17 feb 2009 kl. 21.26 skrev Grant Ingersoll:
I believe Karl Wettin submitted a Lucene patch for a Language
guesser: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-826 but it is
marked as won't fix.
The test case of LUCENE-1039 is a language classifier. I've use patch
to detect languages
15 feb 2009 kl. 20.15 skrev Yonik Seeley:
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 6:45 AM, karl wettin karl.wet...@gmail.com
wrote:
Also, as my threadshold is based on the distance in score between the
first result it sounds like using a result start position greater
than
0 is something I have to look
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Karl Wettin karl.wet...@gmail.com wrote:
I pass a rather large amount of OR clauses to Solr, ending up with lots and
lots of results. It's however only the results above a certain score
threadshold that is interesting for me, thus I'd like to only get facet
Hi Solr,
I pass a rather large amount of OR clauses to Solr, ending up with
lots and lots of results. It's however only the results above a
certain score threadshold that is interesting for me, thus I'd like to
only get facet count of the results within the threadshold. How can I
do
a JAR file. I'm surprised you aren't
seeing an error though.
Erik
On Jan 27, 2009, at 1:07 AM, Karl Wettin wrote:
Hi forum,
I'm trying to get QParserPlugin to work, I've got
queryParser name=myqueryparser class=a.b.QParserPlugin/
but still get Unknown query type 'myqueryparser
27 jan 2009 kl. 17.23 skrev Neal Richter:
Is it really neccessary to use Solr for it? Things going much
faster with
Lucene low-level api and much faster if you're loading the
classification
corpus into the RAM.
Good points. At the moment I'd rather have a daemon with a service
API..
Hi forum,
I'm trying to get QParserPlugin to work, I've got
queryParser name=myqueryparser class=a.b.QParserPlugin/
but still get Unknown query type 'myqueryparser' when I
/solr/select/?defType=myqueryparserq=foo
There is no warning about myqueryparser from Solr at startup.
I do however
19 sep 2008 kl. 23.22 skrev Grant Ingersoll:
As for HDDs, people have noted some nice speedups in Lucene using
Solid-state drives, if you can afford them.
I've seen the average response time cut in 5-10 times when switching
to SSD. 64GB SSD is starting at EUR 200 so that can be a lot
28 maj 2008 kl. 14.15 skrev Erik Hatcher:
On May 28, 2008, at 2:34 AM, Karl Wettin wrote:
It would be perfect if all I had to do was to define a couple of
facet fields, a default text query field and some title/body/class
type to render the results.
Is there such a formula 1A JSP
It would be perfect if all I had to do was to define a couple of facet
fields, a default text query field and some title/body/class type to
render the results.
Is there such a formula 1A JSP/servlet (or PHP) user interface for
Solr? Perhaps something in the example or admin that I missed?
16 okt 2007 kl. 17.12 skrev Ryan McKinley:
So I'll start with an ad hoc session manager within Solr. Where in
Solr should I add such a service?
I am using a custom filter that extends SolrDispatchFilter.
Alright, thanks!
--
karl
Where in Solr would I add my own services? Do I really want to do that?
For reinforcement learning reasons I would like to keep track of all
queries placed during an end user session, and as it expires I want
to feed this information to an aggregated class used by a request
handler.
I
17 sep 2007 kl. 12.06 skrev David Welton:
I'm in the process of evaluating solr and sphinx, and have come to
realize that actually having a large data set to run them against
would be handy. However, I'm pretty new to both systems, so thought
that perhaps asking around my produce something
I've been looking at http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UserTagDesign on
and off for a while and think all the use cases could be explained
with simple UML class diagram semantics:
[Taggable](tag:Tag)-- {0..*} |--- {0..*} --(tag:Tag)[Tagger]
|
I updated LUCENE-626 last night. It should now run smooth without
LUCENE-550, but smoother with.
Perhaps it is something you can use.
12 aug 2007 kl. 14.24 skrev climbingrose:
I'm happy to contribute code for the SpellCheckerRequestHandler.
I'll post
the code once I strip off stuff
11 aug 2007 kl. 10.36 skrev climbingrose:
There is an issue on
Lucene issue tracker regarding multi-word spellchecker:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550
I think you mean LUCENE-626 that sort of depends on LUCENE-550.
--
karl
12 aug 2007 kl. 02.35 skrev climbingrose:
I think you mean LUCENE-626
Yeah. Is it possible to use it in product environment?
It's been running live for a long time at this one place, but the
code is stuck at Lucene 2.0 and an old version of 550. I don't really
do any more Solr than to
12 apr 2007 kl. 17.06 skrev Yonik Seeley:
Sorting works on indexed tokens, and hence doesn't really work on
analyzed fields that produce more than one token per document. I
suspect your title field falls into that category. You could also
index the title field into another field that is
13 apr 2007 kl. 15.48 skrev Yonik Seeley:
On 4/13/07, karl wettin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It just hit me (and I did not consider it any further) that perhaps
one could store String.valueOf(theTitle.hashcode()) in an alternative
field and sort by that instead? It will not be 100% accurate
B.
It is juicy. I like juice. Also, I think it fits better with the
other Lucene sub-project logos.
6 apr 2007 kl. 19.51 skrev Yonik Seeley:
Quick poll... Solr 2.1 release planning is underway, and a new logo
may be a part of that.
What form of logo do you prefer, A or B? There may be
7 feb 2007 kl. 19.04 skrev Erik Hatcher:
I'm interested in improving my existing custom cache warming by
being selective about what updates rather than rebuilding completely.
I know it is not Solr, but I've made great progress on my cache that
updates affected results only, on insert and
6 feb 2007 kl. 04.19 skrev Michael Kimsal:
Thanks Erik. That worked, then threw me for another loop, which I
sort of
have fixed I think.
I'm using the highligher functionality, but it doesn't seem to
highlight the
'matched' word if it's a partial match, although it does in fact
return
On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 02:14 -0700, bo_b wrote:
Is there any solution to this problem? I would like to be able to sort, but
we cant live with 264 second downtime after every commit.
There has been many long threads in the Lucene-users forum on this
subject. Try searching for sorting in subject.
Hi all,
I need to get something up and running in 12 hours, so I thought
it could be fun to see if Solr would work out of the box for me.
Neither the example nor the dist war would start.
No big deal, I'll hack something up another way. Just thought it
would be a good thing to report this.
24 matches
Mail list logo
