASE NOTE - the deadline for submitting papers has been extended by 1
week to 1/28/2011! ***
Please consider submitting a paper to the ICSE 2011 Software Engineering for
Cloud Computing (SECLOUD) Workshop to be held Sunday, May 22, 2011, at the
Hilton
Does anyone know if there is a function in solr that allows us to log
optimize times? ie - the length of time optimization takes. I can find alot
of questions of how long optimization should take, but thus far nothing on
how to access how long a particular run actually took.
Thanks!!
--
View
Looks like this is a bug and I should write a jira issue for it?
Regards
Bernd
Am 20.01.2011 11:30, schrieb Bernd Fehling:
Hi list,
after sending full-import=trueclean=truecommit=true
Solr 4.x (apache-solr-4.0-2010-11-24_09-25-17) responds with:
- DataImporter doFullImport
-
Hi All,
Is there is any way in SOLR or any plug-in through which the folders and
documents in FTP location can be indexed.
/ Pankaj Bhatt.
Hi Rok,
I have used about 25 ids with OR Operator and its working fine for
me.Just Have to Increase the MaxBoolClouse parameter and also have to
configure max header size on Servlet container to enable for big query
requests.
-
Thanx:
Grijesh
--
View this message in context:
Hi All
I want to integrate Surround Query Parser with solr, To do this i have
downloaded jar file from the internet and and then pasting that jar file in
web-inf/lib
and configured query parser in solrconfig.xml as
queryParser name=SurroundQParser
We have tried that as well, but the slave still claims to have a higher index
version, even when the index files were deleted completely
Regards
Thomas
Stevo Slavić, 20.01.2011 16:52:
Not too elegant but valid check would be to bring slave down, delete
it's index data directory, then to commit
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:21 PM, pankaj bhatt panbh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Is there is any way in SOLR or any plug-in through which the folders and
documents in FTP location can be indexed.
[...]
What format are these documents in? Which parts of the documents
do you want to index?
In
On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 12:12 +0100, Julien Piquot wrote:
I would like to be able to prune my search result by removing the less
relevant documents. I'm thinking about using the search score : I use
the search scores of the document set (I assume there are sorted by
descending order),
Would you do that with 1000's of users? How expensive in processor time is it?
Have you ever benchmarked it?
Dennis Gearon
Signature Warning
It is always a good idea to learn from your own mistakes. It is usually a
better
idea to learn from others’ mistakes, so you do not
that's a pretty good idea, using 'delta score'
Dennis Gearon
Signature Warning
It is always a good idea to learn from your own mistakes. It is usually a
better
idea to learn from others’ mistakes, so you do not have to make them yourself.
from
I haven't tried myself, but you could look at solandra :
https://github.com/tjake/Lucandra
- Espen
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 6:30 PM, stockii stock.jo...@googlemail.com wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/NearRealtimeSearchTuning
Sounds to me like you either have to find a way NOT to use a parser that is a
child class of:
org.apache.solr.search.QParserPlugin
(not sure if that's possible), or you have to find out what's wrong with the
file. Where did you get it, have you talked to the author?
Dennis Gearon
61 matches
Mail list logo
