I don't think there is a substring or similar function. This would be quite
nice to add along with other string manipulations.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 2:37 AM Aroop Ganguly
wrote:
> Hey Team
>
>
> Is there a way to extract a part of a
I'm not sure why /stream is exporting faster then /export. It may be that
the different approaches in the client are the reason for the difference.
But the /export handler would be used in both scenarios if you specify
qt=/export in the search() Streaming Expression.
Joel Bernstein
http
Your use case is somewhat special in that it involves 10 fields. With that
many nested facets the JSON facet API may or may not outperform streaming
rollups. For most other cases JSON facet API will outperform rollups.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 11:21
This sounds like a bug, please log a ticket.
I think the workaround you suggest is the only way to solve this problem
currently.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 11:28 AM Kojo wrote:
> I think that you can use stream evaluators in your expressi
I believe the NOT should be working. But the joins won't work correctly.
Apache Calcite, which is parsing the query, is attempting to do the joins
but there are no test cases with joins at all. The official docs should say
that joins are not supported.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com
Joins are not currently supported with Solr SQL. We should create a ticket
through a proper exception in this scenario.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 10:56 PM deniz wrote:
> found out sth strange regarding this case. If i change one of the val
high I mean millions of facet
values are being returned in the same query.
2) Rollups following any kind of relational algebra. For example a rollup
on top of a hashJoin.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 8:54 AM RAUNAK AGRAWAL
wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
>
not the best choice. You'll want to read through the various streaming
expressions to see if they might be more efficient for your use case.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 12:05 PM Kamal Kishore Aggarwal <
kkroyal@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
&g
Interesting, I had not heard of MMR.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 10:43 AM Tim Allison wrote:
> If you haven’t already, might want to check out maximal marginal
> relevance...original paper: Carbonell and Goldstein.
>
> On Thu, Sep 27, 201
parallelism
and scaling. We hope to have this ready for Solr 8, which is just around
the corner.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 2:52 PM RAUNAK AGRAWAL
wrote:
> Thanks a lot Toki. I will get back to you soon regarding patch update after
>
Yeah, I think your plan sounds fine.
Do you have a specific use case for diversity of results. I've been
wondering if diversity of results would provide better perceived relevance.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 1:39 PM Diego Ceccarelli (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON
Please post the Streaming Expression that you are using.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 6:52 PM RAUNAK AGRAWAL
wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Just to give you context, we were using JSON Facets for doing analytical
> queries in solr but they were slow
If you have: true
Then you will get errors with the export handler.
After you set this to false do the errors go away?
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 6:40 PM Gaini Rajeshwar <
raja.rajeshwar2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is it anyway related to the
Ok, that stack trace shows where the problem. I'll investigate and report
back.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 4:01 PM Gaini Rajeshwar <
raja.rajeshwar2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> @Joel: On some of the shards, i am seeing the following erro
The export handler does not do distributed search. So if you have a
multi-shard collection you may have to use Streaming Expressions to get
exports from all shards.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 4:32 AM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yes, you c
if there are errors on the shards?
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 12:10 PM Gaini Rajeshwar <
raja.rajeshwar2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Also, to mention, if i give q="*:*" it is working fine (which is kind of
> weird)
>
> On Thu, Sep 27, 201
Streaming expression only returns JSON. That simplified many aspects of the
implementation.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 12:05 PM Dariusz Wojtas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am working with SOLR 7.4.0 and use streaming expressions.
> This
I've thought about this problem a little bit. What I was considering was
using Kmeans clustering to cluster the top 50 docs, then pulling the top
scoring doc form each cluster as the top documents. This should be fast and
effective at getting diversity.
Joel Bernstein
http
I'll have to take a look and see if I can reproduce this exact behavior.
Let's create a jira ticket so we can track the discussion.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 1:03 PM Kojo wrote:
> Same query feeding 25000 tuples to gatherNodes:
>
> ga
I see that the hits=0 in this log request. Are there log requests that show
results found for one of these queries?
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 10:15 AM Kojo wrote:
> I have just run this expression:
>
>
> gatherNodes(graph_auxilios
That's odd behavior. What do the logs look like? This will produce a series
of queries against the projects collection. Are you seeing those in the
logs? Any errors?
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 9:25 AM Kojo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If I try to feed ga
Solr Streaming Expressions allow you to do this with the cartesianProduct
function:
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_4/stream-decorator-reference.html#cartesianproduct
The structure of the expression is:
cartesianProduct(search(...))
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu
I found the ticket you created and commented on it. I'll work on this today.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 9:04 AM Joel Bernstein wrote:
> Ok, I'll create a ticket for this, it's a very quick fix. I'll try to
> commit today.
>
> Joel Bern
Ok, I'll create a ticket for this, it's a very quick fix. I'll try to
commit today.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 6:52 AM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12749
>
> --
> Jan Høydahl, search soluti
in the latest versions.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 8:58 AM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Hi
>
> We have a timeseries expression with gap="+1DAY" and a sum(imps_l) to
> aggregate sums of an integer for each bucket.
> Now, some day buckets do
Currently Streaming Expressions only work with Solr Cloud. This is because
Streaming Expressions were designed to use Solr Cloud features for all
distributed capabilites of the language.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 1:59 AM, David '-1' Schmid wrote
The export handler doesn't allow sorting by score at this time. It only
supports sorting on fields. So the edismax qparser won't cxcurrently work
with the export handler.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 5:52 PM, Tom Burton-West wrote:
> Hello all,
>
This may be the issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11501
If it turns out that this causing the problem, please create a jira. It's
important to discuss how SOLR-11501 is affecting real deployments.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 12:30 PM
Hi,
Currently the nodes expression doesn't have this capability. Feel free to
make a feature request on jira. This sounds like a fairly easy feature to
add.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 5:21 PM, Heidi McClure <
heidi.mccl...@polarisalpha.com>
Currently the gatherNodes expression can only be filtered by a traditional
filter query. I'm curious about the type of expression you are thinking of
filtering by?
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 1:54 PM, Pratik Patel wrote:
> We can limit the sc
with the results. Things have evolved quite a bit since then and having the
search expression respect the rows parameter is something that I've been
meaning to add. Feel free to create a ticket for this.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 1:35 PM, Alfonso Muñoz-Pomer
Let's move the discussion to the jira ticket.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 3:42 AM, Christian Spitzlay <
christian.spitz...@biologis.com> wrote:
>
>
> > Am 18.06.2018 um 15:30 schrieb Joel Bernstein :
> >
> > You
capabilities we will need to add joins to Solr's parallel SQL. Solr already
uses Apache Calcite, which has a join optimizer, so mainly this would
involve hooking up the various Streaming Expression joins.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 6:37 PM, Aroop Ganguly
the operation would work.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 8:04 AM, Christian Spitzlay <
christian.spitz...@biologis.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had come across the reduce function in the docs but
> I have a hard time getting it to work; I haven't found
and I will work on the issue.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 2:40 PM, Dariusz Wojtas wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to use streaming expressions with SOLR 7.3.1.
> I have successfully used innerJoin, leftOuterJoin and several other
> function
Actually you're second example is probably a straight forward:
reduce(select(...), group(...), by="k1")
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 7:33 PM, Joel Bernstein wrote:
> Take a look at the reduce() function. You'll have to write a custom reduc
in the solrconfig.xml and use
it like any other function. If you're interested in working on this you
could create a ticket and I can provide guidance.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
2018-06-14 13:13 GMT-04:00 Christian Spitzlay <
christian.spitz...@biologis.com>:
. The
select hander does not have this code.
In general you never want to use the select handler and set the rows to
such a big number. If you have that many rows you'll want to use the export
and handler which is designed to export the entire result set.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com
.
This may be an approach that Solr could adopt.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 8:10 AM, Jan Høydahl wrote:
> You could fetch the data from your application directly :;)
> Also, the Streaming expressions has a jdbc() function but then you will
> need to
Can your provide some example expressions that are causing these exceptions?
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 9:02 AM, Christian Spitzlay <
christian.spitz...@biologis.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am seeing a lot of (reproducible) exceptions in m
yes, I was going to suggest that as well.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 9:20 AM, Christian Spitzlay <
christian.spitz...@biologis.com> wrote:
> As a temporary workaround until that issue is fixed
> one could wrap the right stream with a select
uot;fieldA"
)
I suspect that there are only test cases that cover this scenario as well.
I'll create a jira issue for this.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 3:41 AM, Christian Spitzlay <
christian.spitz...@biologis.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
s are being transposed with intersect
function's "on" fields. The same issue was happening with joins and may
have been resolved. I'll do little more research into this.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 9:29 AM, Christian Spitzlay <
christian.spitz
Ah. I'll do some testing to see exactly how nodes function behaves when a
node links to itself.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 5:06 AM, Christian Spitzlay <
christian.spitz...@biologis.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> > Am 07.06.2018 um 03:20 s
Nice example!
I'll take a look at this today. I believe there was/is a bug with the some
of the joins where the "on" parameter is transposing the fields. Its
possible that is the case here as well.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 5:34 AM, Christia
random walk analysis? I've been meaning to add a
function that supports random walks on a graph that would not do cycle
detection.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 9:25 AM, Christian Spitzlay <
christian.spitz...@biologis.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
sort="id asc")
So it appears that the main issue is with the double quotes. This because
double quotes breaks the syntax of streaming expressions so it needed
special handling. That special handling breaks the ability to search on
double quotes as a character.
SOLR-10894 only appears to
test_s:\"hello world", fl="id", sort="id desc")
In this case the double quote is used as part of the term, which is what I
believe you had in mind.
SOLR-10894, I believe was created to address this issue but as of yet no
patch is available.
Joel Bernstein
http
ere I believe SOLR-10894 comes into play.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 11:23 AM, Christian Spitzlay <
christian.spitz...@biologis.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I’m experimenting with streaming expressions and I wonder how to escape a
> dou
which has not yet been resolved:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10894
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 11:23 AM, Christian Spitzlay <
christian.spitz...@biologis.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I’m experimenting with streaming expressio
. This might not yet be documented.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 9:11 AM, Jan Høydahl <jan@cominvent.com> wrote:
> describe() returns a tuple.
>
> I’d like to assign the value of “mean” from that tuple to a separate
> variable for use in
It sounds like the JSON facet API could do what you are describing. I
haven't tried the exclusion of the collapse filter with the JSON facet API
but I suspect it will work.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 3:40 AM, Carl-Johan Syrén <carl-johan.sy...@slu
would need to write an expression that performed the push. For example the
expression you stored in Solr to be executed could be something like:
push(topic(...))
You would provide the logic for the push expression.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 11:33 AM
this matrix much
smaller.
Its fairly easy to make the train function work on a random sample of the
training set on each iteration rather then the entire training set, but
currently this is not how its implemented. Feel free to create a ticket
requesting this the sampling approach.
Joel Bernstein
http
It looks like it accessing a replica that's down. Are the logs from
http://vesta:9100/solr/MODEL1024_1522696624083_shard20_replica_n75 reporting
any issues? When you go to that url is it back up and running?
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 3:55 PM, Joe
Solr 7.3 has very sophisticated math capabilities described below:
https://github.com/joel-bernstein/lucene-solr/blob/math_expressions_documentation/solr/solr-ref-guide/src/math-expressions.adoc
This is the userguide for math expressions which didn't make the 7.3
release but all the functions
Also what is the use case? What do you plan to do with terms? There may be
other approaches that will work better then the terms query.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 9:28 AM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> We need a lot more in
g a linear regression on two fields, X and Y, in a hitlist, we need to
> do a linear regression on field X, and the average value of X. Is that
> possible? To pass in a function to the regress function instead of a field?
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 10:41 PM, Joel Berns
I've been working on the user guide for the math expressions. Here is the
page on regression:
https://github.com/joel-bernstein/lucene-solr/blob/math_expressions_documentation/solr/solr-ref-guide/src/regression.adoc
This page is part of the larger math expression documentation. The TOC is
here
_days_production", sort="id
asc"),
b=col(a, oil_first_90_days_production),
c=col(a, oil_last_30_days_production),
d=regress(b, c),
e=someExpression())
The echo parameter tells the let expression which variables to output.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Mar
I suspect you've got nulls in your data. I just tested with null values and
got the same error. For testing purposes try loading the data with default
values of zero.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 10:12 PM, Joel Bernstein <joels...@gmail.com>
il_first_90_days_production))
This should return variables a and b. Let's see what the data looks like. I
changed the rows from 15 to 15000. If it all looks good we can expand the
rows and continue adding functions.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 4:11 PM,
The field type will also need to be in the schema:
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 8:00 PM, Joel Bernstein <joels...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You'll need to have this field in your schema:
>
>
>
> I'll check to see if the default schema
multiple. I'll create ticket for
getting this fixed.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 4:55 PM, John Smith <localde...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Joel, thanks for the pointers to the streaming feature. I had no idea solr
> had that (and also just discove
d other attributes of the
regression model such as R (correlation), slope, y intercept etc...
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 3:10 PM, John Smith <localde...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Joel, thanks for the answer. I'm not really a stats guy, but the
Typically SSE is the sum of the squared errors of the prediction in a
regression analysis. The stats component doesn't perform regression,
although it might be a nice feature.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 12:17 PM, John Smith <localde...@gmail.com>
, which doesn't require full export or a specific sort order.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 5:54 AM, Gintautas Sulskus <
gintautas.suls...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to apply another search to a streaming expression result
in the cluster.
The parallel SQL interface supports a map_reduce aggregation mode where you
can specific then number of parallel workers. If a SQL group by query works
for you that might be the easiest way to go. The docs have good coverage of
this topic.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com
handler which can also sort data sets with very high cardinality.
The docs should describe the correct usage of the rollup expression with
the /export handler.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:10 AM, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote:
> On 2/
I forgot to mention, in order to do a join you would merge the streams
together that you wanted to join. Then reduce by the join key.
This is basic structure:
reduce(merge(search(), search()))
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 10:45 PM, Joel Bernstein <jo
t;a_s",
group(sort="a_f desc", n="4")
)
The is a basic map/reduce grouping operation.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 6:24 PM, GaneshSe <ganeshmail...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Any help solr streaming expression option i
Currently grouping on the Date field is not supported with SQL interface.
At Alfresco we've added a time series capability to Solr's SQL engine and
plan on contributing it back.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 3:10 PM, Jorge Carlos Guedert Junior <
jorge.
array into tuples and
fetch using the ancestors node IDs.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 5:20 AM, Gintautas Sulskus <
gintautas.suls...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Joel,
>
> Thanks. The alternatives will not be as neat, unfortunately.
>
>
Currently you can only directly gather nodes and aggregations. The fetch()
expression can be used to fetch more fields if needed in a secondary call.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 3:12 PM, Gintautas Sulskus <
gintautas.suls...@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, you can nest decorators. The expression in your email should be
possible, its just a matter of getting all the syntax right. I would build
up the expression one piece at a time and make sure each layer is working
before moving on to the next.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com
CloudSolrClient determines which shard each document is going to in
advance. It then separates the documents based on the route and uses a
thread for each group to send the documents.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 11:09 AM, Steve Pruitt <bpru...@opentext.
Your welcome
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:00 AM, Antelmo Aguilar <aagui...@nd.edu> wrote:
> Hi Joel,
>
> Thank you! Changing the class from SearchHandler to ExportHandler worked.
> I appreciate you looking into it.
>
> -An
ortHandler",
"useParams":"_EXPORT",
"components": [
"query"
],
"defaults": {
"wt": "json"
},
"invariants": {
"rq": "{!xport}",
"distrib": false
}
handler anymore. This should work fine:
http://host:port/solr/collection/export?q=*:*=exp_id_s=exp_id_s+asc
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 4:59 PM, Antelmo Aguilar <aagui...@nd.edu> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I was using this feature in So
Thanks!
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 11:14 AM, Kojo <rbsnk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Joel,
> The Jira is created:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11922
>
> I hope it helps.
>
> Thank you very much.
>
>
>
This looks like a bug in the CartesianProductStream. It's going to have be
fixed before parallel cartesian products can be run. Feel free to create a
jira for this.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 9:58 AM, Kojo <rbsnk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi s
to export result sets of any size.
The underlying buffer sizes are really abstracted away and not meant to
dealt with.
What's the higher level issue you are concerned with?
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 8:54 AM, Radu Gheorghe <radu.gheor...@sematext.
://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_2/stream-decorator-reference.html#cartesianproduct
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 8:07 PM, Joel Bernstein <joels...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The shortestPath returns a list of node id's, and fetch expects a stream
> o
with the shortestPath expression?
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 11:47 AM, Karthik Ramachandran <mrk...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Can shortestPath stream source be used with fetch?
>
> With below streaming expression, we only get the path, are we doing
> so
://joelsolr.blogspot.com/2017/01/deploying-solrs-new-parallel-executor.html
After you've read through the two blogs let me know if you have questions
about how to apply this to your use case.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 8:11 AM, RAUNAK AGRAWAL <agrawal.rau...@gmail.com>
I suspect when you did the upgrade you kept the same configs. The /export
handler is an implicit handler in 6.6 so if you see any reference to
/export handler in the solrconfig remove it.
The /export hander does only return json or javabin in Solr 6.6.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com
The JSON facet API is a different aggregation implementation. So, it will
definitely have different performance characteristics.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 9:17 AM, RAUNAK AGRAWAL <agrawal.rau...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Yonik,
>
> So if th
node. Possibly
one of your nodes is slow for some reason and that is causing the entire
query to respond slowly.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 2:22 PM, Lanny Ripple <la...@spotright.com> wrote:
> Happy to do so. I am testing streams for the
will slow down as you add more fields
to the field list and sort list. But if you post your query and information
on what types the fields are in the field list I can give you an idea of
the type of performance I would expect.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 9:54 AM
and then use Streaming Expressions for specific
use cases.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Kojo <rbsnk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We have a web site with traditional search capabilities, faceting, sorting
> and so on. It has many problems before we took
. If your planning a traditional search interface then Streaming
Expressions is going to be the less efficient approach.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 7:44 AM, Kojo <rbsnk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Amrit,
> as far as I understand, in your example I h
or even a small cluster.
So you'll really need to think about how the joins are designed and whether
they fit your use case.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Webster Homer <webster.ho...@sial.com>
wrote:
> I'm using Solr 6.2.0. I am trying to u
It is not possible to use score with the /export handler. The /export
handler currently only supports sorting by fields.
You can sort by score using the default /select handler.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Webster Homer <webster.ho...@sial.
I don't see a jira ticket for this yet. Feel free to create it and reply
back with the link.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Kojo <rbsnk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, I was looking for information on Graph Traversal. More specifically,
This would be a good jira to create at (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SOLR)
Interesting that the query works in MySQL. I'm assuming MySQL automatically
adds the group by field to the field list. We can look at doing this as
well.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue
is needed.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Joel Bernstein <joels...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Also what version are you using?
>
> Joel Bernstein
> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Joel Bernstein <
Also what version are you using?
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Joel Bernstein <joels...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can you provide the stack trace?
>
> Are you in SolrCloud mode?
>
>
>
> Joel Bernstein
> http://joelsolr.bl
Can you provide the stack trace?
Are you in SolrCloud mode?
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Dmitry Gerasimov <dgerasi...@kommunion.com>
wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> This query works as expected:
> SELECT sum(amount) as total FROM d
of them and because their initialization can be complex. All of
the test cases are now focused on exercising the underlying classes through
the expressions.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Hendrik Haddorp <hendrik.hadd...@gmx.net>
wrote:
> h
It's the automatic node discovery provided by ZooKeeper. If you setup a
single node SolrCloud it will work fine.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 3:09 AM, Pavel Micka <pavel.mi...@zoomint.com>
wrote:
> Glad to hear that. Btw: where is the limitation
101 - 200 of 758 matches
Mail list logo
