hello..
anyone a idea how i can figure out why my replication failed ? i got no
errors =(
my configuratio is.
2 server! both are master and slave at the same time. only one server makes
updates and is so the master. on slave is started via cron a replication. is
one server crashed, i can
Hello,
I'd like to resume this post.
The only way I found to do not split synonyms in words in synonyms.txt it
to use the line
filter class=solr.SynonymFilterFactory synonyms=synonyms.txt
ignoreCase=true expand=true
tokenizerFactory=solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory/
in schema.xml
where
bevore this problem i got this problem
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1781
-
--- System
One Server, 12 GB RAM, 2 Solr Instances, 8 Cores,
1 Core with 45 Million Documents other Cores 200.000
- Solr1 for
Use group=true and group.field in your query.
And your solr version should be solr 3.4 and above.
Thanks,
Ravi
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Group-by-distance-tp3934876p3934886.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I think this only can works when I have many records in same position.
My problem is to group witch short distance... like I say in last mail...
about 10km.
I need put markers on Poland country and display this.
Now I have 100k records, but in future I will have about 2mln records so I
must send
I am trying to implement an auto-suggest feature. The search feature already
exists and searches on file content in user's allotted workspace.
The following is from my schema that will be used for search indexing:
field name=Text type=text indexed=true stored=false
multiValued=false/
field
Ah, this is a really good point. Still seems like it has the downsides of
#2, though, much bigger space requirements and possibly some time lost on
queries.
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Walter Underwood wun...@wunderwood.orgwrote:
There is a third approach. Create two fields and always
I have a custom fieldtype with the below config
fieldType name=text_ngram class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap=100
autoGeneratePhraseQueries=true
analyzer type=index
tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/
filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/
usage of q and fq
q = is typically the main query for the search request
fq = is Filter Query; generally used to restrict the super set of
documents without influencing score (more info.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters#q)
For example:
q=hotel de ville ===
can you please share a sample query?
-Jeevanandam
On 24-04-2012 1:49 pm, prakash_ajp wrote:
I am trying to implement an auto-suggest feature. The search feature
already
exists and searches on file content in user's allotted workspace.
The following is from my schema that will be used for
Hi
I experience that a Solr looses its connection with Zookeeper and
re-establish it. After Solr is reconnection to Zookeeper it begins to
recover.
It has been missing the connection approximately 10 seconds and
meanwhile the leader slice has received some documents (maybe about 1000
I'm trying to migrate from RDBMS to the Lucene ecosystem. To do this, I'm
trying to use the JDBC importer[1]. My configuration is given below:
dataConfig
dataSource driver=net.sf.log4jdbc.DriverSpy user=sa
url=jdbc:log4jdbc:h2:tcp://192.168.1.6/finance/
!-- dataSource driver=org.h2.Driver
Hi
I experience that a Solr looses its connection with Zookeeper and
re-establish it. After Solr is reconnection to Zookeeper it begins to
recover its replicas. It has been missing the connection approximately
10 seconds and meanwhile the leader slice has received some documents
(maybe about
yes, thanks, but this is NOT my question.
I was wondering why I have multiple matches with q=hotel de ville and no
match with fq=CATEGORY_ANALYZED:hotel de ville, since in both case I'm
searching in the same solr fieldType.
Why is q parameter behaving differently in that case? Why do the quotes
I have tried all hints from internet for debugging a junit test of
solr 3.6 under eclipse but didn't succeed.
eclipse and everything is running, compiling, debugging with runjettyrun.
Tests have no errors.
Ant from command line ist also running with ivy, e.g.
ant -Dtestmethod=testUserFields
Hi Andrew,
This would not necessarily increase the size of your index that much - you
don't to store both fields, just 1 of them if you really need it for
highlighting or displaying. If not, just index.
Otis
Performance Monitoring for Solr -
Hi,
I maintain a distributed system which Solr is part of. The data which
is kept is Solr is permissioned and permissions are currently
implemented by taking the original user query, adding certain bits to
it which would make it return less data in the search results. Now I
am at the point where
2012/4/24 Mindaugas Žakšauskas min...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I maintain a distributed system which Solr is part of. The data which
is kept is Solr is permissioned and permissions are currently
implemented by taking the original user query, adding certain bits to
it which would make it return less
Le 24 avr. 2012 à 17:16, Otis Gospodnetic a écrit :
This would not necessarily increase the size of your index that much - you
don't to store both fields, just 1 of them if you really need it for
highlighting or displaying. If not, just index.
I second this.
The query expansion process is
I'm sorry, I'm missing something. What's the difference between storing
and indexing a field?
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Paul Libbrecht p...@hoplahup.net wrote:
Le 24 avr. 2012 à 17:16, Otis Gospodnetic a écrit :
This would not necessarily increase the size of your index that much -
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm about to try out a contribution for serializing queries in
Javascript using Jackson. I've previously done this by serializing my
own data structure and putting the JSON into a custom query parameter.
Thanks for
You might also want to show us your dataimport handler configuration from
solrconfig.xml and also the url you're using to start the data import. When
its complete, browsing to http://192.168.1.6:8995/solr/db/dataimport; (or
whatever the DIH handler name is in your config) should say indexing
What do you mean by grouped? It's relatively easy to return
only documents within a certain radius, and it's also easy to
return the results ordered by distance.
Here's a good place to start:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpatialSearch#geofilt_-_The_distance_filter
Best
Erick
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012
Hey all,
I'd like to know how many terms I have in a particular field in a search. In
other words, I want to know how many facets I have in that field. I use string
fields, there are no numbers. I wanted to use the Stats Component and use its
count value. When trying this out in the browser,
hello all,
i want to experiment with the EdgeNGramFilterFactory at index time.
i believe this needs to go in post tokenization - but i am doing a pattern
replace as well as other things.
should the EdgeNGramFilterFactory go in right after the pattern replace?
fieldType
Elisabeth:
What shows up in the debug section of the response when you add
debugQuery=on? There should be some bit of that section like:
parsed_filter_queries
My other question is are you absolutely sure that your
CATEGORY_ANALYZED field has the correct content?. How does it
get populated?
When you set store=true in your schema, a verbatim copy of
the raw input is placed in the *.fdt file. That is the information
returned when you specify the fl parameter for instance.
When you set index=true, the input is analyzed and the
resulting terms are placed in the inverted index and are
In general, query parsing is such a small fraction of the total time that,
almost no matter how complex, it's not worth worrying about. To see
this, attach debugQuery=on to your query and look at the timings
in the pepare and process portions of the response. I'd be
very sure that it was a
hello,
thank you for the reply,
yes - master has been indexed.
ok - makes sense - the polling interval needs to change
i did check the solr war file on both boxes (master and slave). they are
identical. actually - if they were not indentical - this would point to a
different issue altogether
Hi Erick,
Thanks for looking into this and for the tips you've sent.
I am leaning towards custom query component at the moment, the primary
reason for it would be to be able to squeeze the amount of data that
is sent over to Solr. A single round trip within the same datacenter
is worth around
Right now, the query is a very simple one, something like q=text. Basically,
it would return ['textview', 'textviewer', ..]
But the issue is, the 'textviewer' could be from a file that is out of
bounds for this user. So, ultimately I would like to include the userName in
the query. As mentioned
Hi,
In Solr wiki, for replication, the master url is defined as follows
str name=masterUrlhttp://master_host:port
/solr/corename/replication/str
This url does not contain admin in its path where as in the master url
provided by you, you have an additional admin in the url.
Not very sure if this
On Apr 24, 2012, at 9:37 PM, prakash_ajp wrote:
Right now, the query is a very simple one, something like q=text. Basically,
it would return ['textview', 'textviewer', ..]
hmm, so you're using default query field
But the issue is, the 'textviewer' could be from a file that is out of
On 24 April 2012 07:49, Dyer, James james.d...@ingrambook.com wrote:
You might also want to show us your dataimport handler configuration
from solrconfig.xml and also the url you're using to start the data import.
When its complete, browsing to
http://192.168.1.6:8995/solr/db/dataimport;
On 24 April 2012 22:22, Hasan Diwan hasan.di...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
The dataimport url I'm using is
http://192.168.1.6:8995/solr/db/dataimport?command=full-import
And, does it show you any output? As James mentions, it should
say busy while the data import is running, and indexing completed
After you issue the full-import command with the url you gave:
http://192.168.1.6:8995/solr/db/dataimport?command=full-import
Paste the url in a web browser without the command
http://192.168.1.6:8995/solr/db/dataimport
It should be giving you status as to how many database calls its made, how
If you're assembling an fq clause, this is all done or you, although
you need to take some care to form the fq clause _exactly_
the same way each time. Think of the filterCache as a key/value
map where the key is the raw fq text and the value is the docs
satisfying that query.
So fq=acl:(a OR a)
that was it!
thank you.
i did notice something else in the logs now ...
what is the meaning or implication of the message, Connection reset.?
2012-04-24 12:59:19,996 INFO [org.apache.solr.handler.SnapPuller]
(pool-12-thread-1) Slave in sync with master.
2012-04-24 12:59:39,998 INFO
I'm new to Solr, but I would think the fq=[username] would work here.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters#fq
Mike
-Original Message-
From: prakash_ajp [mailto:prakash_...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 11:07 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Auto
I read on a couple of other web pages that fq is not supported for suggester.
I even tried the query and it doesn't help. My understanding was, when the
suggest (spellcheck) index is built, only the field chosen is considered for
queries and the other fields from the main index are not available
yes only spellcheck indexed build field is for suggest query
I believe, filtering a documents on search handler using fq parameter and spell
suggest are two part we are discussing here.
lets say you have field for spellcheck - used to build spell dictionary
field name=spell type=textSpell …. …
When specifying a field name that starts with a digit (or digits) in the fl
parameter solr returns both the field name and field value as the those
digits. For example, using nightly build
apache-solr-4.0-2012-04-24_08-27-47 I run:
java -jar start.jar
and
java -jar post.jar solr.xml monitor.xml
Hi,
I have a question concerning the spatial field type LatLonType and populating
it via an embedded solr server in java.
So far I've only ever had to index simple types like boolean, float, and
string. This is the first complex type. So I'd like to use the following field
definition for
Well, what effect do you _want_?
I'd probably put it after the PorterStemFilterFactory. As it is, it'll
form a bunch of ngrams, then WordDelimiterFilterFactory will
try to break them up according to _its_ rules and eventually
you'll be sending absolute gibberish to the stemmer. I mean
what is the
hello all,
this is more of a design / newbie question on how others combine faceted
search fields in to their requestHandlers.
say you have a request handler set up like below.
does it make sense (from a design perspective) to add a faceted search field
that is NOT part of the main search
I don't know if there is a really good solution here. The problem is that
suggester (and the trunk FST version) simply traverse the terms in
the index. there's not even a real concept of those terms belonging to
any document. Since your security level is on a document basis, that
makes things
No problem here at all, it's done all the time. Consider a popular
facet series in the last day, in the last week, in the last month...
There's no reason you have to facet on the fields that are
searched on.
The user as search terms like my dog has fleas and your query
looks like
q=my dog has
Hmmm, this does NOT happen on 3.6, and it DOES happen on
trunk. Sure sounds like a JIRA to me, would you mind raising one?
I can't imagine this is desired behavior, it's just weird.
Thanks for pointing this out!
Erick
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 3:38 PM, bleakley bleak...@factual.com wrote:
When
:
: The user as search terms like my dog has fleas and your query
: looks like
: q=my dog has fleasfq=timestamp:[NOW/DAY TO NOW/DAY+1DAY]
: and the user sees all documents with those terms added since midnight
: last night. No confusion at all...
right ... wether the facets are useful or
Thank you for verifying the issue. I've created a ticket at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3407
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Field-names-w-leading-digits-cause-strange-behavior-tp3936354p3936599.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list
Hey everyone,
I field documents by title and body. The title field often has far fewer
terms than the body field. IDF, as a result, will have a profound effect in
the title field compared to the body field.
I currently have the title field boosted by 4x relative to the body field.
While I want
Another option is to use faceting (via the facet.prefix param) for your
auto-suggest. It's not as fast and scalable as using one of the
Suggester implementations, but it does allow arbitrary fq parameters to
be included in the request to limit the results.
Hi,
I am using solr 3.6. I saw in Solr wiki that QueryElevationComponent is not
supported for distributed search.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2949
When I checked the above ticket, it looks like its fixed in Solr 4.0. Does
anyone have any idea when a stable version of solr 4.0
The first one may not work because the number of users can be big. Besides,
the users can simply register themselves and start using it. It won't work
if an admin has to intervene in the registration process.
The second could work I guess. But the problem would be data duplication as
users might
Is it true that faceting is case sensitive? That would be disastrous for our
requirement :(
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Auto-suggest-on-indexed-file-content-filtered-based-on-user-tp3934565p3937370.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at
55 matches
Mail list logo
