This is both an FYI for the list so the issue gets documented and a suggestion
for the developers. I thought about a JIRA, and would be happy to submit one,
but the issue is pretty environment-specific, so I have not done so at this
point.
In testing Solr 3.3 under WebSphere Application
1. Find a dictionary with the English words you find acceptable
2. Use the KeepWordFilterFactory (doc in the AnalyzerTTokenizersTokenFilters
Wiki page).
-Original Message-
From: Omri Cohen [mailto:omri...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2011 1:23 AM
To:
Note on i: Solr replication provides pretty good clustering support
out-of-the-box, including replication of multiple cores. Read the Wiki on
replication (Google +solr +replication if you don't know where it is).
In my experience, the problem with indexing PDFs is it takes a lot of CPU on
On the surface, you could simply add some more fields to your schema. But as
far as I can tell, you would have to have a separate Solr document for each
SKU/size combination, and store the rest of the information (brand, model,
color, SKU) redundantly and make the unique key a combination of
on (p.sku = i.sku)
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Jaeger, Jay - DOT jay.jae...@dot.wi.govwrote:
On the surface, you could simply add some more fields to your schema. But
as far as I can tell, you would have to have a separate Solr document for
each SKU/size combination, and store the rest
to a reasonable solution are you interested in the
details?
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Jaeger, Jay - DOT
jay.jae...@dot.wi.govwrote:
No, I don't think so. A given core can only use one configuration and
therefore only one schema, as far as I know, and a schema can only have one
key.
You
Perhaps your admin doesn’t work because you don't have
defaultCoreName=whatever-core-you-want-by-default in your cores tag? E.g.:
cores adminPath=/admin/cores defaultCoreName=collection1
Perhaps this was enough to prevent it starting any cores -- I'd expect a
default to be required.
, Jaeger, Jay - DOT wrote:
Perhaps your admin doesn’t work because you don't have
defaultCoreName=whatever-core-you-want-by-default in your cores tag? E.g.:
cores adminPath=/admin/cores defaultCoreName=collection1
Perhaps this was enough to prevent it starting any cores -- I'd expect
I tried on my own test environment -- pulling out the default core parameter
out, under Solr 3.1
I got exactly your symptom: an error 404.
HTTP ERROR 404
Problem accessing /solr/admin/index.jsp. Reason:
missing core name in path
The log showed:
Whoops: That was Solr 4.0 (which pre-dates 3.1).
I doubt very much that the release matters, though: I expect the behavior would
be the same.
-Original Message-
From: Jaeger, Jay - DOT [mailto:jay.jae...@dot.wi.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 4:04 PM
To: solr-user
: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Unknown fieldtype 'long'
specified on field area_id
Errr. Why would `long` be an invalid type?
On Tuesday, 16 August, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Jaeger, Jay - DOT wrote:
Whoops: That was Solr 4.0 (which pre-dates 3.1).
I doubt very much that the release matters, though: I expect
. You guys saved me
from the insane asylum.
On Tuesday, 16 August, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Jaeger, Jay - DOT wrote:
That said, the logs are showing a different error now. Excellent! The site
schemas are loading!
Great!
SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Unknown fieldtype 'long
I'd suggest looking at the logs of the master to see if the request is getting
thru or not, or if there are any errors logged there. If the master has a
replication config error, it might show up there.
We just went thru some master/slave troubleshooting. Here are some things that
you might
It would perhaps help if you reported what you mean by noticeably less time.
What were your timings? Did you run the tests multiple times?
One thing to watch for in testing: Solr performance is greatly affected by the
OS file system cache. So make sure when testing that you use the same
What is the latest version of Tika that I can use with Solr 1.4.1? it
comes packaged with 0.4. I tried 0.8 and it no workie.
When I was testing Tika last year, I used Solr build 1271 to get the most
recent Tika I could get my hands on at the time. That was before Solr 3.1, so
I expect it
geospatial requirements
Looking at your email address, no surprise there. 8^)
What insight can you share (if any) regarding moving forward to a later
nightly build?
I used build 1271 (Solr 1.4.1, which seemed to be called Solr 4 at the time)
during some testing, and it performed well --
You could presumably do it with solr.PatternTokenizerFactory with the pattern
set to .* as your tokenizer
Or, maybe, if Solr allows it, you don't use any tokenizer at all?
Or, maybe you could use solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory, allowing it to split
up the words, along with
I would suggest #3, unless you have some very unusual performance requirements.
It has the advantage of isolating your index environment requirements from
the database.
-Original Message-
From: Nicholas Fellows [mailto:n...@djdownload.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 8:40 AM
To:
I am not an XSLT expert, but believe that in XSLT, not is a function, rather
than an operator.
http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-functions/#func-not
So, not(contains)) rather than not contains() should presumably do
the trick.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Gross
You could run the HTML import from Tika (see the Solr tutorial on the Solr
website). The job that ran Tika would need the user/password of the site to be
indexed, but Solr would not. (You might have to write a little script to get
the HTML page using curl or wget or Nutch).
Users could then
One way I had thought of doing this kind of thing: include in the index an
ACL of some sort. The problem I see in your case is that the list if
friends can presumably change over time.
So, given that, one way would be to have a little application in between. The
request goes to the
I don't think it has to be quite so bleak as that, depending upon the number of
queries done over a given timeframe, and the size of the result sets. Solr
does cache the identifiers of documents returned by search results. See
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCaching paying particular
Yes, but since Solr is written in Java to run in a JEE container, you would
host Solr in a web application server, either Jetty (which comes packaged), or
something else (say, Tomcat or WebSphere or something like that).
As a result, you aren't going to find anything that says how to run Solr
A programmer had a problem. He tried to solve it with regular expressions.
Now he has two problems :).
A. That just isn't fair... 8^)
(I can't think of very many things that have allowed me to perform more magic
over my career than regular expressions, starting with SNOBOL. Uh oh: I
shared hosting environment
Thank you!
Since it's shared hosting, how do I install java?
-Original Message-
From: Jaeger, Jay - DOT [mailto:jay.jae...@dot.wi.gov]
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 4:34 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Solr in a windows shared hosting environment
It sounds like the correspondent (Jonty) is thinking just in terms of SolrJ --
wanting to share that across multiple threads in an application server.
In which case the question would be whether it would be possible/safe/efficient
to share a single instantiation of the SolrJ class(es) across
So, the question then seems to be: is there a way to place credentials in the
URLDataSource.
There doesn't seem to be an explicit user ID or password (
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#Configuration_of_URLDataSource_or_HttpDataSource
) but perhaps you can include them in URL
I am trying
to peek into the index to see if my index-time synonym expansions are
working properly or not.
For this I have successfully used the analysis page of the admin application
that comes out of the box. Works really well for debugging schema changes.
JRJ
-Original Message-
Another way that occurs to me is that if you have a securityconstraint on the
update URL(s) in your web.xml, you can map them to no groups / empty groups in
the JEE container.
JRJ
-Original Message-
From: simon [mailto:mtnes...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 12:21 PM
To:
Also... Did he restart either his web app server container or at least the
Solr servlet inside the container?
JRJ
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:erik.hatc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2011 5:29 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: missing field in
Well, if it is for creating a *new* core, Solr doesn't know it is pointing to
your shared conf directory until after you create it, does it?
JRJ
-Original Message-
From: Gérard Dupont [mailto:ger.dup...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 8:17 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
If you are indexing data, rather than documents, another possibility is to
use database triggers to fire off updates.
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:erik.hatc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 9:13 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: is it
I solved a similar kind of issue (where I actually needed multi-valued
attributes, e.g. people with multiple or hyphenated last names) by including
PositionFilterFactory in the filter list for the analyzer in such fields'
fieldType, thereby setting the position of each value to 1.
JRJ
Not quite sure what you are asking.
You can certainly use copyField to copy a field, and then apply regex on the
destination field's fieldType. We do that.
JRJ
-Original Message-
From: alx...@aim.com [mailto:alx...@aim.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 4:16 PM
To:
You seem to have two questions:
1) How to write a script to import data
2) How to schedule that in Windows
For #1, I suggest that you visit the Solr tutorials at
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/tutorial.html to learn what commands might be
used to import data. You might find that you need to
It won't work given your current schema. To get the desired results, you would
need to expand your synonyms at both index AND query time. Right now your
schema seems to specify it only at index time.
So, as the other respondent indicated, currently you replace allergy with the
other list
I have a very huge schema spanning up to 10K lines , if I use query time it
will be huge hit for me because one term will be mapped to multiple terms .
similar in the case of allergy
I think maybe you mean synonym file, rather than the schema? I doubt that the
number of lines matters all
Also, just to make one thing just a bit more clear. You can specify two
different kinds of entries in synonym files. See
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters
(solr.SynonymFilterFactory)
One is replacement, where the words before the = are *replaced* by the right
That is correct. Apache is not an *application* server. It is an HTTP *web*
server. On its own it does not support running Java applications written to
the JEE/J2EE servlet specification - like Solr.
(Apache is also not written in Java, if that was what you meant).
-Original
Other containers that will support Solr: just about any JEE/J2EE container.
We have tested under WebSphere Application Server Version 7 -- works fine.
Oracle's web application server would presumably work, too -- just about
anything.
-Original Message-
From: nagarjuna
Jaeger, Jay - DOT.
so i can conclude that solr will run only on application
servers(having servlet containers) and not in web servers am
i correct?
and i have one more question is it possible to add servlet container to the
web servers?
--
View this message in context:
http
You could host Solr inside the same Tomcat container, or in a different servlet
container (say, a second Tomcat instance) on the same server.
Be aware of your OS memory requirements, though: In my experience, Solr
performs best when it has lots of OS memory to cache index files (at least, if
Following up from your message on the Nutch list. If q=*:* is showing you
empty doc/doc elements,
no fields are getting indexed.
I don't think that is correct. I believe that the correct statement would be
no fields are getting *** stored ***. If the fields were not getting indexed,
they
If you think about it, Lucene (upon which Solr is build) *is* a kind of DBMS -
just not an RDBMS. After all, in the end, a DBMS stores its stuff in files,
too. If you then turned around and mapped the stuff that Solr does into
database tables, you would lose all of the performance advantages
Looking at the Wiki (
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters ), it looks like
the solr.StandardTokenizerFactory changed with Solr 3.1 .
We use solr.KeyWordTokenizerFactory for our middle names (and then also throw
in solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory to normalize to lower
You could prevent queries to the master by limiting what IP addresses are
allowed to communicate with it, or by modifying web.xml to put different
security on /update vs. /select .
We took a simplistic approach. We did some load testing, and discovered that
we could handle our expected update
Some possibilities:
1) Put the file extension into your index (that is what we did when we were
testing indexing documents with Solr)
2) Put a mime type for the document into your index.
3) Put the whole file name / URL into your index, and match on part of the
name. This will give some false
I don't think you understand. Solr does not have the code to do that. It just
isn't there, nor would I expect it would ever be there.
Solr is open source though. You could look at the code and figure out how to
do it (though why anyone would do that remains beyond my ability to
understand).
Nicely put. ;^)
-Original Message-
From: Walter Underwood [mailto:wun...@wunderwood.org]
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 9:16 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: can indexing information stored in db rather than filesystem?
On Sep 13, 2011, at 6:51 AM, kiran.bodigam
numDocs is not the number of documents in memory. It is the number of
documents currently in the index (which is kept on disk). Same goes for
maxDocs, except that it is a count of all of the documents that have ever been
in the index since it was created or optimized (including deleted
Looking at the source for Jetty, line 149 in Jetty's HttpOutput java file looks
like this:
if (_closed)
throw new IOException(Closed);
changed the configuration to point it to my solr dir and started it again
You might look in your logs to see where Solr thinks the Solr home directory is
and/or if it complains about not being able to find it. As a guess, it can't
find it, perhaps because solr.solr.home does not point to the
Just add a bogus 0 timestamp after it when you index it. That is what we did.
Dates are not stored or indexed as characters, anyway, so space would not be
any different one way or the other.
JRJ
-Original Message-
From: stockii [mailto:stock.jo...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Wednesday,
I have not used SolrJ, but it probably is worth considering as a possible
suspect.
Also, do you have anything in between the client and the Solr server (a
firewall, load balancer, etc.?) that might play games with HTTP connections?
You might want to start up a network trace on the server or
I think folks are going to need a *lot* more information. Particularly
1. Just what does your test script do? Is it doing updates, or just
queries of the sort you mentioned below?
2. If the test script is doing updates, how are those updates being fed to
Solr?
3. What version of Solr
of documents (2,000,000).
I was trying everything before asking here.
5. Machine characteristics, particularly operating system and physical
memory on the machine.
OS = Debian 6.0, Physcal Memory = 32 gb, CPU = 2x Intel Quad Core
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Jaeger, Jay - DOT jay.jae
Some things to think about:
When solr starts up, solr should report for the location of solr home. Is it
what you expect?
Is there any security on the dist directory that would prevent solr from
accessing it?
Is there a classloader policy set on glassfish that could be getting in the way?
much.
When i send a set of random queries (10-20 queries per second) response
times goes crayz ( 8 seconds to 60+ seconds).
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Jaeger, Jay - DOT jay.jae...@dot.wi.govwrote:
I don't have enough experience with filter queries to advise well on when
to use fq vs. putting
Actually, Windoze also has symbolic links. You have to manipulate them from
the command line, but they do exist.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NTFS_symbolic_link
-Original Message-
From: Per Osbeck [mailto:per.osb...@lbi.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 7:15 AM
To:
500 / second would be 1,800,000 per hour (much more than 500K documents).
1) how big is each document?
2) how big are your index files?
3) as others have recently written, make sure you don't give your JRE so much
memory that your OS is starved for memory to use for file system cache.
JRJ
We used copyField to copy the address to two fields:
1. Which contains just the first token up to the first whitespace
2. Which copies all of it, but translates to lower case.
Then our users can enter either a street number, a street name, or both. We
copied all of it to the second field
That would still show up as the CPU being busy.
-Original Message-
From: Federico Fissore [mailto:feder...@fissore.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 6:12 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: strange performance issue with many shards on one server
Frederik Kraus, il
Jaeger, Jay - DOT, il 28/09/2011 18:40, ha scritto:
That would still show up as the CPU being busy.
i don't know how the program (top, htop, whatever) displays the value
but when the cpu has a cache miss definitely that thread sits and waits
for a number of clock cycles
with 130GB of ram (per
One time when we had that problem, it was because one or more cores had a
broken XML configuration file.
Another time, it was because solr/home was not set right in the servlet
container.
Another time it was because we had an older EAR pointing to a newer release
Solr home directory. Given
cores adminPath=/admij/cores
Was that a cut and paste? If so, the /admij/cores is presumably incorrect, and
ought to be /admin/cores
-Original Message-
From: Jaeger, Jay - DOT [mailto:jay.jae...@dot.wi.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 4:10 PM
To: solr-user
Are you changing just the host OS or the JVM, or both, from 32 bit to 64 bit?
If it is just the OS, the answer is definitely no, you don't need to do
anything more than copy.
If the answer is the JVM, I *think* the answer is still no, but others more
authoritative than I may wish to respond.
I am no expert, but here is my take and our situation.
Firstly, are you asking what the minimum number of documents is before it makes
*any* sense at all to use a distributed search, or are you asking what the
maximum number of documents is before a distributed search is essentially
required?
I am not expert, but based on my experience, the information you are looking
for should indeed be in your logs.
There are at least three logs you might look for / at:
- An HTTP request log
- The solr log
- Logging by the application server / JVM
Some information is available at
If you are asking how to tell which of 94000 records failed in a SINGLE HTTP
update request, I have no idea, but I suspect that you cannot necessarily tell.
It might help if you copied and pasted what you find in the solr log for the
failure (see my previous response for how to figure out where
I have no idea what might be causing your memory to increase like that (we
haven't run 3.4, and our index so far has been at most 28 million rows with
maybe 40 fields), but just as an aside, depending upon what you meant by we
drop the whole index, I'd think it might work better to do an
It sounds like maybe you either have not told Solr where the Solr home
directory is, or , more likely, have not copied the jar files for this
particular class into the right directory (typically a lib directory) so
Tomcat cannot find that class. There is other correspondence on this list that
It depends upon whether you want Solr to do the XSL processing, or the browser.
After fussing a bit, and doing some reading and thinking, we decided it was
best to let the browser do the work, at least in our case.
If the browser is doing the processing, you don't need to modify sorlconfig.xml
I believe that if you have the Solr distribution, you have the source for the
web UI already: it is just .jsp pages. They are inside the solr .war file.
JRJ
-Original Message-
From: nagarjuna [mailto:nagarjuna.avul...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 12:07 AM
To:
200 instances of what? The Solr application with lucene, etc. per usual? Solr
cores? ???
Either way, 200 seems to be very very very many: unusually so. Why so many?
If you have 200 instances of Solr in a 20 GB JVM, that would only be 100MB per
Solr instance.
If you have 200 instances of
Solr does not have an update per se: you have to re-add the document. A
document with the same value for the field defined as the uniqueKey will
replace any existing document with that key (you do not have to query and
explicitly delete it first).
JRJ
-Original Message-
From: hadi
It won't do it for you automatically. I suppose you might create the thumbnail
image beforehand, Base64 encode it, and add it as a stored, non-indexed, binary
field (see schema: solr.BinaryField) when you index the document.
JRJ
-Original Message-
From: hadi
Commit does not particularly spike disk or memory usage, unless you are adding
a very large number of documents between commits. A commit can cause a need to
merge indexes, which can increase disk space temporarily. An optimize is
*likely* to merge indexes, which will usually increase disk
It certainly is possible to develop search pages, update pages, etc. in any
architecture you like: I think I'd suggest looking at SolrJ if you want to do
that.http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solrj
PLEASE: Go read through the documentation and tutorial and browse thru the
Wiki and FAQ. It's
,combined Index Size is 14GB
.Maximum Individual Index Size is 2.5GB .so My requirement for OS RAM is
14GB +3 * 2.5 GB ~ = 22GB.
Correct?
Regards
Sujatha
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 3:45 AM, Jaeger, Jay - DOT jay.jae...@dot.wi.govwrote:
Commit does not particularly spike disk or memory usage, unless
Instances not solr cores.
We get an avg response time of below 1 sec.
The number of documents is not many most of the isntances ,some of the
instnaces have about 5 lac documents on average.
Regards
Sujahta
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 3:35 AM, Jaeger, Jay - DOT jay.jae...@dot.wi.govwrote:
200 instances
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Jaeger, Jay - DOT
jay.jae...@dot.wi.govwrote:
Well, since the OS RAM includes the JVM RAM, that is part of your
requirement, yes? Aside from the JVM and normal OS requirements, all you
need OS RAM for is file caching. Thus, for updates, the OS RAM is not a
major
1. Solr, proper, does not index files. An adjunct called Solr Cel can. See
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtractingRequestHandler . That article describes
which kinds of files it Solr Cel can handle.
2. I have no idea what you mean by incidents per year. Please explain.
3. Even though you
Maybe put them in a single string field (or any other field type that is not
analyzed -- certainly not text) using some character separator that will
connect them, but won't confuse the Solr query parser?
So maybe you start out with key value pairs of
Key1 value1
Key2 value2
Key3 value3
website but found it was really technical,
since we are not on the developer side and we just want some basic
information or numbers about its usage.
Thanks for your answer, anyway.
2011/10/24 Jaeger, Jay - DOT jay.jae...@dot.wi.gov
1. Solr, proper, does not index files. An adjunct called Solr
Could you replace it with something that will sort it last instead of an empty
string? (Say, for example, replacement={}). This would still give something
that looks empty to a person, and would sort last.
BTW, it looks to me as though your pattern only requires that the input contain
just
As far as I know, in the index, a string that is zero length is still a string,
and would not count as missing.
The CSV importer has a way to not index empty entries, but once it is in the
index, it is in the index -- as an empty string.
i.e.
String silly = null;
Is not the same
Sounds like a possible application of solr.PatternTokenizerFactory
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/api/org/apache/solr/analysis/PatternTokenizerFactory.html
You could use copyField to copy the entire string to a separate field (or set
of fields) that are processed by patterns.
JRJ
I noted that in these messages the left hand side is lower case collection, but
the right hand side is upper case Collection. Assuming you did a cut/paste,
could you have a core name mismatch between a master and a slave somehow?
Otherwise (shudder): could you be doing a commit while the
My goodness. We do 4 million in about 1/2 HOUR (7+ million in 40 minutes).
First question: Are you somehow forcing Solr to do a commit for each and every
record? If so, that way leads to the house of PAIN.
The thing to do next, I suppose, might be to try and figure out whether the
issue is
.
-Original Message-
From: Jaeger, Jay - DOT [mailto:jay.jae...@dot.wi.gov]
Sent: 25 October 2011 20:48
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Replication issues with multiple Slaves
I noted that in these messages the left hand side is lower case collection,
but the right
-
From: Jaeger, Jay - DOT [mailto:jay.jae...@dot.wi.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 4:03 PM
To: 'solr-user@lucene.apache.org'
Subject: RE: Loading data to SOLR first time ( taking too long)
My goodness. We do 4 million in about 1/2 HOUR (7+ million in 40
minutes).
First question
It didn't look like that, but maybe.
Our experience has been very very good. I don't think we have seen a crash in
our prototype to date (though that prototype is also not very busy). We have
had as many a four cores, with as many as 35 million documents.
-Original Message-
From:
From your logs, it looks like the Solr library is being found just fine, and
that the servlet is initing OK.
Does your Jetty configuration specify index.jsp in a welcome list?
We had that problem in WebSphere: we got 404's the same way, and the cure was
to modify the Jetty web.xml to include:
ERRATA, that should the the *SOLR* web.xml (not the Jetty web.xml)
Sorry for the confusion.
-Original Message-
From: Jaeger, Jay - DOT [mailto:jay.jae...@dot.wi.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 4:02 PM
To: 'solr-user@lucene.apache.org'
Subject: RE: Difficulties Installing Solr
I very much doubt that would work: different versions of Lucene involved, and
Solr replication does just a streamed file copy, nothing fancy.
JRJ
-Original Message-
From: Nemani, Raj [mailto:raj.nem...@turner.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 12:55 PM
To:
be messed with unless the intention is to affect global
container-wide behavior. Which I don't. I'm only trying to get Solr
running. I may want to run other apps, so I'd rather leave Jetty's
config files as is.
On 10/26/2011 2:05 PM, Jaeger, Jay - DOT wrote:
ERRATA, that should the the *SOLR
Shishir, we have 35 million documents, and should be doing about 5000-1
new documents a day, but with very small documents: 40 fields which have
at most a few terms, with many being single terms.
You may occasionally see some impact from top level index merges but those
should be very
The file that he refers to, web.xml, is inside the solr WAR file in folder
web-inf. That WAR file is in ...\example\webapps. You would have to
uncomment the init-param section under filter-class and change the
param-value to something else. But, as the comments in the filter-class
section
It seems to me that this issue needs to be addressed in the FAQ and in the
tutorial, and that somewhere there should be a /select lock-down how to.
This is not obvious to many (most?) users of Solr. It certainly wasn't obvious
to me before I read this.
JRJ
-Original Message-
From:
99 matches
Mail list logo
