About the search 'referal_url:*www.someurl.com*', having a wildcard at the
start will cause a dictionary scan for every term you search on unless you use
ReversedWildcardFilterFactory. That could be the cause of your slowdown if you
are I/O bound, and even if you are CPU bound for that matter.
Johnny
What you are going to want to do is boost the artist field with respect to the
others, for example using edismax my 'qf' parameter is:
number^5 title^3 default
so hits in the number field get a five-fold boost and hits in the title field
get a three-fold boost. In your case
Using ReversedWildcardFilterFactory will double the size of your dictionary
(more or less), maybe the drop in performance that you are seeing is a result
of that?
François
On Jan 17, 2012, at 9:01 PM, Shyam Bhaskaran wrote:
Hi,
For reverse indexing we are using the
Anderson
I would say that this is highly unlikely, but you would need to pay attention
to how they are generated, this would be a good place to start:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universally_unique_identifier
Cheers
François
On Feb 8, 2012, at 1:31 PM, Anderson vasconcelos wrote:
Have you tried checking any logs?
Have you tried identifying a file which did not make it in and submitting just
that one and seeing what happens?
François
On Feb 9, 2012, at 10:37 AM, Rong Kang wrote:
Yes, I put all file in one directory and I have tested file names using
code.
You could take a look at this:
http://www.let.rug.nl/vannoord/TextCat/
Will probably require some work to integrate/implement through
François
On Feb 20, 2012, at 3:37 AM, bing wrote:
I have looked into the TikaCLI with -language option, and learned that Tika
can output only the
Ola
Here is what I have for this:
##
#
# Log4J configuration for SOLR
#
# http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrLogging
#
#
# 1) Download LOG4J:
# http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/
#
FWIW it looks like this feature has been enabled by default since JDK 6 Update
23:
http://blog.juma.me.uk/2008/10/14/32-bit-or-64-bit-jvm-how-about-a-hybrid/
François
On Mar 15, 2012, at 6:39 AM, Husain, Yavar wrote:
Thanks a ton.
From: Li
John
You can still use leading wildcards even if you dont have the
ReversedWildcardFilterFactory in your analysis but it means you will be
scanning the entire dictionary when the search is run which can be a
performance issue. If you do use ReversedWildcardFilterFactory you wont have
that
I suspect it is just part of the wildcard handling, maybe someone can chime in
here, you may need to catch this before it gets to SOLR.
François
On Nov 12, 2012, at 5:44 PM, johnmu...@aol.com wrote:
Thanks for the quick response.
So, I do not want to use ReversedWildcardFilterFactory,
I would create a hash of the document content and store that in SOLR along with
any document info you wish to store. When a document is presented for indexing,
hash that and compare to the hash of the stored document, index if they are
different and skip if they are not.
François
On Nov 24,
FWIW, here is the process I follow to create a log4j aware version of the
apache solr war file and the corresponding lo4j.properties files.
Have fun :)
François
##
#
# Log4J configuration for SOLR
#
#
I get slf4j-log4j12-1.6.1.jar from
http://www.slf4j.org/dist/slf4j-1.6.1.tar.gz, it is what interfaces slf4j to
log4j, you will also need to add log4j-1.2.16.jar to WEB-INF/lib.
François
On Jul 26, 2011, at 3:40 PM, O. Klein wrote:
François Schiettecatte wrote:
#
# 4) Copy
I have not seen this mentioned anywhere, but I found a useful 'trick' to
restart solr without having to restart tomcat. All you need to do is 'touch'
the solr.xml in the solr.home directory. It can take a few seconds but solr
will restart and reload any config.
Cheers
François
On Jul 27,
That seems a little far fetched, have you checked your analysis?
François
On Jul 31, 2011, at 4:58 PM, randohi wrote:
One of our clients (a hot girl!) brought this to our attention:
In this document there are many f* words:
Indeed, the analysis will show if the term is a stop word, the term gets
removed by the stop filter, turning on verbose output shows that.
François
On Jul 31, 2011, at 6:27 PM, Shashi Kant wrote:
Check your Stop words list
On Jul 31, 2011 6:25 PM, François Schiettecatte fschietteca
Assuming you are running on Linux, you might want to check /var/log/messages
too (the location might vary), I think the kernel logs forced process
termination there. I recall that the kernel will usually picks the process
consuming the most memory, there may be other factors involved too.
Sounds to me that you are looking for HTTP Persistent Connections (connection
keep-alive as opposed to close), and a singleton object. This would be outside
SOLR per se.
A few caveats though, I am not sure if tomcat supports keep-alive, and I am not
sure how SOLR deals with multiple requests
Merlin
Ü encodes to two characters in utf-8 (C39C), and one in iso-8859-1 (%DC) so it
looks like there is a charset mismatch somewhere.
Cheers
François
On Aug 27, 2011, at 6:34 AM, Merlin Morgenstern wrote:
Hello,
I am having problems with searches that are issued from spiders that
/27 François Schiettecatte fschietteca...@gmail.com
Merlin
Ü encodes to two characters in utf-8 (C39C), and one in iso-8859-1 (%DC) so
it looks like there is a charset mismatch somewhere.
Cheers
François
On Aug 27, 2011, at 6:34 AM, Merlin Morgenstern wrote:
Hello,
I am
Satish
You don't say which platform you are on but have you tried links (with ln on
linux/unix) ?
François
On Aug 31, 2011, at 12:25 AM, Satish Talim wrote:
I have 1000's of cores and to reduce the cost of loading unloading
schema.xml, I have my solr.xml as mentioned here -
I note that there is a full download option available, might be easier than
crawling.
François
On Sep 4, 2011, at 9:56 AM, Markus Jelsma wrote:
Hi,
Solr is a search engine, not a crawler. You can use Apache Nutch to crawl
your
site and have it indexed in Solr.
Cheers,
Hi,
I am
My memory of this is a little rusty but isn't mmap also limited by mem + swap
on the box? What does 'free -g' report?
François
On Sep 7, 2011, at 12:25 PM, Rich Cariens wrote:
Ahoy ahoy!
I've run into the dreaded OOM error with MMapDirectory on a 23G cfs compound
index segment file. The
Wildcard terms are not analyzed, so your synonyms.txt may come into play here,
have you check the analysis for deniz* ?
François
On Sep 7, 2011, at 10:08 PM, deniz wrote:
well yea you are right... i realised that lack of detail issue here... so
here it comes...
This is from my
You have not said how big your index is but I suspect that allocating 13GB for
your 20 cores is starving the OS of memory for caching file data. Have you
tried 6GB with 20 cores? I suspect you will see the same performance as 6GB
10 cores.
Generally it is better to allocate just enough memory
Erik
I would complement the date with default values as you suggest and store a
boolean flag indicating whether the date was complete or not, or store the
original date if it is not complete which would probably be better because the
presence of that data would tell you that the original date
Arshad
Actually it is available, you need to use the ReversedWildcardFilterFactory
which I am sure you can Google for.
Solr and SQL address different problem sets with some overlaps but there are
significant differences between the two technologies. Actually '%Solr%' is a
worse case for SQL
. This is
what's Solr made for. :)
-Kuli
Am 01.11.2011 13:24, schrieb François Schiettecatte:
Arshad
Actually it is available, you need to use the ReversedWildcardFilterFactory
which I am sure you can Google for.
Solr and SQL address different problem sets with some overlaps
Wouldn't 'diseases AND water' or '+diseases +water' return you that result? Or
you could search on 'water' while filtering on 'diseases'.
Or am I missing something here?
François
On Nov 8, 2011, at 4:19 PM, sharnel pereira wrote:
Hi,
I have 10k records indexed using solr 1.4
We have a
It looks like you are using the plural stemmer, you might want to look into
using the Porter stemmer instead:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#Stemming
François
On Nov 28, 2011, at 9:14 AM, mina wrote:
I use solr 3.3,I want solr index words with their suffixes.
It won't and depending on how your analyzer is set up the terms are most likely
stemmed at index time.
You could create a separate field for unstemmed terms though, or use a less
aggressive stemmer such as EnglishMinimalStemFilterFactory.
François
On Nov 29, 2011, at 12:33 PM, Robert Brown
You might try the snowball stemmer too, I am not sure how closely that will fit
your requirements though.
Alternatively you could use synonyms.
François
On Nov 29, 2011, at 1:08 AM, mina wrote:
thank you for your answer.i read it and i use this filter in my schema.xml in
solr:
filter
I am not an expert on this but the oom-killer will kill off the process
consuming the greatest amount of memory if the machine runs out of memory, and
you should see something to that effect in the system log, /var/log/messages I
think.
François
On Dec 14, 2011, at 2:54 PM, Adolfo Castro
I would shard the index so that each shard is no larger than the memory of the
machine it sits on, that way your entire index will be in memory all the time.
When I was at Feedster (I wrote the search engine), the rule of thumb I had was
to have 14GB of index on a 16GB machine.
François
On
I have just been playing around with spell check and from what I can tell it
does not do that automatically, you would need to program that in your
application yourself, basically run a search, check the spellcheck, run the
search again if needed, and present the results to the user, not all
It sounds like your system is I/O bound and I suspect (bet even) that all your
index files are on the same disk drive. Also you have only 8GB of RAM for 100GB
of index, so while your SOLR instance will cache some stuff and the balance
will be used for caching file blocks, there really isn't
This reminded me of a situation I ran into in the past where the JVM was being
rendered useless because it was calling FGC repeatedly. Effectively what was
going on is that a very large array was allocated which swamped the JVM memory
and caused it to trash, much like an OS.
Here are some
Markus
A few things to check, make sure whatever SOLR is hosted on is outputting utf-8
( URIEncoding=UTF-8 in the Connector section in server.xml on Tomcat for
example), which it looks like here, also make sure that whatever http header
there is tells firefox that it is getting utf-8
I use it in a production setting, but I don't have a very large data set or a
very heavy query load, the reason I use it is for edismax.
François
On Feb 19, 2011, at 9:50 AM, Mark wrote:
Would I be crazy even to consider putting this in production? Thanks
Hello
What about adding or deleting fields? I have been reindexing after doing that
but is it needed?
François
On Feb 21, 2011, at 7:16 AM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Hello,
When you change types you typically want to reindex everything.
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ ::
Hi
I get the same problem on tomcat with other applications, so this does not
appear to be limited to SOLR. I got the error on tomcat 6 and 7. The only
solution I found was to kill tomcat and start it again.
François
On Mar 2, 2011, at 2:28 PM, Search Learn wrote:
Hello,
We currently
Hi
I get the same problem on tomcat with other applications, so this does not
appear to be limited to SOLR. I got the error on tomcat 6 and 7. The only
solution I found was to kill tomcat and start it again.
François
On Mar 2, 2011, at 2:28 PM, Search Learn wrote:
Hello,
We currently
I did a little research into this for a client a while. The character mapping
is not one to one which complicates things (TC and SC have evolved
independently) and if you want to do a perfect job you will need a dictionary.
However there are tables out there (I can dig one up for you) that
help.
--- On Mon, 3/7/11, François Schiettecatte fschietteca...@gmail.com wrote:
From: François Schiettecatte fschietteca...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: How to handle searches across traditional and simplifies
Chinese?
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Monday, March 7, 2011, 5:24 PM
I
Tomás
That wont really work, transliteration to Romaji works for individual terms
only so you would need to tokenize the Japanese prior to transliteration. I am
not sure what tool you plan to use for transliteration, I have used ICU in the
past and from what I can tell it does not
with Lucene and Solr.
wunder
On Mar 11, 2011, at 8:09 AM, François Schiettecatte wrote:
Tomás
That wont really work, transliteration to Romaji works for individual terms
only so you would need to tokenize the Japanese prior to transliteration. I
am not sure what tool you plan to use
François Schiettecatte fschietteca...@gmail.com
Good question about transliteration, the issue has to do with recall, for
example, I can write 'Toyota' as 'トヨタ' or 'とよた' (Katakana and Hiragana
respectively), not doing the transliteration will miss results. You will
find that the big search engines
it doesn't do Kanji)
Tomás
2011/3/11 François Schiettecatte fschietteca...@gmail.com
Good question about transliteration, the issue has to do with recall, for
example, I can write 'Toyota' as 'トヨタ' or 'とよた' (Katakana and Hiragana
respectively), not doing the transliteration will miss
Lewis
Quick response, I am currently using Tomcat 7.0.8 with solr (with no issues), I
will upgrade to 7.0.11 tonight and see if I run into the same issues.
Stay tuned as they say.
Cheers
François
On Mar 16, 2011, at 2:38 PM, McGibbney, Lewis John wrote:
Hello list,
Is anyone running
Lewis
My update from tomcat 7.0.8 to 7.0.11 went with no hitches, I checked my
context file and it does not have the xml preamble your has, specifically:
'?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?',
Here is my context file:
Context
at the start of your
XML file or some non blank lines ?
Pierre
-Message d'origine-
De : François Schiettecatte [mailto:fschietteca...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 17 mars 2011 14:48
À : solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Objet : Re: Using Solr 1.4.1 on most recent Tomcat 7.0.11
Lewis
My
François
I think there is a language identification tool in the Nutch code base,
otherwise I have written one in Perl which could easily be translated to Java.
I wont have access to it for 10 days (I am traveling), but I am happy to send
you a link to it when I get back (and anyone else who
I had meant to also include a link to a blog post of mine that lists some
useful links:
http://fschiettecatte.wordpress.com/2008/07/23/language-recognition/
François
On Mar 25, 2011, at 11:59 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
You are looking for a language identification tool. You could
And if you have control over machine placement, split them across racks so that
a power outage on one rack does not take out your search cluster.
François
On Apr 5, 2011, at 3:19 AM, Ephraim Ofir wrote:
I'm not sure about the scale you're aiming for, but you probably want to
do both sharding
You might also want to look at the heritrix crawler too:
http://crawler.archive.org/
I have written three crawlers in the past, all for RSS feeds, it is not easy.
Happy to provide tips and help if you want to go down that route.
François
On Apr 8, 2011, at 1:53 AM, Andrea Campi wrote:
Specifically to the file size support, all the file systems on current releases
of linux (and unixes too) support large files with 64 bit offsets, and I am
pretty sure that java VM supports 64 bit offsets in files, so there is no 2GB
file size limit anymore.
François
On Apr 15, 2011, at 4:31
I think you could approximate this with some empirical measurements, i.e. index
1,000 'typical' documents and see what the resulting index size it. Of course
you may need to adjust this number upwards if there is a lot of variability in
document size.
When I built the search engine that ran
I would start here:
http://snowball.tartarus.org/
François
On Apr 19, 2011, at 11:15 AM, bryan rasmussen wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if I have a large number of queries I want to test
stemming on if there is a free standing library I can just run it
against without having to do
If you are on linux, I would recommend two tools you can use to track what is
going on on the machine, atop ( http://freshmeat.net/projects/atop/ ) and dstat
( http://freshmeat.net/projects/dstat/ ).
atop in particular has been very useful to me in tracking down performance
issues in real time
Couple of things. One you are not swaping which is a good thing. Second (and I
am not sure what delay you selected for dstat, I would assume the default of 1
second) there is some pretty heavy write activity like this:
26 1 71 2 0 0 |4096B 1424k| 0 0 | 719 415 | 197M 11G|1.00
Rajani
You might also want to look at Balie ( http://balie.sourceforge.net/ ), from
the web site:
Features:
• language identification
• tokenization
• sentence boundary detection
• named-entity recognition
Can't vouch for it though.
On May 5, 2011, at 4:58
When I ran the search engine at Feedster, I wrote a perl script that ran
nightly and gave me:
total number of searches
total number of searches per hour
N most frequent searches
max time for a search
min time for a search
mean time for searches
median time for searches
N slowest searches
You can also shut down solr/lucene, do:
rm -rf /YourIndexName/data/index
and restart, the index directory will be automatically recreated.
François
On May 14, 2011, at 1:53 AM, Gabriele Kahlout wrote:
curl --fail $solrIndex/update?commit=true -d
'deletequery*:*/query/delete' #empty
.
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Pawan Darira pawan.dar...@gmail.com
wrote:
I did that. Index directory is created but not contents in that
2011/5/14 François Schiettecatte fschietteca...@gmail.com
You can also shut down solr/lucene, do:
rm -rf
You concatenate the two keys into a single string, with some sort of delimiter
between the two keys.
François
On May 26, 2011, at 6:05 AM, Romi wrote:
what do you mean by combine two fields customerID and ProductId.
what i tried is
1. make both fields unique but it doesnot server my
Here is some code:
--
final String key1 = 1;
final String key2 = 2;
final String masterKey = key1 + : + key2;
--
You need to combine the keys *before* you send them to Solr.
François
On May 26, 2011, at 7:02 AM, Romi wrote:
I am not getting how can i combine two keys in to a
Hi
You might also check the 'max_user_connections' settings too if you have that
set:
# Maximum number of connections, and per user
max_connections = 2048
max_user_connections = 2048
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/server-system-variables.html
Cheers
Are you sure solr.StrField is the way to go with this? solr.StrField stores the
entire text verbatim and I am pretty sure skips any analysis. Perhaps you
should use solr.TextField instead.
François
On Jun 2, 2011, at 2:28 AM, deniz wrote:
Hi all,
here is a piece from my solfconfig:
This is not really an issue with SOLR per se, and I have run into this before,
you will need to read up on 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' which needs to be set
in the http headers that your ajax pager is returning. Beware that not all
browsers obey it and Olivier is right when he suggested
Underscores and dashes are fine, but I would think that colons (:) are verboten.
François
On Jun 4, 2011, at 9:49 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
Is there a list anywhere detailing field name restrictions. I imagine
fields containing periods (.) are problematic if you try to use that field
when
I think you will need to provide more information than this, no-one on this
list is omniscient AFAIK.
François
On Jun 14, 2011, at 10:44 AM, Denis Kuzmenok wrote:
Hi.
I've debugged search on test machine, after copying to production server
the entire directory (entire solr directory),
I am assuming that you are running on linux here, I have found atop to be very
useful to see what is going on.
http://freshmeat.net/projects/atop/
dstat is also very useful too but needs a little more work to 'decode'.
Obviously there is contention going on, you just need to figure out
What do you have set up for stemming?
François
On Jun 18, 2011, at 8:00 AM, Gabriele Kahlout wrote:
Hello,
Debugging query results I find that:
str name=querystringpaste/str
str name=parsedquerycontent:past/str
Now paste and past are two different words. Why does Solr not consider
. My real issue is why are not query keywords treated as a
set?http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-solr-user/201106.mbox/%3CBANLkTikHunhyWc2WVTofRYU4ZW=c8oe...@mail.gmail.com%3E
2011/6/18 François Schiettecatte fschietteca...@gmail.com
What do you have set up for stemming
Sure.
François
On Jun 18, 2011, at 2:25 PM, shacky wrote:
2011/6/15 Edoardo Tosca e.to...@sourcesense.com:
Try to use multiple cores:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin
Can I do concurrent searches on multiple cores?
+
normalized tables, but only 4 cores.
Perhaps describing what you are trying to achieve would give us greater insight
and thus be able to make more concrete recommendation?
Cheers
François
On Jun 18, 2011, at 2:36 PM, shacky wrote:
Il 18 giugno 2011 20:27, François Schiettecatte
That is correct, but you only need to commit, optimize is not a requirement
here.
François
On Jun 18, 2011, at 11:54 PM, Mohammad Shariq wrote:
I have define uniqueKey in my solr and Deleting the docs from solr using
this uniqueKey.
and then doing optimization once in a day.
is this right
Mike
I would be very interested in the answer to that question too. My hunch is that
the answer is no too. I have a few text databases that range from 200MB to
about 60GB with which I could run some tests. I will have some downtime in
early July and will post results.
From what I can tell the
Wayne
I am not sure what you mean by 'changing the record'.
One option would be to implement something like the synonyms filter to generate
the TC for SC when you index the document, which would index both the TC and
the SC in the same location. That way your users would be able to search with
Well you need to find word lists and/or a thesaurus.
This is one place to start:
http://wordlist.sourceforge.net/
I used the US/UK english word list for my synonyms for an index I have because
it contains both US and UK english terms, the list lacks some medical terms
though so we
Create a hash from the url and use that as the unique key, md5 or sha1 would
probably be good enough.
Cheers
François
On Jun 28, 2011, at 7:29 AM, Mohammad Shariq wrote:
I also have the problem of duplicate docs.
I am indexing news articles, Every news article will have the source URL,
If
using SOLR as index engine Only and using Riak(key-value
storage) as storage engine, I dont want to do the overwrite on duplicate.
I just need to discard the duplicates.
2011/6/28 François Schiettecatte fschietteca...@gmail.com
Create a hash from the url and use that as the unique key
to work on it, as there are some other low hanging fruits I've to
capture. Will share my thoughts soon.
*Pranav Prakash*
temet nosce
Twitter http://twitter.com/pranavprakash | Blog http://blog.myblive.com |
Google http://www.google.com/profiles/pranny
2011/6/28 François Schiettecatte
nosce
Twitter http://twitter.com/pranavprakash | Blog
http://blog.myblive.com |
Google http://www.google.com/profiles/pranny
2011/6/28 François Schiettecatte fschietteca...@gmail.com
Maybe there is a way to get Solr to reject documents that already exist
in
the index but I doubt
wrote:
Thanks François Schiettecatte, information you provided is very helpful.
i need to know one more thing, i downloaded one of the given dictionary but
it contains many files, do i need to add all this files data in to
synonyms.text ??
-
Thanks Regards
Romi
--
View this message
Indeed, I find the Porter stemmer to be too 'aggressive' for my taste, I prefer
the EnglishMinimalStemFilterFactory, with the caveat that it depends on your
data set.
Cheers
François
On Jun 29, 2011, at 6:21 AM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
Hi, when i query for elegant in
solr i get results for
I would run that word through the analyzer, I suspect that the word 'teste' is
being stemmed to 'test' in the index, at least that is the first place I would
check.
François
On Jun 30, 2011, at 2:21 PM, Celso Pinto wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm having some trouble figuring out why a query with
,
it is indeed being stemmed, thanks a lot for the heads up. It appears
that stemming is also configured for the query so it should work just
the same, no?
Thanks again.
Regards,
Celso
2011/6/30 François Schiettecatte fschietteca...@gmail.com:
I would run that word through the analyzer, I
Hi
I don't think that anyone has run such benchmarks, in fact this topic came up
two weeks ago and I volunteered some time to do that because I have some spare
time this week, so I am going to run some benchmarks this weekend and report
back.
The machine I have to do this a core i7 960, 24GB,
You just need to provide a second sort field along the lines of:
sort=score desc, author desc
François
On Jul 12, 2011, at 6:13 AM, Lox wrote:
Hi,
In the case where two or more documents are returned with the same score, is
there a way to tell Solr to sort them alphabetically?
http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_9_1/queryparsersyntax.html
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrQuerySyntax
François
On Jul 13, 2011, at 1:29 PM, GAURAV PAREEK wrote:
Hello,
What are wildcards we can use with the SOLR ?
Regards,
Gaurav
Easy, the hyphen is out on its own (with spaces on either side) and is probably
getting removed from the search by the tokenizer. Check your analysis.
François
On Jul 14, 2011, at 6:05 AM, roySolr wrote:
It looks like it's still not working.
I send this to SOLR: q=arsenal \- london
I
I think anything but a 200 OK mean it is dead like the proverbial parrot :)
François
On Jul 19, 2011, at 7:42 AM, Romi wrote:
But the problem is when solr server is not runing
*http://host:port/solr/admin/ping*
will not give me any json response
then how will i get the status :(
when
Check your analyzers to make sure that these characters are not getting
stripped out in the tokenization process, the url for 3.3 is somewhere along
the lines of:
http://localhost/solr/admin/analysis.jsp?highlight=on
And you should be indeed be searching on \#test.
François
On Jul
Adding to my previous reply, I just did a quick check on the 'text_en' and
'text_en_splitting' field types and they both strip leading '#'.
Cheers
François
On Jul 22, 2011, at 10:49 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 7/22/2011 8:34 AM, Jason Toy wrote:
How does one search for words with characters
Just a suggestion, you might want to monitor CPU usage and disk I/O, there
might be a bottleneck.
Cheers
François
On Jun 19, 2012, at 7:07 AM, Bruno Mannina wrote:
Actually -Xmx512m and no effect
Concerning maxFieldLength, no problem it's commented
Le 19/06/2012 13:02, Erick Erickson
during the process but How can I check
IO HDD ?
Le 19/06/2012 14:13, François Schiettecatte a écrit :
Just a suggestion, you might want to monitor CPU usage and disk I/O, there
might be a bottleneck.
Cheers
François
On Jun 19, 2012, at 7:07 AM, Bruno Mannina wrote:
Actually
, at 9:03 AM, Bruno Mannina wrote:
Linux Ubuntu :) since 2 months ! so I'm a new in this world :)
Le 19/06/2012 15:01, François Schiettecatte a écrit :
Well that depends on the platform you are on, you did not mention that.
If you are using linux, you could use atop ( http://www.atoptool.nl
Giovanni
stored=true means the data is stored in the index and can be returned with
the search results (see the 'fl' parameter). This is independent of indexed=..
Which means that you can store but not index a field:
indexed=false stored=true
Best regards
François
On Jun 30,
On Jul 11, 2012, at 2:52 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 7/2/2012 2:33 AM, Nabeel Sulieman wrote:
Argh! (and hooray!)
I started from scratch again, following the wiki instructions. I did only
one thing differently; put my data directory in /opt instead of /home/dev.
And now it works!
I'm
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
