It's worth to mention that fq is profitable only if you have high hit ratio
and proper filterCache size. If you see low hit ratio you just waste
resources on it.
11.12.2012 8:24 пользователь Otis Gospodnetic otis.gospodne...@gmail.com
написал:
If you don't need scoring on it then yes, just use
Hi,
I have a doc with the field type_s. The value can be news, photos and
videos.
The priority will be given in this order, photos, videos then news using the
below query,
q=sachindefType=dismaxbq=type_s:photos^10bq=type_s:videos^7bq=type_s:news^5
eventhough it is giving more priority to
Would you still have performance impact if you set to no cache and just use
fq to avoid impact on rating ?
On Dec 11, 2012 7:00 PM, Mikhail Khludnev mkhlud...@griddynamics.com
wrote:
It's worth to mention that fq is profitable only if you have high hit ratio
and proper filterCache size. If you
My bet, but only bet, is that you'll pointlessly create garbage in your
heap for bitsets that might have gc pressure, eg but is filter is quite
selective you'll have rather compact SortedIntDocSet that would not be so
sensible.
To avoid impact on rating I can propose you boost that clause quite
Lowercasing actually seems to work with Wildcard queries,
but not with fuzzy queries. Are there any reasons why
I should experience such a difference?
Hi Haagen,
Yonik added this recently. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4076
I believe DIH completely ignores names places/prefixes. Try skipping those
and just use local
names.
On 10 Dec 2012 20:48, zhk011 zhk...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
I'm new to Solr and DIH, recently I've been planning to use Solr/DIH to
index some local xml files. Following the DIH example
Thank you! I actually tried to look through Jira, but I didn't focus on the
minor issues. For me, this is quite critical.. :-)
Any chance of merging this into the 4.0.1 release?
Regards, Haagen
Den 11. des. 2012 kl. 12:45 skrev Ahmet Arslan:
Lowercasing actually seems to work with
Hi,
We are planning to setup multiple slaves to handle search loads. Some of
these slaves will be on the same physical machine. Instead of each slave
doing the replication,
1. Can we share the index with multiple slaves? All salves are read-only.
2. Can we have master and slave share the index?
Hi,
We are going to run Solr on Oracle Weblogic server. We would like to utilize
Oracle Weblogic's no-stage deployment. This means, we will have webapp
(Solr.war) deployed on a shared disk with multiple weblogic nodes (JVM's or
Managed servers in weblogic terms) booting the same web app. Solr
HI all,
Based on some good discussion in
Modeling openinghours using multipoints
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Modeling-openinghours-using-multipoints-tp4025336p4025683.html
I was triggered to have a review of an old painpoint of mine: modeling
pricing availability of hotels which
Hello,
I'm running solrcloud with 2 shards.
Lets assume I've 100 documents indexed in total, which are divided 55/45 by
the shards...
when I query, for example:
curl
'http://localhost:7500/solr/index/select?q=*:*lwt=jsonindent=truerows=0'
sometimes I got response:{numFound:0, sometimes -
Hi Sangeetha,
If you need to boost based on date regardless of type, just use date boosting
with a higher boost:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyFAQ#How_can_I_boost_the_score_of_newer_documents
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery#Date_Boosting
-Original Message-
From:
This I didn't knew...
I have a file named buscar.vm with the important part as follows:
div class=results
#foreach($doc in $response.results)
#parse(hit.vm)
#end
/div
hit.vm as follows:
#set($docId = $doc.getFieldValue('id'))
div class=result-document
#parse(doc.vm)
/div
I forgot to mention that the field that I wished to have multiple occurences
shown is the field named conteudo
I am already trying to make it iterate but up to now with no succes...
--
View this message in context:
It's because you are escaping.
Look at this bit:
[parsedquery_toString] = +(smsc_content:abcdefg12345 smsc_content:678910
smsc_description:abcdefg12345
smsc_content:678910) +smsc_lastdate:[1352627991000 TO 1386755331000]
It's searching for as well because you escaped it (hence it is not
I saw this... since I didn't know that much velocity I'll try to understand
but I will be really glad if (obviously in case it didn't take you much
time) you point me in the direction of the changes I need to do in my
files...
best regards,
Rafael
--
View this message in context:
When you say 2 shards do you mean 2 nodes each running a shard?
Seems like you have a collection named index - how did you create this
collection (containing two shards)?
How do you start your 2 nodes - exact command used?
You might want to attach the content of clusterstate.json from ZK. While
Did it as suggested in the link I sent
tks a lot!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/highlighting-multiple-occurrences-tp4025715p4026063.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
My mistake;
I was using the embedded SOLR server. I was storing in one route and
searching through another. The changes from the storage wasnt visible (file
open) for the search.
Changing to use the standalone server solved the problem.
--
View this message in context:
What is the benefit of having two slaves on the same machine?
While it is possible to share indexes across nodes, it isn't
recommended, as you'll need to know what you are doing, and will be
deviating from the norm which will make your life (much) harder.
I really don't see how there's a benefit
I have 1 collection called index.
I created it like explained here: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCloud in
Example A: Simple two shard cluster section
here are the start up commands:
1)java -Dbootstrap_confdir=./solr/index/conf -Dcollection.configName=myconf
-DzkRun -DnumShards=2 -jar start.jar
Thank you,first of all,
Yes,no same unique key means no this trouble.
But for me now,I can't reindex my data,it's too big.And it,s in production
environment .
So,any friends have solutions?
Thank you .
On Wednesday, December 12, 2012, Pawel wrote:
I think that solution is quite obvous. Be
Hi -
our indexed documents currently store solr fields like 'digest' or 'type',
which most of our documents will end up with same value (such as 'sha1' for
field 'digest', or 'message' for field 'type' etc).
on each solr server, we usually have 100 of millions of documents indexed
and with the
Just an update on this issue:
We tried by increasing zookeeper client timeout settings to 3ms in
solr.xml (i think default is 15000ms), and haven't seen any issues from our
tests.
cores . zkClientTimeout=3
Thanks, Sudhakar.
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Sudhakar
I am getting the following error :
Caused by: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error opening new searcher
at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.openNewSearcher(SolrCore.java:1326)
at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.getSearcher(SolrCore.java:1438)
at
I'm running Solr 4.0 on Tomcat 7.0.8 and I'm running the solr/example single
core as well with manifoldcf v1.1
I had everything working but then the crawler stops and I have Tika errors
in the solr log
I had tika 1.1 and that produces these errors:
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException:
The indexed=true side is quite efficient. The stored=true side -- not so
much, but the strings you have here are pretty small and I wouldn't worry
about it. Solr 4.1 (unreleased) does a great job here and compresses all
the stored field data across documents.
~ David
Jie Sun wrote
Hi -
our
Thanks, this is good stuff, I hadn't seen LUCENE-1999, and it even has a
reference to some methods now in core.
I think I'm still stuck for the moment though. I'm pretty fixed on Solr 3.5 for
the next few development cycles, and I've been trying really hard to avoid
compiling my own Solr - as
Do you know when will 4.1 be released or will there be a 4.0.1 release with
bug fixes from 4.0?
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-Query-performance-degrades-with-multiple-servers-tp4024660p4026139.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list
hi all. I have a large amount of spatial data in geo-json format that I get
from mssql server.
I want to be able to index that data and am trying to figure out how to
convert the data into WKT format since solr only accepts WKT.
is anyone away of any solr module or tsql code or c# code that
Has anyone ever attempted to highlight a field that is not stored in Solr? We
have been considering not storing fields in Solr, but still would like to use
Solr's built-in highlighting. On first glance, it looks like it would be
fairly simply to modify DefaultSolrHighlighter to get the stored
Hi Britske,
This is a very interesting question!
britske wrote
...
I realize the new spatial-stuff in Solr 4 is no magic bullet, but I'm
wondering if I could model multiple prices per day as multipoints,
whereas:
- date*duration*nr of persons*roomtype is modeled as point.x
I ran into this today it took me longer than it should have to figure
out the problem, so I wanted to write and share my experience to save
someone else some time. A web search and a search through the mail
archives didn't provide any elucidation.
If you run SolrJ 4.0.0 BETA connecting to
Hi,
I have a problem with updating dataimport.properties - while running single
sold there is no problem at all. Everything works perfectly. But when I
switching to cloud configuration with 2 shards (like described in
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCloud ExampleA: Simple two shard cluster)
this
thank you David!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/suggestion-howto-handle-highly-repetitive-valued-field-tp4026104p4026163.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 8:08 PM, sausarkar sausar...@ebay.com wrote:
Ok we think we found out the issue here. When solrcloud is started without
specifying numShards argument solrcloud starts with a single shard but still
thinks that there are multiple shards, so it forwards every single query to
I'm still looking into this - didn't have a lot of luck seeing it with
a test and am going to look at it manually.
I'm hoping 4.1 by xmas!
We will see though...need to get others on board.
- Mark
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 2:40 PM, sausarkar sausar...@ebay.com wrote:
Do you know when will 4.1 be
Hi David,
Yeah interesting (as well as problematic as far is implementing) use-case
indeed :)
1. You mention there are no special caches / memory requirements inherent
in this.. For a given user-query this would mean all hotels would have to
seach for all point.x each time right? What would be a
OK, I tried to reproduce it on trunk, and I can't (i.e. everything is
looking fine).
rm -rf example/solr/zoo_data
cp -rp example example2
cp -rp example example3
cd example
java -Dbootstrap_confdir=./solr/collection1/conf
-Dcollection.configName=myconf -DzkRun -DnumShards=1 -jar start.jar
cd
Hi there -- you may want to post this to the d...@tika.apache.org list.
Cheers,
Chris
On 12/11/12 11:08 AM, eShard zim...@yahoo.com wrote:
I'm running Solr 4.0 on Tomcat 7.0.8 and I'm running the solr/example
single
core as well with manifoldcf v1.1
I had everything working but then the crawler
Does anybody have any experience with rolling deployments and SolrCloud?
We have a production environment where we deploy new software and config
simultaneously to individual servers in a rolling manner. At any point
during the deployment, there may be N boxes with old software/config and M
Doing this with SolrCloud is not much different than doing it with old style
Solr.
ZooKeeper supports rolling restarts, and AFAIK, so does Solr generally.
While the configs live in zk, they work the same way as if they were local.
A SolrCore won't try and read them until you reload it. I think
I don't recall anyone implementing this, but I know it's been discussed in
the past, so check the ML archives.
Otis
--
SOLR Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm
On Dec 11, 2012 2:49 PM, Michael Ryan mr...@moreover.com wrote:
Has anyone ever attempted to highlight a field that is
But is that the best approach? If you use personIds in your second index
then you don't have to did that. Maybe you are after joins in Solr?
Otis
--
SOLR Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm
On Dec 11, 2012 1:21 PM, Dikchant Sahi contacts...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We have two set
Hi,
Sounds like you don't need to reindex. You need to find duplicates and
delete them.
Otis
--
SOLR Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm
On Dec 11, 2012 12:42 PM, 蒋明原 mailtojiangmingy...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you,first of all,
Yes,no same unique key means no this trouble.
But
What's going on here? What version of tika should I use?
The version that comes with Solr/SolrCell.
Try sending various document types directly to the Solr Extracting Request
Handler and see if it might be related to your parameters or specific
document types. Maybe the document isn't what
My intention is to allow search on person names in the second index also.
If we use personId in the second index, is there a way to achieve that?
Yes, we are looking for join kind of feature.
Thanks!
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Otis Gospodnetic
otis.gospodne...@gmail.com wrote:
But is
britske wrote
Hi David,
Yeah interesting (as well as problematic as far is implementing) use-case
indeed :)
1. You mention there are no special caches / memory requirements inherent
in this.. For a given user-query this would mean all hotels would have to
seach for all point.x each time
48 matches
Mail list logo
