On Mar 4, 2009, at 12:47 AM, The Flight Captain wrote:
Thanks for the DirectSolrConnection tip, that eliminated the need
for parsing
the XML as a string, and all that code need to instantiate a
container. I am
now Using SolrCore.getSolrCore(). This method is deprecated though,
what is
the
Normally you will need to filer by dates... you can do it in two ways...
http://fq=date_field[NOW-7DAY TO NOW]
http://...fq=date_field[2007-01-01T21:21:21 TO 2009-01-01T13:13:13]
I strongly recomend you to use /DAY in the first example. The search will be
faster as it is omitting
Great,
It went down to less than 10 secs now :)
What I don't really understand is that my autowarmCount were pretty
low ( like 128 ) and still the autowarming of the caches were very
slow.
Can you explain more why it can be that slow ?
Cheers !
Jerome.
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Yonik
it also ignore dataDir directive in solr.xml, in fact adding:
core name=core0 instanceDir=core0
property name=dataDir value=/multicore/core0 /
/core
doesn't change the behavior.
this seems a bug introduced somewhere after 2nd february
any clue?
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 5:56 PM,
property name=dataDir value=/multicore/core0 /
is not honored automatically. the dataDir tag has to be present in
solrconfig.xml and it should use this value.
but you can specify it as follows
core name=core0 instanceDir=core0 dataDir=/multicore/core0/
then it should be fine.
can
Hi,
Can someone please tell me if we can write our own Custom Request Handler
and Custom Solr Core?
I want to call execute method of custom solrcore class instead of SolrCore
class.
Actually, I have to modify getQParser method of SolrCore class, so that it
shud start returning my custom
using:
cores adminPath=/admin/cores
core name=core0 instanceDir=core0 dataDir=/multicore/core0/
core name=core1 instanceDir=core1 dataDir=/multicore/core1/
/cores
doesn't work either
here the output:
2009-03-04 12:50:54.890::INFO: Logging to STDERR via
org.mortbay.log.StdErrLog
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Walter Ferrara walters...@gmail.com wrote:
using:
cores adminPath=/admin/cores
core name=core0 instanceDir=core0 dataDir=/multicore/core0/
core name=core1 instanceDir=core1 dataDir=/multicore/core1/
/cores
doesn't work either
dataDir=/multicore/core0
looks like a bug. must reopen the issue
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्
noble.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Walter Ferrara walters...@gmail.com wrote:
using:
cores adminPath=/admin/cores
core name=core0 instanceDir=core0
Hi,
I am trying to implement stemming in solr. If user searches for walk then
all the records which have walk, walking, walks, walked etc should display.
Please suggest.
Thanks,
Amit Garg
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Stemming-in-Solr-tp22328850p22328850.html
Sent
Hi,
did you check Snowball stemmers (http://snowball.tartarus.org/)?
Regards,
Lukas
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 1:12 PM, dabboo ag...@sapient.com wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to implement stemming in solr. If user searches for walk then
all the records which have walk, walking, walks, walked etc
May be you can also check
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFiltersStemming is
discussed there...
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Lukáš Vlček lukas.vl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
did you check Snowball stemmers (http://snowball.tartarus.org/)?
Regards,
Lukas
On Wed, Mar 4,
tried with
core name=core0 instanceDir=core0 dataDir=multicore/core0/
core name=core1 instanceDir=core1 dataDir=multicore/core1/
but no luck, the dataDir parameter seems ignored, no matter what is written
there
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्
Can you explain the problem you are having? Is there a bug in the
SolrCore that you are working around? Or, are you just trying to
plugin your own Query Parser? If that is the case, there is a way to
do that already. You might find http://wiki.apache.org/solr/
SolrPlugins helpful.
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 5:25 AM, Jérôme Etévé jerome.et...@gmail.com wrote:
Great,
It went down to less than 10 secs now :)
What I don't really understand is that my autowarmCount were pretty
low ( like 128 ) and still the autowarming of the caches were very
slow.
Can you explain more why
Hi all,
I am trying to setup a solr instance with Tomcat5 on a Fedora10
machine. Here is what I did,
1.) Copy the apache-solr-nightly.war to webapps/solr.war
2.) Set solr.solr.home in tomcat.conf
3.) Use the Manager interface of tomcat to deploy the webapp
But, while doing so, I get the
Hi,
I am working in a software concern. We are having some RD base work like
making use of solr search tool for searching our Oracle database
content. I read through the documnets provided in the site, there I found
the solr supports only the document search and we have to provide the
document
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Radha C. cra...@ceiindia.com wrote:
Hi,
I am working in a software concern. We are having some RD base work like
making use of solr search tool for searching our Oracle database
content. I read through the documnets provided in the site, there I found
the
Is it possible to filter similarities found by the MLT component/
handler? Something like mlt.fq=site_id:86?
We have 32 cores in our Solr install, and some of those cores have up
to 8 sites indexed in them. Typically those cores will have one very
large site with a few hundred thousand
Doug,
does the good old 'fq' not work with MLT? It should...
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: Doug Steigerwald dsteigerw...@mcclatchyinteractive.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2009 9:20:40
Thanks Shalin,
We just stepped on solr. This information is very much useful for me. But
before that I want some clear details about where to start..
I want to test this in my local environment, so I need some basic
information about how to start using this ( database and solr ). Do you have
'fq' seems to only work with finding the documents with your original
query, not for filtering the similar documents.
Doug
On Mar 4, 2009, at 9:28 AM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Doug,
does the good old 'fq' not work with MLT? It should...
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene
Hm. I checked out a clean Solr 1.3.0 and indexed the example docs and
set up a simple MLT handler the example queries on the Wiki work fine
(fq can filter out docs). Our build has a slight change to
QueryComponent so another query isn't done when we use localsolr+field
collapsing, but
Sorry. The examples on the wiki aren't working with the 'fq' to
filter the similarities. It just filters the actual queries.
http://localhost:8983/solr/mlt?q=id:SP2514Nmlt.fl=manu,catmlt.mindf=1mlt.mintf=1fq=popularity:6mlt.displayTerms=detailsmlt=true
The popularity of the doc found is 6,
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 5:25 AM, Jérôme Etévé jerome.et...@gmail.com wrote:
Great,
It went down to less than 10 secs now :)
What I don't really understand is that my autowarmCount were pretty
low ( like 128 ) and
Upgraded to solr 1.3, and also moved it to a different machine (more
CPU the rest is the same). All the problems seem to have gone away...
Should have upgraded from the start.
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Laimonas Simutis lai...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey,
my SOLR setup looks like the following:
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Radha C. cra...@ceiindia.com wrote:
Thanks Shalin,
We just stepped on solr. This information is very much useful for me. But
before that I want some clear details about where to start..
I want to test this in my local environment, so I need some basic
Hi,
Have you looked at this page: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrTomcat
It almost sounds like you're deploying twice? Putting the solr.war in
webapps would be one way, and the other would be a context config file +
using the web manager. If you're using the config/context, then don't put
the
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Jérôme Etévé jerome.et...@gmail.com wrote:
Strange, we've got plenty of memory on this box and the swap is zero.
But well, I'm happy we went around the problem. What's your experience
with commits with ~10M docs ( and ~128 autowarming count in caches ) ?
Hi Matt,
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 9:52 PM, Matt Mitchell goodie...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Have you looked at this page: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrTomcat
Yes. I mimicked the SimpleInstall method
It almost sounds like you're deploying twice? Putting the solr.war in
webapps would be one
Hello,
I have a multivalued field in my schema of type text_ws, values are of the
form #int #int
I need to be able to query on the first and sort on the second, this does
not seem to be enabled out of the box
I looked around for a while and it seems the recommended approach is to
create a custom
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Fouad Mardini f.mard...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a multivalued field in my schema of type text_ws, values are of the
form #int #int
I need to be able to query on the first and sort on the second, this does
not seem to be enabled out of the box
Can you put the
Also take a look at LuSql:
http://lab.cisti-icist.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/cistilabswiki/index.php/LuSql
2009/3/4 Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Radha C. cra...@ceiindia.com wrote:
Hi,
I am working in a software concern. We are having some RD base work
17 feb 2009 kl. 21.26 skrev Grant Ingersoll:
I believe Karl Wettin submitted a Lucene patch for a Language
guesser: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-826 but it is
marked as won't fix.
The test case of LUCENE-1039 is a language classifier. I've use patch
to detect languages of
Hah. Sorry, I'm really out of it today.
The MoreLikeThisComponent doesn't seem to work for filtering using fq,
but the MoreLikeThisHandler does.
Problem solved, we'll just use the handler instead of a component.
Doug
On Mar 4, 2009, at 11:02 AM, Doug Steigerwald wrote:
Sorry. The
I posted a while back with this problem and I've finally got it working
using the following method:
in solrconfig.xml:
requestHandler name=mlt class=solr.MoreLikeThisHandler
lst name=defaults
str name=mlt.flid,title/str
int name=mlt.mintf0/int
/lst
/requestHandler
then when
Thanks,
I set up a another test instance of solr and ran a full import within
the DIH Development Console. I examined the query and found that
last_index_time is not getting set in the query. Yet the value does
get updated after a full import completes (outside of the development
console). Is
Hi everyone!
So it seems like I ran into a bug with sdouble.
I have a document with two fields.
field1 is double
field name=field1type=double indexed=true
stored=true omitNorms=true/
field name=field2 type=sdouble
indexed=true stored=true omitNorms=true/
when
I'll do the obvious one first. :)
Have you tried Solr 1.3 or, even better, 1.4-dev nightly?
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: Jonathan Ariel ionat...@gmail.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2009
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Jonathan Ariel ionat...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone!
So it seems like I ran into a bug with sdouble.
I have a document with two fields.
field1 is double
field name=field1 type=double indexed=true
stored=true omitNorms=true/
field name=field2
I'm doing some testing of a solr master/slave config and find that,
after syncing my slave, I need to sleep for about 400ms after commit
to see the new index state. i.e. if I don't sleep, and I execute a
query, I get results that reflect the prior state of the index.
I suspect this has something
Hello,
In my case, my query of id_s_i_s_nm:(om_B00114162K*) returned nothing but
query id_s_i_s_nm:om_B00114162K* returned the right result.
What's the difference between using () or not.
Thanks a lot,
Kevin
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 6:06 AM, Steve Conover scono...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm doing some testing of a solr master/slave config and find that,
after syncing my slave, I need to sleep for about 400ms after commit
to see the new index state. i.e. if I don't sleep, and I execute a
query, I get
the dataimport.properties is created only after one successful import
.so it is available only from second import onwards. probably you can
create one manually and put it in the conf dir.
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 12:52 AM, Garafola Timothy timgaraf...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks,
I set up a another
I have reopened the issue. We will fix it completely in a day or two.
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Walter Ferrara walters...@gmail.com wrote:
tried with
core name=core0 instanceDir=core0 dataDir=multicore/core0/
core name=core1 instanceDir=core1 dataDir=multicore/core1/
but no luck,
Hi,
I am implementing column specific query with q query parameter. for e.g.
?q=prdMainTitle_product_s:math qt=dismaxrequest
The above query doesnt work while if I use the same query with q.alt
parameter, it works.
?q=q.alt= prdMainTitle_product_s:math qt=dismaxrequest
Please suggest, how
The syntax for the q param when using dismax is different from standard.
Check this out:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DisMaxRequestHandler#head-df8184dddf870336839490ba276ea6ac566d0bdf
q.alt under dismax is parsed using the standard query parser though:
Hi Guys,
Are you aware of any standard/specification (like JSR 168/286 for portals, CMIS
for CMS) for Search engines ?
Is there any such specification people are working on currently ?
Regards,
Sourav
CAUTION - Disclaimer *
This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND
: Ok, so it wouldn't be possible to have a smaller, faster authoritative
: shard for near-real-time updates while keeping the entire dataset in a
: second shard which is updates less frequently?
I believe Otis's point is that many people use distributed search across
shards where some
Does anybody has any stats to share on how much time does DataImportHandler
takes to index a given set of data ?
I am currently indexing 18 millions rows in 1.5 - 2 hours by sending xmls to
solr.
From: Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.com
To:
50 matches
Mail list logo
