Re: Possible memory leak with VersionBucket objects

Sorry, I meant we are "not" running Solr in cloud mode On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Sundeep T wrote: > Yes, but that issue seems specific to SolrCloud like I mentioned. We are > running Solr in cloud mode and don't have Zookeeper configured > > Thanks > Sundeep > > On

When will be solr 7.1 released?

Hi, How are the release dates decided for new versions, are they known in advance? Thanks Nawab

Re: Possible memory leak with VersionBucket objects

Yes, but that issue seems specific to SolrCloud like I mentioned. We are running Solr in cloud mode and don't have Zookeeper configured Thanks Sundeep On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Steve Rowe wrote: > Hi Sundeep, > > This looks to me like

Contributors Group

Hello There. Can you please add the following user to the contributors group: JustinBaynton Thank you! Justin

DocValues, Long and SolrJ

I ran into a problem with indexing documents which I worked around by changing data type, but I am curious as to how the setup could be made to work. Solr 6.5.1 - Field type Long, multivalued false, DocValues. In indexing with Solr, I set the value of field with: Long

Re: Contributors Group

Done. On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Justin Baynton wrote: > Hello There. Can you please add the following user to the contributors > group: > > JustinBaynton > > Thank you! > > Justin

Re: Question on SOLR join query

First of all, Solr is a _search_ engine, it wasn't built to be an RDBMS. Whenever I see this question (paraphrasing) "I've indexed my tables and want to use Solr just like a DB" I cringe. The join performance goes up with the number of unique values for the join field. High-cardinality fields are

Re: When will be solr 7.1 released?

In a word "no". Basically whenever a committer feels like there are enough changes to warrant spinning a new version, they volunteer. Nobody has stepped up to do that yet, although I expect it to be in the next 2-3 months, but that's only a guess. Best, Erick On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 5:21 PM,

Question on SOLR join query

I am facing a performance problem and could narrow it down to a join query that we are using. The join is on a unique field. We have a person profile stored in RDB in a relational way. Like person name table , address table etc. SOLR indexes are build using this RDB data,Each children is stored

Solr 5.5.2 - Custom Function Query update

Hi, I added a custom Function Query in a jar library that is loaded from the `solr/data/lib` folder (same level as the cores) with the solrconfig line: I just updated this lib but after restarting Solr, it seems that it still uses the previous version. I also tried to delete the lib from the

Problem with live Solr cloud (6.6) backup using collection API

Cluster has 1 zookeeper node and 3 solr nodes. There is only one collection with 3 shards. Data is continuously indexed using SolrJ API. System is running on AWS and I am taking backup on EFS (Elastic File System). Observed behavior: If indexing is not in progress, I take a backup of cluster

Re: Replication on startup takes a long time

Hi Eric, I don’t think that there are some bugs with searcher reopening - this is a scenario with a new slave: “But when I add a *new* slave pointing to the master…” So expected to have zero results until replication finishes. Regards, Emir > On 23 Sep 2017, at 19:21, Erick Erickson

How to resolve Overlapping on DeckSearchers=2

Hi I am using solr 6.1 version. Getting A continous warning in both master slaves as *Performance Warning: Overlapping on DeckSearchers=2 * *Analyzed after the same warning on slaves replication starts throwing index fetch failed error as not able to open a new searcher* *went through some

Re: How to resolve Overlapping on DeckSearchers=2

Hi Rubi, As you probably know, in order to have changes visible, you have to reopen searcher. Opening searcher includes warming up searcher. What happens to you is that new commit happens while previous commit did not result in a new searcher. What you can do: commit less frequently - it is

Re: Solr 6 CDCR does not work

Hi Uwe, Here is 09/24/2017, recently I am trying to set up my own CDCR, bounced into this situation also. Means I have done all the configurations and all the status were fine when I “START” and “STATUS” but nothing have pushed into target center, so I googled then I found this one, it helps

Re: Solr fields for Microsoft files, image files, PDF, text files

bq: How do I get a list of all valid field names based on the file type You don't. At least I've never found any. Plus various document formats will allow custom meta-data fields so there's no definitive list. bq: Also how do I search the "free form" text for a word/pattern in the Solr search

Re: Replication on startup takes a long time

Emir: OK, thanks for pointing that out, that relieves me a lot! Erick On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 1:03 AM, Emir Arnautović wrote: > Hi Eric, > I don’t think that there are some bugs with searcher reopening - this is a > scenario with a new slave: > > “But when I add

Solr 5.5.2 - Custom Function Query update

Hi, I added a custom Function Query in a jar library that is loaded from the `solr/data/lib` folder (same level as the cores) with the solrconfig line: class="blah.blah.solr.search.function.MyFuncValueParser" /> I just updated this lib but after restarting Solr, it seems that it still uses

Re: Solr 5.5.2 - Custom Function Query update

ignore solr version... On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Susheel Kumar wrote: > Check if your jar is present at solr-6.0.0/server/solr//lib/ or do > a find under solr directory... > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Florian Le Vern > wrote: >

Re: Solr 5.5.2 - Custom Function Query update

Check if your jar is present at solr-6.0.0/server/solr//lib/ or do a find under solr directory... On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Florian Le Vern wrote: > Hi, > > I added a custom Function Query in a jar library that is loaded from the > `solr/data/lib` folder (same

RE: Solr fields for Microsoft files, image files, PDF, text files

bq: How do I get a list of all valid field names based on the file type bq: You don't. At least I've never found any. Plus various document formats will allow custom meta-data fields so there's no definitive list. It would be trivial to add field counts per mime to tika-eval. If you're

Re: Solr fields for Microsoft files, image files, PDF, text files

Phillip - You may be interested to start with the example/files that ships with Solr. It is specifically designed as a configuration (and UI!) that deals with indexing rich files with a bit more than other examples - it pulls out acronyms, e-mail addresses, and URLs from text, as well as what

Re: Archiving site not working

Downloads and unzips fine for me. What specifically do you mean by "not working"? Didn't download? Downloaded and didn't unzip? Best, Erick On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 11:21 AM, FUENTES MARTINEZ Alejandro < alejandro.fuentes.consul...@axa.com.mx> wrote: > Hi, > > > > We want to download *solr

Possible memory leak with VersionBucket objects

Hello, We are running our solr 6.4.2 instance on a single node without zookeeper. So, we are not using solr cloud. We have been ingesting about 50k messages per second into this instance spread over 4 cores. When we looked at the heapdump we see that it has there are around 385 million instances

Archiving site not working

Hi, We want to download solr version 4.3.1 but the archiving site doesn't work (https://archive.apache.org/dist/lucene/solr/4.3.1/solr-4.3.1.zip) Is there a mirror site to download it? We appreciate your help. Best Regards. -- Alejandro Fuentes Martínez AXA Technology Services- México

Re: Seeing very low ingestion performance for a single non-cloud Solr core

Hi All, Thanks for the response. Increasing hard/soft commit intervals did not help. But by changing "text" field in the ingestion input from the same message to random messages of similar length gave 60% improved performance. Im able to ingest 40k - 45k messages per second, earlier I did 26k.

Re: Possible memory leak with VersionBucket objects

Hi Sundeep, This looks to me like / , which was fixed in Solr 7.0. -- Steve www.lucidworks.com > On Sep 25, 2017, at 2:42 PM, Sundeep T wrote: > > Hello, > > We are

RE: Solr SQL: standalone mode

Glad to hear that. Btw: where is the limitation (that its not possible to run the SQL in standalone). Is it in the distribution algorithm itself, or is just Solr missing ZooKeeper storage. I am asking because if its the second case, we can just install single node ZK + single Solr and have a

Re: overwrite the parameter query in DIH

Hello, I don't fully understand the question but you might need to check this https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/uploading-structured-data-store-data-with-the-data-import-handler.html#dih-request-parameters On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 6:17 PM, solr2020 wrote: > Hi All,

Re: Solr SQL: standalone mode

It's the automatic node discovery provided by ZooKeeper. If you setup a single node SolrCloud it will work fine. Joel Bernstein http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 3:09 AM, Pavel Micka wrote: > Glad to hear that. Btw: where is the limitation (that its

Re: AEM SOLR integaration

integrating can be done in AEM at different layers, however my suggestion would be to enable that at the repository (Oak) level [1] so that usual AEM search would also take ACLs into account. [1] : http://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/docs/query/solr.html Il giorno ven 22 set 2017 alle ore 18:47