.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-3-3-0-multivalued-field-sort-problem-tp3248778p3248778.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Met vriendelijke groet,
Martijn van Groningen
On 13.08.2011 18:03 Erick Erickson wrote:
The problem I've always had is that I don't quite know what
sorting on multivalued fields means. If your field had tokens
a and z, would sorting on that field put the doc
at the beginning or end of the list? Sure, you can define
rules (first
The first solution would make sense to me. Some kind of a strategy
mechanism
for this would allow anyone to define their own rules. Duplicating results
would be confusing to me.
On 13 August 2011 18:39, Michael Lackhoff mich...@lackhoff.de wrote:
On 13.08.2011 18:03 Erick Erickson wrote:
The
I have a different use case. Consider a spatial multivalued field with latlong
values for addresses. I would want sort by geodist() to return the closest
distance in each group. For example find me the closest restaurant which each
doc being a chain name like pizza hut. Or doctors with multiple
On 13.08.2011 20:31 Martijn v Groningen wrote:
The first solution would make sense to me. Some kind of a strategy
mechanism
for this would allow anyone to define their own rules. Duplicating results
would be confusing to me.
That is why I would only activate it on request (setting a special
Fair enough, but what's first value in the list?
There's nothing special about mutliValued fields,
that is where the schema has multiValued=true.
under the covers, this is no different than just
concatenating all the values together and putting them
in at one go, except for some games with the
On 13.08.2011 21:28 Erick Erickson wrote:
Fair enough, but what's first value in the list?
There's nothing special about mutliValued fields,
that is where the schema has multiValued=true.
under the covers, this is no different than just
concatenating all the values together and putting them
.
Is there a work around available to fix this problem?
Thanks,
Johnny
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-3-3-0-multivalued-field-sort-problem-tp3248778p3248778.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
.
Is there a work around available to fix this problem?
Thanks,
Johnny
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-3-3-0-multivalued-field-sort-problem-tp3248778p3248778.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-3-3-0-multivalued-field-sort-problem-tp3248778p3248778.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Met vriendelijke groet,
Martijn van Groningen
[mailto:salman.ak...@northbaysolutions.net]
Sent: January-17-11 5:47 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: sort problem
Yes.
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Philippe VINCENT-ROYOL
vincent.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 17/01/11 10:32, Grijesh a écrit :
Use Lowercase
-Original Message-
From: Salman Akram [mailto:salman.ak...@northbaysolutions.net]
Sent: January-17-11 5:47 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: sort problem
Yes.
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Philippe VINCENT-ROYOL
vincent.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 17
Hi guys,
I use solr with utf8 charset and i've a sort problem. For example, i
make a sort on a name field.. results looks like:
Article
Banana
Foo
aviation
brunch
...
So my question is, how to force solr to ignore case in result ? I would
like to have result as:
Article
aviation
Banana
Use Lowercase filter to lowering your data at both index time and search time
it will make case insensitive
-
Thanx:
Grijesh
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/sort-problem-tp2271207p2271231.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Le 17/01/11 10:32, Grijesh a écrit :
Use Lowercase filter to lowering your data at both index time and search time
it will make case insensitive
-
Thanx:
Grijesh
Thanks,
so tell me if i m wrong... i need to modify my schema.xml to add
lowercase filter and reindex my content?
Yes.
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Philippe VINCENT-ROYOL
vincent.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 17/01/11 10:32, Grijesh a écrit :
Use Lowercase filter to lowering your data at both index time and search
time
it will make case insensitive
-
Thanx:
Grijesh
Thanks,
so tell me if i
[mailto:salman.ak...@northbaysolutions.net]
Sent: January-17-11 5:47 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: sort problem
Yes.
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Philippe VINCENT-ROYOL
vincent.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 17/01/11 10:32, Grijesh a écrit :
Use Lowercase filter to lowering
your data, unless you
happen to already have such a field (via copyField, perhaps).
Brad
-Original Message-
From: Salman Akram [mailto:salman.ak...@northbaysolutions.net]
Sent: January-17-11 5:47 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: sort problem
Yes.
On Mon, Jan
Thanks Yonik,
I was using example schema.xml, in that alphaOnlySort FieldType contains
following analyzer.
fieldType name=alphaOnlySort class=solr.TextField
sortMissingLast=true omitNorms=true
analyzer
!-- KeywordTokenizer does no actual tokenizing, so the entire
input
Thanks Yonik,
It works fine. But sort is *case sensitive. *
And also,
If my String contains some white space(or - or any other special char) then
failed to sort, with following error.
INFO: /select/
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 3:36 AM, Mahesh Udupa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Yonik,
It works fine. But sort is *case sensitive. *
And also,
If my String contains some white space(or - or any other special char) then
failed to sort, with following error.
INFO: /select/
Hello,
I have following entry in my title list:
Content1
Content2
Content3
Content4
Content5
If I try to Sort it in ascending or descending order, I am getting same
order.
I am using following alphaOnlySort field and text.
Please let me know if I miss anything here.
Thanks in advance for
I admit I know little about SOLR, but wouldn't an AlphaOnlySorter ignore
the digits?
Erick
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 3:51 AM, Mahesh Udupa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello,
I have following entry in my title list:
Content1
Content2
Content3
Content4
Content5
If I try to Sort it in
Thanks Erick for your quick response.
Even I tried with *text* Field type. But no use.
As splitOnCaseChange=1, do we have splitOnLetterToNumberChange or
something like that?
Thanks in advance
kmu
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Erick Erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I admit I know
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:45 PM, Mahesh Udupa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even I tried with *text* Field type. But no use.
As splitOnCaseChange=1, do we have splitOnLetterToNumberChange or
something like that?
Sorting requires a single token in the field (you want to sort on the
whole
I'll try switching to int. Thanks.
Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/2/07, michael ravits wrote:
this is the field definition:
holds message id's, values range from 0 to 127132531
can I disable this cache?
No, sorting wouldn't work without it.
The cache structure certainly
If you could live with a cap of 2B on message id, switching to type
int would decrease the memory usage to 4 bytes per doc (presumably
you don't need range queries?)
I haven't found exact definitions of the fieldTypes anywhere. Does
integer span the common range from -2^31 to 2^31-1?
And
On 9/3/07, Marcus Stratmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you could live with a cap of 2B on message id, switching to type
int would decrease the memory usage to 4 bytes per doc (presumably
you don't need range queries?)
I haven't found exact definitions of the fieldTypes anywhere. Does
hello mike,
this is the field definition:
field name=msgid type=slong indexed=true stored=true
required=true /
holds message id's, values range from 0 to 127132531
can I disable this cache?
Mike Klaas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 28-Aug-07, at 6:19 AM, michael ravits
wrote:
hello solrs,
On 9/2/07, michael ravits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this is the field definition:
field name=msgid type=slong indexed=true stored=true
required=true /
holds message id's, values range from 0 to 127132531
can I disable this cache?
No, sorting wouldn't work without it.
The cache structure
hello solrs,
i have an index with 30M records, weights ~50GB. latest trunk version. heap
size 1024mb.
queries work fine until I specify a field to sort results by. even if the
result set consists of only 2 documents, the CPU jumps high and after about 5
minutes I get the following exception:
Hi,
I am new to using SOLR.
I have read that the default sorting is by the score desc.
However when I ran the query, I get some erroneous results.
This is the query I ran:
solr include_in_directory_p:t AND active_p:t AND (in_shelves:(0777,1)^100
OR in_groups:(02343^50 02345^30 abc xyz)); score
: I have read that the default sorting is by the score desc.
: However when I ran the query, I get some erroneous results.
:
: This is the query I ran:
:
: solr include_in_directory_p:t AND active_p:t AND (in_shelves:(0777,1)^100
: OR in_groups:(02343^50 02345^30 abc xyz)); score desc
what
33 matches
Mail list logo
