Re: Phrase query no hits when stopwords and FlattenGraphFilterFactory used

go, but was wondering whether this is something others > > have done? > > > > Best wishes, > > Edd > > > > > > Edward Turner > > > > > > On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 at 13:58, Edward Turner wrote: > > > >> Hi

Re: Phrase query no hits when stopwords and FlattenGraphFilterFactory used

> > Edward Turner > > > On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 at 13:58, Edward Turner wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> We are experiencing some unexpected behaviour for phrase queries which we >> believe might be related to the FlattenGraphFilterFactory and stopw

Re: Phrase query no hits when stopwords and FlattenGraphFilterFactory used

On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 at 13:58, Edward Turner wrote: > Hi all, > > We are experiencing some unexpected behaviour for phrase queries which we > believe might be related to the FlattenGraphFilterFactory and stopwords. > > Brief description: when performing a phrase query > "Mol

Phrase query no hits when stopwords and FlattenGraphFilterFactory used

Hi all, We are experiencing some unexpected behaviour for phrase queries which we believe might be related to the FlattenGraphFilterFactory and stopwords. Brief description: when performing a phrase query "Molecular cloning and evolution of the" => we get expected hits "

Re: getting different errors from complex phrase query

Check your “df” parameter in all your handlers in solrconfig.xml. Second, add "=query” to the query and look at the parsed return, you’ll probably see something field qualified by “text:….” Offhand, though, I don’t see where that’s happening in your query. wait, how are you submitting this? If

Re: getting different errors from complex phrase query

On 6/15/2020 2:52 PM, Deepu wrote: sample query is "{!complexphrase inOrder=true}(all_text_txt_enus:\"by\\ test*\") AND (({!terms f=product_id_l}959945,959959,959960,959961,959962,959963) AND (date_created_at_rdt:[2020-04-07T01:23:09Z TO *} AND date_created_at_rdt:{* TO 2020-04-07T01:24:57Z]))"

getting different errors from complex phrase query

Hi All, i am trying to use {!complexphrasequeryparser inOrder=true} along with other text fields. i am using solrj client to initiate the request. sample query is "{!complexphrase inOrder=true}(all_text_txt_enus:\"by\\ test*\") AND (({!terms

Re: Phrase query as feature in LTR not working

Hi AshB, from what I see, this is the expected behavior. You pass this efi to your "isPook" feature : efi.query=thrones%20of%20game*. Then you calculate: { "name" : "isPook", "class" : "org.apache.solr.ltr.feature.SolrFeature", "params" : { "fq": ["{!type=edismax qf=*text*

Phrase query as feature in LTR not working

Phrase query is not working when applied in LTR. Feature supplied is { "name" : "isPook", "class" : "org.apache.solr.ltr.feature.SolrFeature", "params" : { "fq": ["{!type=edismax qf=text v=$qq}=\"${query}\&qu

Re: Solr uppercase inside phrase query

Did you manage to solve the problem? I have the same problem and would like to know a solution. Chien Nguyen wrote > Many thank. I will try it. -- Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html

Re: Type ahead functionality using complex phrase query parser

t; > -Original Message- > From: Hanjan, Harinder [mailto:harinder.han...@calgary.ca] > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2018 5:01 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: [EXT] Type ahead functionality using complex phrase query parser > > Hello! > > I can't g

RE: Type ahead functionality using complex phrase query parser

@lucene.apache.org Subject: [EXT] Type ahead functionality using complex phrase query parser Hello! I can't get Solr to give the results I would expect, would appreciate if someone could point me in the right direction here. /select?q={!complexphrase}"gar*" shows me the following terms -

Type ahead functionality using complex phrase query parser

Hello! I can't get Solr to give the results I would expect, would appreciate if someone could point me in the right direction here. /select?q={!complexphrase}"gar*" shows me the following terms -garages -garburator -gardening -gardens -garage -

Re: Solr regex phrase query syntax

ore occurrences) > | repeatexp {n,m} (n to m occurrences, including both) > > > Does Solr support multiple occurrence of terms in a phrase query? For > example: name:”abc{0, 3} def”, which means term “abc” repeats 0 to 3 times > in the phrase. > > Thanks, > > Chuming > > -- Sincerely yours Mikhail Khludnev

Solr regex phrase query syntax

+ (one or more occurrences) | repeatexp {n} (n occurrences) | repeatexp {n,} (n or more occurrences) | repeatexp {n,m} (n to m occurrences, including both) Does Solr support multiple occurrence of terms in a phrase query? For example: name:”abc{0, 3} def”, which

Re: Solr NGram Phrase Query

Thanks Shawn. Now I understand why my query without slop worked on the old system, not new one. On top of this NGram phrase query, I also want to do some wildcards. I used complex phrase in my query. {!complexphrase inOrder=true}sequence:"KK?” worked debug":{ "

Re: Solr NGram Phrase Query

On 11/16/2017 8:40 AM, Chuming Chen wrote: > I think the position is the issue, but how do I fix it? Is something wrong > with my index analyzer or just my query is not right? I need to do phrase > query, order is important here. > > I tried “KKS KSA”~1 in the query, it worked. H

Re: Solr NGram Phrase Query

Hi Shawn, I think the position is the issue, but how do I fix it? Is something wrong with my index analyzer or just my query is not right? I need to do phrase query, order is important here. I tried “KKS KSA”~1 in the query, it worked. However, if I do "KKS KSA SAR”~1, it didn’t work,

Re: Solr NGram Phrase Query

that the *query* doesn't match is that the relative *positions* don't match.  In your query, the terms are at position 1 and 2, but in the *index*, all the terms are at position 1.  Because the query has quotes, it is a phrase query, which means that positions matter.  With the query terms at position 1

RE: FastVector does not highlight for phrase query when it contains stop word/s

Hi Rick, Thanks for response. I understood that If I do not use StopFilter factory or do not exclude stop words , than it will solve problem. But here stop words excluded and search is working well with stop word in phrase query.. but fast vector highlighter does not highlighting. I debug

Re: FastVector does not highlight for phrase query when it contains stop word/s

;field values when search for phrase query contains stop word. >For example , Query is "blue is the sky" , it will return result but >highlighting will not available for this field. > >I have applied, >hl.usePhraseHighlighter=true >hl.preserveMulti=true >hl.highlightMu

Re: FastVector does not highlight for phrase query when it contains stop word/s

values when search for phrase query contains stop word. > For example , Query is "blue is the sky" , it will return result but > highlighting will not available for this field. > > I have applied, > hl.usePhraseHighlighter=true > hl.preserveMulti=true > hl.highlightMulti

FastVector does not highlight for phrase query when it contains stop word/s

Hi Solr Users, I come across issue that fast Vector highlighter does not highlight field values when search for phrase query contains stop word. For example , Query is "blue is the sky" , it will return result but highlighting will not available for this field. I ha

Re: Apache 4.9.1 - trouble trying to use complex phrase query parser.

If you'd include the actual error message you get .. it might easier to try and help? -Stefan On Jun 28, 2017 6:24 PM, "Michael Craven" <mcrav...@jhu.edu> wrote: > Hi - > > I am trying to use the complex phrase query parser on my Drupal > installation. Our core

Apache 4.9.1 - trouble trying to use complex phrase query parser.

Hi - I am trying to use the complex phrase query parser on my Drupal installation. Our core is sore 4.9.1, so I thought it should be no problem. Search works fine when I use a local parameter to do a search of type lucene, dismax, or edismax, (a la {!lucene} etc.), but when I try to do

Re: Phrase Query only forward direction

Hatcher" <erik.hatc...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Using ps=5 causes the phrase matching to be unordered matching. You’ll > >> have to set ps=0, if using edismax, to get exact order phrase matches. > >> > >>Erik > >> >

Re: Phrase Query only forward direction

-Jun-2017 5:44 PM, "Erik Hatcher" <erik.hatc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Using ps=5 causes the phrase matching to be unordered matching. You’ll >> have to set ps=0, if using edismax, to get exact order phrase matches. >> >>Erik >> >

Re: Phrase Query only forward direction

2017, at 1:09 AM, Aman Deep Singh <amandeep.coo...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> I'm using a phrase query ,but it was applying the phrase boost to the > query >> where terms are in reverse order also ,which i don't want.Is their any way >> to avoid the phra

Re: Phrase Query only forward direction

oo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > I'm using a phrase query ,but it was applying the phrase boost to the query > where terms are in reverse order also ,which i don't want.Is their any way > to avoid the phrase boost for reverse order and apply boost only in case of > terms

Re: Phrase Query only forward direction

Using ps=5 causes the phrase matching to be unordered matching. You’ll have to set ps=0, if using edismax, to get exact order phrase matches. Erik > On Jun 12, 2017, at 1:09 AM, Aman Deep Singh <amandeep.coo...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi, > I'm

Phrase Query only forward direction

Hi, I'm using a phrase query ,but it was applying the phrase boost to the query where terms are in reverse order also ,which i don't want.Is their any way to avoid the phrase boost for reverse order and apply boost only in case of terms are in same sequence Solr version 6.5.1 e.g. http

Re: Solr uppercase inside phrase query

Many thank. I will try it. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-uppercase-inside-phrase-query-tp4337403p4337787.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Solr uppercase inside phrase query

Many thank. I will try it -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-uppercase-inside-phrase-query-tp4337403p4337786.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Solr uppercase inside phrase query

rotected="protwords.txt"/> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> words="stopwords.txt"/> >>> >> ignoreCase="true" expand="true"/> >>> >> generateWordParts="1" >>> generateNumberParts="1 catenateWords="0" catenateNumbers="0" >>> catenateAll="0" >>> splitOnCaseChange="1"/> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> protected="protwords.txt"/> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble >>> .com/Solr-uppercase-inside-phrase-query-tp4337403.html >>> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >> >>

Re: Solr uppercase inside phrase query

> > protected="protwords.txt"/> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > words="stopwords.txt"/> >> > ignoreCase="true" expand="true"/> >>

Re: Solr uppercase inside phrase query

gt; > generateWordParts="1" > generateNumberParts="1 catenateWords="0" catenateNumbers="0" > catenateAll="0" > splitOnCaseChange="1"/> > > > > protected="protwords.txt"/> > > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3. > nabble.com/Solr-uppercase-inside-phrase-query-tp4337403.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Solr uppercase inside phrase query

this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-uppercase-inside-phrase-query-tp4337403.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: help: Solr greek insensitive regex phrase query search

ct job for greek language If we use ICUFoldingFilterFactory filter, single word search works well but if we use a regex query or search for a phrase query, that we used before the filter ICUFoldingFilterFactory

Re: help: Solr greek insensitive regex phrase query search

nguage > positionIncrementGap="1000"> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If we use ICUFoldingFilterFactory filter, single word search works wel

help: Solr greek insensitive regex phrase query search

ery or search for a phrase query, that we used before the filter ICUFoldingFilterFactory installation, do not work. positionIncrementGap="1000"> We have

Re: Phrase query proximity parameter doe not show up in parsed query string

Hi, I think synonym_edismax is not part of solr. Can you re-produce with the stock edismax? On Monday, June 20, 2016 12:34 PM, preeti kumari wrote: Hi All, My query looks like below : q=((_query_:"{!synonym_edismax qf='partnum' v='597871' bq='' mm=100

Phrase query proximity parameter doe not show up in parsed query string

Hi All, My query looks like below : q=((_query_:"{!synonym_edismax qf='partnum' v='597871' bq='' mm=100 synonyms=true synonyms.constructPhrases=true synonyms.ignoreQueryOperators=true}") OR (partnumcomp:597871* OR partnum:"597871"~4 OR ngramc:"597 978 787 871"~4 OR partnumngramc:"597 978 787

Re: How to use a regex search within a phrase query?

nal Message- > From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2016 7:43 PM > To: solr-user <solr-user@lucene.apache.org> > Subject: Re: How to use a regex search within a phrase query? > > Erez: > > Before going too far down this path, und

RE: How to use a regex search within a phrase query?

:erickerick...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2016 7:43 PM To: solr-user <solr-user@lucene.apache.org> Subject: Re: How to use a regex search within a phrase query? Erez: Before going too far down this path, understand that even if you can get this syntax to work, you're going to pay

Re: How to use a regex search within a phrase query?

gex query across term boundaries. The pure > regex is good as long I'm querying for a single term. > > > -Original Message- > From: Ahmet Arslan [mailto:iori...@yahoo.com] > Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2016 4:49 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Erez Michalak <emicha...@

RE: How to use a regex search within a phrase query?

. -Original Message- From: Ahmet Arslan [mailto:iori...@yahoo.com] Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2016 4:49 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Erez Michalak <emicha...@varonis.com> Subject: Re: How to use a regex search within a phrase query? Hi Erez, I don't think it is possible to combine

Re: How to use a regex search within a phrase query?

, Erez Michalak <emicha...@varonis.com> wrote: Hey, I'm developing a search application based on SOLR 5.3.1, and would like to add to it regex search capabilities on a specific tokenized text field named 'content'. Is it possible to combine the default regex syntax within a phrase

How to use a regex search within a phrase query?

Hey, I'm developing a search application based on SOLR 5.3.1, and would like to add to it regex search capabilities on a specific tokenized text field named 'content'. Is it possible to combine the default regex syntax within a phrase query (and moreover, within a proximity search)? If so

Re: Update to solr 5 - custom phrase query implementation issue

On 02/02/2016 03:20 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote: On Feb 2, 2016, at 8:57 AM, Elodie Sannier wrote: Hello, We are using solr 4.10.4 and we want to update to 5.4.1. With solr 4.10.4: - we extend PhraseQuery with a custom class in order to remove some terms from phrase

Re: Update to solr 5 - custom phrase query implementation issue

Gerald - I don’t quite understand, sorry - perhaps best if you could post your code (or some test version you can work with and share here) so we can see what exactly you’re trying to do.Maybe there’s other ways to achieve what you want, maybe with somehow leveraging a StopFilter-like

Re: Update to solr 5 - custom phrase query implementation issue

Erik, here is some context : - migration from solr 4.10.4 to 5.4.1. - we have our own synonym implementation that do not use solr synonym mechanism: at the time, we needed to manage multi token synonym and it wasn't covered by the Lucene features. So basically we - let' say

Re: Update to solr 5 - custom phrase query implementation issue

> On Feb 2, 2016, at 8:57 AM, Elodie Sannier wrote: > > Hello, > > We are using solr 4.10.4 and we want to update to 5.4.1. > > With solr 4.10.4: > - we extend PhraseQuery with a custom class in order to remove some > terms from phrase queries with phrase slop (update

Update to solr 5 - custom phrase query implementation issue

Hello, We are using solr 4.10.4 and we want to update to 5.4.1. With solr 4.10.4: - we extend PhraseQuery with a custom class in order to remove some terms from phrase queries with phrase slop (update of add(Term term, int position) method) - in order to use our implementation, we extend

phrase query

I have the following field type: I am trying to use dismax query parser (because it seems to have better phrase query support compared with standard query parser?) I have mm = 1 ps = 4 I have the following data indexed: 1) acute care pharmaceuticals 2) carefusion llc When q

Re: phrase query

crementGap="100"> > > > > maxGramSize="25"/> > > > > > > > > I am trying to use dismax query parser (because it seems to have better > phrase query support compared with standard query parser?) > I have mm = 1 > ps = 4 > &

Phrase query not matching exact tokens in some cases

For the query police office our users are getting back highlighted results for police office*r* (and police office*rs*) I get why a search for police officers would include just office since the stemmer would cause that behavior. However I don't understand why office is matching officer here when

Re: Phrase query not matching exact tokens in some cases

Also, the first place to look for answers for questions like what is the stemmer doing is to look at the admin/analysis page. Each step in the analysis chain will be shown. Hover over the light gray initials and you'll see the class used (e.g. WST == WhitespaceTokenizer). Best, Erick On Tue, Jul

Re: Phrase query not matching exact tokens in some cases

Which kind of Highlighter are you using ? Anyway it is responsibility of your analysis chain. it is an heavy analysis chain and I can see : solr. HunspellStemFilterFactory If you are using the term vector for your field, to be used by your highlighter, in the term vector , for each document, you

Re: Phrase query get converted to SpanNear with slop 1 instead of 0

Ok. Thank you Chris. It is a custom Query parser. I will check my Query parser on where it inject the slop 1. On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 3:26 AM, Chris Hostetter hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote: : I encounter this peculiar case with solr 4.10.2 where the parsed query : doesnt seem to be logical.

Re: Phrase query get converted to SpanNear with slop 1 instead of 0

Hi Ariya, I think Hossman specified you that the slop 1 is fine in your use case :) Of course in the case using span queries was what you were expecting ! Cheers 2015-06-16 10:13 GMT+01:00 ariya bala ariya...@gmail.com: Ok. Thank you Chris. It is a custom Query parser. I will check my Query

Re: Phrase query get converted to SpanNear with slop 1 instead of 0

: I encounter this peculiar case with solr 4.10.2 where the parsed query : doesnt seem to be logical. : : PHRASE23(reduce workforce) == : SpanNearQuery(spanNear([spanNear([Contents:reduceä, : Contents:workforceä], 1, true)], 23, true)) 1) that does not appear to be a parser syntax of any parser

Phrase query get converted to SpanNear with slop 1 instead of 0

Hi, I encounter this peculiar case with solr 4.10.2 where the parsed query doesnt seem to be logical. PHRASE23(reduce workforce) == SpanNearQuery(spanNear([spanNear([Contents:reduceä, Contents:workforceä], 1, true)], 23, true)) The question is why does the Phrase(quoted string) gets converted

Auto-correct the phrase/query

Hello, I want to do same like google phrase/spell correction. If anyone type a query the dark night then I need a suggestion like the dark knight in Solr. Is there anyway to do this?

pf doesn't work like normal phrase query

My aim is to boost exactish matches similar to the recipe described in [1]. The anchoring works in q but not in pf, where I need it. Here is an example that shows the effect: q=title_exact:anatomiepf=title_exact^2000 debugQuery says it is interpreted this way: +title_exact: anatomie

Re: pf doesn't work like normal phrase query

What happens when you do not use fielded query? q=anatomieqf=title_exact instead of q=title_exact:anatomie Ahmet On Sunday, January 11, 2015 12:05 PM, Michael Lackhoff mich...@lackhoff.de wrote: My aim is to boost exactish matches similar to the recipe described in [1]. The anchoring works

Re: pf doesn't work like normal phrase query

Am 11.01.2015 um 14:01 schrieb Ahmet Arslan: What happens when you do not use fielded query? q=anatomieqf=title_exact instead of q=title_exact:anatomie Then it works (with qf=title): +(title:anatomie) (title_exact: anatomie ^20.0) Only problem is that my frontend always does a

Re: pf doesn't work like normal phrase query

Am 11.01.2015 um 14:19 schrieb Michael Lackhoff: Or put another way: How can I do this boost in more complex queries like: title:foo AND author:miller AND year:[2010 TO *] It would be nice to have a title foo before another title some foo and bar (given the other criteria also match both

Re: pf doesn't work like normal phrase query

Hi, You might find this useful : https://lucidworks.com/blog/whats-a-dismax/ Regarding your example : title:foo AND author:miller AND year:[2010 TO *] last two clauses better served as a filter query. http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters#fq By the way it is possible to combine

Re: pf doesn't work like normal phrase query

Hi Ahmet, You might find this useful : https://lucidworks.com/blog/whats-a-dismax/ I have a basic understanding but will do further reading... Regarding your example : title:foo AND author:miller AND year:[2010 TO *] last two clauses better served as a filter query.

Re: pf doesn't work like normal phrase query

It's still not quite clear to me what your specific goal is. From your vague description it seems somewhat different from the blog post that you originally cited. So, let's try one more time... explain in plain English what use case you are trying to satisfy. You mention fielded queries, but in

Re: pf doesn't work like normal phrase query

Thanks for the clarification. The issue still remains that you need to distill all of the competing requirements into a single, concise, and consistent model, and whether that adequately aligns with existing Solr features remains problematic. The general guidance is to stick with the existing

Re: pf doesn't work like normal phrase query

For the title searches, Doug Turnbull wrote a really interesting in-depth article: http://opensourceconnections.com/blog/solr/using-solr-cloud-for-robustness-but-returning-json-format/ I don't know if that's the one you read already. For the fielded query, you get more flexibility if you use

Re: pf doesn't work like normal phrase query

Am 11.01.2015 um 18:30 schrieb Jack Krupansky: It's still not quite clear to me what your specific goal is. From your vague description it seems somewhat different from the blog post that you originally cited. So, let's try one more time... explain in plain English what use case you are

Re: pf doesn't work like normal phrase query

Hi Michael, I had to deal such expert users in the past :) I suggest you to create a new syntax for exact match. Since he is an expert he will love it. either suggest i) ask user to enter number of tokens e.g. q=title:Anatomie AND length:1 or ii) use dollar sign (or something else) for

Re: pf doesn't work like normal phrase query

Thanks everyone for all the advice! To sum up there seems to be no easy solution. I only have the option to either - make things really complicated - only help some users/query structures - accept the status quo What could help is an analogon to field aliases: If it was possible to say

Re: phrase query in solr 4

On top of what Shawn rightly said, two things: 1. Try to benchmark yourself (best bet) solution with and without the shingles. Then you know better and have story with numbers to tell. 2. If you go with the shingles approach, consider removing duplicates with

phrase query in solr 4

Hi We are trying to upgrade our index from 3.6.1 to 4.9.1 and I wanted to make sure our existing indexing strategy is still valid or not. The statistics of the raw corpus are: - 4.8 Billon total number of tokens in the entire corpus. - 13MM documents We have 3 requirements 1) we want to

Re: phrase query in solr 4

On 10/27/2014 6:20 AM, Robust Links wrote: 1) we want to index and search all tokens in a document (i.e. we do not rely on external stores) 2) we need search time to be fast and willing to pay larger indexing time and index size, 3) be able to search as fast as possible ngrams of 3

phrase query in solr 4

Hi We are trying to upgrade our index from 3.6.1 to 4.9.1 and I wanted to make sure our existing indexing strategy is still valid or not. The statistics of the raw corpus are: - 4.8 Billon total number of tokens in the entire corpus. - 13MM documents We have 3 requirements 1) we want to

Re: Leading and trailing wildcard with phrase query and positional ordering

Hi Ankur, For the leading wildcard you may want to try the ReversedWildcardFilterFactory: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Filter+Descriptions#FilterDescriptions-ReversedWildcardFilter in the code of CPQ there is a loop over filters of your text field and a specific check:

Leading and trailing wildcard with phrase query and positional ordering

Hi, I am using Solr 4.2.1. I have a couple of questions regarding using leading and trailing wildcards with phrase queries and doing positional ordering. * I have a field called text which is defined as the text_general field. I downloaded the ComplexPhraseQuery plugin

Re: Phrase query combined with term query for maximum accuracy

=*,scorecountry=US for collection_DE it works fine with both lowercase and uppercase operators - Thanks, Michael -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Phrase-query-combined-with-term-query-for-maximum-accuracy-tp4098215p4098596.html Sent from the Solr - User

Re: Phrase query combined with term query for maximum accuracy

.n3.nabble.com/Phrase-query-combined-with-term-query-for-maximum-accuracy-tp4098215p4098599.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Phrase query combined with term query for maximum accuracy

OR title:john doe^30 OR description:john doe^10 Would the above query provide me what i want, or is there a better way to do it? Thanks! - Thanks, Michael -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Phrase-query-combined-with-term-query-for-maximum-accuracy-tp4098215.html

Re: Phrase query combined with term query for maximum accuracy

You need some parentheses: title:john doe^30 OR description:john doe^10 should be: title:(john doe)^30 OR description:(john doe)^10 -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: michael.boom Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 7:20 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Phrase query

Is it possible to use phrase query in range queries?

I am trying to use range queries to take advantage of having constant scores in multivalued field but I am not sure if range queries support phrase query.. Ex: The below range query works fine. str name=q _query_:address:([Charlotte TO Charlotte])^5.5 /str The below query doesn't work, str

Re: Is it possible to use phrase query in range queries?

-Original Message- From: SolrLover Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 5:53 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Is it possible to use phrase query in range queries? I am trying to use range queries to take advantage of having constant scores in multivalued field but I am not sure if range

Phrase query with prefix query

Is there a query parser that supports a phrase query with prefix query at the end, such as San Fran* ? -- - T. Kuro Kurosaka • Senior Software Engineer

Re: Phrase query with prefix query

Search against a field using edge N-grams. --wunder On Aug 2, 2013, at 11:16 AM, T. Kuro Kurosaka wrote: Is there a query parser that supports a phrase query with prefix query at the end, such as San Fran* ? -- - T. Kuro Kurosaka • Senior

Re: Phrase query with prefix query

a phrase query with prefix query at the end, such as San Fran* ? -- - T. Kuro Kurosaka • Senior Software Engineer

Re: Phrase query with prefix query

...@healthline.com To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Friday, August 2, 2013 9:16 PM Subject: Phrase query with prefix query Is there a query parser that supports a phrase query with prefix query at the end, such as San Fran* ? -- - T. Kuro Kurosaka

Re: edismax, phrase query with slop, pf parameter

Hi I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4362 for this. Ahmet --- On Sun, 1/20/13, Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com wrote: From: Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com Subject: edismax, phrase query with slop, pf parameter To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Date: Sunday, January 20, 2013

Re: Solr - Keep Punctuation in Parsed Phrase Query

I am working with apache-solr-3.6.0 on windows machine. I would like to search for phrases which contain punctuation marks. Example: He said: Hi I tried to escape the punctuation marks using \ so my url was:

Re: Solr - Keep Punctuation in Parsed Phrase Query

Thanks, it worked after editing my schema line to: field name=text type=text_ws indexed=true stored=true termVectors=true multiValued=true/ But I wonder what text_ws means? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Keep-Punctuation-in-Parsed-Phrase-Query

Re: Solr - Keep Punctuation in Parsed Phrase Query

But I wonder what text_ws means? it means text whitespace you can find its definition in schema.xml. search for 'text_ws' It uses whitespacetokenizer.

phrase query and string/keyword tokenizer

the two queries either opens up matching a ton of documents that shouldn't really match (e.g. total found goes from 24 to 4800+ documents) or doesn't match the one I want, giving poor results. Does anyone have suggestions for how I can convince the phrase query to match against my bestMatchTitle

Re: edismax ignores the quoted sub phrase query ?

: Is this the intended behavior of edismax, or am I missing anything ? it definitely looks like a bug to me, that pf clause is non sensical. I've opened a jira to track this, but i'm afraid i can't offer any advice on how to fix it... https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3008 -Hoss

edismax ignores the quoted sub phrase query ?

Hi, I am new to edismax, and trying to migrate from dismax to edismax. For the queries with the explicitly quoted sub phrase query, it seems edismax will ignore the quoted one, compared with dismax during the whole query phrase matching process (pf). Here is one example: For the same query: 2012

Re: help with phrase query

I think you can use pf2 and pf3 in your requestHandler. Best regards, Elisabeth 2011/10/16 Vijay Ramachandran vijay...@gmail.com Hello. I have an application where I try to match longer queries (sentences) to short documents (search phrases). Typically, the documents are 3-5 terms in

help with phrase query

Hello. I have an application where I try to match longer queries (sentences) to short documents (search phrases). Typically, the documents are 3-5 terms in length. I am facing a problem where phrase match in the indicated phrase fields via pf doesn't seem to match in most cases, and I am stumped.

  1   2   3   >