On 3/1/07, Gunther, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone post their magic formula for filterCache (Erik?) We've hit
a plateau around 1.7mill docs and my response times have suffered when
filtering.
Is this for field faceting (facet.field)?
Have adjusted filtercache up and down all
On 2/9/07, Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I freely admit that i'm totally lost on most of what you're suggestion ...
it seems like you're suggesting that organizing the terms in a facet field
into a tree structure would help us know which terms to compute the
counts for first for a
Yonik wrote:
Thinking all this stuff up from scratch seems like the hard way...
Does anyone know how other people have implemented this stuff?
It's not really what Yonik was asking for, but on the semantic front,
one thing that might help is OCLC's FAST project (Faceted Application of
Subject
And to add some fuel to this fire, I'm seeing in the (first 100k of
UVa MARC records) data I'm processing that the facets are sparse with
documents. There are a lot of documents that simply don't have a
subject genre on them, for example... like almost 50%. Maybe the
data will get
I freely admit that i'm totally lost on most of what you're suggestion ...
it seems like you're suggesting that organizing the terms in a facet field
into a tree structure would help us know which terms to compute the
counts for first for a given query -- but it's not clear to me why that
would
Any suggestions on how to optimize the loading of facets? My index is
roughly 35,000 and I am asking solr to return 6 six facet fields on
every query. On large result sets with facet params set to false
searching is zippy, but when set to true, and facet fields designated,
it takes some time to
On 2/7/07, Gunther, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes most all terms are multi-valued which I can't avoid.
Since the data is coming from a library catalogue I am translating a
subject field to make a subject facet. That facet alone is the biggest,
hovering near 39k. If I remove this
: Andrew, I haven't yet found a successful way to implement the SOLR
: faceting for library catalog data. I developed my own system, so for
Just to clarify: the out of hte box faceting support Solr has at the
moment is very deliberately refered to as SimpleFacets ... it's intended
to solve
On 2/7/07, Gunther, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any suggestions on how to optimize the loading of facets? My index is
roughly 35,000
35,000 documents? That's not that big.
and I am asking solr to return 6 six facet fields on
every query. On large result sets with facet params set to
Are there any simple automatic test we can run to see what fields
would support fast faceting?
Is it just that the cache size needs to be bigger then the number of
distinct values for a field?
If so, it would be nice to add an /admin page that lists each field,
the distinct value count and a
: Is it just that the cache size needs to be bigger then the number of
: distinct values for a field?
basically yes, but the cache is going to be used for all filters -- not
just those for a single facet (so your cache might be big enough that
faceting on fieldA or fieldB is fine, but if you
on distinct
values...
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 2:02 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: facet optimizing
: Andrew, I haven't yet found a successful way to implement the SOLR
: faceting for library
On 2/7/07, Binkley, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the library subject heading context, I wonder if a layered approach
would bring performance into the acceptable range. Since Library of
Congress Subject Headings break into standard parts, you could have
first-tier facets representing the
Yonik - I like the way you think
Yeah!
It's turtles (err, trees) all the way down.
Erik
/me Pulling the Algorithms book off my shelf so I can vaguely follow
along.
On Feb 7, 2007, at 8:22 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On 2/7/07, Binkley, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the
On 2/7/07, Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yonik - I like the way you think
Yeah!
It's turtles (err, trees) all the way down.
Heh...
I'm still thinking/brainstorming about it... it only helps if you can
effectively prune though.
Each node in the tree could also keep the max
15 matches
Mail list logo
