Hi Prakhar,
Thanks for the reply, But What I am actually curious to know how is it
implemented Internally?
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 12:47 PM Prakhar Nigam
wrote:
>
> HI Lucky Prakhar here
>
> we have met at a training at Mahindra Comviva. I have found this article it
> may be a little helpful
>
Have you tried to specify =text
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
> 14. nov. 2018 kl. 12:09 skrev marotosg :
>
> Hi all,
>
> Currently I am trying to do index documents from different kinds with Solr
> and tika. It's working fine but when solr returns
Hi all,
Currently I am trying to do index documents from different kinds with Solr
and tika. It's working fine but when solr returns the content of the
document. Doesn't return the plain text. It comes back as well with some
metadata.
For instance my request.
HI,
Good Morning.
I don;t see median aggregation in JSON facet api documentation. Could you
please point me to the documentation to create custom json facet apis ?
Thanks.
Regards,
Anil
On Mon, 2018-11-12 at 14:19 +0200, Sofiya Strochyk wrote:
> I'll check if the filter queries or the main query tokenizers/filters
> might have anything to do with this, but I'm afraid query
> optimization can only get us so far.
Why do you think that? As you tried eliminating sorting and
No it doesn't match. You have to get the search in as a single term.
You get a lot of information by adding =true and looking at your
parsed query.
Try
myFieldName:"Some\ Text"
o
myFieldName:Some\ Text
Best,
Erick
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 4:02 PM Angel Todorov wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I have
On 11/13/2018 11:51 AM, Luca Vergantini wrote:
Maybe I skipped the correct steps to open an issue,
but here https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12985
you can find the details.
I think that is at least a configuration issue for the install script, but
maybe is most hard.
I detected this
Hi guys,
I have SOLR 6.5 , and a custom defined field which is of type string (not
text or text_general). In some document, there is the value for that field,
for example, "Some Text" . When I query by myFieldName:"Some Text" , I
don't get any matches, but I think I should, because this matches
On Wed, 2018-11-14 at 17:53 +0530, Anil wrote:
> I don;t see median aggregation in JSON facet api documentation.
It's the 50 percentile:
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_5/json-facet-api.html#metrics-example
- Toke Eskildsen, Royal Danish Library
Thanks everyone this gave me great arguments for migrating to Solr7 :D
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 7:50 PM Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 11/9/2018 1:58 PM, David Hastings wrote:
> > I personally like standalone solr for this reason, i can tune the
> indexing
> > "master" for doing nothing but taking in
On 13/11/2018 22:34, Shawn Heisey wrote:
If it's important for you to have the data separated from the program,
setting the solr home is in my opinion the right way to go. This
separation is achieved by the service installer script that Solr
includes, which runs on most operating systems
I am trying to achieve search by connecting to multiple Databases (in my case
trying with 2 different DBs) to index data from multiple DB tables.
I have tried doing the below as an approach to achieve my goal but in vain,
I am able to get only data from the DB 1 when I perform a full-import.
Steps
The JSON facet API uses the t-digest approach to estimate the percentiles.
You can also use Solr Math Expressions to take a random sample from a field
and estimate the median from the sample. Here is the Streaming Expression:
let(a=random(collection1, q="*:*", fl="filesize_d", rows="25000"),
The implementation is as follows:
1) There are "stream sources" that generate results from Solr Cloud
collections. Some of these include: search, facet, knnSearch, random,
timeseries, nodes, sql etc...
2) There are "stream decorators" that wrap stream sources and operated over
the result set
Hi, We are using SOLR 6.3 in cloud and we have created 2 collections in a
single SOLR cluster consisting of 20 shards and 3 replicas each(overall 20X3 =
60 instances). The first collection has close to 2.5 billion records and the
second collection has 350 million records. Both the collection
Good afternoon Solr community,
I have a situation where I require the following solr features.
1. Highlighting must be available for the matched search results
2. After a user performs a regular solr search (/select, rows=10) I
require a drill down which has the potential to export
Well, docValues doesn't necessarily waste much index space if you
don't store the field and useDocValuesAsStored. It also won't beat up
your machine as badly if you fetch all your fields from DV fields. To
fetch a stored field, you need to
> seek to the stored data on disk
> decompress a 16K
Thanks a lot Jan.
That works very well.
I am now trying to index the doc in Solr deleting the extractOnly parameter
and can't find any similiar option to get the data indexed in plain text. I
am getting the metadata as well,
This is my request.
Thanks Erick.
I do use this strategy for indexing data from DB. It is very flexible for
me.
I work in a company where .net is the main dev platform , so even more
important to separate things.
Does you post mean that functionality for indexing documents in Solr using
ExtractRequestHandler doesn't
While ERH is find for getting started, as you go toward production
you'll want to consider parsing the data outside of Solr for the
reasons (and example) outlined here:
https://lucidworks.com/2012/02/14/indexing-with-solrj/
Best,
Erick
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 6:46 AM Sergio García Maroto wrote:
Reading up on atomic updates, the Solr reference guide states the following:
The core functionality of atomically updating a document requires that all
fields in your schema must be configured as stored (stored="true") or
docValues (docValues="true") except for fields which are
destinations,
Can't really be answered. For instance, stored data is held in *.fdt
files and is largely irrelevant to searching since that data is only
consulted for returning stored fields of the top N docs. So if your
index consists of 90% stored data it's one answer, if 10% it's totally
another. the stored
bq. Does you post mean that functionality for indexing documents in Solr using
ExtractRequestHandler doesn't provide the option of Indexing plain data
Frankly I don't know. It's just that if you plan to eventually offload
the Tika parsing onto a client (or use a service), does it make sense
to
I'm a little confused on what you're trying. Say your source field is
Y and your destination field X. Are you saying that you want your
destination field X to contain both the old value of field Y and the
new value of field Y when you atomically update that field Y?
H, I'm actually not sure
Was wondering if anyone has an idea of the ratio size of indexed only vs
stored and indexed in solr 7.x. I was gong to run some testing myself
later today but was curious what others have seen in this regard.
Thanks,
David
Helloo
I want to have 3 different solr instances on the same server.
1 - Master
2 - Slave
I want to have this 3 instances also on different ports.
How can i do this.
Thx
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
It is not that I want it.
I just can't reproduce it even though I read it as an expected behaviour.
So I wondered if something has been changed since the warning was written,
or if I had misunderstood something.
ons. d. 14. nov. 2018 17.09 skrev Erick Erickson :
> I'm a little confused on what
Hi!
Have you tried to name entity in Fulldataimport http call
As
/dataimport/?command=full-import=Document1=true=true
Is there something sane in the log file after that command?
--
Vadim
> -Original Message-
> From: Santosh Kumar S [mailto:santoshkumar.saripa...@infinite.com]
>
bin/solr start -help
e.g.
bin/solr start -z localhost:2181 -p 8981 -s example/cloud/node1/solr
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 7:59 AM cristian.tiu...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
> Helloo
>
> I want to have 3 different solr instances on the same server.
> 1 - Master
> 2 - Slave
>
> I want to have this 3
Helloo
I want to have 3 different solr instances on the same server.
1 - Master
2 - Slave
I want to have this 3 instances also on different ports.
How can i do this.
Thx
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
On 11/14/2018 7:58 AM, cristian.tiu...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to have 3 different solr instances on the same server.
1 - Master
2 - Slave
Why do you want multiple Solr instances on the same server?
If this is to mock up an install that will have the different instances
on separate servers
On 11/14/2018 10:35 AM, Jon Kjær Amundsen wrote:
It is not that I want it.
I just can't reproduce it even though I read it as an expected behaviour.
So I wondered if something has been changed since the warning was written,
or if I had misunderstood something.
To my knowledge, nothing has
32 matches
Mail list logo
