I need to gather all the children of docid 1 . Root item has parent as null.
(Sample data below)
Tried as below
nodes(graphtest,
walk="1->parent",
gather="docid",
scatter="branches, leaves")
Response :
{
"result-set": {
"docs": [
{
"node": "1",
You can certainly replicate the joined collection to every shard. It must fit
in one shard and a replica of that shard must be co-located with every replica
of the “to” collection.
Have you looked at streaming and “streaming expressions"? It does not have the
same problem, although it does
Hi
I have several large collections that cannot fit in a standalone solr
instance. They are split over multiple shards in solr-cloud mode.
Those collections are supposed to be joined to an other collection to
retrieve subset. Because I am using distributed collections, I am not
able to use the
Hi
I am looking for a way to faster the update of documents.
In my context, the update replaces one of the many existing indexed
fields, and keep the others as is.
Right now, I am building the whole document, and replacing the existing
one by id.
I am wondering if **atomic update feature**
Hi Solr Users,
We are using Solr 7.2.1 with 2 nodes (245GB RAM each) and 3 node ZK cluster
in production. We are using Java 8 with default GC settings (with
NewRatio=3) with 15GB heap, changed to 16 GB after the performance issue
mentioned below.
We have about 90 collections in this (~8 shards
If this is about a normalized query, I would put the normalization text
into a specific field. The reason for this is you may want to search the
overall text during any form of expansion phase of searching for data.
That is, maybe you want to know the context of up to the 120th word. At
least
Is the 100 words a hard boundary or a soft one?
If it is a hard one (always 100 words), the easiest is probably copy
field and in the (unstored) copy, trim off whatever you don't want to
search. Possibly using regular expressions. Of course, "what's a word"
is an important question here.
Hi Oleksandr,
Thanks very much for help. Yes that jira looks like exactly our problem.
I'll give that a go tomorrow.
Cheers,
Peter.
-Original Message-
From: Oleksandr Drapushko [mailto:drapus...@gmail.com]
Sent: 15 October 2019 19:52
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL]
Hi,
curl -XPOST -H 'Content-Type: application/json'
'http://localhost:8983/solr/ggg/update' --data-binary '{
"add" : { "doc" : { "id" : "a", "docid" : "1", "name" : "Root document one" } },
"add" : { "doc" : { "id" : "b", "docid" : "2", "name" : "Root document two" } },
"add" : { "doc" : {
Hello Adi,
There is no SpanLastQuery or equivalent. But you could reverse the text and use
SpanFirstQuery. Or, perhaps easier, add a bogus term to the end of the field
and use PhraseQuery.
Regards,
Markus
-Original message-
> From:Kaminski, Adi
> Sent: Tuesday 15th October 2019
Hi Peter,
This bug was introduced in Solr 7.7.0. It is related to Java 8. And it was
fixed in Solr 7.7.2.
Here are the ways to deal with it:
1. Upgrade to Solr 7.7.2
2. Patch your Solr 7.7
3. Use Java 9+
You can read more on this here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13349
Regards,
Hi Shawn,
I included the wrong file for solr4 and did not realize until you pointed
out the heap size. The correct file that is setting the Java environment
is "Solr 4 tomcat setenv" I have uploaded that to the shared folder along
with the requested screenshots "Solr 4 top screenshot","Solr 6 top
We have a solr cloud on v7.7.0 and we observe very high cpu usage when we're
indexing new documents.
The solr cloud in question has 50 shards and 2 replicas of each and we're using
NRT. Obviously indexing takes some resources but we see pretty much 100% cpu
usage when we're indexing documents
Hello Community,
I've discovered data loss bug and couldn't find any mention of it. Please
confirm this bug haven't been reported yet.
Description:
If you try to update non pre-analyzed fields in a document using atomic
updates, data in pre-analyzed fields (if there is any) will be lost. The
We keep all essential user documentation (and some dev docs) in the Ref Guide.
The source for the Ref Guide is checked-in under solr/solr-ref-guide, it uses a
simple ASCII markup so adding some content should be easy. You should follow
the same workflow as with the code (create a JIRA, and then
I was once “Chris Erickson”, but infra straightened it out.
> On Oct 15, 2019, at 11:59 AM, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON)
> wrote:
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> Sorry to hear you're experiencing log-in difficulties. I've opened
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-19280 for this,
Hi Richard,
Sorry to hear you're experiencing log-in difficulties. I've opened
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-19280 for this, hopefully it can be
read without logging in.
Regards,
Christine
From: solr-user@lucene.apache.org At: 10/15/19 16:31:36To:
solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Many thanks both for your responses, they've been helpful.
@Andrzej - Sorry I wasn't clear on the "A latency of 1mil" as I wasn't
aware the image wouldn't come through. But following your bullet points
helped me present a better unit for measurement in the axis.
In regards to contributing, would
Hey,
Sorry if this is the wrong group, I tried to email us...@infra.apache.org a
few weeks ago but haven't heard anything.
I am unable to log into my account, with it saying my password is
incorrect. But what is more odd is my name on the account has changed from
Richard Goodman to Alex Goodman.
Also check ,
pf , pf2 , pf3
ps , ps2, ps3 parameters for phrase searches.
Regards,
Rohan K
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 6:41 AM Audrey Lorberfeld -
audrey.lorberf...@ibm.com wrote:
> I'm not sure how your config file is setup, but I know that the way we do
> multi-token synonyms is to have the sow
Hello Shawn, thanks for reply. The results that come back are correct, but are
we implementing the query correctly to filter by a selected facet? When I say
wrong, it's more about the design/use of Facets in the Query. Is it proper to
do fq=Tags:Retirement? Is using a Multivalued field correct
Hello,
I am having a bit of a problem with Wildcard queries and I don't know how
to pin it down yet. I have a suspect, but I kind find an error in it, one
of the filters in the respective search field.
The problem is that when I do a wildcard query:
title:todesmä*
it does return a result, but it
I'm not sure how your config file is setup, but I know that the way we do
multi-token synonyms is to have the sow (split on whitespace) parameter set to
False while using the edismax parser. I'm not sure if this would work with
PhraseQueries , but it might be worth a try!
In our config file
On 10/15/2019 2:49 AM, Vassil Velichkov (Sensika) wrote:
I've reduced the JVM heap on one of the shards to 20GB and then simulated some
heavy load to reproduce the issue in a faster way.
The solr.log ROOT was set to TRACE level, but I can't really see anything meaningful, the
solr.log ends @
Hi kshitij
Thanks for the reply!
I tried to debug it and found that raw query(black company) has parsed as
two separate queries
black and company and returning the results based on black query instead of
this it should have
got parsed as a single phrase query like("black company") because i am
On 10/15/2019 12:42 AM, vikas shinde wrote:
Dear Solr team,
Which is the latest Tomcat version that supports the latest Solr version
8.2.0?
Also provide details about previous Solr versions & their compatible Tomcat
versions.
Dominique is correct. We do not officially support running under
On 10/14/2019 3:25 PM, Moyer, Brett wrote:
Hello, looking for some advice, I have the suspicion we are doing Facets all wrong. We
host financial information and recently "tagged" our pages with appropriate
Facets. We have built a Flat design. Are we going at it the wrong way?
In Solr we have
Hi,
Solr is not tested with Tomcat since version 4.
Why not using the embedded Jetty server ?
Regards
Dominique
Le mar. 15 oct. 2019 à 10:44, vikas shinde a écrit :
> Dear Solr team,
>
> Which is the latest Tomcat version that supports the latest Solr version
> 8.2.0?
>
> Also provide
On 10/14/2019 1:36 PM, Russell Bahr wrote:
Backend replacement of solr4 and hopefully Frontend replacement as well.
solr-spec 8.1.1
lucene-spec 8.1.1
Runtime Oracle Corporation OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 12 12+33
1 collection 6 shards 5 replicas per shard 17,919,889 current documents (35
days
Hi Markus,
Thanks for the guidance.
Is there any official Solr documentation for that ? Tried some googling, only
some Stackoverflow / Lucene posts are available.
Also, will that approach work for the other use case of searching from end of
documents ?
For example if I need to perform some
Hi Shawn,
I've reduced the JVM heap on one of the shards to 20GB and then simulated some
heavy load to reproduce the issue in a faster way.
The solr.log ROOT was set to TRACE level, but I can't really see anything
meaningful, the solr.log ends @ 07:31:40.352 GMT, while the GC log shows later
Dear Solr team,
Which is the latest Tomcat version that supports the latest Solr version
8.2.0?
Also provide details about previous Solr versions & their compatible Tomcat
versions.
Thanks & Regards.
Vikas Shinde.
Hi,
Try debugging your solr query and understand how it gets parsed. Try using
"debug=true" for the same
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 12:58 PM Shubham Goswami
wrote:
> *Hi all,*
>
> I am a beginner to solr framework and I am trying to implement
> *autoGeneratePhraseQueries* property in a fieldtype
Hello Adi,
Try SpanFirstQuery. It limits the search to within the Nth term in the field.
Regards,
Markus
-Original message-
> From:Kaminski, Adi
> Sent: Tuesday 15th October 2019 8:25
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Position search
>
> Hi,
> What's the recommended way
*Hi all,*
I am a beginner to solr framework and I am trying to implement
*autoGeneratePhraseQueries* property in a fieldtype of type=text_general, i
kept the property value as true and restarted the solr server but still it
is not taking my two words query like(Black company) as a phrase without
Hi,
What's the recommended way to search in Solr (assuming 8.2 is used) for
specific terms/phrases/expressions while limiting the search from position
perspective.
For example to search only in the first/last 100 words of the document ?
Is there any built-in functionality for that ?
Thanks in
36 matches
Mail list logo
