(12/03/03 1:39), Donald Organ wrote:
I am trying to get synonyms working correctly, I want to map floor locker
tostorage locker
currently searching for storage locker produces results were as searching
for floor locker does not produce any results.
I have the following setup for index t
(12/03/02 6:05), Ahmet Arslan wrote:
I have the same problem. This happens
only for some documents in the index.
Andrew, can you provide a document string and a query pair? I will try to
re-produce the exception. Then we can create a test case that fails. Others can
look into it.
+1. Please
(12/02/22 7:53), Nitin Arora wrote:
Hi,
I'm using SOLR and Lucene in my application for search.
I'm facing an issue of highlighting using FastVectorHighlighter not working
when I use PayloadTermQueries as clauses of a BooleanQuery.
After Debugging I found that In DefaultSolrHighlighter.Java,
f
i.com/
(12/02/22 21:35), dhaivat wrote:
Koji Sekiguchi wrote
(12/02/22 11:58), dhaivat wrote:
Thanks for reply,
But can you please tell me why it's working for some documents and not
for
other.
As Solr 1.4.1 cannot recognize hl.useFastVectorHighlighter flag, Solr just
ignore it, but
(12/02/22 11:58), dhaivat wrote:
Thanks for reply,
But can you please tell me why it's working for some documents and not for
other.
As Solr 1.4.1 cannot recognize hl.useFastVectorHighlighter flag, Solr just
ignore it, but due to hl=true is there, Solr tries to create highlight snippets
by usi
(12/02/21 21:22), dhaivat wrote:
Hi Koji,
Thanks for quick reply, i am using solr 1.4.1
Uh, you cannot use FVH on Solr 1.4.1. FVH is available Solr 3.1 or later.
So your hl.useFastVectorHighlighter=true flag is ignored.
koji
--
Query Log Visualizer for Apache Solr
http://soleami.com/
Dhaivat,
Can you give us the concrete document that you are trying to search and make
a highlight snippet? And what is your Solr version?
koji
--
Query Log Visualizer for Apache Solr
http://soleami.com/
(12/02/21 20:29), dhaivat wrote:
Hi
I am newbie to Solr and i am using Sorj Client to cre
(12/02/14 22:25), O. Klein wrote:
I have not been able to find any logic in the behavior of hl.q and how it
analyses the query. Could you explain how it is supposed to work?
Nothing special on hl.q. If you use hl.q, the value of it will be used for
highlighting rather than the value of q. There
We are excited to announce the launch of soleami - a free visualization service
for Apache Solr query log.
soleami - Visualize the needs of your visitors.
http://soleami.com/
Soleami summarizes Solr query logs of past 12 months by search keyword.
It is a very useful tool for you to see various in
I got it fixed now I think.
I thought that if you used it like "hl.q=spell Checker" it would use the
query analysis of the field that was being highlighted as default. But in my
case it needs to be "hl.q=content_hl:(spell Checker)" for it to work. The
behavour I got default made no sense whatsoev
(12/02/11 21:19), O. Klein wrote:
Koji Sekiguchi wrote
(12/01/24 9:31), O. Klein wrote:
Let's say I search for "spellcheck solr" on a website that only contains
info about Solr, so "solr" was added to the stopwords.txt. The query that
will be parsed then (dismax)
It seems a bug to me
Can you open a ticket? Thank you
Koji Sekiguchi from iPhone
On 2012/02/08, at 13:32, Shyam Bhaskaran wrote:
> Hi Koji,
>
> Thanks for the response when I use hl.bs.chars=".!?" and hl.bs.maxScan=200 I
> see improvements, below is the highlighted val
(12/02/08 1:54), Shyam Bhaskaran wrote:
Hi Koji,
I have tried using hl.bs.type=SENTENCE and still no improvement.
We are storing PDF extracted content in the field which has termVectors enabled.
Example the field contains the following data extracted from PDF
"User-defined resolution function
(12/02/08 0:50), Shyam Bhaskaran wrote:
Hi,
We are using Solr 4.0 along with FVH and there is an issue we are facing while
highlighting.
For our requirement we want the highlighted search result should start with the
beginning of the sentence and needed help to get this done.
As of now this i
(12/02/01 4:28), Vadim Kisselmann wrote:
Hmm, i don´t know, but i can test it tomorrow at work.
i´m not sure about the right syntax with hl.q. (?)
but i report :)
hl.q can accept same syntax of q, including local params.
koji
--
http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
(12/01/24 9:31), O. Klein wrote:
Let's say I search for "spellcheck solr" on a website that only contains
info about Solr, so "solr" was added to the stopwords.txt. The query that
will be parsed then (dismax) will not contain the term "solr".
So fragments won't contain highlights of the term "so
(12/01/23 23:14), O. Klein wrote:
Im using trunk and FVH and eventhough I filter stopwords when searching, I
would like to highlight stopwords in fragments. Using a different field
without the stopwords filter did not have the desired effect.
Please provide more info. In particular, how your qu
(12/01/16 19:43), stockii wrote:
Why does this not work?
OR
i dont know where is my error?
i only want to replace comma with a blank ...
Try t
Hi Mike,
(12/01/11 16:14), Michael Lissner wrote:
- I need help with fragsize. The wiki says to set it to either 0 or a huge
number to disable
fragmenting. Which is it?
It is original Highlighter.
- the wiki says that hl.useFastVectorHighlighter is defaulted to false. I read
somewhere that
(12/01/10 6:31), TRAN-NGOC Minh wrote:
Last year a patch with an IgnoreTikaexception has been developped.
My question is how could I change the IgnoreTikaexception flag value
Just setting ignoreTikaException=true request parameter should work when you
calling ExtractingRequestHandler. Or you c
(12/01/09 21:51), O. Klein wrote:
Koji, maybe you missed my confirmation due to the hijacking of the thread.
I am using Solr 4.0 and after reindexing with LUCENE_33 I got the behaviour
for highlighting I want. So yeah, I can confirm this is a bug.
Looking forward to a fix :)
The fix of the p
Jul,
Maybe you missed "Example of content :" and "My charfilter should clean it like
:"
in your previous mail? We need them in order to consider your problem. :->
koji
--
http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
(12/01/04 2:19), darul wrote:
Hello,
I wanted to use char filter PatternReplaceCharFilterFac
(11/12/29 5:50), Jamie Johnson wrote:
I've seen in the solr faceting overview that it is possible to sort
either by count or lexicographically, but is there a way to sort so
the lowest counts come back first?
As far as I know, no. What is your use case?
koji
--
http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
(11/12/28 17:08), Ahmet Arslan wrote:
FastVectorHighlighter requires Solr3.1
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters#hl.useFastVectorHighlighter
Right. In addition, baoundaryScanner requires 3.5.
koji
--
http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
(11/12/28 15:29), meghana wrote:
Hi all ,
i seen hl.boundaryScanner and hl.bs.chars parameters in solr highlighting
feature. but i didn't get its meaning exactly , what its use and how can i
use it in my search?
My need is something like ,i want to set my fragment to start and end from
special
(11/12/26 23:58), Robert Muir wrote:
The old one didn't really handle this correctly either.
Sorry, I jumped the gun! I should say offsets, not positions!
So please ignore what I quoted in javadoc in my previous mail, sorry!
Koji, what is the highlighting problem? Can we have a test case?
I
I found that SynonymFilter javadoc says:
"Matches single or multi word synonyms in a token stream.
This token stream cannot properly handle position increments != 1"
I think due to the feature, Highlighter doesn't work properly in some cases:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/c3ed1
(11/12/24 21:20), O. Klein wrote:
Copy pasted following text from lucene mailing list as it describes my
problem:
" I'm trying to use multi-word synonyms. For example in my synonyms file I
have nhl, national
hockey league. If I do this index only, a search for nhl returns a correct
match, but hi
(11/12/21 22:28), Tanguy Moal wrote:
Dear all,
I'm try to get highlighting working, and I'm almost done, but that's not
perfect yet...
Basically my documents have a title and a description.
I have two kind of text fields :
text :
and text_french_light :
SynonymFilterFactory can take tokenizerFactory attribute that is used when
reading synonyms file. If you don't specify it, WhitespaceTokenizerFactory will
be used.
https://builds.apache.org/job/Solr-trunk/javadoc/org/apache/solr/analysis/SynonymFilterFactory.html
koji
--
Check out "Query Log Vi
(11/12/13 6:51), Devon Baumgarten wrote:
Hello,
I am having trouble finding how to remove/ignore whitespace when indexing. The
only answer I have found suggested that it is necessary to write my own
tokenizer. Is this true? I want to remove whitespace and special characters
from the phrase an
Now when i start my solr it gives an exception :
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error loading class
'org.apache.solr.update.processor.LangDetectLanguageIdentifierUpdateProcessorFactory'
Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
org.apache.solr.update.processor.LangDetectLanguageIdentifi
(11/12/07 3:42), Nejla Karacan wrote:
Hello,
I need the tf-idf-values from texts and now Im using Apache-Solr.
I am a novice and have some Problems.
My question is, how can I extract the tf-idf-values?
Nejla,
You can use TermVectorComponent on your field which is needed to be set
termVector
(11/12/02 4:20), Aaron Wong wrote:
Hi all,
We're encountering a problem with querying terms with dashes (and other
non-alphanumeric characters). For example, we
use PatternReplaceCharFilterFactory to replace dashes with blank characters
for both index and query, however any terms with dashes in
Suppose my search query is "*Rak*".In my database i have "*Rakesh Chaturvedi
*" name.
I am getting "*RakRakesh Chaturvedi*" as the response.
Same the case with the following names.
Search "Dhar" -- highlight "DharDharmesh Darshan"
Search "Suda"-- highlight "SudaSudarshan Faakir"
Can som
(11/11/22 22:30), VladislavLysov wrote:
Hello!!!
I have a trouble with Solr highlighting. I have any document with next
fields- "TYPE", "DBID" and others. When i do next request -
https://localhost:8443/solr/myCore/afts?wt=standard&q=TYPE:
https://localhost:8443/solr/myCore/afts?wt=standard&q=
(11/11/16 13:12), Shyam Bhaskaran wrote:
Hi,
Wanted to know whether we can set different maxAnalyzedChars values in the
solrconfig.xml based on different fields.
Can someone point if this is possible at all, my requirement needs me to set
different values for maxAnalyzedChars parameter based
(11/11/16 18:58), Shyam Bhaskaran wrote:
Hi,
Can we use Lucene regular highlighter along with fastVectorHighlighter together
in solrconfig.xml (solr) ?
-Shyam
Yes, you can. See section in
solr/example/solr/conf/solrconfig.xml for example.
koji
--
Check out "Query Log Visualizer" for Apac
(11/11/11 23:16), Michael Herchel wrote:
Thanks Koji!
Using the elevate request handler worked.
Is there a way to use the QueryElevationComponent in the default search handler?
I added the following:
true
true
to, so the result
looked like
explicit
true
(11/11/11 4:15), Michael Herchel wrote:
I've searched high and low for this via Google and the Solr wiki page, and
cannot find the answer.
My problem:
---
I'm having trouble getting the elevate.xml working. Here's what it currently
looks like:
Fro
(11/11/01 0:56), abhayd wrote:
hi
I have two questions
First on commit, external field file does not get loaded in index
===
http://localhost:8080/solr/core/update?stream.body=%3Ccommit/%3E&wt=json
Also it is not clear if external file can
(11/10/27 9:12), Xue-Feng Yang wrote:
Hi,
From Solr Info page, I can see my solr-uima core is there, but
updateRequestProcessorChain is not there. What is the reason?
Because UpdateRequestProcessor(and Chain) is not type of SolrInfoMBean.
(As those classes in the page implement SolrInfoMBean
(11/10/24 17:42), Xue-Feng Yang wrote:
Hi,
Where can I find test code for solr-uima component?
You should find them under:
solr/contrib/uima/src/test
koji
--
Check out "Query Log Visualizer" for Apache Solr
http://www.rondhuit-demo.com/loganalyzer/loganalyzer.html
http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
(11/09/29 5:38), ntsrikanth wrote:
Hi,
I got a set of values which needs to be mapped to a facet. For example, I
want to map the codes
SC, AC to the facet value 'Catering',
HB to Half Board
AI, IN to All\ inclusive
I tried creating the following in the schema file.
Use KeywordToken
(11/09/23 20:03), O. Klein wrote:
The regex fragmenter showed that there was enough content to show multiple
snippets.
The amount of snippets has no effect on any of the types of breakIterator.
Only fragsize has effect.
Or is this highlighter not supporting multiple snippets?
This highlighter
(11/09/23 8:57), O. Klein wrote:
The content_text field is filled with text from pdf's. So this is not the
problem. Besides the regex fragmenter gives back multiple snippets like
expected.
This doesn't show that BoundaryScanner has the bug. Highlighter's fragmenter
and FVH FragmentsBuilder are
(11/09/23 7:59), O. Klein wrote:
Thanx for you answer, but you are not using the Boundaryscanner
No. Regardless of specifying BoundaryScanner or not, it is used implicitly
because BaseFragmentsBuilder always use it (SimpleBoundaryScanner is the
default).
Try to index a long text and highlight
(11/09/22 23:09), O. Klein wrote:
Im testing the new Boundaryscanner in the highlighter, but I can't get it to
show more then 1 snippet.
2
Bug or am I doing something wrong?
I think your content_text is too short to get more than one snippets?
Try the following with solr example (I'm using t
(11/09/14 15:54), Dmitry Kan wrote:
Hello list,
Not sure how many of you are still using solr 1.4 in production, but here is
an issue with highlighting, that we've noticed:
The query is:
(drill AND ships) OR rigs
Excerpt from the highlighting list:
Within the fleet of 27 floatingrigs<
(11/09/09 6:16), Rahul Warawdekar wrote:
Hi,
I am currently evaluating the FastVectorHighlighter in a Solr search based
project and have a couple of questions
1. Is there any specific reason why the FastVectorHighlighter does not
provide support for multiterm(wildcard) queries ?
2. What are the
(11/09/05 23:09), O. Klein wrote:
Using the regex in the old highlighter I had reasonable sentence aware
highlighting, but speed is an issue. So I tried to get this working with the
VFH, but this obviously didn't work with the regex.
So I am looking for ways to get the same behavior but with imp
(11/09/02 4:00), Herman Kiefus wrote:
Thank you very much.
Name
mlt
This is not what I was suggesting. MLT*Handler* is a request handler but not
SearchComponent-aware
handler. That said, it ignores ... part. If
MLTHandler
(11/09/01 23:24), Herman Kiefus wrote:
mlt
but ends up returning a 500 error on a core reload. What is an appropriate
configuration entry for the MLT handler?
Why you got 500 error because MLTComponent was set for requestHandler class.
Set class="solr.SearchHandler
(11/09/01 1:22), samuele.mattiuzzo wrote:
SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error Instantiating
UpdateRequestProcessorFactory, ToTheGoCustom is not a
org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessorFactory
i'm getting this error, but i don't know how to fix it
this is solrcon
(11/08/26 2:32), Val Minyaylo wrote:
Hi there,
I am trying to utilize highlighting alternateField and can't get highlights on
the results from
targeted fields. Is this expected behavior or am I understanding
alternateFields wrong?
Yes, it is expected behavior.
solrconfig.xml:
description_hi
(11/08/25 5:29), Daniel Skiles wrote:
I have a very large field in my index that I need to highlight. Where in
the config file do I set the maxAnalyzedChars in order to make this work?
Has anyone successfully done this?
Placing it in your requestHandler should work. For example:
1000
(11/08/19 4:14), Alexei Martchenko wrote:
Hi Koji thanks for the reply.
My is defined directly in. SOLR 3.3 warns me
is a deprecated form do you think it is in the wrong
place?
Hi Alexei,
Yes, it is incorrect. What deprecate is that tag just under
directly.
After 3.1, it needs to be
Alexei,
From the log, I think Solr couldn't find colored fragmentsBuilder defined in
solrconfig.xml.
Can you check the following setting in
...
in solrconfig.xml?
koji
--
Check out "Query Log Visualizer"
http://www.rondhuit-demo.com/loganalyzer/loganalyzer.html
http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
(
(11/07/29 8:52), Chris Hostetter wrote:
: If I got an exception during faceting (e.g. undefined field), Solr doesn't
: return HTTP 400 but 200 with the exception stack trace in
: ... tag. Why is it implemented so? I checked Solr 1.1 and saw the same
behavior.
super historic, pre-apache, code
k out "Query Log Visualizer"
http://www.rondhuit-demo.com/loganalyzer/loganalyzer.html
http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
(11/07/29 1:18), Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
> If I got an exception during faceting (e.g. undefined field), Solr doesn't
> return HTTP 400 but 200 with the excepti
If I got an exception during faceting (e.g. undefined field), Solr doesn't
return HTTP 400 but 200 with the exception stack trace in
... tag. Why is it implemented so? I checked Solr 1.1 and saw the same
behavior.
Except FacetComponent, HighlightComponent for example, if I use a bad regex
patte
time:[1296777600+TO+1296778000]
Should be time:[1296777600 TO 1296778000] ?
koji
--
http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
(11/07/18 23:35), Siddhesh Shirode wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I would like to know the best practices or best tools for Calculating QPS in
Solr. Thanks.
Just an FYI:
Admin GUI > STATISTICS > QUERY gives you avgRequestsPerSecond for each request
handler.
koji
--
http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
(11/07/14 13:12), Pawan Darira wrote:
Hi
my readercycle script is not reloading the searcher. where i may be wrong.
please help
readercycle is somewhat old or broken and it's been removed at SOLR-2046.
I recommend you to use commit script instead:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-20
(11/07/13 1:40), Elaine Li wrote:
Hi Folks,
I need to filter out the returns if the document's field activated = false.
I tried the following in order to retrieve similar products which are
all activated products. But this does not work.
http://localhost:8983/solr/mlt?q=(id:2043144 AND activate
How to restart Solar ? I am using Solr with the windchill 10.
I don't know windchill 10, but if you run Solr on Jetty or Tomcat,
CTRL+C to shutdown then start Solr again. Or if you use CoreAdmin,
RELOAD action might help:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin#RELOAD
koji
--
http://www.rondhuit
] "POST
/apache-solr-3.3.0/update/javabin?wt=javabin&version=2 HTTP/1.1" 400 1262
It is difficult to understand whats going on. Can anyone tell me where I can
see a more detailed log?
S.
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
I don't think you have wrong
false
text
I don't understand where exactly can I see a more detailed log of why its
not getting indexed.
Sowmya.
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
disclaimer: I'm not an expert of UIMA. I've just started usin
disclaimer: I'm not an expert of UIMA. I've just started using it when Solr 3.1
integrated UIMA!
Thanks for the clarification. Now, I get it.
Should section mention all the annotators, even if the
annotators do not add any new fields?
For example, if I have a pipeline, starting from "parser"
method?
Sowmya.
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
Now I've pasted sample solrconfig.xml to the project top page.
Can you visit and look at it again?
koji
--
http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
(11/07/09 2:29), Sowmya V.B. wrote:
Hi Koji
Thanks. I have checked out the cod
(11/07/11 4:26), Marcus Paradies wrote:
Thanks for the helpful hints!
The debugQuery didn't work in combination with MLT for me.
If I'm using MLT in the distributed mode, how would that work? Let's assume,
I'm having 5 shards and I'm executing a MLT query which will run against all
shards. How
(11/07/11 4:45), Gabriele Kahlout wrote:
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 6:21 PM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
There are such RequestHandlers. Look at CSVRequestHandler, for example.
IndexWriter writer = new IndexWriter(FSDirectory.open(**new
File(req.getCore().getDataDir(**), "
There are such RequestHandlers. Look at CSVRequestHandler, for example.
IndexWriter writer = new IndexWriter(FSDirectory.open(new
File(req.getCore().getDataDir(), "index")), req.getSchema().getAnalyzer(),
IndexWriter.MaxFieldLength.LIMITED);
updateSolrIndex(writer);
D
(11/07/09 22:55), Marcus Paradies wrote:
(1) Is there a way to see the similarity value in the response?
Try debugQuery=on with MLT.
(2) Can the MLT be used in the distributed search mode?
Not yet. There is an open issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-788
(3) How can I retriev
the
same class (next.NamedEntity, in this case)?
I am sorry for repeated mails...but its a bit confusing, because there is no
README file.
Thankyou once again!
Sowmya.
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
(11/07/08 16:19), Sowmya V.B. wrote:
Hi Koji
Thanks for the mail.
T
(11/07/08 16:19), Sowmya V.B. wrote:
Hi Koji
Thanks for the mail.
Thanks for all the clarifications. I am now using the version 3.3.. But,
another query that I have about this is:
How can I add an annotator that I wrote myself, in to Solr-UIMA?
Here is what I did before I moved to Solr:
I wrot
Plus, debugQuery=on would help you when using MLT after 3.1:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-860
koji
--
http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
(11/07/08 6:55), Juan Grande wrote:
Hi Elaine,
The first thing that comes to my mind is that neither the content nor the
term vectors of "text" and "
(11/07/07 18:38), Sowmya V.B. wrote:
Hi
I am trying to add UIMA module in to Solr..and began with the readme file
given here.
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/tags/lucene_solr_3_1/solr/contrib/uima/README.txt
I would recommend you to use Solr 3.3 rather than 3.1, as we have changed
(11/06/28 16:40), lboutros wrote:
You could add this filter after the NGram filter to prevent the phrase query
creation :
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.PositionFilterFactory
Ludovic.
There is an option to avoid producing phrase queries,
autoGeneratePhraseQu
quot; created core is
initalizing, the "old" one will continue to accept requests. Once it
has finished, all new request will go to the "new" core, and the "old"
core will be unloaded.
*/quote*
I guess, same handling for other actions, like rename.
Regards
Stefan
2011/
I accidentally rename a core to the same name of existing core, e.g. using
example-DIH:
http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/cores?action=RENAME&core=db&other=tika
I expected solr throws an exception, but it worked, and the existing core
(tika) is gone.
Does it a known bug (but I couldn't find open
(11/06/20 21:41), Jamie Johnson wrote:
I am trying to index data where I'm concerned that storing the contents of a
specific field will be a bit of a hog so we are planning to retrieve this
information as needed for highlighting from an external source. I am
looking to extend the default solr hi
(11/06/20 16:16), Jason, Kim wrote:
Hi, Mark
I think FileNotFoundException will be worked around by raise the ulimit.
I just want to know why segments are created more than mergeFactor.
During the googling, I found contents concerning mergeFactor:
http://web.archiveorange.com/archive/v/bH0vUQzfY
(11/06/17 0:15), Massimo Schiavon wrote:
I have an index with various fields and I want to highlight query matchings on "title"
and "content"
fields.
These fields could contain html tags so I've configured HtmlFormatter for
highlighting. The problem
is that if the query doesn't match the text o
(11/06/12 8:27), Markus Jelsma wrote:
Hi,
How can i calculate the memory requirements for highlighting documents where
the variables are number of documents to highlight and the total size of the
documents in a single request? I can then multiply a worst-case result set
with the expected concurr
Hi Tom,
(11/06/11 2:01), Burton-West, Tom wrote:
According to the documentation on the Solr wiki page, setting the hl.fragsize parameter
to "0" indicates that the whole field value should be used (no fragmenting).
However the FastVectorHighlighter throws an exception
message fragCharSize(0
(11/06/10 0:14), Burton-West, Tom wrote:
Hi Koji,
Thank you for your reply.
It is the feature of FVH. FVH supports TermQuery, PhraseQuery, BooleanQuery and
DisjunctionMaxQuery
and Query constructed by those queries.
Sorry, I'm not sure I understand. Are you saying that FVH supports MultiT
(11/06/09 4:24), Burton-West, Tom wrote:
We are trying to implement highlighting for wildcard (MultiTerm) queries. This
seems to work find with the regular highlighter but when we try to use the
fastVectorHighlighter we don't see any results in the highlighting section of
the response. Appe
(11/06/08 16:20), Denis Kuzmenok wrote:
If you could move to 3.x and your "linked item" boosts could be
calculated offline in batch periodically you could use an external
file field to store the doc boost.
a few If's though
I have 3.2 and external file field doesn't work without solr resta
TermFreqVector vector = reader.getTermFreqVector(this.docId, "universal");
String universalTerms[] = vector.getTerms();
to see the lenght of universalTerms array, and it is 1 and only value that
array stores is the field value:
universalTerms[0]= "car house road age s
(11/05/29 8:47), tinman wrote:
Hi all,
I've followed the instructions at this link
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Deduplication and got the basic dedupe field
working. However, it doesn't seem to recognize case differences or white
space differences even thought I've defined the type of the fields
(11/05/26 13:23), Andy wrote:
Hi,
When specifying an analyzer for a fieldType, I can say type="index" or
type="query"
What if I don't spcify the type for an analyzer? Does it default to "index" or
"query" or both?
Both.
koji
--
http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
(11/05/24 20:56), Lord Khan Han wrote:
Hi ,
Can I limit the terms that the HighlightComponent uses. My query is
generally long and I want specific ones to be highlighted and the rest is
not highlighted. Is there an option like the SpellCheckComponent. it uses q
unless spellcheck.q if specified.
(11/05/20 3:45), Brian Lamb wrote:
Hi all,
Based on advice I received on a previous email thread, I applied patch
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2338. My goal was to be able to
apply a similarity class to certain fields but not all fields.
I ran the following commands:
$ cd
$ svn u
(11/05/17 3:27), Nemani, Raj wrote:
All,
I have just installed Solr 3.1 running on Tomcat 7. I am noticing a possible issue with
Highlighting. I have a filed in my index called "story". The solr document
that I am testing with the data in the story field starts with the following snippet
Thanks Tommaso! I'm glad to hear from the person with experience.
I'll commit shortly.
Koji
(11/05/09 17:57), Tommaso Teofili wrote:
Thanks Koji for opening that, the dynamicField mapping is a commonly used
feature especially for named entities mapping.
Tommaso
2011/5/7 Koji Sekigu
I've opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2503 .
Koji
--
http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
(11/05/06 20:15), Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to use dynamicField in feature-field mapping of uima update
> processor. It doesn't seem to be acceptable
Hello,
I'd like to use dynamicField in feature-field mapping of uima update
processor. It doesn't seem to be acceptable currently. Is it a bad idea
in terms of use of uima? If it is not so bad, I'd like to try a patch.
Background:
Because my uima annotator can generate many types of named entity
(11/05/01 3:45), firdous_kind86 wrote:
Hi all,
i have solr 3.1 with DIH running fine, but i m unable to use
tikaentityprocessor, i tried with replacing tika-parsers and tika-core jars
0.9 (in contrib/extraction/lib) but still no success, may be i m missing
something, could anyone define the exact
(11/04/27 7:35), Alejandro Delgadillo wrote:
Hi,
I¹ve been using solr with Coldfusion9, I¹ve made a couple of adjustment to
it in order to fulfill my needs of my client, I¹m using solr as a document
search engine for a online library which has documents larger then 20MB and
some of them have mo
101 - 200 of 545 matches
Mail list logo
