> From:
> Kevin Risden
>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 10:24:24 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SolrCloud Replication Failure
>
> I haven't dug into why this is happening but it definitely reproduces. I
> removed the local requireme
on.
From: Kevin Risden
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 10:24:24 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: SolrCloud Replication Failure
I haven't dug into why this is happening but it definitely reproduces. I
removed the local requirements (port mapping
On Wed, 2018-10-31 at 13:42 +0200, Sofiya Strochyk wrote:
> q===0= expression>==24=2.2=json
Not much to see here, perhaps because you are not allowed to share it?
Maybe we can try and isolate the cause? Could you try different runs,
where you change different components and tell us roughly how
day, October 31, 2018 8:20:18 PM
> To: solr-user
> Subject: Re: SolrCloud Replication Failure
>
> What version of solr? This code was pretty much rewriten in 7.3 IIRC
>
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018, 10:47 Jeremy Smith
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We are currently running
Thanks Erick, this is 7.5.0.
From: Erick Erickson
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 8:20:18 PM
To: solr-user
Subject: Re: SolrCloud Replication Failure
What version of solr? This code was pretty much rewriten in 7.3 IIRC
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018, 10:47 Jeremy Smith
What version of solr? This code was pretty much rewriten in 7.3 IIRC
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018, 10:47 Jeremy Smith Hi all,
>
> We are currently running a moderately large instance of standalone
> solr and are preparing to switch to solr cloud to help us scale up. I have
> been running a number
Hi all,
We are currently running a moderately large instance of standalone solr
and are preparing to switch to solr cloud to help us scale up. I have been
running a number of tests using docker locally and ran into an issue where
replication is consistently failing. I have pared down
The logfiles on your servers should be verbose enough to indicate what
machines are handling which parts of the request.
Yes, generally i see the following entries in logs:
1.
df=_text_=false=_id=score=4=0=true=fq===24=2==1540984948280=true=javabin
2.
st do to produce results.
SolrCloud complicates the situation further. It normally does load
balancing of all requests that come in across the cloud. So the machine
handling the request might not be the machine where you SENT the request.
Very likely the one with a higher load is the one tha
Sure, here is IO for bigger machine:
https://upload.cc/i1/2018/10/30/tQovyM.png
for smaller machine:
https://upload.cc/i1/2018/10/30/cP8DxU.png
CPU utilization including iowait:
https://upload.cc/i1/2018/10/30/eSs1YT.png
iowait only:
https://upload.cc/i1/2018/10/30/CHgx41.png
On 30.10.18
Please see inline...
Deepak
"The greatness of a nation can be judged by the way its animals are
treated. Please consider stopping the cruelty by becoming a Vegan"
+91 73500 12833
deic...@gmail.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deicool
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/deicool
"Plant a Tree,
On 10/29/2018 8:56 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
The interval between when a commit happens and all the autowarm
queries are finished if 52 seconds for the filterCache. seen warming
that that long unless something's very unusual. I'd actually be very
surprised if you're really only firing 64
My swappiness is set to 10, swap is almost not used (used space is on
scale of a few MB) and there is no swap IO.
There is disk IO like this, though:
https://upload.cc/i1/2018/10/30/43lGfj.png
https://upload.cc/i1/2018/10/30/T3u9oY.png
However CPU iowait is still zero, so not sure if the disk
Yes. Swapping from disk to memory & vice versa
Deepak
"The greatness of a nation can be judged by the way its animals are
treated. Please consider stopping the cruelty by becoming a Vegan"
+91 73500 12833
deic...@gmail.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deicool
LinkedIn:
Sofiya:
The interval between when a commit happens and all the autowarm
queries are finished if 52 seconds for the filterCache. seen warming
that that long unless something's very unusual. I'd actually be very
surprised if you're really only firing 64 autowarm queries and it's
taking almost 52
Could you please clarify what is memory disk layer? Do you mean swapping
from memory to disk, reading from disk to memory, or something else?
On 29.10.18 17:20, Deepak Goel wrote:
I would then suspect performance is choking in memory disk layer. can
you please check the performance?
On Mon,
Sure, i can test that, will set to zero now :)
We never tried a small number for the autowarming parameter but it has
been running with zero (default value) for a while before being changed
to 64, and the startup after the commit has been a bit slow. But
overall, there was rather little
Speaking of your caches... Either it's a problem with the metrics
reporting or your warmup times very, very long. 11 seconds and, er,
52 seconds! My guess is that you have your autowarm counts set to a
very high number and are consuming a lot of CPU time every time a
commit happens. Which will
I would then suspect performance is choking in memory disk layer. can you
please check the performance?
On Mon, 29 Oct 2018, 20:30 Sofiya Strochyk, wrote:
> Hi Deepak and thanks for your reply,
>
> On 27.10.18 10:35, Deepak Goel wrote:
>
>
> Last, what is the nature of your request. Are the
kirjoitti 26.10.2018 klo 18.55:
Hi everyone,
We have a SolrCloud setup with the following configuration:
* 4 nodes (3x128GB RAM Intel Xeon E5-1650v2, 1x64GB RAM Intel Xeon
E5-1650v2, 12 cores, with SSDs)
* One collection, 4 shards, each has only a single replica (so 4
replicas in total
Hi Deepak and thanks for your reply,
On 27.10.18 10:35, Deepak Goel wrote:
Last, what is the nature of your request. Are the queries the same? Or
they are very random? Random queries would need more tuning than if
the queries the same.
The search term (q) is different for each query, and
Hi Shalin,
these are stats for caches used:
*documentCache*
class:org.apache.solr.search.LRUCache
description:LRU Cache(maxSize=128, initialSize=128)
stats:
CACHE.searcher.documentCache.cumulative_evictions:234923643
CACHE.searcher.documentCache.cumulative_hitratio:0
On Mon, 2018-10-29 at 10:55 +0200, Sofiya Strochyk wrote:
> I think we could try that, but most likely it turns out that at some
> point we are receiving 300 requests per second, and are able to
> reasonably handle 150 per second, which means everything else is
> going to be kept in the growing
,
Ere
Sofiya Strochyk kirjoitti 26.10.2018 klo 18.55:
Hi everyone,
We have a SolrCloud setup with the following configuration:
* 4 nodes (3x128GB RAM Intel Xeon E5-1650v2, 1x64GB RAM Intel Xeon
E5-1650v2, 12 cores, with SSDs)
* One collection, 4 shards, each has only a single replica (so 4
I think we could try that, but most likely it turns out that at some
point we are receiving 300 requests per second, and are able to
reasonably handle 150 per second, which means everything else is going
to be kept in the growing queue and increase response times even further..
Also, if one
Erick,
thanks, i've been pulling my hair out over this for a long time and
gathered a lot of information :)
Doesn't there exist a setting for maxIndexingThreads in solrconfig with
default value of about 8? It's not clear if my updates are being
executed in parallel or not but i would expect
lso help rather than CMS, but as you're well aware GC
tuning "is more art than science" ;).
Good luck!
Erick
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 8:55 AM Sofiya Strochyk
<mailto:s...@interlogic.com.ua> wrote:
Hi everyone,
We have a SolrCloud setup with the following configuration:
4 nodes
What does your cache statistics look like? What's the hit ratio, size,
evictions etc?
More comments inline:
On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 8:23 AM Erick Erickson
wrote:
> Sofiya:
>
> I haven't said so before, but it's a great pleasure to work with
> someone who's done a lot of homework before pinging
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 9:25 PM Sofiya Strochyk
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> We have a SolrCloud setup with the following configuration:
>
>- 4 nodes (3x128GB RAM Intel Xeon E5-1650v2, 1x64GB RAM Intel Xeon
>E5-1650v2, 12 cores, with SSDs)
>- One collection, 4
On 10/26/2018 9:55 AM, Sofiya Strochyk wrote:
We have a SolrCloud setup with the following configuration:
I'm late to this party. You've gotten some good replies already. I
hope I can add something useful.
* 4 nodes (3x128GB RAM Intel Xeon E5-1650v2, 1x64GB RAM Intel Xeon
E5
Sofiya Strochyk wrote:
> Target query rate is up to 500 qps, maybe 300, and we need
> to keep response time at <200ms. But at the moment we only
> see very good search performance with up to 100 requests
> per second. Whenever it grows to about 200, average response
> time abruptly increases to
Sofiya:
I haven't said so before, but it's a great pleasure to work with
someone who's done a lot of homework before pinging the list. The only
unfortunate bit is that it usually means the simple "Oh, I can fix
that without thinking about it much" doesn't work ;)
2. I'll clarify a bit here. Any
David Hastings wrote:
> Would adding the docValues in the schema, but not reindexing, cause
> errors? IE, only apply the doc values after the next reindex, but in the
> meantime keep functioning as there were none until then?
As soon as you specify in the schema that a field has docValues=true,
Would adding the docValues in the schema, but not reindexing, cause
errors? IE, only apply the doc values after the next reindex, but in the
meantime keep functioning as there were none until then?
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 2:15 PM Toke Eskildsen wrote:
> Sofiya Strochyk wrote:
> > 5. Yes,
Sofiya Strochyk wrote:
> 5. Yes, docValues are enabled for the fields we sort on
> (except score which is an internal field); [...]
I am currently working on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8374
which speeds up DocValues-operations for indexes with many documents.
What "many" means
you a hint as to whether the
>> TLOG/PULL configuration would be helpful. There's been talk of
>> separate thread pools for indexing and querying to give queries a
>> better shot at the CPU, but that's not in place yet.
>>
>> 7> G1GC may also help rather than CMS, but a
nd querying to give queries a
better shot at the CPU, but that's not in place yet.
7> G1GC may also help rather than CMS, but as you're well aware GC
tuning "is more art than science" ;).
Good luck!
Erick
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 8:55 AM Sofiya Strochyk wrote:
Hi everyone,
We have a SolrClou
than science" ;).
Good luck!
Erick
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 8:55 AM Sofiya Strochyk wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> We have a SolrCloud setup with the following configuration:
>
> 4 nodes (3x128GB RAM Intel Xeon E5-1650v2, 1x64GB RAM Intel Xeon E5-1650v2,
> 12 cores,
Hi everyone,
We have a SolrCloud setup with the following configuration:
* 4 nodes (3x128GB RAM Intel Xeon E5-1650v2, 1x64GB RAM Intel Xeon
E5-1650v2, 12 cores, with SSDs)
* One collection, 4 shards, each has only a single replica (so 4
replicas in total), using compositeId router
tually came out
ahead in some setups.
Now I'm not trying to say that CUSC performs better than CSC, just
that "It Depends" (Erick's TM) on the rest of your ETL code, on the
topology of your SolrCloud cluster, etc.
Good luck!
Jason
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 6:49 PM shamik wrote:
-z 172.22.9.16:2181]*
>
> once solrcloud instance started. we have created core with shards (2) and
> custom configSet("_test") (schema.xml), Fields : id,name
>
> We have used dataImportHandler (DIH) post.jar to push data to respective
> core.
>
> Here we have
and started solr instance (8983)
with -z (zookeeper) localhost:2181.
*[solr start -cloud -p 8983 -z 172.22.9.16:2181]*
once solrcloud instance started. we have created core with shards (2) and
custom configSet("_test") (schema.xml), Fields : id,name
We have used dataImportHandler (DIH) post.j
Thanks Erick, appreciate your help
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
No best practices as such, "whatever works" about covers it. That's
not a huge query rate, especially if you have replicas per shard so I
wouldn't worry too much about it. If you rack 100 clients all driving
Solr as hard as possible and people complain that query responses are
bad you'll know
Thanks Erick, that's extremely insightful. I'm not using batching and that's
the reason I was exploring ConcurrentUpdateSolrClient. Currently, N threads
are reusing the same CloudSolrClient to send data to Solr. Ofcourse, the
single point of failure was my biggest concern with
r
> indexing a large volume of data instead of CloudSolrClient. Having an
> async,batch API seems to be a better fit for us where we tend to index a
> lot of data periodically. As I'm looking into the API, I'm wonderign if
> this can be used for SolrCloud.
>
if
this can be used for SolrCloud.
ConcurrentUpdateSolrClientclient = new
ConcurrentUpdateSolrClient.Builder(url).withThreadCount(100).withQueueSize(50).build();
The Builder object only takes a single url, not sure what that would be in
case of SolrCloud. For e.g. if I've two shards with a couple
Thank you. Will check all options and let you know.
From: Alexandre Rafalovitch
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2018 8:09:34 PM
To: solr-user
Subject: Re: Error while indexing Thai core with SolrCloud
Ok,
That may have been a bit too much :-) However, it was useful
Ok,
That may have been a bit too much :-) However, it was useful.
There seem to have several possible avenues:
1) You are using SolrJ and your SolrJ version is not the same as the
version of the Solr server. There was a bunch of things that could
trigger, especially in combination with Unicode
Hi,
Thank you.
Full stacktrace below
"core_node_name":"172.19.218.201:8082_solr_core_th"}DEBUG - 2018-10-19
02:13:20.343; org.apache.zookeeper.ClientCnxn$SendThread; Reading reply
sessionid:0x200b5a04a770005, packet:: clientPath:null serverPath:null
finished:false header:: 356,1
there (that's as easy as "bin/solr start -e cloud").
Regards,
Alex.
On Sun, 21 Oct 2018 at 10:20, Moshe Recanati | KMS wrote:
>
> Hi Alexandre,
>
> Thank you.
>
> How this explain the issue exists only with SolrCloud and not standalone?
>
>
> Moshe
>
&
Hi Alexandre,
Thank you.
How this explain the issue exists only with SolrCloud and not standalone?
Moshe
From: Alexandre Rafalovitch
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2018 5:18:24 PM
To: solr-user
Subject: Re: Error while indexing Thai core with SolrCloud
I would
at 09:55, Moshe Recanati | KMS wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We've specific exception that happening only on Thai core and only once we're
> using SolrCloud.
>
> Same indexing activity is running successfully while running on EN core with
> SolrCloud or with Thai core and standalone co
Hi,
We've specific exception that happening only on Thai core and only once we're
using SolrCloud.
Same indexing activity is running successfully while running on EN core with
SolrCloud or with Thai core and standalone configuration.
We're running on Linux with Solr 4.6
On 10/3/2018 10:45 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
Here's one way to do this:
Oh, and when you delete the data directory, delete the tlog directory
too. Don't copy tlog from the non-cloud install. Solr will re-create
it as long as the directory gives it permission to do so.
Thanks,
Shawn
have an index that can be restored to Solr 7. Do you know if
it's possible to restore an index like this to a SolrCloud environment if I
can get it into a directory that is shared by all the nodes?
Each node needs its own copy of the data, they cannot share an index
directory. Lucene works
Hello,
We currently run Solr 5.4 as our production search backend. We run it in a
master/slave replication architecture, and we're starting an upgrade to
Solr 7.5 using a SolrCloud architecture.
One of our collections is around 20GB and hosts about 200M documents, and
it would take around 6
gt;
>> I followed the guide over here to setup basic auth for solrcloud
>>
>> http://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_4/basic-authentication-plugin.html
>>
>> Our solrcloud version is 7.4. We have a 3 ensemble zookeeper with 3 solr
>> nodes. I restarted the zookeep
Any one have any ideas as to what could be going wrong.
Thank you
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 10:43 PM Sushant Vengurlekar <
svengurle...@curvolabs.com> wrote:
> I followed the guide over here to setup basic auth for solrcloud
>
> http://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_4/basic
Hi all,
I am a Solr newbie and would like to understand how enum types can be
added to solrcloud schema which resides in zookeeper.
In the example here
<
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_0/working-with-enum-fields.html#working-with-enum-fields
>
it relies on an enumsConfig.xm
I followed the guide over here to setup basic auth for solrcloud
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_4/basic-authentication-plugin.html
Our solrcloud version is 7.4. We have a 3 ensemble zookeeper with 3 solr
nodes. I restarted the zookeepers and the solr nodes but I still don't get
prompted
tion issue with
their SolrCloud install. They're running Solr 5.3.1, with a collection
spread across 12 shards. Each shard has a single replica.
They were seeing "Index Corruption" errors when running certain queries.
We investigated, and narrowed it down to a single shard. Using the
Lucen
ecent Solr releases, especially
starting with Solr 7.3. (SOLR-11702)
Best,
Erick
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 7:17 AM Matt Pearce wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We've just been working with a client who had a corruption issue with
> their SolrCloud install. They're running Solr 5.3.1, with a coll
Hi,
We've just been working with a client who had a corruption issue with
their SolrCloud install. They're running Solr 5.3.1, with a collection
spread across 12 shards. Each shard has a single replica.
They were seeing "Index Corruption" errors when running certain queries.
We in
On 9/13/2018 6:47 AM, Gu, Steve (CDC/OD/OADS) (CTR) wrote:
After zk servers have started, I got the following error when I tried to start
solr: localhost:2182 was unexpected at this time.
Where is this error seen? Was there more to the message? In addition
to knowing that, we will need to
8 11:10 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: solrcloud configuration: solr failed to start with multiple
zookeeper servers
Which version of Solr and ZooKeeper are you using?
What is the command that you used to start Solr?
Regards,
Edwin
On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 at 21:56, Gu, Steve (CDC/OD/
--
> From: Pure Host - Wolfgang Freudenberger
> Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2018 8:57 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: solrcloud configuration: solr failed to start with multiple
> zookeeper servers
>
> did you configure the zookeeper as a quorum?
>
&g
That makes sense. CloudSolrClient accepts a list of zookeepers. It works
beautifully.
Thanks
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Walter Underwood
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2018 10:55 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: how to access solr in solrcloud
Use direct
--Original Message-
> From: Florian Gleixner
> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2018 6:27 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: how to access solr in solrcloud
>
> On 9/12/18 8:21 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
>> On 9/12/2018 7:38 AM, Gu, Steve (CDC/OD/OADS) (CTR) wro
Yes, my zookeeper ensemble have 3 servers and they are all up running.
-Original Message-
From: Pure Host - Wolfgang Freudenberger
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2018 8:57 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: solrcloud configuration: solr failed to start with multiple
did you configure the zookeeper as a quorum?
Am 13.09.2018 um 14:47 schrieb Gu, Steve (CDC/OD/OADS) (CTR):
Hi,
I am prototyping solrcloud and I have three zookeeper servers
(localhost:2181,localhost:2182,localhost:2183). I set the zkHost in
solr.in.cmd file as:
set ZK_HOST="localhost
Hi,
I am prototyping solrcloud and I have three zookeeper servers
(localhost:2181,localhost:2182,localhost:2183). I set the zkHost in
solr.in.cmd file as:
set ZK_HOST="localhost:2181,localhost:2182,localhost:2183"
After zk servers have started, I got the following error when I trie
On 9/13/2018 6:23 AM, Gu, Steve (CDC/OD/OADS) (CTR) wrote:
Hi, Florian
We need to pass zookeeper url to CloudSolrClient. Since there are multiple zk
servers, is it the common practice to set a proxy server in front of zookeeper?
ZooKeeper should not be behind a load balancer. Your client
PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: how to access solr in solrcloud
On 9/12/18 8:21 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 9/12/2018 7:38 AM, Gu, Steve (CDC/OD/OADS) (CTR) wrote:
>> I am upgrading our solr to 7.4 and would like to set up solrcloud for
>> failover a
On 9/12/18 8:21 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 9/12/2018 7:38 AM, Gu, Steve (CDC/OD/OADS) (CTR) wrote:
>> I am upgrading our solr to 7.4 and would like to set up solrcloud for
>> failover and load balance. There are three zookeeper servers
>> (zk1:2181, zk1:2182) and two sol
On 9/12/2018 7:38 AM, Gu, Steve (CDC/OD/OADS) (CTR) wrote:
I am upgrading our solr to 7.4 and would like to set up solrcloud for failover
and load balance. There are three zookeeper servers (zk1:2181, zk1:2182) and
two solr instance solr1:8983, solr2:8983. So what will be the solr url
Vadim,
That makes perfect sense.
Thanks
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Vadim Ivanov
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2018 10:23 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: how to access solr in solrcloud
Hi, Steve
If you are using solr1:8983 to access solr and solr1 is down IMHO
Thanks, Walter
-Original Message-
From: Walter Underwood
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2018 10:41 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: how to access solr in solrcloud
Use a load balancer. It doesn’t have to be fancy, we use the Amazon ALB because
our clusters are in AWS
Thanks, David
-Original Message-
From: David Santamauro
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2018 10:28 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc: David Santamauro
Subject: Re: how to access solr in solrcloud
... or haproxy.
On 9/12/18, 10:23 AM, "Vadim Ivanov" wrote:
Sep 12, 2018, at 6:38 AM, Gu, Steve (CDC/OD/OADS) (CTR)
> wrote:
>
> Hi, all
>
> I am upgrading our solr to 7.4 and would like to set up solrcloud for
> failover and load balance. There are three zookeeper servers (zk1:2181,
> zk1:2182) and two solr instance solr1:89
s frontend to access
Solrcloud.
--
BR, Vadim
-Original Message-
From: Gu, Steve (CDC/OD/OADS) (CTR) [mailto:c...@cdc.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2018 4:38 PM
To: 'solr-user@lucene.apache.org'
Subject: how to access solr in
Hi, Steve
If you are using solr1:8983 to access solr and solr1 is down IMHO nothing
helps you to access dead ip.
You should switch to any other live node in the cluster or I'd propose to
have nginx as frontend to access
Solrcloud.
--
BR, Vadim
-Original Message-
From: Gu, Steve
Hi, all
I am upgrading our solr to 7.4 and would like to set up solrcloud for failover
and load balance. There are three zookeeper servers (zk1:2181, zk1:2182) and
two solr instance solr1:8983, solr2:8983. So what will be the solr url should
the client to use for access? Will it be solr1
Yeah, I am not sure about how the Authentication band aid feature will
work, the mentioned stackoverflow link. It is about time we include basic
authentication support in CDCR.
On Thu, 6 Sep 2018, 8:41 pm cdatta, wrote:
> Hi Amrit, Thanks for your response.
>
> We wiped out our complete
Hi Amrit, Thanks for your response.
We wiped out our complete installation and started a fresh one. Now the
multi-direction replication is working but we are seeing errors related to
the authentication sporadically.
Thanks & Regards,
Chandi Datta
--
Sent from:
Thanks Shawn. I wrote my own filter. I attached my jar in hear.
I found your answer in hear:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-load-plugins-with-Solr-4-9-and-SolrCloud-td4312113.html
Based on your answer, is it possible that blob Api does not work for my own
filter jar?
norm.jar
Once Solr 7.5 is released you will have a new "Cloud -> ZK Status" tab that
will among other things show the data path on each ZK server.
Until then, log in to the ZK server, locate zoo.cfg and check.
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
> 31. aug. 2018 kl.
You should have a "zoo.cfg" file in the conf directory (a sibling to
the bin directory where you run ZK). Inside there the dataDir property
specifies where ZooKeeper stores data. NOTE: the default is somewhere
under /tmp and should NOT be used for production since the contents of
/tmp can
On 8/31/2018 8:40 AM, Sushant Vengurlekar wrote:
Any idea where this database is stored on the file system. I don’t want to
read it but just know where it resides.
If you followed recommendations, your ZooKeeper ensemble is NOT using
the ZK server that's embedded inside Solr. In that case I
tructure that cannot be easily examined by
> anything other than ZooKeeper itself.
>
> If you want detailed information about how ZK stores data, you will need
> to visit a support resource for the ZooKeeper project. It is a
> completely separate project from Solr.
>
> SolrCloud
. It is a
completely separate project from Solr.
SolrCloud does not store index data in ZooKeeper.
Thanks,
Shawn
Where does zookeeper store the collection info on local filesystem on
zookeeper?
Thank you
t; expect and the like.
>
> That said, I'd never jump straight to SolrCloud implementations
> without my QA being on SolrCloud. Not only do subtle differences creep
> in, but some things simply aren't supported, e.g. group.func.
>
> And, as Sameer says, you can set up a SolrCloud environ
I do quite a bit of "correctness" testing on a local stand-alone Solr,
as Walter says, that's often easier to debug, especially when working
through creating the proper analysis chains, do queries do what I
expect and the like.
That said, I'd never jump straight to SolrCloud imple
eveloping applications with solr and are using
> solrcloud in production: what are you doing locally? Cloud seems
> unnecessary locally besides testing strictly for cloud specific use cases
> or configurations. Am I totally off basis there? We are considering keeping
> a “standard” (read:
Why not just revert to everything SolrCloud? The advantages you will have
is that you or your other team members are using the same APIs, parameters,
experience, etc. that they will be using when they go from one environment
to another. It would be less confusion to explain to someone why you
For those of you who are developing applications with solr and are using
solrcloud in production: what are you doing locally? Cloud seems
unnecessary locally besides testing strictly for cloud specific use cases
or configurations. Am I totally off basis there? We are considering keeping
On 8/20/2018 10:00 PM, Sushant Vengurlekar wrote:
I have a dataimport working on standalone solr instance but the same
doesn't work on solrcloud. I keep on hitting this error
Full Import failed:java.lang.RuntimeException:
java.lang.RuntimeException
I have a dataimport working on standalone solr instance but the same
doesn't work on solrcloud. I keep on hitting this error
Full Import failed:java.lang.RuntimeException:
java.lang.RuntimeException:
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImportHandlerException:
Exception in invoking url
To the concerned,
This is certainly unfortunate if 3-way Active CDCR is not happening
successfully. At the time of writing the feature I was able to perform
N-way Active CDCR approach. How are the logs looking, are the documents are
not getting forwarded in sync? Can you attach the source solr
401 - 500 of 5468 matches
Mail list logo
