take a look at the SearchComponent interface:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SearchComponent
with that, you can inject extra fields into each document before
passing them on
ryan
On Oct 3, 2008, at 4:13 PM, Brian Whitman wrote:
Not sure if this is possible or easy: I want to make a
what about:
SolrQuery query = ...;
query.addFilterQuery( type:xxx );
On Oct 2, 2008, at 1:23 PM, Jeryl Cook wrote:
i can execute what i want simply with using lucene directly
Hits hits = searcher.search(customScoreQuery, myQuery.getFilter());
howerver, i can't find the right Class
On Oct 2, 2008, at 2:24 PM, Jeryl Cook wrote:
I don't have issues adding a filter query to a SolrQuery...
i guess ill look at the source code, i just need to pass the a custom
Filter object at runtime before i execute a search using the
SolrServer..
currently this is all i can do the below
Thanks!
If there is interest, we could start a non-apache project for plugins
that don't make sense in core or contrib...
Apache Wicket has a project called Wicket Stuff on sourceforge that
is a repository for non-core components. This is where components
linking to non-Apache
- Original Message
From: Ryan McKinley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, October 2, 2008 2:46:20 PM
Subject: Re: SolrPluginRepository
Thanks!
If there is interest, we could start a non-apache project for plugins
that don't make sense in core or contrib
On Oct 2, 2008, at 11:03 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On Oct 2, 2008, at 3:38 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
Yes, contrib should be for anything general and fits within apache
guidelines.
SOLR-380 may belong as a contrib (or core) -- i have not looked at
it.
Just throwing it out
hymm -- i've replied to this three times now... but it does not appear
the list revieved it...
http://www.nabble.com/Any-idea-I%27m-lost--Thanks-to19762598.html
(now i'm trying from a different client)
Have you tried solr.xml rather then multicore.xml?
before 1.3 was released, the file
On Sep 23, 2008, at 12:35 PM, Gregg wrote:
I've got a small configuration question. When posting docs via
SolrJ, I get
the following warning in the Solr logs:
WARNING: The @Deprecated SolrUpdateServlet does not accept query
parameters:
wt=xmlversion=2.2
If you are using solrj, make sure
I have temporarily solved the problem by hardcoding the folders in the
dataDir element like so:
dataDirC:\tomcatweb\merchant\data/dataDir (in the
solrconfig.xml)
Any ideas of what I am doing wrong?
Is it solr home or or the data directory that is getting set wrong?
I *think* the
Second, I've got some code running in the same JVM as Solr that
does some
stuff like getting the latest timestamp in the index to determine
if we need
to pull an update from our product info database, kicking off an
optimize
every night at 2:00AM, stuff like that. However I take it that
On Sep 19, 2008, at 3:22 PM, Mark Baird wrote:
SearchComponent is the class I was missing. Looks like if I can
provide an
entirely new implementation of that it will be a lot cleaner than
the hack I
had been using in 1.2 over top of facets.
thats why SearchComponets got added!
It was
On Sep 18, 2008, at 3:23 AM, Geoff Hopson wrote:
As per other thread
1) security down to field level
how complex of a security model do you need?
Is each users field visibility totally distinct? are there a few
basic groups?
If you are willing to write (or hire someone to write) a
Solr only manages the indexing/search side, it does not do any
crawling like nutch.
For crawling a small site, you may want to check out:
http://aperture.sourceforge.net/ (mature, but RDF heavy)
Or Droids: http://people.apache.org/~thorsten/droids/
Droids is new, and will change a lot soon,
My guess is it has to do with switching the StAX implementation to
geronimo API and the woodstox implementation
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-770
I'm not sure what the solution is though...
On Sep 17, 2008, at 10:02 PM, Joshua Reedy wrote:
I have been using a stable dev
On Sep 16, 2008, at 10:12 AM, Jason Rutherglen wrote:
Hello Ryan,
SQL database such as H2
Mainly to offer joins and be able to perform hierarchical queries.
Also any other types of queries a hybrid SQL search system would
offer. This is something that is best built into SOLR rather than
ryantxu wrote:
...
Yes, I would like to see a way to specify all the fieldtypes /
handlers in one location and then only specify what fields are
available for each core.
So yes -- I agree. In 2.0, I hope to flush out configs so they are
not monstrous.
...
What about using include so each
Here are my gut reactions to this list... in general, most of this
comes down to sounds great, if someone did the work I'm all for it!
Also, no need to post to solr-user AND solr-dev, probably better to
think of solr-user as a superset of solr-dev.
1. Machine learning based suggest
I also have trouble understanding why you would care how solrj talks
to the server... the javabin option is the fastest available.
If you need to give JSON to a client, can't you just put in a proxy?
On Sep 15, 2008, at 12:46 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
If the client wants JSON, then it seems
The solrj API does not care how data is passed around, the interface
to use it is identical.
If you create a CommonsHttpSolrServer and don't set the parser, it
will by default use the javabin parser.
SolrServer server = new CommonsHttpSolrServer(url);
SolrQuery query = new SolrQuery();
I get what you are trying to do yes, googlebot essentially fills
up the cache with edge cases.
There is nothing in solr to prevent using the cache for some queries
and not others -- given the way parts of solr works, it is a bad idea
to turn off caching completly (a Document my be
check SolrSharp
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrSharp
On Aug 18, 2008, at 9:23 PM, Norberto Meijome wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:08:24 -0300
Alexander Ramos Jardim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you wanna a full web service for SOLR example? How a .wsdl will
help you?
Why don't you use the
have you updated recently?
isEnabled() was removed last night...
On Aug 14, 2008, at 2:30 PM, Doug Steigerwald wrote:
I'd try, but the build is failing from (guessing) Ryan's last commit:
compile:
[mkdir] Created dir: /Users/dsteiger/Desktop/java/solr/build/core
[javac] Compiling 337
In the effort to clean up confusion around MultiCore usage, we have
renamed the class that handle runtime core administration from
MultiCoreX to CoreAdminX. Additionally, the path that the default
MultiCoreRequest expects to hit is: /admin/cores rather then /admin/
multicore -- if you have
Check: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MultiCore
If you can wait a few days, there will likely be a 1.3 release
candidate out soon.
On Aug 13, 2008, at 11:30 AM, McBride, John wrote:
Hi,
I am deploying an application across 3 geographies - and as a result
will be running multiple solr
check a recent version, this issue should have been fixed in:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-545
On Aug 13, 2008, at 2:22 PM, Doug Steigerwald wrote:
Yeah, that's the problem. Not having the core in the URL you're
posting to shouldn't update any core, but it does.
Doug
On Aug
)?
On Aug 13, 2008, at 3:00 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
check a recent version, this issue should have been fixed in:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-545
On Aug 13, 2008, at 2:22 PM, Doug Steigerwald wrote:
Yeah, that's the problem. Not having the core in the URL you're
posting
check now. Should be fixed in trunk
On Aug 13, 2008, at 3:05 PM, Doug Steigerwald wrote:
I checked out the trunk about 2 hours ago. Was the last commit on
the 10th supposed to fix this (r684606)?
On Aug 13, 2008, at 3:00 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
check a recent version, this issue
On Aug 13, 2008, at 3:29 PM, Andrew Nagy wrote:
Thanks for clarifing that Ryan - I was a bit confused too...
Before 1.3 is released, you will either be able to:
1. set the dataDir from your solr.xml config
core name=core0 instanceDir=core0 dataDir=XXX /
I have been perusing the
I'm looking for a way to get common word groups within documents.
That is, what are the top two, three, ... n word groups within the
index.
I was messing with indexing adjacent words together (sorry about the
earlier commit)... is this a reasonable approach? Any other ideas for
pulling
/analysis/shingle/ShingleFilter.html
). I have it set up to build 'shingles' of size 2, 3, 4, 5 which I
index into separate fields. If there is a better way of doing this
sort of thing I'd love to know :-)
Brendan
On Aug 13, 2008, at 3:59 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
I'm looking for a way
Check: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-646
hopefully that will solve your problems...
On Aug 1, 2008, at 4:35 PM, CameronL wrote:
The dataDir parameter specified in the core... element in
multicore.xml
does not seem to point to the correct directory. I commented out the
In general though i wondering if steping back a bit and modifying your
request handler to use a SolrDocumentList where you've already
flattened
the ExternalFileField into each SolrDocument would be an easier
approach
-- then you wouldnt' need to modify the ResponseWriter at all.
core.getDataDir()
what kind of plugin? If you don't have access to core, you can
implement SolrCoreAware...
On Jul 25, 2008, at 2:27 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
How do I get the solr / data dir from a plugin without using
anything thats deprecated?
- Mark
bug that needs fixed! Can you file a jira ticket?
On Jul 24, 2008, at 12:50 PM, kalyan chakravarti wrote:
Forgot to mention, I am using dismax queryhandler. I just tested
this with out of box latest nightly build and it throws the same
error.
Currently, there are not any helper functions to pick out spellcheck
info.
But you can always use:
NamedListObject getResponse()
to pick out the data contained in the response:
Adding spellcheck functions to QueryResponse would be a welcome
contribution!
On Jul 21, 2008, at 12:51 PM,
I can't figure how to use the poll either...
here are a few others to check out:
http://lapnap.net/solr/
perhaps a and f could live together, you use 'a' if you need a
background other then white
On Jul 21, 2008, at 2:14 PM, Mike Klaas wrote:
On 20-Jul-08, at 6:19 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
nor does http://selectricity.org/
On Jul 21, 2008, at 2:28 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
Too bad the polls created with Google docs don't support images in
them (or
atleast i couldn't figure out how to do it)
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:52 PM, Ryan McKinley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I
committed in rev 678204
thanks nobel!
On Jul 19, 2008, at 2:40 PM, Noble Paul നോബിള്
नोब्ळ् wrote:
A patch is submitted in SOLR-536
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 11:23 PM, Noble Paul നോബിള്
नोब्ळ्
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
meanwhile , you can manage by making the field
ListString
I found that in org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrServlet.java, always
PrintWriter object is sent as input parameter.
SolrServlet is deprecated.
If you are going to use new features like MultiCore, make sure you
have the XmlUpdateRequestHandler registered to /update
requestHandler
for the field or choice.
This is a definite workaround, but I think it might work. Hmm,
except we only have one QueryConverter
-Grant
On Jul 15, 2008, at 8:56 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
I have a use case where I want to spellcheck the input query across
multiple fields:
Did you mean: location
(assuming you are using 1.3-dev), you could use the dismax query
parser syntax for the fq param. I think it is something like:
fq=!dismaxyour query
I can't find the syntax now (Yonik?)
but I don't know how you could pull out the qf,pf,etc fields for the
fq portion vs the q portion.
On
On Jul 15, 2008, at 2:45 AM, Sunil wrote:
Hi All,
I want to change the duplicate content behavior in solr. What I want
to
do is:
1) I don't want duplicate content.
2) I don't want to overwrite old content with new one.
Means, if I add duplicate content in solr and the content already
On Jul 15, 2008, at 10:31 AM, Fuad Efendi wrote:
Thanks Ryan,
Is uniqueKey really unique if we allow duplicates? I had similar
problem...
if you allowDups, then uniqueKey may not be unique...
however, it is still used as the key for many items.
Quoting Ryan McKinley [EMAIL
I have a use case where I want to spellcheck the input query across
multiple fields:
Did you mean: location = washington
vs
Did you mean: person = washington
The current parameter / response structure for the spellcheck
component does not support this kind of thing. Any thoughts on
nothing to automatically create a new index, but check the multicore
stuff to see how you could implement this:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MultiCore
On Jul 8, 2008, at 10:25 AM, Willie Wong wrote:
Hi,
Sorry if this question sounds daft but I was wondering if there
was
anything built
If all you are doing is stripping text from HTML, the best option is
probably to just do that on the client *before* you send it to solr.
If you need to do something more complex -- or that needs to rely on
other solr configurations you can consider using an
UpdateRequestProcessor. Likely
re-reading your post...
Shalin is correct, just use the snapshooter script to create a point-
in-time snapshot of the index. The multicore stuff will not help with
this.
ryan
On Jul 8, 2008, at 11:09 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
Hi Willie,
If you want to have backups (point-in-time
to
users one
final question though, after snapshot has been created is there a
way to
totally clear out the contents in the master index - or have solr
recreate
the data directory?
Thanks,
Willie
Ryan McKinley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
08/07/2008 11:17 AM
Please respond to
solr-user
The random sort field in solr 1.3 relies on the field name and dynamic
fields for ordering. Check the example solrconfig.xml in 1.3
dynamicField name=random* type=random /
to get random results, try various field names:
sort=rand_123 asc
sort=rand_xyz asc
sort=rand_{generate your
Any thoughts / ideas on how to make formatting and laying out custom
results less obtuse?
$sj('div/').html(item.id).appendTo(this.target);
seems ok for simple things -- like a list -- but not very designer
friendly.
ryan
On Jul 1, 2008, at 3:00 AM, Matthias Epheser wrote:
Hi
Not sure exactly what you are asking for -- I'll answer a few versions:
Do you have an existing index and want to change the field A to
duck for every document? If so, there is no way to do that off the
shelf -- check SOLR-139 for an option (but the current patch will not
work)
Do you
Hi-
I'm working on a case where we have review text that may include words
that describe what the item is *not*.
Given the text the kitten is not clean, searching for clean should
not include (at least at the top) the kitten.
The approach I am considering is to copy the text to a
On Jun 24, 2008, at 12:07 AM, Norberto Meijome wrote:
hi all,
( I'm using 1.3 nightly build from 15th June 08.)
Is there some documentation about how analysers + tokenizers are
applied in
fields ? In particular, my question :
best docs are here:
also, check the LukeRequestHandler
if there is a document you think *should* match, you can see what
tokens it has actually indexed...
On Jun 24, 2008, at 7:12 PM, Norberto Meijome wrote:
hi,
I'm trying to understand why a search on a field tokenized with the
nGram
tokenizer, with
solrj was not released in 1.2, so the change is not incompatible...
The rationalle for abstract class vs interface is more to do with
usage and future maintenance. If SolrServer is an interface and solr
1.4 adds methods, there is no way to make it backwards compatible --
as an abstract
:20 PM, Alexander Ramos Jardim wrote:
It is mapped correctly.
2008/6/4 Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Jun 4, 2008, at 10:07 AM, Alexander Ramos Jardim wrote:
2008/6/3 Ryan McKinley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This way I don't connect:
new CommonsHttpSolrServer(http://localhost:8983/solr
access solr via web browser when
using
multicore.
2008/6/5 Ryan McKinley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
without solrj, are you able to hit the url:
http://localhost:8983/solr/idxItem/update
If not, something is amiss in your configs. Assuming you have
multi-core
configured correctly, you should be able
Are you using a recent version of multi-core?
Do you have the /update RequestHandler mapped in solrconfig.xml?
Since multicore support is new, it does not support the @deprecated /
update servlet
ryan
On Jun 4, 2008, at 10:07 AM, Alexander Ramos Jardim wrote:
2008/6/3 Ryan McKinley
This way I don't connect:
new CommonsHttpSolrServer(http://localhost:8983/solr/idxItem;)
this is how you need to connect... otherwise nothing will work.
Perhaps we should throw an exception if you initialize a URL that
contains ?
ryan
You may want to check field collapsing
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236
There is a patch that works against 1.2, but the one for trunk needs
some work before it can work...
ryan
On May 13, 2008, at 2:46 PM, oleg_gnatovskiy wrote:
There is an XSLT example here:
make sure you are following all the directions on:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateCSV
in particular check Methods of uploading CSV records
On May 9, 2008, at 9:58 AM, Ricky wrote:
Hello,
Am a newbie to SOLR. I am trying to learn it now. i have downloaded
apache-solr 1.2.0.zip file. I have
check the status action
also, check the index.jsp page
(i don't have the code in front of me)
On May 9, 2008, at 10:16 AM, Walter Ferrara wrote:
In solr, last trunk version in svn, is it possible to access the
core registry, or what used to be the static MultiCore object? My
goal is to
On May 9, 2008, at 7:33 PM, Sasha Voynow wrote:
Is it generally better to handle
batching your commits programmatically on the client side rather
than
relying on auto-commit?
the time based auto-commit is useful if you are indexing from multiple
clients to a single server. Rather then
The XML format is fixed, and there is not a good way to change it. If
you can transform your custom docs via XSLT, down the line this may be
possible (it currently is not)
If you really need to index your custom XML format, write your own
RequestHandler modeled on XmlRequestHandler,
Hello-
There has been a long running thread on solr-dev proposing switching
the logging system to use something other then JDK logging.
http://www.nabble.com/Solr-Logging-td16836646.html
http://www.nabble.com/logging-through-log4j-td13747253.html
We are considering using http://www.slf4j.org/.
* write response using custom response writer? (this may not be
right, I'd have to check) that grabs the extra data from cache
and includes it with each hit
Not a custom response writer... use a custom QueryComponent to augment
the document. Localsolr has a good example of
On Apr 30, 2008, at 11:52 PM, Lance Norskog wrote:
The MultiCore writeup on the Wiki (http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MultiCore
)
says:
...
Configuration-core-dataDir
The data directory for a given core. (optional)
How can a core not have its own dataDir? What happens if this is not
think I meant: this writeup implies to me that two cores could share
the same default index. I don't see how this would work, or be
useful.
Thanks,
Lance Norskog
-Original Message-
From: Ryan McKinley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 9:30 PM
To: solr-user
In the future, don't post the same idea in solr-user and solr-dev...
most people on solr-dev read solr-user and the cross posting splits
where discussion ends up.
On Apr 29, 2008, at 5:01 AM, Noble Paul നോബിള്
नोब्ळ् wrote:
hi ,
The current replication strategy in solr involves shell
We are not doing away with the current replication strategy. It's
just that
we're proposing an alternative.
I'm all for adding a replication strategy that works on windows and is
controlled/managed from the webapp. The existing hardlink rsync
methods may have better performance...
On Apr 29, 2008, at 3:09 PM, James Brady wrote:
Hi all,
I'm aiming to use the new multicore features in development versions
of Solr. My ideal setup would be to have master / slave servers on
the same machine, snapshotting across from the 'write' to the 'read'
server at intervals.
This
On Apr 27, 2008, at 7:50 AM, Thijs Vonk wrote:
What is the best way to get the unique terms from a field in a result?
I've been using SimpleFacet to do this. However, I don't need the
counts, so it seems overkill to have to iterate over all the result
documents per field to get the unique
In 1.3 (trunk, dev build), the query parsing has been extracted into a
component. It shoudl be easy to replace just query parsing component
and keep the rest of the chain the same.
I'm not quite following why it is a problem to have two urls for
dismax vs standard query. Dismax expects
- RB
On 4/24/08, Ryan McKinley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 24, 2008, at 12:25 PM, Rantjil Bould wrote:
Hi Group,
I was asked in my project to implement google suggest
kind of
functionality for searching help system. I have seen one thread
http://www.mail-archive.com/solr-user
check the dismax handler -- it expects words to search for, not a
query syntax
On Apr 24, 2008, at 9:53 AM, Geoffrey Young wrote:
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Not in one place and documented. The place to look are query
parsers, but things like AND OR NOT TO are the ones to look out for.
On Apr 24, 2008, at 12:25 PM, Rantjil Bould wrote:
Hi Group,
I was asked in my project to implement google suggest
kind of
functionality for searching help system. I have seen one thread
http://www.mail-archive.com/solr-user@lucene.apache.org/
msg06739.html which
deals with the
Hey-
to create an issue, make an account on jira and post it...
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR
Give that a try and holler if you have trouble.
ryan
On Apr 21, 2008, at 12:31 PM, Wagner,Harry wrote:
Hi HH,
Here's a note I sent Solr-dev a while back:
---
I've implemented a Solr
hymmm -- default should be removed and should not do anything.
The intended behavior is that /solr/select?q=*:* should be 404, you
would need to call
/solr/core0/select or /solr/core1/select to get anything.
So yes, this is a bug. I'll remove the old default=true bit and
file a bug to
, there is no reason
they should not work in multi-core invironment.
Also try debugging using just url access (keep perl out of it for a
bit) and make sure the issue is with just the server or with the
client, or how you are using the client.
ryan
Thanks
K
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Ryan McKinley
$
Thanks
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Ryan McKinley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Do the cores: newswire2, TestIndex, and core5 work on their own?
Can you load each of them into a clean multicore environment?
(Grasping here but...) perhaps there is something wrong with the
config
for thoes cores
Do the cores: newswire2, TestIndex, and core5 work on their own?
Can you load each of them into a clean multicore environment?
(Grasping here but...) perhaps there is something wrong with the
config for thoes cores and they don't initalize properly and there is
not a nice error.
Do the
Thank you for your reply
In other word, can I set 2 unique key field?
directly in solr: no
In your own code, yes -- either in the client or in custom plugin.
ryan
On Apr 2, 2008, at 5:03 AM, 李银松 wrote:
Edward.Zhang had commit the problem before
I want to programmatically retrieve the schema and the config from
the
ShowFileRequestHandler. I encounter some trouble. There are CJK
characters
in the xml files as follows:
!-- Field to use to
search is based on the fields you index and how you index them.
If you index using the text field -- with stemming etc, you will
have to search with the same criteria.
If you want exact search, consider the string type. If you want
both, you can use the copyField to copy the same content
You *may* want to consider MultiCore:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MultiCore
but it may still be more appropriate to install multiple instances.
On Apr 1, 2008, at 2:40 AM, Bhavin Pandya wrote:
I have configured solr instance for one of my application in which
there is one master server and 3
Are you using jetty?
I forget the JIRA issue to point you too, but (assuming it is jetty),
this has something to do with the war file extracting itself again.
The solution is to change the directory it is configured to use.
The default jetty settings included in the nightly builds should
Without writing any custom code, no.
If you write a SearchComponent http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SearchComponent
-- you can programatically change the response at runtime.
ryan
On Mar 28, 2008, at 3:38 AM, Umar Shah wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to know whether we can append a field (Fdyn say) to
the
reults.
and then prepare a custom field after iterating through all the
documents in
the result set. After having created this field for each document
how do I
add corresponding custom field to each document in the response set.
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Ryan McKinley [EMAIL
what app container are you running on? (jetty? tomcat? resin...)
what version of solr are you running?
In solr -- the request goes through all the same hoops if it is GET or
POST, so I suspect it is something to do with the container... but
honestly don't know.
ryan
On Mar 31, 2008, at
On Mar 31, 2008, at 2:43 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: 2. Augment the documents with a field value -- this is a bit more
: complex and runs the risk of name collisions with fields in your
: documents. You can pull the docLIst out from the response and add
: fields to each document.
:
:
Jeryl Cook wrote:
Top often requested feature:
1. Make the option on using the RAMDirectory to hook in Terracotta(
billion(s) of items in an index anyone?..it would be possible using
this.)
This is noted in: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-465
Out of cueriosity, any sense of
It *should* work as a drop in replacement. Check:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/trunk/CHANGES.txt
So you should be good. Note that trunk has a newer verison of lucene,
so the index will be automatically upgraded and you can't go back from
there.
so make sure to backup before
wanted to try Terracotta + Lucene, but... time.
Thanks,
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: Ryan McKinley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 10:52:45 AM
Subject: Re: Update schema.xml without
assume they could downgrade. Maybe under
Upgrading from Solr 1.2?
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Ryan McKinley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It *should* work as a drop in replacement. Check:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/trunk/CHANGES.txt
So you should be good. Note that trunk has
Vinci wrote:
Hi all,
I have checked the wiki and have some question in mind for the solrj...
1. If I want to run solrj as independent server, do I need to write my own
client program?
solrj is the client -- it connects to a server. You should not need to
write your own client.
2. Can I
Vinci wrote:
Hi all,
I am new to Solr and just make the Solr (3-8-nightly) run on the machine.
I want the System to be more portable so I want to use the jetty Solr in
example...before I tried to index the documents, I would like to ask some
question:
1. Do I need to pay special attention when
The way we plan to use Solr
together with a Content Management System is that the authors/editors
can create new article/document types when needed, without any need to
restart anything.
Perhaps consider using dynamic fields if you need new fields:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Ryan McKinley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The way we plan to use Solr together with a Content Management
System is that the authors/editors can create new article/document
types when needed, without any need to restart anything.
Do you really need to change
where 'distribution' of queried single-value field is extemely low, such as
fq=country:USA
Standard query q=country:USA is 1 times faster than less intelligent
q=id:[* TO *]fq=country:USA
Does anyone experience similar staff?
It's probably specific to [* TO *] which was stupid in this
Tricia Williams wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on a custom SearchComponent to display context stored in
payloads. I noticed that both the FacetComponent and the
HighlightComponent are tightly coupled with the ResponseBuilder through
the frequent use of doFacet and doHighlight. If I am building
201 - 300 of 607 matches
Mail list logo
