Thanks Eric
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 10:28 PM Erick Erickson
wrote:
> Complex phrase also has an inorder flag that I think you're looking for
> here.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 7:16 AM, Erik Hatcher
> wrote:
> > Understood.
I am using following one:
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/5_4_1/solr-core/org/apache/solr/search/join/ScoreJoinQParserPlugin.html
q={!join from=id to=id fromIndex=B}id:*
2017-06-12 20:05 GMT-07:00 Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo :
> What is the query that you used to do the Join?
>
>
What is the query that you used to do the Join?
There is the Streaming expression which has the various Join function, but
it requires Solr version 6 onward.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Streaming+Expressions
Regards,
Edwin
On 13 June 2017 at 05:25, Ray Niu
I managed to miss that. Thanks very much. I have some very large documents. I
will look at index size and look at posting instead.
-Original Message-
From: David Smiley [mailto:david.w.smi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 12 June 2017 2:40 p.m.
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re:
Hi:
We encounter an issue when using join query in Solr Cloud, our version
is 5.5.2. We will query collection A and join with Collection B in the
runtime, collection A and B always co-exist in the same node.
Sometimes we found collection B was down for some reason, while
collection A was
Should i make stored=false? don't i need _version_ for the mvcc semantics?
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 10:41 AM Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> just replying to some comments/discussion in general rather then
> individual msgs/sentences..
>
> * uninversion/FieldCache of
Thanks a lot Joel! No wonder I could not find it :-). I will try to see if
this will work for us.
Rohit
-Original Message-
From: Joel Bernstein [mailto:joels...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 1:01 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Parallel API interface into
Thank you for your response. I will look into this link. Also, sorry I did
not specify the file type. I am working with XML files.
~~~
William Kevin Miller
ECS Federal, Inc.
USPS/MTSC
(405) 573-2158
-Original Message-
From: Alexandre Rafalovitch
suggestAnalyzerFieldType and queryAnalyzerFieldType are related to the field
parameter (in my case property_value), not to the contextField. Moreover, the
change you suggest makes AnalyzingInfixLookupFactory always return 0 results
(something that’s not discussed in the reference guide and has
Solr 6.5.1 DIH setup has - somewhat broken - RSS example (redone as
ATOM example in 6.6) that shows how to get stuff from https URL. You
can see the atom example here:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/releases/lucene-solr/6.6.0/solr/example/example-DIH/solr/atom/conf/atom-data-config.xml
Thank you for your response. That is the issue that I am having. I cannot
figure out how to get the list of files from the remote server. I have tried
changing the parent Entity Processor to the XPathEntityProcessor and the
baseDir to a url using https. This did not work as it was looking
Change below type to string and try...
text_en
text_en
Thanks,
Susheel
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Alfonso Muñoz-Pomer Fuentes <
amu...@ebi.ac.uk> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was wondering if anybody has experience setting up a suggester with
> filtering using a context field that has
You can do what you're trying to do by using the SolrStream but it's
complex and not documented. Here is the basic code for having multiple
clients hitting the same shard:
*On client 1:*
SolrClientCache cache = new SolrClientCache();
StreamContext context = new StreamContext();
How do you get a list of URLs for the files on the remote server? That's
probably the first issue. Once you have the URLs in an outside entity or
two, you can feed them one by one into the inner entity.
Regards,
Alex.
http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and
Hi all,
I was wondering if anybody has experience setting up a suggester with filtering
using a context field that has blanks. Currently this is what I have in
solr_config.xml:
AnalyzingInfixLookupFactory
DocumentDictionaryFactory
species
text_en
text_en
false
Erick,
I think so, although I may have overlooked something. The idea is that we
would make a request to the API from a single client but expect multiple
streams of results to be returned in parallel to multiple parallel processes
that we have set up to receive those results from SOLR. Do
Complex phrase also has an inorder flag that I think you're looking for here.
Best,
Erick
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 7:16 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> Understood. If you need ordered, “sloppy” (some distance) phrases, you
> could OR in a {!complexphrase} query.
>
>
Have you looked at Streaming Aggregation/Streaming Expressions/Parallel SQL etc?
Best,
Erick
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Rohit Jain wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> We have a solution where we would like to connect to SOLR via an API, submit
> a query, and then pre-process the
just replying to some comments/discussion in general rather then
individual msgs/sentences..
* uninversion/FieldCache of *singlevalued* Points fields was fixed in SOLR-10472
* currently a bad idea to use indexed="true" Points for _version_ due to
SOLR-10832
* AFAICT it's a good idea (in
Thanks for the suggestions Erik and Vrindavda,
i was trying to understand how does the above query work when we have slop
set to 10. the debug output of the SOLR Query gave the terms which were
being looked up but the transpositions done to look up the search wasn't
exposed.
i found following
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 12:24 PM, Shawn Feldman wrote:
> Why do you need doc values though? i'm never going to sort by version
Solr needs a quick lookup from docid->_version_
If you don't have docValues, Solr tries to create an in-memory version
(via the FieldCache).
Why do you need doc values though? i'm never going to sort by version
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 10:13 AM Yonik Seeley wrote:
> I think the _version_ field should be
> - indexed="false"
> - stored="false"
> - docValues="true"
>
> -Yonik
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 12:08
Hi folks,
We have a solution where we would like to connect to SOLR via an API, submit a
query, and then pre-process the results before we return the results to our
users. However, in some cases, it is possible that the results being returned
by SOLR, in a large distributed cluster
I think the _version_ field should be
- indexed="false"
- stored="false"
- docValues="true"
-Yonik
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Shawn Feldman wrote:
> I changed all my TrieLong Fields to Point fields. _version_ always returns
> an error unless i turn on
logged this ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10872
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 10:08 AM Shawn Feldman
wrote:
> I changed all my TrieLong Fields to Point fields. _version_ always
> returns an error unless i turn on docvalues
>
>
>
>
> Getting this
I changed all my TrieLong Fields to Point fields. _version_ always returns
an error unless i turn on docvalues
Getting this error when i index. Any ideas?
Remote error message: Point fields can't use FieldCache. Use
docValues=true for field: _version_
solr2_1|at
Understood. If you need ordered, “sloppy” (some distance) phrases, you could
OR in a {!complexphrase} query.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Other+Parsers#OtherParsers-ComplexPhraseQueryParser
Yes Erik I can use ps=0 but, my problem is that I want phrase which have
same sequence and they can be present with in some distance
E.g.
If I have document masitha xyz 12345
I want that to be boosted since the sequence is in order .That's why I have
use ps=5
Thanks,
Aman Deep Singh
On
I am using Solr 6.5.1 and working on importing xml files using the
DataImportHandler. I am wanting to get the files from a remote server, but I
am dealing with multiple xml files in multiple folders. I am using a nested
entity in my dataConfig. Below is an example of how I have my dataConfig
Using ps=5 causes the phrase matching to be unordered matching. You’ll have
to set ps=0, if using edismax, to get exact order phrase matches.
Erik
> On Jun 12, 2017, at 1:09 AM, Aman Deep Singh
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I'm using a phrase query ,but it was
Adding =true to your search requests will give you the parsing details,
so you can see how edismax interprets the query string and parameters to turn
it into the underlying dismax and phrase queries.
Erik
> On Jun 12, 2017, at 3:22 AM, abhi Abhishek wrote:
>
> Hi
hi you can refer : http://yonik.com/solr/query-syntax/
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Proximity-Search-using-edismax-parser-tp4340115p4340133.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi All,
How does proximity Query work in SOLR.
Example if i am running a query like below, for the field containing the
text “India registered a historical test match win against the arch rival
Pakistan here in Lords, England on Sunday”
Query: “Test match India Pakistan” ~ 10
Hi,
I found that this edismax query works.
http://localhost:8983/solr/collection1/select?defType=edismax=*test* AND
field1_tc:"Main"* =field1_s field2_s field3_s field4_s
Regards,
Edwin
On 12 June 2017 at 11:20, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo wrote:
> Hi Ravi,
>
> Thanks for your
34 matches
Mail list logo