!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Benefits-of-Solr-over-Lucene-tp4039964.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
in are:
Geospatial Search
Highlighting
Dynamic Fields
Near Real-Time Indexing
Multiple Search Indices
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Benefits-of-Solr-over-Lucene-tp4039964.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
This is apples and pomegranates. Lucene is a library, Solr is a server. In
features, they are more alike than different.
wunder
On Feb 12, 2013, at 7:40 AM, JohnRodey wrote:
I know that Solr web-enables a Lucene index, but I'm trying to figure out
what other things Solr offers over Lucene.
Here's yet another short list of benefits of Solr over Lucene (not that any
of them take away from Lucene since Solr is based on Lucene):
- Multiple core index - go beyond the limits of a single lucene index
- Support for multi-core or named collections
- richer query parsers (e.g., schema
wrote:
Here's yet another short list of benefits of Solr over Lucene (not that any
of them take away from Lucene since Solr is based on Lucene):
- Multiple core index - go beyond the limits of a single lucene index
- Support for multi-core or named collections
- richer query parsers (e.g
(or
highlighting, or dynamic fields, or etc...). I am more curious about core
index and search features, and not as much with sharding, cloud features,
different client languages and so on.
Any thoughts?
thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Benefits-of-Solr-over
On 2/12/2013 11:19 AM, JohnRodey wrote:
So I have had a fair amount of experience using Solr. However on a separate
project we are considering just using Lucene directly, which I have never
done. I am trying to avoid finding out late that Lucene doesn't offer what
we need and being like aw
Is there a page on the wiki that points out the use cases (or the
features) that are best suited for Lucene adoption, and those best
suited for SOLR adoption?
-Glen
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 2/12/2013 11:19 AM, JohnRodey wrote:
So I have had a
It is like deciding between a disk drive and a file server. Solr and Lucene are
different kinds of things.
wunder
On Feb 12, 2013, at 12:26 PM, Glen Newton wrote:
Is there a page on the wiki that points out the use cases (or the
features) that are best suited for Lucene adoption, and those
And helping people - who don't know much about them - how to decide
which to use is not useful?
-Glen
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Walter Underwood wun...@wunderwood.org wrote:
It is like deciding between a disk drive and a file server. Solr and Lucene
are different kinds of things.
Do you want to embed an index into your application, e.g. as a desktop
app? Use Lucene. Is search basically the whole of your app? Perhaps use
Lucene.
Do you want you offer search as a service? Do you want to be able to
arbitrarily scale your index (beyond the number of documents a single
index
this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Benefits-of-Solr-over-Lucene-tp4039964.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
12 matches
Mail list logo