Re: How to accelerate your Solr-Lucene appication by 4x

A Rowe sar...@syr.edu wrote: Why Jason, I declare, whatever do you mean? -Original Message- From: Jason Rutherglen [mailto:jason.rutherg...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 8:29 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: How to accelerate your Solr-Lucene appication

Re: soft commit

*Laugh* I stand by what Mark said: Right - in most NRT cases (very frequent soft commits), the cache should probably be disabled. On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote: On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Jason Rutherglen jason.rutherg...@gmail.com wrote

Re: soft commit

multi-select faceting Yikes. I'd love to see a test showing that un-inverted field cache (which is for ALL segments as a single unit) can be used efficiently with NRT / soft commit. On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 4:36 PM,

Re: soft commit

The main point is, Solr unlike for example Elastic Search and other Lucene based systems does NOT cache filters or facets per-segment. This is a fundamental design flaw. On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Erik Hatcher

Re: soft commit

Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Jason Rutherglen jason.rutherg...@gmail.com wrote: Yikes.  I'd love to see a test showing that un-inverted field cache (which is for ALL segments as a single unit) can be used efficiently with NRT / soft commit. Please

Re: soft commit

It still normally makes sense to have the caches enabled (esp filter and document caches). In the NRT case that statement is completely incorrect On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote: On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com

Re: Core overhead

Wow the shameless plugging of product (footer) has hit a new low Otis. On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Otis Gospodnetic otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi Yury, Not sure if this was already covered in this thread, but with N smaller cores on a single N-CPU-core box you could run N queries

Re: Core overhead

that will help you solve your problem.  That is responsive to the OP and it is clear that it is a commercial deal. On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Jason Rutherglen jason.rutherg...@gmail.com wrote: Wow the shameless plugging of product (footer) has hit a new low Otis. On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 7

Re: Core overhead

Ted, The list would be unreadable if everyone spammed at the bottom their email like Otis'. It's just bad form. Jason On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote: Sounds like we disagree. On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Jason Rutherglen jason.rutherg

Re: server down caused by complex query

CATALINA_OPTS=$CATALINA_OPTS -Dfile.encoding=utf-8 export CATALINA_OPTS=$CATALINA_OPTS -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC == Thanks Jason -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/server-down-caused-by-complex-query

performance of json vs xml?

I'm thinking about modifying my index process to use json because all my docs are originally in json anyway . Are there any performance issues if I insert json docs instead of xml docs? A colleague recommended to me to stay with xml because solr is highly optimized for xml.

How to set default query operator in surround query parser?

Hi, all I'm using surround query parser. The request A B returns ParseException. But A OR B returns correct results. I think this is the problem of default query operator. Anyone know how to set? Thanks, Jason -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-set

Re: How to set default query operator in surround query parser?

Oh. That's bad to me. Thanks anyway. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-set-default-query-operator-in-surround-query-parser-tp3570034p3570088.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

how to implement per doc weighting

I've been reading the solr source code and made modifications by implementing a custom Similarity class. I want to implement a weight to the score by multiplying a number based on if the current doc has certain term in it. So if the query was q=data_text:foo then the Similiarity class would

Re: joins and filter queries effecting scoring

that contains all user documents that are active. This docset is used as filter during the execution of the main query (q param), so it only returns posts with the contain the text hello for active users. Martijn On 28 October 2011 01:57, Jason Toy jason...@gmail.com wrote: Does anyone have

is there a way using 1.4 index at 4.0 trunk?

Hello, I'm using solr 1.4 version. I want to use some plugin in trunk version. But I got IndexFormatTooOldException when it run old version index at trunk. Is there a way using 1.4 index at 4.0 trunk? Thanks, Jason -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com

appling SurroundQParserPlugin

Hi all Is it possible to use SurroundQParserPlugin in Solr 1.4.0? if so, how shoud I do it? Thank in advance Jason -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/appling-SurroundQParserPlugin-tp3540283p3540283.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive

server down caused by complex query

.) After that, server is like down. We also have old version's k2 engine. But k2 is not down for same query. k2 uses more i/o than memory. Could we control solr memory usage? Or is there any other solution? (we are using solr1.4) Thanks in advance. Jason -- View this message in context: http

getting lots of errors doing bulk insertion

I've written a script that does bulk insertion from my database, it grabs chunks of 500 docs (out of 100 million ) and inserts them into solr over http. I have 5 threads that are inserting from a queue. After each insert I issue a commit. Every 20 or so inserts I get this error message: Error:

abort processing query

Jason -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/abort-processing-query-tp3495876p3495876.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: overwrite=false support with SolrJ client

It should be supported in SolrJ, I'm surprised it's been lopped out. Bulk indexing is extremely common. On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Ken Krugler kkrugler_li...@transpac.com wrote: Hi list, I'm working on improving the performance of the Solr scheme for Cascading. This supports generating

Re: Replicating Large Indexes

Thanks Robert. We optimize less frequently than we used to. Down to twice a month from once a day. Without optimizing the search speed stays the same, however the index size increases to 70+ GB. Perhaps there is a different way to restrict disk usage. Thanks, Jason Robert Stewart bstewart

RE: Replicating Large Indexes

Thanks Erick, Will take a look at this article. Cheers, Jason -Original Message- From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 8:05 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Replicating Large Indexes Yes, that's expected behavior. When

Replicating Large Indexes

:8080/solr/update?optimize=truemaxSegments=1waitFlush=trueexpungeDeletes=true' Willing to share our experiences with Solr. Thanks, Jason

Re: large scale indexing issues / single threaded bottleneck

We should maybe try to fix this in 3.x too? +1 I suggested it should be backported a while back. Or that Lucene 4.x should be released. I'm not sure what is holding up Lucene 4.x at this point, bulk postings is only needed useful for PFOR. On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Simon Willnauer

Re: large scale indexing issues / single threaded bottleneck

it will be 6 months before 4.0 ships, that's too long. Also it is an amusing contradiction that your argument flies in the face of Lucid shipping 4.x today without said functionality. On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Jason Rutherglen

Re: large scale indexing issues / single threaded bottleneck

abstract away the encoding of the index Robert, this is what you wrote. Abstract away the encoding of the index means pluggable, otherwise it's not abstract and / or it's a flawed design. Sounds like it's the latter.

Re: Limit by score? sort by other field

I have a similar problem except I need to filter scores that are too high. Robert Stewart bstewart...@gmail.com 於 Oct 27, 2011 7:04 AM 寫道： BTW, this would be good standard feature for SOLR, as I've run into this requirement more than once. On Oct 27, 2011, at 9:49 AM,

Re: joins and filter queries effecting scoring

Does anyone have any idea on this issue? On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Jason Toy jason...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Yonik, Without a Join I would normally query user docs with: q=data_text:testfq=is_active_boolean:true With joining users with posts, I get no no results: q={!join from

exact matches are not filtered to the top

, the exact matches are not filtered to the top. This should be a simple use case, anyone can suggest when goes wrong ? Thanks, Jason

Re: joins and filter queries effecting scoring

, but with the ability to join with the Posts docs. On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.comwrote: Can you give an example of the request (URL) you are sending to Solr? -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Jason Toy jason...@gmail.com

joins and filter queries effecting scoring

I have 2 types of docs, users and posts. I want to view all the docs that belong to certain users by joining posts and users together. I have to filter the users with a filter query of is_active_boolean:true so that the score is not effected,but since I do a join, I have to move the filter query

Re: How to make UnInvertedField faster?

Sweet + Very cool! On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 7:50 AM, Simon Willnauer simon.willna...@googlemail.com wrote: In trunk we have a feature called IndexDocValues which basically creates the uninverted structure at index time. You can then simply suck that into memory or even access it on disk

Re: Question about near query order

Which one is better performance of setting inOrder=false in solrconfig.xml and quering with A B~1 AND B A~1 if performance differences? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Question-about-near-query-order-tp3427312p3437701.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing

Re: Question about near query order

Thank you for your kind reply. Is it possible only defType=lucnee in your second suggestion? I'm using ComplexPhraseQueryParser. So my defType is complexphrase. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Question-about-near-query-order-tp3427312p3431465.html Sent from

Re: Question about near query order

Thanks a ton iorixxx. Jason. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Question-about-near-query-order-tp3427312p3432922.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Question about near query order

analyze term~2 term analyze~2 In my case, two queries return different result set. Isn't that in your case? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Question-about-near-query-order-tp3427312p3429916.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Question about near query order

Hi, all I have some near query like analyze term~2. That is matched in that order. But I want to search regardless of order. So far, I just queried analyze term~2 OR term analyze~2. Is there a better way than what i did? Thanks in advance. Jason. -- View this message in context: http://lucene

Phrase search error

search or WordDelimiterFilterFactory options just set catenateAll=1, no problems. But If WordDelimiterFilterFactory options set like below 'My Schema.xml', occured error. How can I solve this problem? Give me any idea. Thanks in advance. Jason [Error Message

Re: Phrase search error

Hi, Ludovic That's just what I'm looking for. You're been a big help. Thank you so much. Jason. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Phrase-search-error-tp3423799p3423916.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

composite Unique Keys?

I have several different document types that I store. I use a serialized integer that is unique to the document type. If I use id as the uniqueKey, then there is a possibility to have colliding docs on the id, what would be the best way to have a unique id given I am storing my unique identifier

I think I've found a bug with filter queries and joins

I'm testing out the join functionality on the svn revision 1175424. I've found when I add a single filter query to a join it works fine, but when I do more then 1 filter query, the query does not return results. This single function query with a join returns results:

Re: dismax with AND/OR combination

Can dismax understand that query in a translated form? 在 Sep 29, 2011 10:01 PM 時，yingshou guo guoyings...@gmail.com 寫到： you cann't use this kind of query syntax against dismax query parser. your query can by understood by standard query parser or edismax query parser. qt request parameter is

resource to see which versions build from trunk?

Hi all, I am testing various versions of solr from trunk, I am finding that often times the example doesn't build and I can't test out the version. Is there a resource that shows which versions build correctly so that we can test it out?

what are the disdvantages of using dynamic fields?

? Jason

Re: OOM errors and -XX:OnOutOfMemoryError flag not working on solr?

time or other times, hence why I was thinking that maybe solr is doing something different. My script notifies me of the memory exception and then restarts the jvm. Running the script manually works fine. I'll try to do some more testing to see what exactly is going on. Jason On Wed, Sep 21

how to perform joins with function queries?

I had a join query that was originally written as : {!join from=self_id_i to=user_id_i}data_text:hello and that works fine. I later added an fq filter: {!frange l=0.05 }div(termfreq(data_text,'hello'),max_i) and the query doesn't work anymore. if I do the fq by itself without the join the query

OOM errors and -XX:OnOutOfMemoryError flag not working on solr?

I have solr issues where I keep running out of memory. I am working on solving the memory issues (this will take a long time), but in the meantime, I'm trying to be notified when the error occurs. I saw with the jvm I can pass the -XX:OnOutOfMemoryError= flag and pass a script to run. Every time

Re: how would I use the new join feature given my schema.

Anyone know the query I would do to get the join to work? I'm unable to get it to work. On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Jason Toy jason...@gmail.com wrote: I've been reading the information on the new join feature and am not quite sure how I would use it given my schema structure. I have

how would I use the new join feature given my schema.

is the description/fieldfield name=title_textthis is a cool title/field/field/doc /add?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?commit/ Is it possible to do this with the join functionality? If not, how would I do this? I'd appreciate any pointers or help on this. Jason

using a function query with OR and spaces?

I had queries breaking on me when there were spaces in the text I was searching for. Originally I had : fq=state_s:New York and that would break, I found a work around by using: fq={!raw f=state_s}New York My problem now is doing this with an OR query, this is what I have now, but it doesn't

Re: using a function query with OR and spaces?

I wrote the title wrong, its a filter query, not a function query, thanks for the correction. The field is a string, I had tried fq=stats_s:New York before and that did not work, I'm puzzled to why this didn't work. I tried out your b suggestion and that worked,thanks! On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at

Re: How to plug a new ANTLR grammar

I'd love to see the progress on this. On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Roman Chyla roman.ch...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, The standard lucene/solr parsing is nice but not really flexible. I saw questions and discussion about ANTLR, but unfortunately never a working grammar, so... maybe you find

syntax for functions used in the fq parameter

I'm trying to limit my data to only docs that have the word 'foo' appear at least once. I am trying to use: fq=termfreqdata,'foo'):[1+TO+*] but I get the syntax error: Caused by: org.apache.lucene.queryparser.classic.ParseException: Encountered : : at line 1, column 33. Was expecting one of:

automatically dealing with out of memory exceptions

After running a combination of different queries, my solr server eventually is unable to complete certain requests because it runs out of memory, which means I need to restart the server as its basically useless with some queries working and not others. I am moving to distributed setting soon,

solr keeps dying every few hours.

I have a large ec2 instance(7.5 gb ram), it dies every few hours with out of heap memory issues. I started upping the min memory required, currently I use -Xms3072M . I insert about 50k docs an hour and I currently have about 65 million docs with about 10 fields each. Is this already too much

Re: solr keeps dying every few hours.

. -Original Message- From: Jason Toy [mailto:jason...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 5:15 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: solr keeps dying every few hours. I have a large ec2 instance(7.5 gb ram), it dies every few hours with out of heap memory issues. I

Re: solr keeps dying every few hours.

I've only set set minimum memory and have not set maximum memory. I'm doing more investigation and I see that I have 100+ dynamic fields for my documents, not the 10 fields I quoted earlier. I also sort against those dynamic fields often, I'm reading that this potentially uses a lot of memory.

Re: solr keeps dying every few hours.

What can I do temporarily in this situation? It seems like I must eventually move to a distributed setup. I am sorting on dynamic float fields. On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.comwrote: On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Jason Toy jason...@gmail.com wrote

is it possible to do a sort without query?

I am trying to list some data based on a function I run , specifically termfreq(post_text,'indie music') and I am unable to do it without passing in data to the q paramater. Is it possible to get a sorted list without searching for any terms?

bug in termfreq? was Re: is it possible to do a sort without query?

/8/8 Jason Toy jason...@gmail.com I am trying to list some data based on a function I run , specifically termfreq(post_text,'indie music') and I am unable to do it without passing in data to the q paramater. Is it possible to get a sorted list without searching for any terms

Re: bug in termfreq? was Re: is it possible to do a sort without query?

your index size and number of unique terms. On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Alexei Martchenko ale...@superdownloads.com.br wrote: You can use the standard query parser and pass q=*:* 2011/8/8 Jason Toy jason...@gmail.com I am trying to list some data based

Re: bug in termfreq? was Re: is it possible to do a sort without query?

choices effect what is possible at query time. Lucene In Action is a pretty good book. On 8/8/2011 5:02 PM, Jason Toy wrote: Are not Dismax queries able to search for phrases using the default index(which is what I am using?) If I can already do phrase searches, I don't understand

getting result count only

How can I run a query to get the result count only? I only need the count and so I dont need solr to send me all the results back.

dealing with so many different sorting options

As I'm using solr more and more, I'm finding that I need to do searches and then order by new criteria. So I am constantly add new fields into solr and then reindexing everything. I want to know if adding in all this data into solr is the normal way to deal with sorting. I'm finding that I

problem searching on non standard characters

How does one search for words with characters like # and +. I have tried searching solr with #test and \#test but all my results always come up with test and not #test. Is this some kind of configuration option I need to set in solr? -- - sent from my mobile 6176064373

saving timestamps in trunk broken?

In Solr 1.3.1 I am able to store timestamps in my docs so that I query them. In trunk when I try to store a doc with a timestamp I get a sever error, is there a different way I should store this data or is this a bug? Jul 22, 2011 7:20:14 PM org.apache.solr.update.processor.LogUpdateProcessor

Re: saving timestamps in trunk broken?

I haven't modified my schema in the older solr or trunk solr,is it required to modify my schema to support timestamps? On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Chris Hostetter hossman_luc...@fucit.orgwrote: : In Solr 1.3.1 I am able to store timestamps in my docs so that I query them. : : In trunk

Re: saving timestamps in trunk broken?

=solr.DateField sortMissingLast=true omitNorms=true/ On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Jason Toy jason...@gmail.com wrote: I haven't modified my schema in the older solr or trunk solr,is it required to modify my schema to support timestamps? On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Chris Hostetter

Re: saving timestamps in trunk broken?

Hi Chris, you were correct, the filed was getting set as a double. Thanks for the help. On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Jason Toy jason...@gmail.com wrote: This is the document I am posting: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?adddocfield name=idPost 75004824785129473/fieldfield name=typePost

Re: I found a sorting bug in solr/lucene

According to that bug list, there are other characters that break the sorting function. Is there a list of safe characters I can use as a delimiter? On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Chris Hostetter hossman_luc...@fucit.orgwrote: : When I try to sort by a column with a colon in it like :

I found a sorting bug in solr/lucene

Hi all, I found a bug that exists in the 3.1 and in trunk, but not in 1.4.1 When I try to sort by a column with a colon in it like scores:rails_f, solr has cutoff the column name from the colon forward so scores:rails_f becomes scores To test, I inserted this doc: In 1.4.1 I was able to

Re: I found a sorting bug in solr/lucene

actually prohibited, but that could be your problem. Nick On 7/18/2011 8:10 AM, Jason Toy wrote: Hi all, I found a bug that exists in the 3.1 and in trunk, but not in 1.4.1 When I try to sort by a column with a colon in it like scores:rails_f, solr has cutoff the column name from

searching for google+

How does one search for the term google+ with solr? I noticed on twitter I can search for google+: http://search.twitter.com/search?q=google%2B (which uses lucene, not sure about solr) but searching on my copy of solr, I can't search for google+ -- - sent from my mobile 6176064373

how to improve query result time.

Hi All I have complex phrase queries including wildcard. (ex. q=conn* pho*~2 OR inter* pho*~2 OR ...) That takes long query result time. I tried reindex after changing termIndexInterval to 8 for reduce the query result time through more loading term index info. I thought if I do so query result

SolrDocumentList in Distributed search

Hi All I have 5 shards. (sh01 ~ sh05) I was debugging using solrJ. When I quiried at each shard, results are right. But when I quiried at all shards, elementData of SolrDocumentList is null. But numFound of SolrDocumentList is right. How can I get the SolrDocumentList in shards? Thanks in Advance

sorting by termfreq on trunk doesn't work?

I am trying to use sorting by the termfreq function using the trunk code since termfreq was added in the 4.0 code base. I run this query: http://127.0.0.1:8983/solr/select/?q=librariansort=termfreq(all_lists_text,librarian)%20desc but I get: HTTP ERROR 500 Problem accessing /solr/select/.

Re: why too many open files?

Hi, Mark I think FileNotFoundException will be worked around by raise the ulimit. I just want to know why segments are created more than mergeFactor. During the googling, I found contents concerning mergeFactor: http://web.archiveorange.com/archive/v/bH0vUQzfYcdtZoocG2C9 Yonik wrote: mergeFactor

example doesnt run from source?

I'm trying to run the example app from the svn source, but it doesn't seem to work. I am able to run : java -jar start.jar and Jetty starts with: INFO::Started SocketConnector@0.0.0.0:8983 But then when I go to my browser and go to this address: http://localhost:8983/solr/ I get a 404 error.

why too many open files?

Hi, All I have 12 shards and ramBufferSizeMB=512, mergeFactor=5. But solr raise java.io.FileNotFoundException (Too many open files). mergeFactor is just 5. How can this happen? Below is segments of some shard. That is too many segments over mergFactor. What's wrong and How should I set the

disable sort by score

Hi, All I want to get the search result which is not sorted by anything. Sorting by score take more time. So, I want to disable sorting by score. How can i do this? Thanks, Jason. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/disable-sort-by-score-tp3057767p3057767.html

Re: disable sort by score

) ++ I tried to check perfomance using _docid_ asc. But _docid_ didn't work in distributed search. So I made inquiries to know that another method is. Best Jason -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/disable-sort-by-score

can't determine sort order?

I am trying to use sorting by function on solr 3.2 and it doesn't now workt with termfreq. I do this query: /solr/select?q=testqf=all_lists_textdefType=dismaxsort=termfreq%28all_lists_text%2Ctest%29+descrows=50 I get this error: Can't determine Sort Order: 'termfreq(description_text,'test')

Re: how can I return function results in my query?

Ahmet, that doesnt return the idf data in my results, unless I am doing something wrong. When you run any function you get the results of the function back? Can you show me an example query you run ? //http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery#idf On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Jason Toy

Re: how can I return function results in my query?

Markus, Thanks for this info, I'll use debugQuery to test for now. It seems strange that I can't have arbitrary function results returned with my data. Is this an obstacle on the lucene or solr side? Jason On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 5:59 AM, Markus Jelsma markus.jel...@openindex.iowrote: Ah

how can I return function results in my query?

I want to be able to run a query like idf(text, 'term') and have that data returned with my search results. I've searched the docs,but I'm unable to find how to do it. Is this possible and how can I do that ?

found a bug in query parser upgrading from 1.4.1 to 3.1

. For that reason I believe the bug is in solr and not in lucene. Jason Toy socmetrics http://socmetrics.com @jtoy

Re: Solr vs ElasticSearch

Thanks Shashi, this is oddly coincidental with another issue being put into Solr (SOLR-2193) to help solve some of the NRT issues, the timing is impeccable. At a base however Solr uses Lucene, as does ES. I think the main advantage of ES is the auto-sharding etc. I think it uses a gossip

Re: Solr vs ElasticSearch

-0700, Jason Rutherglen jason.rutherg...@gmail.com wrote: Mark, Nice email address.  I personally have no idea, maybe ask Shay Banon to post an answer?  I think it's possible to make Solr more elastic, eg, it's currently difficult to make it move cores between servers without a lot of manual

Re: Solr vs ElasticSearch

And some way to delete the core when it has been transferred. Right, I manually added that to CoreAdminHandler. I opened an issue to try to solve this problem: SOLR-2569 On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 8:26 AM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote: On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 07:52 -0700, Jason Rutherglen

Re: Solr vs ElasticSearch

Jonathan, This is all true, however it ends up being hacky (this is from experience) and the core on the source needs to be deleted. Feel free to post to the issue. Jason On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote: On 6/1/2011 10:52 AM, Jason Rutherglen wrote

Re: Solr vs ElasticSearch

Mark, Nice email address. I personally have no idea, maybe ask Shay Banon to post an answer? I think it's possible to make Solr more elastic, eg, it's currently difficult to make it move cores between servers without a lot of manual labor. Jason On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Mark

how to work cache and improve performance phrase query included wildcard

million full text index. That is running 10 shards on 1 tomcat. Thanks, Jason -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/how-to-work-cache-and-improve-performance-phrase-query-included-wildcard-tp2956671p2956671.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive

RE: *:* query with dismax

/6/2011 7:34 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: *:* query with dismax it does seem a little weird, but q.alt will get what you want: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DisMaxQParserPlugin#q.alt hth, rc On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Jason Chaffee jchaf...@ebates.com wrote: Can you

*:* query with dismax

have any clues? Thanks, Jason

RE: *:* query with dismax

to use *:* when the query is empty, so that you can still get back a full result set if you need it, say for faceting. HTH Mark On May 7, 2011 9:22 AM, Jason Chaffee jchaf...@ebates.com wrote: I am using dismax and trying to use q=*:* to return all indexed documents. However, it is always returning 0

Re: Can the Suggester be updated incrementally?

Good question, you could be correct about that. It's possible that part hasn't been built yet? If not then you could create a patch? On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Andy angelf...@yahoo.com wrote: --- On Fri, 4/29/11, Jason Rutherglen jason.rutherg...@gmail.com wrote: It's answered

Re: Can the Suggester be updated incrementally?

It's answered on the wiki site: TSTLookup - ternary tree based representation, capable of immediate data structure updates Although the EdgeNGram technique is probably more widely adopted, eg, it's closer to what Google has implemented.

Re: Search across related/correlated multivalue fields in Solr

Renaud, Can you provide a brief synopsis of how your system works? Jason On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Renaud Delbru renaud.del...@deri.org wrote: Hi, you might want to look at the SIREn plugin [1,2], which allows you to index and query 1:N relationships such as yours, in a tabular data

Re: Updates during Optimize

You can index and optimize at the same time. The current limitation or pause is when the ram buffer is flushing to disk, however that's changing with the DocumentsWriterPerThread implementation, eg, LUCENE-2324. On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 8:34 AM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote: On 4/12/2011

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >