Hi,
I'm wondering what are the best way to do this for this scenario:
Index will have about 250 - 400 million items. Index needs to be updated
every 10/20 minutes and no. of records updated could be upto 5-6 million in
each.
Could you please guide me on how the indexing is done when there are
Hi,
Here is my environment: 32bits windows server 2008 (4cpu and 12G RAM),
320million docs, index size 12G.
When we use query=*:* and 10 fields for faceted searching, it works. However,
15 feilds or more faceted searching caused the following exception:
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap
Hi.
i have a problem with logic operator OR in dismax query search.
some days ago the query worked well. now it returns me anything (0
documents)
i explain:
the query is:
http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=
1324OR4322OR2324OR%20hello+worlddefType=dismaxqf=code%20title
the schema has the
Hello,
The Dismax search handler doesn't have the concept of a logical operator in
terms of OR-AND but rather uses a feature called Min-Should-Match (or mm).
This parameter specifies the absolute number or percentage of the entered
terms that you need them to match. To have an OR-like effect you
Hello,
This thread might help:
http://search-lucene.com/m/09PHV1E0ZxQ1/Possibilities+of+near+real+time+search+with+solr/v=threaded
On 21 March 2011 09:33, Prav Buz buz.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering what are the best way to do this for this scenario:
Index will have about 250 -
I'm having an issue performing a spellcheck on some information and
search of the archive isn't helping.
I'm indexing the word p!nk (yes, that's a bang in there), and have a
replacement filter setup so that the ! becomes i. Looking at the
analyzer the right thing is happening with both the
Hello,
I'd like to know the fastest way (code lines) to update a field of a
document.
So my idea was:
1) Get a SolrDocument
2) Add all fields of the SolrDocument to a new SolrInputDocument
3) Update the field in SolrInputDocument
4) Add SolrInputDocument to the server and commit it
Is there a
Hi Marc,
as far as I know the best way to do it is working from the original
source, because it is possible, that not all fields are stores, and
the original content of the not stored fields is not inside the Solr
document.
Péter
2011/3/21 Marc SCHNEIDER marc.schneide...@gmail.com:
Hello,
Is there a fastest way to do that? I mean transforming a
SolrDocument into a
SolrInputDocument?
Does these static methods help?
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.util.ClientUtils.toSolrDocument()
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.util.ClientUtils.toSolrInputDocument()
How much memory you specify for java heap?
-Xmx...
OK, I think you're jumping ahead and trying to do
too many things at once.
What did you download? Source? The distro? The error
you posted usually happens for me when I haven't
compiled the example target from source. So I'd guess
you don't have the proper targets built. This assumes you
Dismax does not support boolean queries, you may try using Extended
Dismax for the boolean support.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1553
Regards,
Jayendra
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Savvas-Andreas Moysidis
savvas.andreas.moysi...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello,
The Dismax search
More details please? Solr doesn't generate any schemas, so I'm
completely lost what you're after here.
Best
Erick
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 7:59 PM, geag34 sac@gmail.com wrote:
Hello.
I am working with collection.
When I do a new collection I would like a custom schema.xml to be generated.
Get the release and re-index? You can get a trunk
version either through SVN or from the nightly build
at https://builds.apache.org/hudson/view/S-Z/view/Solr/
Note that 3.1 also has result grouping, and is currently
being released, so you might want to consider that
version.
Best
Erick
On Sun,
Memory consumption grows as the number of unique terms grows. So in
addition to Darx's question, how many unique terms are in all the
fields you're faceting on?
Best
Erick
2011/3/21 newsam new...@zju.edu.cn:
Hi,
Here is my environment: 32bits windows server 2008 (4cpu and 12G RAM),
Hi Ahmet,
That did it, thanks a lot!
Marc.
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com wrote:
Is there a fastest way to do that? I mean transforming a
SolrDocument into a
SolrInputDocument?
Does these static methods help?
The problem is that unless you *stored* every field in the Solr index, getting
the document back will not have all the original information. Getting a Solr
document only returns the stored fields.
And updating is really a delete followed by an add. So let's say you have
field A that hasn't been
On 3/15/2011 12:54 PM, onlinespend...@gmail.com wrote:
That's pretty interesting to use the autoincrementing document ID as a way
to keep track of what has not been indexed in Solr. And you overwrite this
document ID even when you modify an existing document. Very cool. I
suppose the number
Hi Erick,
Thanks for your answer.
I'm a quite newbie to Solr so I'm a little bit confused.
Do you mean that (using Solrj in my case) I should add all fields (stored
and not stored) before adding the document to the index?
Thanks,
Marc.
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Erick Erickson
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 8:33 PM, Marc SCHNEIDER
marc.schneide...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Erick,
Thanks for your answer.
I'm a quite newbie to Solr so I'm a little bit confused.
Do you mean that (using Solrj in my case) I should add all fields (stored
and not stored) before adding the document to
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 3/15/2011 12:54 PM, onlinespend...@gmail.com wrote:
That's pretty interesting to use the autoincrementing document ID as a way
to keep track of what has not been indexed in Solr. And you overwrite
this
document ID
So Solr 1.4.1, lucene query parser, generally has no problem with a
query that's simply one clause NOT
defType=lucene
q=NOT foo
No problem! Also no problem:
q=foo AND NOT bar
But, problem when the operand to an OR is a NOT:
q=foo OR (NOT bar)
Does NOT work correctly. Can be worked around
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
So Solr 1.4.1, lucene query parser, generally has no problem with a query
that's simply one clause NOT
defType=lucene
q=NOT foo
No problem! Also no problem:
q=foo AND NOT bar
But, problem when the operand to an
Hi Gora,
The absolute path solved the issue, but in a weird situation though. The
index files are being written to /example/solr/data/index instead of
.example/test/solr/data/index.
I run start jetty with ./test/solr/ as home would you know why this is
happening.
PS: While starting with
yes we are having physical memory issues, but do does anyone know for a fact
if there is direct correlation between be segment counts and RAM - memory?
i.e. when the system begins a search on a segment, does it load that
segments full index. Or does the system load All index data for all
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 9:45 PM, neha pneha...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi Gora,
The absolute path solved the issue, but in a weird situation though.
Great. That should be most of your issue solved.
The
Thanks Gora...it works.. Thanks again..:)
Neha
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/DIH-Issue-newbie-to-solr-tp2695407p2710864.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thanks Gora it works..!!! Thanks again. One last question, the documents get
indexed well and all but when I issue full-import command it still says
Total Requests made to DataSource 0
Would you know why this could happen.
Neha
--
View this message in context:
Hi,
I am working on a migration from verity k2 to solr.
At this point I have a parser for the Verity Query Language (our used subset)
which generates a syntax tree.
I transfer this in a couple of filters and one query. This fragmentation is the
reason, why I can not use my parser inside
Hi Erick
Thanks for your reply. 3.1 should be OK for me. When will it be release and
where is the link to download it? Thanks
Richard
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 7:20 AM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.comwrote:
Get the release and re-index? You can get a trunk
version either through SVN or
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Erick Erickson
erickerick...@gmail.com wrote:
Get the release and re-index? You can get a trunk
version either through SVN or from the nightly build
at https://builds.apache.org/hudson/view/S-Z/view/Solr/
Note that 3.1 also has result grouping
Result
Hi folks, I was running 1.4.0, but today I'm trying to switch to 1.4.1 (which
appears to work with Zoie), however when I try to retrieve data in CSV
format, wt=csv does not appear to work anymore.
Looking at the solrconfig.xml I see: (I tried pulling out the CSV entry, but
that failed (class not
CSV response format is only available in 3.1 (soon to be released) and later.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CSVResponseWriter
-Yonik
http://www.lucenerevolution.org -- Lucene/Solr User Conference, May
25-26, San Francisco
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 3:02 PM, danomano dshopk...@earthlink.net wrote:
Thanks. Then where is the link to download the latest 4.0?
Richard
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.comwrote:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Erick Erickson
erickerick...@gmail.com wrote:
Get the release and re-index? You can get a trunk
version
Is it the file
apache-solr-4.0-2011-03-18_08-07-35-src.tgzhttps://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Solr-trunk/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/artifacts/apache-solr-4.0-2011-03-18_08-07-35-src.tgz
on page
https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Solr-trunk/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/artifacts/?
Thanks
Hi list,
I am working with a Ajax-Solr GUI but I am getting the following error from
Firebug when launching the web app on Tomcat 7.0.11. The web app uses Solr
version 1.4.1
HTTP Status 400 - undefined field links/h1HR size=1
noshade=noshadepbtype/b Status report/ppbmessage/b
uundefined
Hi,
I’m using Data Import Handler for index emails.
The problem is that nota ll the emails was indexed When I do a full import.
Someone have any idea?
Regards,
--
Matias.
--- On Mon, 3/21/11, McGibbney, Lewis John lewis.mcgibb...@gcu.ac.uk wrote:
From: McGibbney, Lewis John lewis.mcgibb...@gcu.ac.uk
Subject: Implementing Facets
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Monday, March 21, 2011, 9:50 PM
Hi list,
I am working with a
Hello all,
I am using Solr in a Java architecture right now, and the results are great.
The app development team has asked me if it is possible to embed Solr, but the
request is to embed it into a C++ app and mac app using objective C. I do not
have much knowledge on embedded Solr. Does it
Hi Ahmet,
Yes this is the case. I have changed it to reflect your suggestion thank you
for this.
After reloading the app I still get the error, here is the full stack trace
from catalina.out
INFO: [] Registered new searcher Searcher@8af0b0 main
21-Mar-2011 20:28:53
On Mar 21, 2011, at 14:19 , karsten-s...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
I am working on a migration from verity k2 to solr.
At this point I have a parser for the Verity Query Language (our used subset)
which generates a syntax tree.
I transfer this in a couple of filters and one query. This
Yes this is the case. I have changed it to reflect your
suggestion thank you for this.
After reloading the app I still get the error, here is the
full stack trace from catalina.out
It seems you have one more typo:
str name=f.topics.facet.limit.50/str =
str name=f.topics.facet.limit50/str
i am trying to put this query on Solr-1.3.0 server which is integrated with
Nutch-1.0.
http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=solrversion=2.2start=0rows=10indent=ondebugQuery=on
But the results, i am getting doesnot have explaination for the score as
it should include tf, idf etc
Should i
Hi
Have this problem I tried to solve with filter queries but I think I`m stuck
now, and don't see a solution how to solve my problem.
My problem is that i want a result page that shows those documents that
matches
these filter query fq=openingtime:[* TO NOW] , fq=closingtime[NOW TO *] for
the
You can put an actual OR in the fq (an fq, by default, is in the
solr-lucene query parser language). Might that achieve what you want?
fq= -openingtime:[* TO *] OR openingtime:[* TO NOW]
fq= -closingtime:[* TO *] OR closingtime:[NOW TO *]
Does that, or some variation of it, do what you need?
--- On Mon, 3/21/11, Anurag anurag.it.jo...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Anurag anurag.it.jo...@gmail.com
Subject: debugQuery doesnot work with Solr-1.3.0 , is it true?
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Monday, March 21, 2011, 11:18 PM
i am trying to put this query on
Solr-1.3.0 server which
Unfortunalty have I tried the OR approach in the fq.
with the positive filter query first i get document 4, with negative filter
query first i get none result,
This request gives me 1 reply
Ok thank.
It is my fault. I have created collection with a lucidimagination perl
script.
I will errase the schema.xml.
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/working-with-collection-Where-is-default-schema-xml-tp2700455p2712496.html
Sent from the Solr -
Hi,
In a _high load_ environment with queryResultCache and filterCache enabled, you
need to be very careful about using NOW in its highest precision. It adds -
and likely evicts - a non retrievable entry in both caches, wasting a lot of
resources.
It's best to always reduce precision when
Yes it needs java to run
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
On Mar 21, 2011, at 2:30 PM, Greg Georges greg.geor...@biztree.com wrote:
Hello all,
I am using Solr in a Java architecture right now, and the results are great.
The app development team has asked me if it is possible to embed Solr, but
How about using below as a q= parameter? With df=OR
+openingtime:[* TO NOW] +closingtime[NOW TO *] (+*:* -openingtime[* TO *]
-closingtime[* TO *])
http://search-lucene.com/m/TN2a3WgvyX/
--- On Tue, 3/22/11, Jan-Eirik B. Nævdal jan-eirik.naev...@iterate.no wrote:
From: Jan-Eirik B.
If the OR actually worked to do what it's trying to say, would it be what you
wanted?
Because I can't believe I didn't recognize this is an instance of the very
thing I posted on this list this morning, where the solr-lucene query parser
has problems with some kinds of 'pure negative' queries.
52 matches
Mail list logo
