ConcurrentUpdateSolrClient Invalid version (expected 2, but 60) or the data in not in 'javabin' format

I'm updating from a basic Solr Client to the ConcurrentUpdateSolrClient and I'm hitting a really strange error. I cannot share the code but the snippet is like: try (ConcurrentUpdateSolrClient solrUpdateClient = > new ConcurrentUpdateSolrClient(" >

Re: Solr5.5:DocValues/CopyField does not work with Atomic updates

Karthik: The Apache mailing list is pretty aggressive about removing attachments. Could you possibly open a JIRA and attach the file as a patch? If at all possible a patch file with just the diffs would be best. One problem is that it'll be a two-step process. The JIRAs have been being hit with

Re: Replicas for same shard not in sync

Slow down a bit ;)... First, just to cover the bases, you have done a commit, right? The index generation on the UI screen is a bit misleading as replicas in SolrCloud don't necessarily have the same generation, that's normal. The "master/slave" bits are cruft from the older non-cloud days. So

Re: ConcurrentUpdateSolrClient Invalid version (expected 2, but 60) or the data in not in 'javabin' format

Joe this might be _version_ as in Solr's optimistic concurrency used in atomic updates, etc http://yonik.com/solr/optimistic-concurrency/ On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 5:24 PM Joe Lawson < jlaw...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote: > I'm updating from a basic Solr Client to the

Re: Solr5.5:DocValues/CopyField does not work with Atomic updates

I think I just added the right person, let us know if you don't have access and/or if you need access to the LUCENE JIRA. Erick On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Karthik Ramachandran wrote: > Eric > I have created a JIRA id (kramachand...@commvault.com). Once I

Re: Solr5.5:DocValues/CopyField does not work with Atomic updates

Eric I have created a JIRA id (kramachand...@commvault.com). Once I get access I will create the JIRA and submit the patch. With Thanks & Regards Karthik Ramachandran CommVault Direct: (732) 923-2197 P Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to On 4/22/16, 8:04 PM, "Erick

Re: Where to set Shards.tolerant to true ?

I'm confused. Are you sharding or not? Sharding is used when your index is too big to fit on one Solr, so your docs go to separate Solr nodes. That is, if shard1 contains the doc with id=12, shard2 will NOT have that doc. If you're not sharding (i.e. each slave has all the docs in your

Create collections in SolrCloud "Could not get shard id for core"

Hey, I'm using solr 5.2.1 and yesterday I started migrating to SolrCloud so I might be quite noobish with it. The thing is that I could create 3 collections with not so many inconvenients, but when trying to create another collection it throws a timeout and inside solr log it says "Could not get

Solr - index polygons from csv

Hello guys, I use solr 6 for indexing data with points and polygons. I have a question about indexing polygons from csv file. I have configured type: and field I have tried to import this csv:

How can I set the defaultOperator to be AND?

Hi guys, How can I set the defaultOperator to be AND? If I add the following line to the schema.xml, even if I do a search 'title:"test" OR author:"me"', it will returns documents matching 'title:"test" AND author:"me"': solr version: 6.0 I know that I can overwrite the query with q.op,

Re: set session variable in mysql importHandler

sessionVariables=group_concat_max_len=. in the connection URL works as expected. Thank you very much! Bye Zaccheo Il giorno gio 21 apr 2016 alle ore 01:14 Alexandre Rafalovitch < arafa...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > The driver documentation talks about "sessionVariables" that might be >

Re: How can I set the defaultOperator to be AND?

Yes Jan, I'm using edismax. This is (a part of) my requestHandler: false explicit 10 title,abstract,authors,doi edismax title^1.0 author^1.0 [...] Is there anything I should do to improve/fix it? Kind regards, Bastien On 22/04/2016 12:42,

Re: How can I set the defaultOperator to be AND?

Hi Which query parser are you using? If using edismax yo may be hitting a recent bug concerning default operator and explicit boolean operators. -- Jan Høydahl, search solution architect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > 22. apr. 2016 kl. 11.26 skrev Bastien Latard - MDPI AG >

Re: Block Join faceting on intermediate levels with JSON Facet API (might be related to block join rollups & SOLR-8998)

Hi Alisa, This was a bit too hard for me to grok on a first pass... then I saw your related blog post which includes the actual sample data and makes it more clear. More comments inline: On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Alisa Z. wrote: > Hi all, > > I have been stretching

Re[2]: Block Join faceting on intermediate levels with JSON Facet API (might be related to block join rollups & SOLR-8998)

Hi Yonik, Thanks a lot for your response.   I have discussed this with Mikhail Khludnev already and tried this suggestion. Here's what I've got:  sentiment: positive author: Bob text: Great post about Solr 2.blog-posts.comments-id: 10735-23004       //this is a new

Solr Max Query length

I used SolrJ and wrote a test to confirm that the max query length supported by Solr (by default) was 8192 in Solr 5.3.1 Based on the default Jetty settings jetty.xml: The test would not work however until I had used a max size of 4096 (so the query passes at 4095 and returns a

Re: Solr Max Query length

Are you using get instead of post? https://dzone.com/articles/solr-select-query-get-vs-post On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Kelly, Frank wrote: > I used SolrJ and wrote a test to confirm that the max query length > supported by Solr (by default) was 8192 in Solr 5.3.1

Re: Solr Max Query length

I'm not sure, may be this should work : QueryResponse response = solr.query(q, METHOD.POST); Let's wait for others response. On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 8:51 PM, Kelly, Frank wrote: > I am using the SolrJ library - does it have a way to specify one variant > (POST) over

Re: concat 2 fields

Have you added this new processor chain to update handler that you are using(as shown below)? myChain https://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateRequestProcessor#Selecting_the_UpdateChain_for_Your_Request On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 2:59 PM, vrajesh wrote: > to concatenating two

Re: Solr Max Query length

I am using the SolrJ library - does it have a way to specify one variant (POST) over the other (GET)? -Frank On 4/22/16, 11:13 AM, "Reth RM" wrote: >Are you using get instead of post? > >https://dzone.com/articles/solr-select-query-get-vs-post > > > >On Fri, Apr 22,

Re: Re[2]: Block Join faceting on intermediate levels with JSON Facet API (might be related to block join rollups & SOLR-8998)

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Alisa Z. wrote: > Hi Yonik, > > Thanks a lot for your response. > > I have discussed this with Mikhail Khludnev already and tried this > suggestion. Here's what I've got: > > > > sentiment: positive > author: Bob > text: Great post about Solr >

Where to set Shards.tolerant to true ?

Hey guys, I am trying to implement Distributed search with Master Slave server. Search requests goes to Slave Servers. I am planning to have a load balancer before the Slave servers. So here is the custom search handler which is defined. *:*

Replicas for same shard not in sync

I have a SolrCloud setup with v5.2.1 - just two hosts. A ZK ensemble of 3 hosts. Just today, customers searching in one specific collection reported seeing varying results with the same search. I could confirm this by looking at the logs - same search with different hits by the solr host. In the

Re: Making managed schema unmutable correctly?

Solved it - had to make sure default requestHander was configured for spellcheck. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Making-managed-schema-unmutable-correctly-tp4264051p4272235.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.