I would like to accomplish the same effect using the MoreLikeThis
query parser, so that I can take advantage of such benefits as
sharding support.
I am currently using Solr 5.5.0, and in spite of trying many
syntactical variations, I can't seem to get it to work. Some
discussion on this JIR
in the qf setting of the
MoreLikeThis request handler:
https://github.com/vufind-org/vufind/blob/master/solr/vufind/biblio/conf/solrconfig.xml#L410
I would like to accomplish the same effect using the MoreLikeThis
query parser, so that I can take advantage of such benefits as
sharding support.
I am curren
fic boosts in the qf setting of the
MoreLikeThis request handler:
https://github.com/vufind-org/vufind/blob/master/solr/vufind/biblio/conf/solrconfig.xml#L410
I would like to accomplish the same effect using the MoreLikeThis query parser,
so that I can take advantage of such benefits as sharding s
Hello,
I am currently using field-specific boosts in the qf setting of the
MoreLikeThis request handler:
https://github.com/vufind-org/vufind/blob/master/solr/vufind/biblio/conf/solrconfig.xml#L410
I would like to accomplish the same effect using the MoreLikeThis query parser,
so that I can
Hi,
Are you using a correct stopword file for the French language ? It is
very importante in order the the MLT component works fine.
You should also take a look at this document.
http://cephas.net/blog/2008/03/30/how-morelikethis-works-in-lucene/
MLT support in SolrJ is a an old story. May be
Hi :)
I'm using Solr 3.6.1 and i'm trying to use the similarity features of
lucene/solr to compare texts.
The content of my documents is in french so I defined a field like :
indexed="true" stored="true"/>
(it uses the default text_fr fieldType provided with the default
schema.xml file)
d like to exclude
would
be based on the document I use for MoreLikeThis Query. As I understand
from StopFilter,
it is a static method to exclude terms such as stop words.
My problem is that I want to return theme/area specific results for
MoreLikeThis. Usually, MoreLikeThis picks up nouns su
rameters are unusable for your case, I don't think
> you can exclude certain terms OOTB.
>
> Koji
>
>
>
> Paras Chopra wrote:
>
>> Hi Koji,
>> Thank you for your reply. Actually, the terms I would like to exclude
>> would
>> be based on the docume
your reply. Actually, the terms I would like to exclude would
be based on the document I use for MoreLikeThis Query. As I understand
from StopFilter,
it is a static method to exclude terms such as stop words.
My problem is that I want to return theme/area specific results for
MoreLikeThis. Usually, M
Hi Koji,
Thank you for your reply. Actually, the terms I would like to exclude would
be based on the document I use for MoreLikeThis Query. As I understand
from StopFilter,
it is a static method to exclude terms such as stop words.
My problem is that I want to return theme/area specific results
Paras Chopra wrote:
Hi All,
I am tinkering with MoreLikeThis component of Solr and had a particular use
case where I would like to exclude certain terms from consideration while
MoreLikeThis makes a query vector out of a document. Is it possible with
Solr? I searched for this in the documentation
Hi All,
I am tinkering with MoreLikeThis component of Solr and had a particular use
case where I would like to exclude certain terms from consideration while
MoreLikeThis makes a query vector out of a document. Is it possible with
Solr? I searched for this in the documentation but wasn't able to fi
e SolrJ calls not working.
>
> For SolrJ calls not working my suggestion is to look at the logs and
> compare the GetMethod call with the SolrJ call. Paste them if you want
> more people to look at them.
>
>
> Otis
> --
> Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
want more people to
look at them.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: SergeyG
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, July 3, 2009 4:08:37 AM
> Subject: Re: Implementing PhraseQuery and MoreLikeThis Query i
om/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
>
>
>
> - Original Message
>> From: SergeyG
>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2009 6:17:59 PM
>> Subject: Re: Implementing PhraseQuery and MoreLikeThis Query in one app
>>
>>
>>
t; To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2009 6:17:59 PM
> Subject: Re: Implementing PhraseQuery and MoreLikeThis Query in one app
>
>
> Otis,
>
> Your recipe does work: after copying an indexing field and excluding stop
> words the MoreLikeThis query
Otis,
Your recipe does work: after copying an indexing field and excluding stop
words the MoreLikeThis query started fetching meaningful results. :)
Just one issue remained.
When I execute query in this way:
String query = "q=id:1&mlt.fl=content&...&fl=title+author+score&qu
> Subject: Re: Implementing PhraseQuery and MoreLikeThis Query in one app
>
> I think it works better to use the highest tf.idf terms, not the highest tf.
> That is what I implemented for Ultraseek ten years ago. With tf, you get
> lots of terms with low discrimination power.
>
&
wunder, thank you. (Sorry, I'm not sure this is your first name). I thought
the MoreLikeThis query normally uses tf.idf of the terms when deciding what
terms are the most important (not the most frequent). And if this is not the
case, how can I change its behavior?
SergeyG wrote:
&g
estion regarding using stop words in a
> PhraseQuery and in a MoreLikeThis query in the same app. I posted it
> twice. Unfortunately I didn't get any responses. I realize that the
> question might not have been formulated clearly. So let me reformulate it.
>
> Can both queries
t;> Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2009 6:20:05 AM
>> Subject: Re: Implementing PhraseQuery and MoreLikeThis Query in one app
>>
>> SergeyG schrieb:
>>
>>> Can both queries - PhraseQuery and MoreLikeThis Query - be implemented
>>> in the same app taking into acc
2009 6:20:05 AM
> Subject: Re: Implementing PhraseQuery and MoreLikeThis Query in one app
>
> SergeyG schrieb:
>
> > Can both queries - PhraseQuery and MoreLikeThis Query - be implemented
> > in the same app taking into account the fact that for the former to
> &g
comes to mind.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: SergeyG
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2009 5:31:21 AM
> Subject: Implementing PhraseQuery and MoreLikeThis Query in one app
>
>
&
>Why would the inclusion of a stopword list result in stopwords being of
>top importance in the MoreLikeThis query?
Michael,
I just saw some of them (words from the stop words list) in the MLT query's
response.
Sergey
SergeyG wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Recently I've
SergeyG schrieb:
Can both queries - PhraseQuery and MoreLikeThis Query - be implemented
in the same app taking into account the fact that for the former to
work the stop words list needs to be included and this results in the
latter putting stop words among the most important words?
Why would
Hi,
Recently I've posted a question regarding using stop words in a PhraseQuery
and in a MoreLikeThis query in the same app. I posted it twice.
Unfortunately I didn't get any responses. I realize that the question might
not have been formulated clearly. So let me reformulate it.
uestHandler
and executed by calling server.query(query), the latter query is handled by
the MoreLikeThisRequestHandler and there is no specific method to execute
it. Is this right?
And if this is the case, how can the latter query be triggered?
Thanks,
Sergey
--
View this message in context:
http:
27 matches
Mail list logo
