Hi,
My results from solr returns about 982 documents and I use jaxb to parse them
into java objects, which takes about 469 ms, which is over my 150-200ms
threshold.
Is there a solution around this? Can I store the java objects in the index and
return them in the solr response and then
Erick, you're right. It's working, my schema looks like this:
fieldType name=name_type class=solr.TextField
positionIncrementGap=100
analyzer type=index
charFilter class=solr.HTMLStripCharFilterFactory/
tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/
filter
Hi,
I am using solr-3.3.0 and carrot² clustering which works fine out of the box
with the examples doc and default solr configuration (the 'features' Field is
used as snippet).
I indexed my own documents using the embed ExtractingRequestHandler wich by
default stores contents in the
Hi folks,
I'm writing here again (beside Jira: SOLR-2565), eventually any one can help
here:
I tested the nightly build #1595 with an new patch (2565), but NRT doesn't
work in my case.
I index 10 docs/sec, it takes 1-30sec. to see the results.
same behavior when i update an existing document.
Hi Pablo,
The reason clustering doesn't work with the text field is that the field
is not stored:
field name=text type=text_general indexed=true stored=false
multiValued=true/
For clustering to work, you'll need to keep your documents' titles and
content in stored fields.
Staszek
On Fri,
Hi Satish,
: I also added the following files to my apache-solr-3.3.0\example\lib
: folder:
I use ICU, and I copied the jar files not into example/lib as you did,
but example/solr/lib. First I had to create that directory. It works
for me both under 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3. In multicore setup I
Firewall? Proxy?
I am new user and I have SOLR installed. I can use the admin page and
query the example data.
However, I was using nutch to load index with intranet web pages and I
got this message.
SolrIndexer: starting at 2011-08-12 16:52:44
Hi,
I am currently using SOLR 1.4.1, With this version sorting working fine even
in multivalued field.
Now I am planning to upgrade my SOLR version from 1.4.1 -- 3.3.0, In this
latest version sorting is not working on multivauled field.
So I am in unable to upgrade my SOLR due to this drawback.
Hi,
I am having one problem while using the fuzzy search from query.
I have two fields in my SOLR output, one field is endNgramed and other one
is a normal Integer field which will have my customized score for that
document.
I have a handler[myhandler] which by default will sort the documents
Hi,
There is no direct solution, you have to create single value field(s)
to create search. I am aware of two workarounds:
- you can use a random or a given (e.g. the first) instance of the
multiple values of the field, and that would be your sortable field.
- you can create two sortable fields:
Thanks for your reply Staszek,
Of course, the field has to be stored. I forgot to mention that I already
updated the schema for that. I also checked that data was effectiveley stored
in that field.
Anyway, I tried to reproduce it on a fresh Solr install and clustering works
well. ;-)
Hi All,
Please correct me if I am wrong, but when I am trying to insert a document
into Solr which was previously index, it overwrites the current key.
Is there a way to change the behaviour,
1. I don't want Solr to override but on the other hand it should ignore the
entry
2. Also,
Hi,
Currently I am indexing documents by directly adding files as
'req.addFile(fi);' or by sending the content of the file like
'req.addContentStream(stream);' using solrj.
Assume, if the solrj client Solr server are in different network (ie, Solr
server is in remote location) I need to
hi
i am using nutch 1.2. in my crawl-urlfilter.txt, i am specifying URLs to be
skipped. i am giving some patterns that need to be skipped but it is not
working
e.g.
-^http://([a-z0-9]*\.)*domain.com
+^http://([a-z0-9]*\.)*domain.com/([0-9-a-z])*.html
-^http://([a-z0-9]*\.)*domain.com/([a-z/])*
Hi Markus,
thanks for your answer.
I'm using Solr. 4.0 and jetty now and observe the behavior and my error logs
next week.
tomcat can be a reason, we will see, i'll report.
I'm indexing WITHOUT batches, one doc after another. But i would try out the
batch indexing as well as
retry indexing
It turned out that there is a sorting issue with solr 3.3.
As fas as I could trace it down currently:
4 docs in the index and a search for *:*
sorting on field dccreator_sort in descending order
Hi i have queried solr to retrieve
information from database now i have to
integrate with web page...i dont know how to implement this
please help
me...
actually i have one jsp page which is having
search field and search
button now i need to get the results from solr in the jsp
This is both an FYI for the list so the issue gets documented and a suggestion
for the developers. I thought about a JIRA, and would be happy to submit one,
but the issue is pretty environment-specific, so I have not done so at this
point.
In testing Solr 3.3 under WebSphere Application
On 8/12/2011 12:52 AM, nagarjuna wrote:
Hi i have queried solr to retrieve information from database now i have to
integrate with web page...i dont know how to implement this please help
me...
actually i have one jsp page which is having search field and search
button now i need to get the
Hi Johnny,
Sorting on a multivalued field has never really worked in Solr.
Solr versions = 1.4.1 allowed it, but there was a change that an error
occurred and that the sorting might not be what you expect.
From Solr 3.1 and up sorting on a multivalued isn't allowed and a http 400
is returned.
Spellchecker works fine, but when using spellcheck.q it gives following
exception (queryAnalyzerFieldType is defined if that would matter).
Is it bug or am I doing something wrong?
2011-08-12 17:30:54,368 java.lang.NullPointerException
at
Hello.
I'm having a Solr running within Tomcat7 and Tomcat is closing at
fixed hours, everytime is a different hour. catalina.log doesn't show
anything other than a clean tomcat shutdown (no exception or
anything). I would really apreciate some advice on how to debug this.
Tomcat doesn't run
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Bernd Fehling
bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de wrote:
It turned out that there is a sorting issue with solr 3.3.
As fas as I could trace it down currently:
4 docs in the index and a search for *:*
sorting on field dccreator_sort in descending order
HI Peter
I found the issue,
Actually we were getting this exception because of JVM space. I allocated
512 xms and 1024 xmx .. finally increased the time limit for write lock to
20 secs .. things are working fine ... but still it did not help ...
On closely analysis of doc which we were
After a whole lot of facet-wrangling, I've come up with a practical
solution that suits my situation, which is to index each triple as a
series of paths. For example, if the shelve process of the
accessionWF workflow is completed, it gets indexed as:
field name=wf_wpsaccessionWF/field
field
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Bernd Fehling
bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de wrote:
It turned out that there is a sorting issue with solr 3.3.
As fas as I could trace it down currently:
4 docs in the index and a
Hi,
I am working with the velocity response writer, and I want to develop a
custom velocity tool.
To do so, I have written a JAVA class that looks like that:
@DefaultKey(mytool)
public class MyCustomTool {
public MyCustomTool() {
}
public String doit(Object arg) {
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Bernd Fehling
bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de wrote:
It turned out that there is a sorting issue with
I currently have a build system for my Solr index written in Perl. I am
in the process of rewriting it in Java. I've reached the part of the
project where I'm using SolrJ, and I have a bunch of questions. All of
the SolrJ examples I can find are too simple to answer them.
A note before I
On 8/12/2011 1:49 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
I am sure that I have more questions, but I may be able to answer a
lot of them myself if I can see better examples.
Thought of another question. My Perl build system uses DIH for all
indexing, but with the Java rewrite I am planning to do all
I've checked in an improved TestSort that adds deleted docs and
randomizes things a lot more (and fixes the previous reliance on doc
ids not being reordered).
I still can't reproduce this error though.
Is this stock solr? Can you verify that the documents are in the
wrong order also (and not just
Recently started looking into solr to solve a problem created before my
time. We have a dataset consisting of 390,000,000+ records that had a
search written for it using a simple query. The problem is that the
dataset needs additional indices to keep operating. The DBA says no go,
too large a
We have a 200,000,000 record index with 14 fields, and we can re-index
the entire data set in about five hours. One thing to note is that the
DataImportHandler uses one thread per entity by default. If you have a
multcore box, you can drastically speed indexing by specifying a
threadcount of n+1,
On 8/12/2011 3:32 PM, Eric Myers wrote:
Recently started looking into solr to solve a problem created before my
time. We have a dataset consisting of 390,000,000+ records that had a
search written for it using a simple query. The problem is that the
dataset needs additional indices to keep
Hi,
We are using solr 1.4.1 and we need to sort our results by distance. We have
lat lons for each document in the response and our reference point.
Is it possible? I read about the spatial plugin but the does range searching:
Stephane -
Also - I don't think even with v.properties=velocity.properties that it'd be
picked up from the solr-home/conf directory the way the code is loading it
using SolrResourceLoader. The .properties file would need to be in your JAR
file for your custom tool (or in the classpath somehow
I don't know anything about LifeRay (never heard of it), but it sounds like
you've actually figured out what you need to know about LifeRay, all you've got
left is: how to replicate the writer solr server content into the readers.
This should tell you how:
37 matches
Mail list logo
