Hi David,
You can upload configuration to the zookeeper - it is nearly the same as
the standaloneconfig.
You can also edit the schema.xml in this file. At least I do it like this.
Mit freundlichem Gruß / kind regards
Wolfgang Freudenberger
Pure Host IT-Services
Münsterstr. 14
48341
Well considering that any access to the user interface by anyone can
completely destroy entire collections/cores, I would think the security of
the stop word file wouldnt be that important
Thanks Erick, it seems the only reason I have any desire to use SolrCloud
is the use of streaming
Why would you want to? This sounds like an XY problem, there's some
problem you think would be cured by clearing the cache. What is
that problem?
Because I doubt this would do anything useful, pretty soon the caches
would be filled up again and you'd be right back where you started and
the real
David,
One benefit of the way recommended in the reference guide is that it lets
you use zookeeper upconfig/downconfig as deployment tools on a set of text
files, which in turn allows you to manage your Solr configuration like any
other bit of source code, e.g. with version control and, if your
Disabling or reducing autowarming can help too, in addition to cache size
reduction.
Edward
Em ter, 20 de nov de 2018 17:29, Erick Erickson Why would you want to? This sounds like an XY problem, there's some
> problem you think would be cured by clearing the cache. What is
> that problem?
>
>
Hi David,
Well, as a last resort you can resort to classic schema.xml if you are
using standalone Solr and don't bother to give up schema API. Then you are
back to manually editing conf/ files. See:
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_4/schema-factory-definition-in-solrconfig.html
Best
David:
Sure would. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5287.
Especially the bits about how allowing this leads to security
vulnerabilities. You're not the first one who had this idea ;).
Whether those security issues are still valid is another question I suppose.
Best,
Erick
On
Thanks, researching that now, but this seems extremely annoying. wouldnt
it just be easier if you could edit the config files raw from the admin
UI?
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 1:41 PM Pure Host - Wolfgang Freudenberger <
w.freudenber...@pure-host.de> wrote:
> Hi David,
>
>
> You can upload
On 11/20/2018 3:02 AM, Anchal Sharma2 wrote:
I have enabled SSL for solr using steps mentioned over Lucene
website .And though solr console URL is now secure(https) ,it is still
using TLS v1.0.
I have tried few things to force SSL to use TLS1.2 protocol ,but they
have not worked for me .
Hi Erick
As per the documentation -
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lucene.apache.org
> _solr_guide_7-5F5_updating-2Dparts-2Dof-2Ddocuments.html-23field-2Dsto
> rage=DwIDaQ=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE=HEBHcZdI
>
Erick and Toke,
Thank you for the replies. I am surprised there already isn’t a JIRA for
this. In my opinion, this should be an error condition on search or
alternatively should simply be giving zero results. That would be a defined
behavior as opposed to now, where the searches are not
bq. While creating a document , I have provide the required
information to field "category".
But you did not store it, you have stored="false" for that field.
Atomic updates require that all source fields are stored. What happens
under the covers is that the stored data is read from the doc,
On 11/20/2018 8:18 PM, Rahul Goswami wrote:
Erick and Toke,
Thank you for the replies. I am surprised there already isn’t a JIRA for
this. In my opinion, this should be an error condition on search or
alternatively should simply be giving zero results. That would be a defined
behavior as
Hi Shawn,
Schema version is 1.6 and Solr version is 7.5.
While creating a document , I have provide the required information to field "
category".
Now, I would like to update document for other set of fields using Atomic
Update but not category field.
While performing atomic update
Thanks for your replies.
The requirement is basically to avoid documents which may have a match but
with very less number of term or phrase in it. May a be 1/2 matches.
The user is interested in those document which has matched term/phrase
beyond a certain number.
This can be a valid
But then I would lose the steaming expressions right?
> On Nov 20, 2018, at 6:00 PM, Edward Ribeiro wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> Well, as a last resort you can resort to classic schema.xml if you are
> using standalone Solr and don't bother to give up schema API. Then you are
> back to manually
Sharding can be one of the option.
But what is the size of your documents? And which Solr version are you
using?
Regards,
Edwin
On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 at 01:40, Balanathagiri Ayyasamypalanivel <
bala.cit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> We are in the process for live Publishing document in solr and
Hi Rahul
Router name is "compositeId".
To let you know the issue is intermittent.
Thanks
Rajeswari
-Original Message-
From: Rahul Goswami [mailto:rahul196...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2018 11:47 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Error:Missing Required Fields
On Mon, 2018-11-19 at 22:19 -0500, Rahul Goswami wrote:
> I am using SolrCloud 7.2.1. My understanding is that setting
> docvalues=true would optimize faceting, grouping and sorting; but for
> a field to be searchable it needs to be indexed=true.
Erick explained the search thing, so I'll just
HI ,
I am using stats component to determine stats on two columns together.
stats query is failing with following exception -
*Invalid Number: num_useful *
*Query response : *
{
"responseHeader": {
"zkConnected": true,
"status": 400,
"QTime": 19,
"params": {
* "q":
On 11/20/2018 9:07 PM, Rajeswari Kolluri wrote:
Schema version is 1.6 and Solr version is 7.5.
While creating a document , I have provide the required information to field "
category".
Now, I would like to update document for other set of fields using Atomic
Update but not category field.
Hi Shawn,
When I query the document, category field is shown in search.
Thanks
Rajeswari
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Heisey [mailto:apa...@elyograg.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 11:38 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Error:Missing Required Fields for Atomic
Thanks Edward.
Can we find stats on two fields ? (eg - sum = sum of (userful+not useful)) ?
On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 at 16:14, Edward Ribeiro
wrote:
> You are using a function query as stats.field and as seen here:
> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_4/function-queries.html the syntax
> for
You can get stats on multiple fields, it's just a matter of specifying the
stats.field parameter multiple times:
stats.field=field1=field2, etc.
Besides that Solr also has a built-in sum function so that you can sum the
values of two or more fields: sum(field1, field2, ...). You could try to
use
Hi All,
I have enabled SSL for solr using steps mentioned over Lucene
website .And though solr console URL is now secure(https) ,it is still
using TLS v1.0.
I have tried few things to force SSL to use TLS1.2 protocol ,but they
have not worked for me .
While trying to do same ,I have
Hi
I am working on backups.
I have created a backup with below command:
/http://dev/solr/XXX/replication?command=backup=XXXBackup=D:\Backup\/
all worked fine, files have been created.
I wanted to restore the index from this backup with below command:
You are using a function query as stats.field and as seen here:
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_4/function-queries.html the syntax
for termfreq is termfreq(field_name, value). You're using
termfreq('num_not_useful','num_useful'). It looks like num_useful is a
numeric (int, float) type in
On 11/19/2018 9:19 PM, Rajeswari Kolluri wrote:
Below is part of schema , entityid is my unique id field. Getting exception missing
required field for "category" during atomic updates.
Your category field is not stored. And it's required. It does have
docValues, but unless
Hello,
We are using solr with a home made jar with a custom function.
function(0.1,1.0,43.8341851366,5.7818349,43.8342868634,5.7821059,latlng_pi)
where latlng_pi is a document field of type location
In solr 5.5.2, location was defined like this
and parsed in the jar like this
Hi all,
Without restarting is it possible to clear the cache?
@David Sorry for late reply. The SKG query that I am using is actually
fairly basic in itself. For example,
{
> "queries":[
> "dataStoreId:\"123\"",
> "text:\"foo\""
> ],
> "compare":[
> {
> "type":"text_shingles",
> "limit":30,
> "discover_values":true
> }
> ]
> }
What I am
On 11/20/2018 9:25 AM, Rajdeep Sahoo wrote:
Hi all,
Without restarting is it possible to clear the cache?
You'll need to clarify what cache you're talking about, but I think for
the most part that if you reload the core (or collection if running
SolrCloud) that all caches should be rebuilt
I cant seem to find the documentation on how to actually edit the schema
file myself, everything seems to lead me to using an API to add fields and
stop words etc. this is more or less obnoxious, and the admin api for
adding fields/field types is not exactly functional. is there a guide or
33 matches
Mail list logo
