Hi,
I have tried to deploy solr.war from building it from 4.7.2 but it is
showing the below mentioned error. Has anyone faced the same? any lead
would also be appreciated.
Error Message:
{
responseHeader: {
status: 500,
QTime: 33
},
error: {
msg: parsing error,
trace:
Hi there,
I have come accross a problem that when using managed schema in SolrCloud,
adding fields into schema would SOMETIMES end up prompting Can't find
resource 'schema.xml' in classpath or '/configs/collectionName',
cwd=/export/solr/solr-5.1.0/server, there is of course no schema.xml in
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for the detailed explanation.
My understanding is also similar to you that we should not provide limit
over the shard for number of documents that it can index. Usually it will
depend on shard routing provided by Solr and I am not expecting any change
to document routing
Hi guys,
was thinking to the clustering and the integration of the clustering search
component in an existing request handler.
I am talking about Online clustering ( the clustering of search results).
Once you configure the search component with the engine definition,
clustering will happen
Hello,
I’m trying to import data using a read only account to an Oracle database.
My data-config.xml is:
dataConfig
dataSource name=jdbc driver=oracle.jdbc.OracleDriver
url=jdbc:oracle:oci8:@//localhost:10010:CONNECTION
user=ATLAS_PANDABIGMON_R
password=Lutini72
Thank you Erick. I'm sorry I did not mention this earlier, but I am still on
Solr 4.10.3. Once I upgrade to Solr 5.0+ , I would consider your suggestion
in your blog post.
O. O.
Erick Erickson wrote
Uh, you mean because I forgot to pate in the URL? Siih...
Anyway, the URL is irrelevant
: Right now, I specify the boost for my request handler as:
: requestHandler name=/select class=solr.SearchHandler
: .
: str name=boostln(qty)/str
:
: /requestHandler
:
: Is there a way to specify this boost in the Solrconfig.xml?
:
: I tried: str name=boost(*:*
Our current production index size is 1.5 TB with 3 shards. Currently we
have the following field type:
fieldType name=text_ngram class=solr.TextField
positionIncrementGap=100
analyzer type=query
tokenizer class=solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory/
filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/
/analyzer
Our current production index size is 1.5 TB with 3 shards. Currently we
have the following field type:
fieldType name=text_ngram class=solr.TextField
positionIncrementGap=100
analyzer type=query
tokenizer class=solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory/
filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/
/analyzer
On 5/7/2015 11:59 AM, Siarhei Padolski wrote:
I’m trying to import data using a read only account to an Oracle database.
My data-config.xml is:
dataConfig
dataSource name=jdbc driver=oracle.jdbc.OracleDriver
url=jdbc:oracle:oci8:@//localhost:10010:CONNECTION
Hi ,
I am getting below exception while running ant compile command.
[ivy:retrieve] ERROR: impossible to acquire lock for
net.sourceforge.nekohtml#nekohtml;1.9.17
[ivy:retrieve] tried
C:\Users\ani\.ivy2\local\net.sourceforge.nekohtml\nekohtml\1.9.17\ivys\ivy.xml
[ivy:retrieve]
Upon occasion I've had to purge my ivy cache. On a Mac just 'rm -rf
~/.ivy2/cache'
brute force and you'll download a lot of jars when you compile, but
simple to test.
Erick
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Aniket Kumar 008aniketku...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi ,
I am getting below exception while
Hi Yonik,
I am reading your blog. It is helpful. One question for you, for following
example,
curl http://localhost:8983/solr/query -d 'q=*:*rows=0
json.facet={
categories:{
type : terms,
field : cat,
sort : { x : desc},
facet:{
x : avg(price),
y :
Thanks Shawn.
Just to make the picture more clear, I'm trying to understand why a 3 node
solrcloud cluster and a old style solr server take same time to index same
documents.
But in the wiki is written:
If the machine is a leader, SolrCloud determines which shard the document
should go to,
that should be fine. In fact, the current trunk (eventual 6.0)
_requires_ Java 8.
Best,
Erick
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Vincenzo D'Amore v.dam...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
may be this is a silly question, but just to be sure: is there any
contraindication to run solrcloud with Java 8?
Thanks for your reply, I was under the impression that clusterstate.json and
aliases.json are the two files that the zookeeper maintains.
Did not know that schema.xml is also maintained by zookeeper.Yes I am
running solrCloud.
should I use the zookeeper client to re-upload?
--
View this
Not sure I understand your problem. If you have 20m documents, and 8
shards, then each shard is (broadly speaking) only going to have 2.5m docs
each, so I don't follow the 5m limit? That is with the default
routing/hashing, obviously you can write your own hash algorithm or you can
shard at your
Thanks Erick. I'm not sure I got your answer.
I try to recap, when the raw document has to be indexed, it will be
forwarded to shard leader. Shard leader indexes the document for that
shard, and then forwards the indexed document to any replicas.
I want just be sure that when the raw document is
Hi !
Currently Solr builds FST to provide proper fuzzy search or spellcheck
suggestions based on the string distance .
The current default algorithm is the Levenstein distance ( that returns the
number of edit as distance metric).
In your case you should calculate client side, the edit you want to
Thank you for the information.
I've currently using the fuzzy search and set the edit distance value to
~0.79, and this has allowed a 20% error rate. (ie for words with 5
characters, it allows 1 mis-spelled character, and for words with 10
characters, it allows 2 mis-speed characters).
However,
response inline.
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Shawn Heisey apa...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 5/7/2015 3:43 AM, Rahul Singh wrote:
I have tried to deploy solr.war from building it from 4.7.2 but it is
showing the below mentioned error. Has anyone faced the same? any lead
would also be
On May 6, 2015, at 8:25 PM, Yonik Seeley ysee...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote:
It’s by design that you can copyField the same source/dest multiple times -
according to Yonik (not sure where this was discussed), this capability has
On 5/7/2015 3:43 AM, Rahul Singh wrote:
I have tried to deploy solr.war from building it from 4.7.2 but it is
showing the below mentioned error. Has anyone faced the same? any lead
would also be appreciated.
Error Message:
{
responseHeader: {
status: 500,
QTime: 33
},
bq: We will not be able to limit the documents per shard in Solr
Cloud. As Solr will accept all the documents as long as space is there
for it to index.
True, end of story ;).
How does Solr know it will run out of space? It hits an exception,
there's really no this doesn't look like it will fit
Thanks Steve and Yonik. This now makes sense. Updating the doc will be of
a big help.
With regards to deleting a copy-field, what I found is that if I have N
instances of the same copy-field, I have to issue N deletes to remove them
all. This behavior matches with the add and need to be kept.
This one does not have problem, but how do I include sort in this facet
query. Basically, I want to write a solr query which can sort the facet
count ascending. Something like http://localhost:8983/solr
/demo/query?q=applejson.facet={field=price sort='count asc'}
Is there any book to read so I won't ask such dummy questions? Thanks.
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Frank li fudon...@gmail.com wrote:
This one does not have problem, but how do I include sort in this facet
query. Basically, I want to write a solr query which can sort the facet
count
On 5/7/2015 3:51 PM, pras.venkatesh wrote:
I am trying to enable Doc Values for certain fields in Solr schema which
helps with memory management while sorting the results and here is
configuration I have
field name=ip_addr type=string indexed=true stored=true
omitNorms=true docValues=true /
On 5/7/2015 11:03 AM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
When I browse to /solr I see a link that points me to /solr/admin. And when
I click on that link is when I see the error:
*missing core name in path*
I think what my problem is, is that I am not listing the cores correctly in
the solr.xml file.
bq: ...forwards the index notation to itself and any replicas...
That's just odd phrasing.
All that means is that the document sent through the indexing process
on the leader and all followers for a shard and
is indexed independently on each.
This is as opposed to the old master/slave situation
I am trying to enable Doc Values for certain fields in Solr schema which
helps with memory management while sorting the results and here is
configuration I have
field name=ip_addr type=string indexed=true stored=true
omitNorms=true docValues=true /
And field type defined this way.
fieldType
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Frank li fudon...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Yonik,
I am reading your blog. It is helpful. One question for you, for following
example,
curl http://localhost:8983/solr/query -d 'q=*:*rows=0
json.facet={
categories:{
type : terms,
field : cat,
Hi all,
may be this is a silly question, but just to be sure: is there any
contraindication to run solrcloud with Java 8?
Thanks for your patience,
Vincenzo
--
Vincenzo D'Amore
email: v.dam...@gmail.com
skype: free.dev
mobile: +39 349 8513251
On 5/7/2015 4:36 PM, Vincenzo D'Amore wrote:
may be this is a silly question, but just to be sure: is there any
contraindication to run solrcloud with Java 8?
Solr 4.8 should work very well running on Java 8. I would recommend the
latest Java 8 from Oracle, version 8u45. There are supposed to
Good to know that its working as expected.
I have some couple of question on your autosuggest implementation.
I see that you are using SpellcheckComponent instead of SuggestComponent
are you using this intentionally if not plz read this
On 5/7/2015 9:24 AM, Aki Balogh wrote:
I'm seeing the following error while indexing:
May 06, 2015 10:52:32 PM org.apache.jk.common.MsgAjp processHeader
SEVERE: BAD packet signature 18245
May 06, 2015 10:52:32 PM org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket
processConnection
SEVERE: Error, processing
When working with Suggesters I suggest to take a deep look to this guide :
http://lucidworks.com/blog/solr-suggester/
It was really helpful.
Cheers
2015-05-07 16:58 GMT+01:00 Rajesh Hazari rajeshhaz...@gmail.com:
Good to know that its working as expected.
I have some couple of question on
Anyone has any inputs on this?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/getting-frequent-CorruptIndexException-and-inconsistent-data-though-core-is-active-tp4204129p4204347.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thank you Erick. I have no clue what you are referring to when you used to
word this? Are you referring to my question in my original email/message?
Erick Erickson wrote
Have you seen this? I tried to make something end-to-end with assorted
gotchas identified
Best,
Erick
--
Hello,
I'm seeing the following error while indexing:
May 06, 2015 10:52:32 PM org.apache.jk.common.MsgAjp processHeader
SEVERE: BAD packet signature 18245
May 06, 2015 10:52:32 PM org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket
processConnection
SEVERE: Error, processing connection
Wait a minute, guys... aren't we in the 21st century, where disk is
ultra-cheap and ultra plentiful? So... what's the REAL problem here?
Seriously, when multi-terabyte drives are so common on servers and Solr
really doesn't work well with more than 100 to 250 million docs per server
anyway, which
A leader is also a replica - SolrCloud is not a master/slave architecture.
Any replica can be elected to be the leader, but that is only temporary and
can change over time.
You can place multiple shards on a single node, but was that really your
intention?
Generally, number of nodes equals
Thank you Rajesh for your persistence. I now got it to work. In my original
email/message, I mentioned that I use 'text_general' as defined in the
examples:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/dev/trunk/solr/example/example-DIH/solr/db/conf/schema.xml?view=markup
I'm sorry I did not mention this
Hi
I have a cluster of 16 shards, 3 replicas.
I keep getting situations where a whole shard breaks.
the leader is at down state and says:
I was asked to wait on state recovering for shard but i still do not see
the requested state. I see state: recovering live:true leader from
ZK:http://...
Uh, you mean because I forgot to pate in the URL? Siih...
Anyway, the URL is irrelevant now that you've solved your problem, but
in case you're interested:
http://lucidworks.com/blog/solr-suggester/
Sorry for the confusion.
Erick
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Alessandro Benedetti
Jilani, you did say My team needs that option if at all possible, my
first response would be why?. Why do they want to limit the number of
documents per shard, what's the rationale/use case behind that
requirement? Once we understand that, we can explain why its a bad idea. :)
I suspect I'm
Hi Shawn,
The URL must include the core name. Your defaultCoreName is
collection1, and I'm guessing you don't have a core named collection1.
Try browsing to just /solr instead of /solr/admin ... you should get a
list of links for valid cores, each of which will take you to the admin
page
On 5/7/2015 3:04 AM, Vincenzo D'Amore wrote:
Thanks Erick. I'm not sure I got your answer.
I try to recap, when the raw document has to be indexed, it will be
forwarded to shard leader. Shard leader indexes the document for that
shard, and then forwards the indexed document to any replicas.
Thank you Rajesh, Alessandro and Erick. I apparently did not have much
knowledge about the Suggester - in fact I had no clue that there is a
difference between the SpellcheckComponent and the SuggestComponent.
I would be reading about this, esp. Erick blog post on Lucidworks.
O. O.
Rajesh
49 matches
Mail list logo