Re: SOLR 7.1 queries not including empty fields in results

On 1/24/2018 4:17 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: I ask because even if you are using the ClassicIndexSchemaFactory, your update processor chain might be using TrimFieldUpdateProcessorFactory and/or RemoveBlankFieldUpdateProcessorFactory ? When i use the sample techproducts configs in 7.1, I have no

Re: SOLR 7.1 queries not including empty fields in results

: I am converting a SOLR 4.10 db to SOLR 7.1 : : It is NOT schemaless - so it uses a ClassicIndexSchemaFactory. : : In 4.10, I have a field that is a phone number (here's the schema information for the field): : : : : When inserting documents into SOLR, there are some documents where the :

Spellcheck collations results

Hi, in a spellchecker call, if I don't get back collations object in the response, is it correct to assume that even if I create a query myself by joining the individually spell-corrected words in suggestions object in response, it will have 0 results? E.g. In the following spellchecker

Re: Issues with refine parameter when subfaceting in a range facet

: We encountered an issue when using the refine parameter when subfaceting in : a range facet. : When enabling the refine option, the counts of the response are the double : of the counts of the response without refine option. : We are running Solr 6.6.1 in a cloud setup. ... : If I

Re: Preserve order during indexing

Alessandro, Right. Solr's docnums are changed when segments merge and reordered. On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 4:15 PM, alessandro.benedetti wrote: > Hi Mikhail, > but if he keeps the docs within a segment, the ordering may be correct just > temporary right ? > As soon as a

SOLR 7.1 queries not including empty fields in results

I am converting a SOLR 4.10 db to SOLR 7.1 It is NOT schemaless - so it uses a ClassicIndexSchemaFactory. In 4.10, I have a field that is a phone number (here's the schema information for the field): When inserting documents into SOLR, there are some documents where the value of Phone is an

Re: Solr 7.2.1 - cursorMark and elevateIds

Given the technical nature of this problem? Do you think I should try raising this on the developer group or raising a bug? On 24 January 2018 at 12:36, Greg Roodt wrote: > Hi > > I'm trying to use the Query Eleveation Component in conjunction with > CursorMark pagination.

What are solr index.properties files

While upgrading our QA solr 6.1 solrclouds to Solr 7.2.0 I discovered that some of our index folders for a replica had directory names like index.20170830071504690 These replicas also had a file index.properties which indicates which index directory is current. We don't see this configuration in

Re: Strange Alias behavior

I don't like that this behavior is not documented. It appears from this that aliases are recursive (sort of) and that isn't documented. On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 6:38 AM, alessandro.benedetti wrote: > b2b-catalog-material-etl -> b2b-catalog-material > b2b-catalog-material ->

configuring zookeeper authentication and authorization

Hi, I am following the Solr documentation to configure ZK authentication and ACLS from here https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/zookeeper-access-control.html I am planning to go with MD5 Digest authentication mechanism I am assuming that you still have to enable authentication on the

Re: No inserts in Query Result Cache

Did some further digging and found that as grouping is enabled query result cache is not having any inserts . Only disabling grouping adds an entry in query result cache. Is there a way we can cache grouped results because as per wiki there is parameter group.cache.percent but then again it doesnt

Re: BinaryResponseWriter fetches unnecessary fields?

: Thanks Chris! Is RetrieveFieldsOptimizer a new functionality introduced in : 7.x? Our observation is with botht 5.4 & 6.4. I have created a jira for : the issue: The same basic code path (related to stored fields) probably existed largely as is in 5.x and 6.x and was then later refactored

No inserts in Query Result Cache

Hi We are using Solr 6.6.2 version with 10g of memory (2 slaves and 1 master ) allocated to each and have around 30 docs. Our queries have combinations of q, fq and facets with grouping enabled... We have enabled filter cache and query result cache with 2048 entries. Recently we performed a

Re: LTR original score feature

This is actually an interesting point. The original Solr score alone will mean nothing, the ranking position of the document would be a more relevant feature at that stage. When you put the original score together with the rest of features, it may be of potential usage ( number of query terms, tf

Post-processing of Solr responses in Velocity templates by calling external Java methods

Hi, *Quick context of the application first.* I am currently using Solr in standalone mode to index thousands of text-like documents (not exactly textual documents). A single document has a structure like following: - *id* - unique file id - *line_text* - textual data -

Re: solr cluster: solr auto suggestion with requestHandler

have you tried adding the "distrib =true" request parameter when building the suggester ? It should be by default, but trying explicitly won't harm. I think nowadays the suggester component is Solr Cloud compatible, I have no chance to test it right now but it should just works. Worst case you

Re: Preserve order during indexing

Hi Mikhail, but if he keeps the docs within a segment, the ordering may be correct just temporary right ? As soon as a segment merge happens ( for example after sequent indexing sessions or updates) the internal Lucene doc Id may change and the default order Solr side may change, right ? I am just

Re: LTR and features operating on children doc data

I think this has nothing to do with LTR in particular. have you tried executing the function query on its own ? I think it doesn't exist at all, right ? [1] So maybe the first approach to that would be to add this nested children function query capability to Solr. I think there is a document

Re: Strange Alias behavior

b2b-catalog-material-etl -> b2b-catalog-material b2b-catalog-material -> b2b-catalog-material-180117 and we do a data load to b2b-catalog-material-etl We see data being added to both b2b-catalog-material and b2b-catalog-material-180117 -> *in here you wanted just to index in

Re: Using 'learning to rank' with user specific features

Hi, let me see if I got your problem : your "user specific" features are Query dependent features from Solr side. The value of this feature depends on a query component ( the user Id) and a document component( product Id) You can definitely use them. You can model this feature as a binary

RE: Using lucene to post-process Solr query results

I have never been a big fan of " getting N results from Solr and then filter them client side" . I get your point about the document modelling, so I will assume you properly tested it and having the small documents at Solr side is really not sustainable. I also appreciate the fact you want to

Issues with refine parameter when subfaceting in a range facet

Hi, We encountered an issue when using the refine parameter when subfaceting in a range facet. When enabling the refine option, the counts of the response are the double of the counts of the response without refine option. We are running Solr 6.6.1 in a cloud setup. If I execute the query: curl

RE: Using lucene to post-process Solr query results

Exactly. I want to validate each lucene document with the query and discard the ones that don't match. Regards, Rahul -Original Message- From: Diego Ceccarelli (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) [mailto:dceccarel...@bloomberg.net] Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 7:35 PM To:

Re: How to use facet pivoting with paging?

Hi, Can you explain a bit more what is the issue? If you are talking of paging results, then it depends on your presentation layer - you can include facet numbers when returning the first page or ask for facets separately and for the next page you do not return facets and only refresh results.