Hi Mozzam,
I finally got it working
Thanks a ton guys :)
Regards
Raakhi
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Moazzam Khan moazz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Rakhi,
Sorry, I didn't see this email until just now. Did you get it working?
If not here's some things that might help.
Hi Rakhi,
Sorry, I didn't see this email until just now. Did you get it working?
If not here's some things that might help.
- Download the patch first.
- Check the date on which the patch was released.
- Download the version of the trunk that existed at that date.
- Apply the patch using the
Hi,
Patching did work. but when i build the trunk, i get the following
exception:
[SolrTrunk]# ant compile
Buildfile: /testWorkspace/SolrTrunk/build.xml
init-forrest-entities:
[mkdir] Created dir: /testWorkspace/SolrTrunk/build
[mkdir] Created dir: /testWorkspace/SolrTrunk/build/web
Oops this is probably i didn't checkout the modules file from the trunk.
doing that right now :)
Regards
Raakhi
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Rakhi Khatwani rkhatw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Patching did work. but when i build the trunk, i get the following
exception:
[SolrTrunk]#
fieldType:analyzer without class or tokenizer filter list seems to point
to the config - you may want to correct.
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Rakhi Khatwani rkhatw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I checked out modules lucene from the trunk.
Performed a build using the following
Hi,
But these is almost no settings in my config
heres a snapshot of what i have in my solrconfig.xml
config
updateHandler class=solr.DirectUpdateHandler2 /
requestDispatcher handleSelect=true
requestParsers enableRemoteStreaming=false
multipartUploadLimitInKB=2048 /
/requestDispatcher
Hi,
I tried checking out the latest code (rev 956715) the patch did not
work on it.
Infact i even tried hunting for the revision mentioned earlier in this
thread (i.e. rev 955615) but cannot find it in the repository. (it has
revision 955569 followed by revision 955785).
Any pointers??
What exactly did not work? Patching, compiling or running it?
On 22 June 2010 16:06, Rakhi Khatwani rkhatw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I tried checking out the latest code (rev 956715) the patch did not
work on it.
Infact i even tried hunting for the revision mentioned earlier in this
Hi,
Oh in that case is the code stable enough to use it for production?
Does it support features which solr 1.4 normally supports?
I am using facets as a workaround but then i am not able to sort on any
other field. is there any workaround to support this feature??
Regards,
Raakhi
On Fri,
Oh in that case is the code stable enough to use it for production?
- Well this feature is a patch and I think that says it all.
Although bugs are fixed it is deferentially an experimental feature
and people should keep that in mind when using one of the patches.
Does it support features
Hi Moazzam,
Where did u get the src code from??
I am downloading it from
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/branches/branch-1.4
and the latest revision in this location is 955469.
so applying the latest patch(dated 17th june 2010) on it still generates
errors.
Any
Hi Rakhi,
The patch is not compatible with 1.4. If you want to work with the
trunk. I'll need to get the src from
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/trunk/
Martijn
On 18 June 2010 13:46, Rakhi Khatwani rkhatw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Moazzam,
Where did u get the src
AND
what configuration tweaks you've used that helped.
Thanks!
From: mark.robe...@red-gate.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:21:54 +
Subject: RE: Field Collapsing SOLR-236
Yeah got it working fine - but I needed to revert to Trunk (1.5
.
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Gearon [mailto:gear...@sbcglobal.net]
Sent: 25 March 2010 00:49
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Field Collapsing SOLR-236
Boy, I hope that field collapsing works! I'm planning on using it
heavily
: mark.robe...@red-gate.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:21:54 +
Subject: RE: Field Collapsing SOLR-236
Yeah got it working fine - but I needed to revert to Trunk (1.5)
to
get
the patch to apply.
It does certainly have some performance implications
On Jun 16, 2010, at 7:31 PM, Mark Diggory wrote:
p.s. I'd be glad to contribute our Maven build re-organization back
to the community to get Solr properly Mavenized so that it can be
distributed and released more often. For us the benefit of this
structure is that we will be able to
I've added a new patch to the issue, so building the trunk (rev
955615) with the latest patch should not be a problem. Due to recent
changes in the Lucene trunk the patch was not compatible.
On 17 June 2010 20:20, Erik Hatcher erik.hatc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 16, 2010, at 7:31 PM, Mark
I knew it wasn't me! :)
I found the patch just before I read this and applied it to the trunk
and it works!
Thanks Mark and martijn for all your help!
- Moazzam
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Martijn v Groningen
martijn.is.h...@gmail.com wrote:
I've added a new patch to the issue, so
Erik,
I try not to be exclusionary of others development tool choices in the
selection of my own. However, just to surely stir up a nest of hornets in true
Apache fashion... when I saw what was done with the templating of the Maven
pom work that was originally donated to solr, I just cringed
On Jun 17, 2010, at 7:44 PM, Mark Diggory wrote:
when I saw what was done with the templating of the Maven pom
work that was originally donated to solr, I just cringed at it.
Most of us Solr committers are fairly anti-Maven or ambivalent about
it at best, so it hasn't gotten much TLC,
.
Thanks!
From: mark.robe...@red-gate.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:21:54 +
Subject: RE: Field Collapsing SOLR-236
Yeah got it working fine - but I needed to revert to Trunk (1.5) to get
the patch to apply.
It does certainly have some performance
Message-
From: Dennis Gearon [mailto:gear...@sbcglobal.net]
Sent: 25 March 2010 00:49
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Field Collapsing SOLR-236
Boy, I hope that field collapsing works! I'm planning on using it
heavily.
Dennis Gearon
Signature Warning
.
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Gearon [mailto:gear...@sbcglobal.net]
Sent: 25 March 2010 00:49
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Field Collapsing SOLR-236
Boy, I hope that field collapsing works! I'm planning on using it
heavily.
Dennis Gearon
Signature Warning
@lucene.apache.org
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:21:54 +
Subject: RE: Field Collapsing SOLR-236
Yeah got it working fine - but I needed to revert to Trunk (1.5) to
get
the patch to apply.
It does certainly have some performance implications, but tweaking
configuration can help here
implications you are
seeing AND
what configuration tweaks you've used that helped.
Thanks!
From: mark.robe...@red-gate.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:21:54 +
Subject: RE: Field Collapsing SOLR-236
Yeah got it working fine - but I needed to revert
are
seeing AND
what configuration tweaks you've used that helped.
Thanks!
From: mark.robe...@red-gate.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:21:54 +
Subject: RE: Field Collapsing SOLR-236
Yeah got it working fine - but I needed to revert to Trunk
you are seeing AND
what configuration tweaks you've used that helped.
Thanks!
From: mark.robe...@red-gate.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:21:54 +
Subject: RE: Field Collapsing SOLR-236
Yeah got it working fine - but I needed to revert to Trunk (1.5
...@hotmail.com wrote:
From: blargy zman...@hotmail.com
Subject: Field Collapsing SOLR-236
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, March 24, 2010, 12:17 PM
Has anyone had any luck with the field collapsing patch
(SOLR-236) with Solr
1.4? I tried patching my version of 1.4 with no such luck
: Dennis Gearon [mailto:gear...@sbcglobal.net]
Sent: 25 March 2010 00:49
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Field Collapsing SOLR-236
Boy, I hope that field collapsing works! I'm planning on using it heavily.
Dennis Gearon
Signature Warning
EARTH has a Right To Life
Thanks Ill give field-collapse-5 a try although I heard it has some bad memory
bugs in it.
From: martijn.is.h...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:29:30 +0100
Subject: Re: Field Collapsing SOLR-236
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Hi Blargy,
The latest path is not compatible with 1.4
.
Thanks!
From: mark.robe...@red-gate.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:21:54 +
Subject: RE: Field Collapsing SOLR-236
Yeah got it working fine - but I needed to revert to Trunk (1.5) to get the
patch to apply.
It does certainly have some performance
Has anyone had any luck with the field collapsing patch (SOLR-236) with Solr
1.4? I tried patching my version of 1.4 with no such luck.
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Field-Collapsing-SOLR-236-tp28019949p28019949.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list
wrote:
From: blargy zman...@hotmail.com
Subject: Field Collapsing SOLR-236
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, March 24, 2010, 12:17 PM
Has anyone had any luck with the field collapsing patch
(SOLR-236) with Solr
1.4? I tried patching my version of 1.4 with no such luck
, December 9, 2008 2:58:42 AM
Subject: Solr 1.3 - Field Collapsing - SOLR 236
Hi,
About a year ago, I took the then-existing SOLR 1.2 patches for Field
Collapsing, adapted them to my use, and have been using them successfully in
production for most of this year.
I'm now looking to upgrade my
to 1.4-dev
would be good, too.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: SOLR lists [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Solr Users List solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:58:42 AM
Subject: Solr 1.3 - Field Collapsing
/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: SOLR lists [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Solr Users List solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2008 2:58:42 AM
Subject: Solr 1.3 - Field Collapsing - SOLR 236
Hi,
About a year ago, I took the then-existing SOLR 1.2 patches for Field
Hi,
About a year ago, I took the then-existing SOLR 1.2 patches for Field
Collapsing, adapted them to my use, and have been using them
successfully in production for most of this year.
I'm now looking to upgrade my installation to SOLR 1.3. That leads to
several questions.
- As far as
We are about to release Field collapsing in our production site, but the
index size is not as big as yours.
Definitely collapsing is an added overhead. You can do some load testing and
bench mark on some dataset as you would expect on your production project as
SOLR-236 is currently available
gurudev wrote:
One thing that you can go with is using adjacent field collapsing rather
than simple collapsing. As internally SOLR would first sort on the collapse
field to use simple collapsing, which is not the case with adjacent
collapsing.
This something that I think could be improved in
if only i could magic all these damn pdfs I have into some code :)
+1
I want some of that magic too!
Hi,
A requirement has come up in a project where we're going to need to
group by a field in the result set. I looked into the SOLR-236 patch
and it seems there are a couple versions out now that are supposed to
work against the Solr 1.3.0 release.
This is a production site, it really
41 matches
Mail list logo
