Re: Licensing issue advice for Solr.

2017-03-27 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 3/24/2017 11:53 AM, russell.lemas...@comcast.net wrote: > I'm just getting started with Solr (6.4.2) and am trying to get > approval for usage in my workplace. I know that the product in general > is licensed as Apache 2.0, but unfortunately there are packages > included in the build that are

Re: Licensing issue advice for Solr.

2017-03-24 Thread Chris Hostetter
: I know that the product in general is licensed as Apache 2.0, but unfortunately there are packages : included in the build that are considered "non-permissive" by my company and as such, means that ... : It appears that the vast majority of the licensing issues are within the

Re: Licensing issue advice for Solr.

2017-03-24 Thread Alexandre Rafalovitch
There is no official build with minimal Solr configuration. Some downstream projects may do so, but we don't keep track of their installation specifics. If it is an issue with contrib directory I would think you should be able to just not use it or even delete it. As to the searching, you've

Re: Licensing issue advice for Solr.

2017-03-24 Thread Pablo Pita Leira
No answer from my side, but if you like to search the mailing list, you can try this: http://markmail.org/search/?q=license+list%3Aorg.apache.lucene.solr-user On 24.03.2017 18:53, russell.lemas...@comcast.net wrote: Hi all, I'm just getting started with Solr (6.4.2) and am trying to get

Licensing issue advice for Solr.

2017-03-24 Thread russell . lemaster
Hi all, I'm just getting started with Solr (6.4.2) and am trying to get approval for usage in my workplace. I know that the product in general is licensed as Apache 2.0, but unfortunately there are packages included in the build that are considered "non-permissive" by my company and as