Hi,
1. What is the impact , use of giving opensearcher as true
autoCommit
maxTime${solr.autoCommit.maxTime:15000}/maxTime
openSearchertrue/openSearcher
2. Giving the value as false , does this create index in the temp file
and then commit?
Regards,
Prasi
Hi
My solr 3.5.0 indexed by wikipedia dump with java 1.6 is working perfectly.
I run the solr server in my server CentOS release 5.7 (Final) and client
Ubuntu 11.04 which access the solr server in my local system. The problem
is that it is taking too much time. This problem does not arise when
Hi,
the TermVectorComponent allows me to retrieve data about the terms of a
document, including tf-idf. Is it possible to get this data for a text, but
without storing it in SOLR? As far as I figured out, the AnalysisComponent
comes close, but does not return the core specific frequencies.
Comments inline:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Prasi S prasi1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
1. What is the impact , use of giving opensearcher as true
autoCommit
maxTime${solr.autoCommit.maxTime:15000}/maxTime
openSearchertrue/openSearcher
From the Solr reference guide:
As you noted, sharing S's ResponseBuilder is not possible because once
the handler's process method is complete, the http action is deemed
complete and the pipe is broken. You cannot send the client any
further responses anymore.
One way to solve this problem is to maintain the state of the job
Thanks Jack,
but if my keyword search are two words? for example french fries ? how is
the right syntax?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/get-term-frequency-just-only-keywords-search-tp4084510p4085399.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at
Your _version_ does not match.
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Bruno René Santos brunor...@gmail.comwrote:
Using the document interface on the Solr admin i try to update the
following document:
{ responseHeader: { status: 0, QTime: 1, params: { indent:
true,
q: *:*, _: 1376064413493, wt:
Hi,
I have created a new index. So reindexing shouldnt be the issue.
Analysis page shows me correct result and match should be found as per the
analysis page.But no output on actual query
The Output of debug query is as follows
str name=rawquerystringcontent:speedPost/str
str
Hi Greg,
I am a colleague of Harald and had a look at his experiments last week.
You are right, unpacking a fresh Solr 4.4, feeding a small number of
documents (in my case 144) and trying to split the shard is not working.
I get the same error message (maxValue must be non-negative) that was
Funnily just today itself I was looking at Lux for searching through my xml
file. Now what I have inferred is that I need to format my xml to fit the
format of Solr. Now do I have to manually code it or do i have some kind of
parser on which the xml if fed is formatted to the Solr version? I
Well, the case of your parsedQuery field _name_ (i.e. content) does not
match
the case of your field definition, (i.e. Content). This may just be an
artifact
however.
That said, the MultiPhraseQuery is probably coming from your request
handler definition. Can we see that too?
Erick
On Mon, Aug
Hi Erik,
These are the request handlers defined in solrconfig.xml
requestHandler name=/analysis/field
class=solr.FieldAnalysisRequestHandler /
requestHandler name=standard class=solr.StandardRequestHandler
default=true /
requestHandler name=/update
Hi,
I've found an issue in displaying of Swap Space at Solr Admin page. When
swap page is not used, the admin page shows a NaN percent of usage. Since
used and total space are stored in double variables, the result of division
of the used space (0.0Mb) by the total space (0.0Mb) is NaN. Maybe
Hi,
I have setup solrcloud with 4.4 version. There is one external zookeeper
and two instances of solr ( Total 4 shards - 2 shards in each instance)
I was using dih to index from sql server. I twas indexing fine initially.
Later when i shutdown solr and zookeeper's and then restarted them, I get
Not sure of any solr specific tool but you can use jprofiler to see what is
causing delay under the hood.
Andy,
On Aug 19, 2013, at 3:08 AM, prabu palanisamy pr...@serendio.com wrote:
Hi
My solr 3.5.0 indexed by wikipedia dump with java 1.6 is working perfectly.
I run the solr server in
Hi,
Another observation while testing
Docs having the value for content field as below
1. content:speedPost
2. content:sPeedpost
3. content:speEdpost
4. content:speedposT
matches the query q=content:speedPost. So basically if in the entire word
there is one 1 letter that is camel cased then it
Hi;
I want to write an analyzer that will prevent some special words. For
example sentence to be indexed is:
diet follower
it will tokenize it as like that
token 1) diet
token 2) follower
token 3) diet follower
How can I do that with Solr?
You can look at this tool
http://sematext.com/spm/solr-performance-monitoring/
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Regarding-mointoring-the-solr-tp4085392p4085423.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
Last week we configured Solr master and slave set up. All the Solr search
requests are routed to slave. After this configuration, we are seeing
drastic performance problems with Solr.
Can any one explain what would be the reason?
And, how to disable optimizing the index, warming the
I am searching with a keyword and if that keyword is attached to a
negation(not, could not and etc) in the document that document should not be
matched.
For example I have a document text like I have not wheezed since I have
been taking Spiriva.
I am searching with a keyword wheeze should not
Hi,
I have a very standard use case of Spatial search. Was trying to figure out
how to do it in Solr, but couldn't figure out a standard way of doing it.
Please point me to any document which explains this use case or how this
specific use case can be implemented in Solr.
The Use case is:
There
Hi Vicky,
Please check you if you have a second multiValued field by the name
content defined in your schema.xml. It is typically part of the default
schema definition is different from the one you had initially posted had
Content with a capital C.
Here's the debugQuery on my system (with both
Hi Aloke,
I have multiple fields in my schema which are of type text. i tried the
same case on all the fields. Not working for me on any of them. If possible
for u can u please post your dummy solrconfig.xml and schema.xml. I can
replace them and check
--
View this message in context:
wheezed AND NOT not wheezed
or
+wheezed -not wheezed
perhaps?
Note: this assumes that you meant to search with the keyword wheezed and
not wheeze.
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 2:38 PM, venkatesham.gu...@igate.com
venkatesham.gu...@igate.com wrote:
I am searching with a keyword and if that
Here you go, it is the default 4.2.1 schema.xml (
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/tags/lucene_solr_4_2_1/solr/example/solr/solr.xml),
with the following additions:
!-- Added these fields --
field name=Content type=text_general indexed=true stored=true
multiValued=false/
field
Hi there,
is there a way to penalize a document's score for lacking a particular
term? It would be quite nice if I could add a negative term to the score,
which is proportional to the idf of a word that is not present in a given
field of that document.
Thanks for your time,
Rafael Calsaverini
Location of the schema.xml:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/tags/lucene_solr_4_2_1/solr/example/solr/collection1/conf/schema.xml
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Aloke Ghoshal alghos...@gmail.com wrote:
Here you go, it is the default 4.2.1 schema.xml (
Abhiroop, I'm cc-ing the lux mailing list since this thread might not be
of interest to all of solr-user; I'd suggest following up on that list.
But to answer your actual question: see the documentation here
http://luxdb.org/REST-API.html#LuxUpdateProcessor where it explains what
to do.
Your example doesn't prevent any keywords.
You need to elaborate the specific requirements with more detail.
Given a long stream of text, what tokenization do you expect in the index?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Furkan KAMACI
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 8:07 AM
To:
Solr has tools for lexical analysis of text, not deeper syntax and semantics
of text.
IOW, Solr supports keyword search, not natural language search.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: venkatesham.gu...@igate.com
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 8:38 AM
To:
Hi Aloke,
After taking the schema.xml and solrconfig.xml with the changes u mentioned
it worked fine. However simply making this changes in schema.xml doesnt
work. So seems like there is an issue in some configuration in
solrconfig.xml. I will figure that out and post it here.
Anyways thanks a
Generally, you shouldn't be trying to maintain, let alone share state in
Solr itself. It sounds like you need an application layer between your
application clients and Solr which could then maintain whatever state it
needs.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Peyman Faratin
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5173
On Aug 18, 2013, at 8:43 PM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote:
bq. I thought that when Steve moved it from the test module to the core, he
handled it so that it would not go out in the dist.
Mea culpa.
@Chris Collins, I think you're
french fries is a phrase, not a term or a keyword. It consists of two
terms or keywords, french and fries. They have to be treated separately.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: danielitos85
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 4:30 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re:
there isn't a way to get termFreq about a search like french fries
(sentence)?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/get-term-frequency-just-only-keywords-search-tp4084510p4085454.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
The Solr Terms Component will give you the terms in the index and the
document frequency of each.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/The+Terms+Component
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Domma, Achim
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 3:09 AM
To:
directoryFactory name=DirectoryFactory
class=${solr.directoryFactory:solr.NRTCachingDirectoryFactory}/
I commented out the lockType, so it should be using the default of native
according to the documentation.
There is nothing special about our file systems.
Thanks
--
You could penalize by boosting documents that have the term.
Can you give a concrete example? How dynamic is the absent words list?
Erik
On Aug 19, 2013, at 09:26 , Rafael Calsaverini wrote:
Hi there,
is there a way to penalize a document's score for lacking a particular
term?
Term frequency is about terms, nothing else.
So, by definition, a phrase or any other collection of terms does not have a
termfreq - in Lucene.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: danielitos85
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 9:59 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re:
ok I undestand it (thanks) but if I search a sentence and type
debugQuery=on, in the explain I obtain termFreq=2.0 and it right.
Is it possible to obtain that parameter?
--
View this message in context:
Let's assume that my sentence is that:
*Alice is a diet follower*
My special keyword = *diet follower*
Tokens will be:
Token 1) Alice
Token 2) is
Token 3) a
Token 4) diet
Token 5) follower
Token 6) *diet follower*
2013/8/19 Jack Krupansky j...@basetechnology.com
Your example doesn't
Okay, but what is it that you are trying to prevent??
And, diet follower is a phrase, not a keyword or term.
So, I'm still baffled as to what you are really trying to do. Trying
explaining it in plain English.
And given this same input, how would it be queried?
-- Jack Krupansky
Vladimir
Would you mind attaching the output of /solr/admin/system?wt=json ? The last
about 20 lines should be enough .. i'm only interested in the system key
which contains the memory informations. if that is completely missing .. or
literally 0?
- Stefan
On Monday, August 19, 2013 at
re: monitoring performance trends we use a free option which is lightweight and
works at collecting the general java stats info out of solr is using the sflow
agent for java. in concert with a host sflowd setup you can gather the jvm and
system stats in decently dense intervals (default is 30s)
This is an interesting topic - my employer is a medical library and there
are many keywords that may need to be aliased in various ways, and 2 or 3
word phrases that perhaps should be treated specially. Jack, can you give
me an example of how to do that sort of thing?Perhaps I need to buy
On 8/19/2013 11:10 AM, Boogie Shafer wrote:
the not often mentioned stats URL is another interface which you could scrape
for stats (although i just noticed this url doesnt seem to work in my 4.4.0
test environment (it does work on the 4.2.1 hosts) so something may have
changed, or my 4.4 env
My solr index has a field called author_geo which contains the author's
location, and when I am trying to get all docs whose author are within 10
km of 35.0,35.0 using the following query.
curl '
BTW: my schema.xml contains the following related lines.
fieldType name=location class=solr.LatLonType
subFieldSuffix=_coordinate/
field name=author_geo type=location indexed=true stored=true/
dynamicField name=*_coordinate type=tdouble indexed=true
stored=false/
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 2:02
thanks for that.
that URL with the corename explicity called out seems to work correctly on both
4.4 (using the new style config for solr.xml) and 4.2.1 (using the old style
config.xml)
From: Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org
Sent: Monday, August 19,
Hey All,
If you don't specify numShards at the start, then you can do custom
hashing, because Solr will just write the document to whatever shard you
send it to.
However, when I don't specify numshards, I'm having trouble creating more
than one shard. It makes one shard and the others I add are
Not until you tell us a lot more about your symptoms. What are your
replication intervals? autowarm settings? how are you measuring
drastic reductions? What have you tried in terms of diagnosing
the problem?
Please review:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists
Best
Erick
On Mon, Aug
I think you can do this by a combination of standard function queries,
see: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery#if
and geodist, see:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpatialSearch#geodist_-_The_distance_function
WARNING: I haven't tried this myself, but it seems like it would work. The
trick is
There are a series of functions that can deal with _some_ relevance data,
see:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery#Relevance_Functions
Best
Erick
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:25 AM, danielitos85 danydany@gmail.comwrote:
ok I undestand it (thanks) but if I search a sentence and type
: Let's talk about the real use case. We are marketplace that sells
: products that users have listed. For certain popular, high risk or
: restricted keywords we charge the seller an extra fee/ban the listing.
: We now have sellers purposely misspelling their listings to circumvent
: this fee.
Right, you can't just tell Solr to create a single shard (i.e. by not
specifying numshards) then expect to be able to do anything
except index to a single shard. All the nodes will be replicas
of the single shard. From there it really doesn't matter what you do,
the documents will be routed to all
The Lucene PhraseQuery goes through a lot of effort to calculate phrase
frequency (phraseFreq) - but that is not the same as term frequency (don't
confuse terms and phrases). Feel free to pick that number out of the
debugQuery output, or from the XML variant of the explain output.
For
I have a field which consists of a store name.
How can I make sure that these queries return relevant results when
searched against this column:
*Example1: Best Buy*
q=best (tokenizer filter makes this work)
q=bestbuy
q=buy (tokenizer filter makes this work)
q=best buy (lower case filter makes
Hello:
I want to get final search result sorted by (0.2*relervance score + 0.8*
specified_numberic_field) .
I have known that if I use “bf”in edismax (e.g. bf=field(value)), I can get a
result sorted by(relervance sore + field(value)) ,but I don`t know how to
Implement the result sorted
Edismax applies the multiplicative boost (boost) after applying the
additive boost functions (bf).
I think (0.2*relervance score + 0.8* specified_numberic_field) should be
equivalent to:
0.2*(relevance score + (0.8/0.2)* specified_numeric_field)
or
0.2*(relevance score + 4.0*
Thank you very much!
Then could you tell me how to implement
relervance_score*numberic_field/(relervance_score + numberic_field) ? I think
it's better to sort by harmmean
-- Original --
From: Jack Krupanskyj...@basetechnology.com;
Date: Tue, Aug 20, 2013
This is a known limitation. From CHANGES.txt:
* SOLR-2345: Enhanced geodist() to work with an RPT field, provided that the
field is referenced via 'sfield' and the query point is constant.
(David Smiley)
The reason why that limitation is there relates to the fact that the
function query
Thank goodness for Solr's feature of echo'ing params back in the response as
it helps diagnose problems like this. In your case, the filter query that
Solr is seeing isn't what you (seemed) to have given on the command line:
fq:!geofilt sfield=author_geo
Clearly wrong. Try escaping the braces
Shishir,
Use the location_rpt type and index circles of the business and the distance
they serve with this syntax: field name=myfieldNameCircle(lat,lon
d=degreesRadius)/field
Your query shape is then simply a point; use bbox query parser with d=0.
This approach should scale *great* at query
63 matches
Mail list logo
