hello..
i have many big entities in my data-config.xml. in the many entities is the
same query.
the entities look like this:
entity name=name transformer=DateFormatTransformer pk=id
query=
SELECT
field as fielname,
IF(bla NOT NULL, 1, 0) AS blob,
fieldname,
fieldname AS field, ...
more
Hi,
I have 2 fields, one containing a string (product) and another containing a
boolean (show_product).
Is there a way of returning the product field with a value of null when the
show_product field is false?
I can make another field (product_computed) and index that with null where I
need but I
Hi, we are considering a long-term project (likely lifecycle of
several years) with an initial production release in approximately
three months.
We're intending to use Solr 3.6.0, with a view for upgrading to 4.0
upon stable release.
However, http://lucene.apache.org/solr/ now has 4.0-ALPHA as
I came across a problem where one of my column is multivalued. eg: value can
be (11,22) (11,33) (11,55) , (22,44) , (22,99)
I want to perform a grouping operation that will yield:
* 11 : count 3
* 22 : count 3
* 33 : 1
* 44 : 1
* 55 : 1
* 99 : 1
--
View this message
Hi,
I am getting this error with DIH using a combination of SQLEntityProcessor
and XPathEntityProcessor:
Caused by: org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImportHandlerException:
Unable to execute query: null Processing Document # 1
at
Hi,
I have problem with faceting count in distributed grouping. It appears only
when I make query that returns almost all of the documents.
My SOLR implementation has 4 shards and my queries looks like:
http://host:port
You could also just keep a special document in your index with a known
ID that contains meta-data fields. If this document had no fields in common
with any other document it wouldn't satisfy searches (except the *:* search).
Or you could store this info somewhere else (file, DB, etc).
Or you can
This question, reasonable as it appears, is just unanswerable in the
abstract. About
all you can do is prototype and test. Take facet queries. The
hardware requirements
vary drastically based on the number of unique values in the field(s)
you're faceting on,
as well as whether they're multi-valued
Right, as Michael says you've allocated a massive amount of memory.
I suspect you're just hitting a full-pause garbage collection and it's
taking a lng time. Do you know whether you actually need all
that memory or was it allocated on the theory that more is better?
We often recommend that
On 13 July 2012 15:22, girishyes girish...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am getting this error with DIH using a combination of SQLEntityProcessor
and XPathEntityProcessor:
entity name=child_xml
rootEntity=true
You'll have to lowercase your facet.prefix. All the terms in your
field are lowercased, as per your fieldType so you'll have to
specify searching that way too
Best
Erick
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Nestor Oviedo oviedones...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all.
I have a field configured with
It really comes down to you.
Many people run a trunk version of Solr in production. Some never would.
Generally, bugs are fixed quickly, and trunk is pretty stable. The main
issue is index format changes and upgrades. If you use trunk you generally
have to be willing to reindex to upgrade. That's
I'm having trouble with edismax not working in one of my cores. I have
three cores up and running, including the demo in Solr 3.6 on Tomcat
7.0.27 on Java 1.6.
I can't get edismax to work on one of those cores, and it's configured
very similar to the demo, which does work. I have different
solr-user-subscribe solr-user-subscr...@lucene.apache.org
: Whenever I reply to an email to this list I got a failure notice (please see
below)
The message you just send is plain text, but according to this failure
your other message used HTML, so i would suggest checking your mail
settings and always sending plain text mails to the list.
It's
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Jonatan Fournier
jonatan.fourn...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a flag for: if document does not exist, create it for me?
Not currently, but it certainly makes sense.
The
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Jonatan Fournier
jonatan.fourn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Jonatan Fournier
jonatan.fourn...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a flag for: if document does not
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Jonatan Fournier
jonatan.fourn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Jonatan
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Jonatan Fournier
jonatan.fourn...@gmail.com wrote:
Yonik,
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Jonatan Fournier
jonatan.fourn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:05 AM,
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Jonatan Fournier
jonatan.fourn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Jonatan Fournier
jonatan.fourn...@gmail.com wrote:
But later on when I want to append cat3 to the field by doing this:
mv_f:{add:cat3},
...
I end up with something like this
I have an index with field collapsing defined like this:
lst name=default
str name=group.fieldSomeField/str
str
21 matches
Mail list logo
