Thnx guys.
--
Yavuz Selim YILMAZ
2010/10/20 Tim Gilbert tim.gilb...@morningstar.com
Sorry, what Pradeep said, not Prasad. My apologies Pradeep.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Gilbert
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 12:18 PM
To: 'solr-user@lucene.apache.org'
Subject: RE:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 10:46 AM, satya swaroop satya.yada...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I increased my RAM size to 8GB and i want 4GB of it to be used
for solr itself. can anyone tell me the way to allocate the RAM for the
solr.
[...]
You will need to set up the allocation of
I found the problem's cause.It's the DocSetCollector. my fitler query result's
size is about 300,so the DocSetCollector.getDocSet() is OpenBitSet. And
300 OpenBitSet.fastSet(doc) op is too slow. So I used SolrIndexSearcher's
TopFieldDocs search(Query query, Filter filter, int n,
Hi everyone,
I was looking at using the Embedded Solr server through SolrJ and I
have a couple of concerns.
I'd like to use a custom repository to store my index. Is there a way
I can define this. Is there a data output interface I can implement
for this purpose?
Or can this be done in some
Hi,
We have installed ComplexPhraseQuery and since that we can see strange
behaviour in proximity search.
We have the 2 following queries:
(text:(protein digest~50))
(text:(digest protein~50))
Without ComplexPhraseQuery, both queries are returning 6 documents matching.
With ComplexPhraseQuery,
You will also need to switch to a 64 bits JVM
You might have to add the `-d64` flag as well as the `-Xms` and `-Xmx`
- Original Message -
From: Gora Mohanty g...@mimirtech.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 2:34 AM
Subject: Re: RAM increase
On Thu,
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:42 +0530, Tharindu Mathew mcclou...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi everyone,
I was looking at using the Embedded Solr server through SolrJ and I
have a couple of concerns.
I'd like to use a custom repository to store my index. Is there a way
I can define this. Is there a
Hi,
Does the latest Solr provide an explanation for results returned by MLT?
I want to get the interesting terms for each result that overlap with the
source document. This set of terms will vary from result to result
possibly.
Thanks!
Darren
You need to look into actual logs of the system. There you will see more
details why import failed.
check tomcat or jetty logs
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Import-From-MYSQL-database-tp1738753p1745246.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive
(10/10/21 20:33), dar...@ontrenet.com wrote:
Hi,
Does the latest Solr provide an explanation for results returned by MLT?
No, but there is an open issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-860
Koji
--
http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
Hi,
does a field which should be cached needs to be indexed?
I have a binary field which is just stored. Retrieving it via
FieldCache.DEFAULT.getTerms returns empty ByteRefs.
Then I found the following post:
http://www.mail-archive.com/d...@lucene.apache.org/msg05403.html
How can I use the
2010/10/21 kafka0102 kafka0...@163.com:
I found the problem's cause.It's the DocSetCollector. my fitler query
result's size is about 300,so the DocSetCollector.getDocSet() is
OpenBitSet. And 300 OpenBitSet.fastSet(doc) op is too slow.
As I said in my other response to you, that's a
Thank you!
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 23:03 +0900, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
(10/10/21 20:33), dar...@ontrenet.com wrote:
Hi,
Does the latest Solr provide an explanation for results returned by MLT?
No, but there is an open issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-860
Koji
Jean-Sebastien Vachon wrote:
You will also need to switch to a 64 bits JVM
You might have to add the `-d64` flag as well as the `-Xms` and `-Xmx`
I've actually had no luck googling what's up with the -d64. Can you
point me to any documentation on what effect it has, and on particular
on
Everything ovger ~3.7 3.7GB RAM (2^32, use your calculator) needs 64 bit
addressing.
Dennis Gearon
Signature Warning
It is always a good idea to learn from your own mistakes. It is usually a
better idea to learn from others’ mistakes, so you do not have to make them
yourself.
I'm using Solr 1.4. My observations and this page
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DistributedSearchDesign#line-254 indicate that the
general strategy for Distributed Search is something like:
1. Query the shards with the user's query and fl=unique_field,score
2. Re-query (maybe a
Memory limits info:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/hotspotfaq-138619.html#gc_heap_32bit
-d64 usage info:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1443677/what-impact-if-any-does-the-d64-swtich-have-on-sun-jvm-resident-memory-usage
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Gearon
I'm exploring the possibility of using cores as a solution to bookmark
folders in my solr application. This would mean I'll need tens of thousands
of cores... does this seem reasonable? I have plenty of CPUs available for
scaling, but I wonder about the memory overhead of adding cores (aside from
Is anyone using the newish JVM XX:+UseCompressedOops with Solr? Do you
have reason to believe it's helpful? Is there any way it can be harmful?
I am hoping it reduces my memory consumption somewhat.
An old thread with someone asking the same question, but with no
answers:
Hi there,
I noticed that the java-based replication does not make replication of
multiple core automatic. For example, if I have a master with 7
cores, any slave I set up has to explicitly know about each of the 7
cores to be able to replicate them. This information is stored in
solr.xml, and
No, it does not seem reasonable. Why do you think you need a seperate
core for every user?
mike anderson wrote:
I'm exploring the possibility of using cores as a solution to bookmark
folders in my solr application. This would mean I'll need tens of thousands
of cores... does this seem
On 10/21/2010 1:42 PM, didier deshommes wrote:
I noticed that the java-based replication does not make replication of
multiple core automatic. For example, if I have a master with 7
cores, any slave I set up has to explicitly know about each of the 7
cores to be able to replicate them. This
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 10/21/2010 1:42 PM, didier deshommes wrote:
I noticed that the java-based replication does not make replication of
multiple core automatic. For example, if I have a master with 7
cores, any slave I set up has to
If I do _not_ have any auto-commit enabled, and add 500k documents and
commit at end, no problem.
If I instead set auto-commit maxDocs to 10 (pretty large number),
and try to add 500k docs, with autocommits theoretically happening every
100k... I run into an OutOfMemory error.
Can
--- On Thu, 10/21/10, jmr jmpala...@free.fr wrote:
From: jmr jmpala...@free.fr
Subject: A bug in ComplexPhraseQuery ?
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Thursday, October 21, 2010, 12:53 PM
Hi,
We have installed ComplexPhraseQuery and since that we can
see strange
behaviour in
Is it possible to define different Similarity classes for
different fields?
No. See http://search-lucene.com/m/g9cVf23EQO11/
We have a use case where we are interested in avoid term
frequency (tf) when
our fields are multiValued.
May be omitTermFreqAndPositions=true?
On 10/21/2010 2:14 PM, didier deshommes wrote:
I use this configuration too but doesn't this assume that solr.xml is
the same in master and slave? what happens when master creates a new
core?
That's a very good question, one that I can't answer. I don't
dynamically create new cores. If you
quick follow-up: I also notice that the query from solrj gets version=1,
whereas the admin webapp puts version=2.2 on the query string, although
this param doesn't seem to change the xml results at all. Does this
indicate an older version of solrj perhaps?
-Mike
On 10/21/2010 04:47 PM, Mike
Hey guys,
I have a list of people indexed in Solr. I am trying to sort by their
first names but I keep getting results that are not alphabetically
sorted (I see the names starting with W before the names starting with
A). I have a feeling that the results are first being sorted by
relevancy then
need additional information .
Sorting is easy in Solr just by passing the sort parameter
However, when it comes to text sorting it depends on how you analyse
and tokenize your fields
Sorting does not work on fields with multiple tokens.
apache-solr-1.4.1Hello folks,
I'm very new user to solr. Please help
What I have in hand: 1) apache-solr-1.4.1; 2) Geronimo
After installing solr.war using Geronimo administration GUI, I got a
strange file, under the
Yes. Indexing activity suspends until the commit finishes, then
starts. Having both queries and indexing on the same Solr will have
this memory problem.
Lance
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
If I do _not_ have any auto-commit enabled, and add 500k
Hi Gora, I really appreciate.
Your reply was a great help to me. :)
I hope everything is fine with you.
Regards,
Jason
Gora Mohanty-3 wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Jason, Kim hialo...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry for the delay in replying. Was caught up in various things this
Thanks for your answer Upayavira. Appreciate it.
I want to do this because of a clustering requirement.
When clustering takes place in the product I'm working on the custom
repository we use replicates accordingly and makes data available to
all nodes. But if this is available on the file system
Hi Mike,
I've also considered using a separate cores in a multi tenant
application, ie a separate core for each tenant/domain. But the cores
do not suit that purpose.
If you check out documentation no real API support exists for this so
it can be done dynamically through SolrJ. And all use cases
iorixxx wrote:
ComplexPhraseQuery is ordered phrase query where default Lucene's
PhraseQuery is unordered. With ComplexPhrase order or terms are important.
Thanks for your answer.
With this request: (text:(protein digest~50)) || (text:(digest
protein~50))
I get my 6 documents.
In my
36 matches
Mail list logo
