Hi, guys,
It seems there's a small bug in the bin/commit script for solr 1.2.
I was able to run snapinstaller successfully to install the index and open a
new searcher. (This is verified by querying the new docs through the web
admin UI.) However, the snapinstaller script failed due to the
:
: It seems there's a small bug in the bin/commit script for solr 1.2.
A fix was already commited to the trunk for this as part of SOLR-282 (but
there doesn't seem to be a note about it in the changelog)
-Hoss
: Does this case arise when i do a search when there is no index?? - If yes,
: then i guess the Exception can be made more meaningful.
in normal operation, i believe this shouldn't happen -- Solr will create
the index for you on startup if there isn't one. You're attampting a
fairly advanced
Maybe I got this wrong...but isn't this what mapreduce is meant to deal with?
eg,
1) get the job (a query)
2) map it to workers ( servers that provide search results from their own
indexing)
3) wait for the results from all workers that reply within acceptable
timeframe.
4) comb through
On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 10:11 +0200, Thierry Collogne wrote:
Hello,
We are experiencing some strange behavior while searching with words
containing accents.
We are using two examples rené and matthé
When we search for rené or for rene, we get the same results, so that is
ok.
But when we
On 9/20/07, Thierry Collogne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
..when we search for matthé or for matthe, we get two totally
different results
The analyzer admin tool should help you find out what's happening, see
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FAQ#head-b25df8c8393bbcca28f1f344c432975002e29ca9
We are using this schema definition
fieldType name=text class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap=100
analyzer type=index
tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/
!-- in this example, we will only use synonyms at query time
filter
I have entered the the matthé term in the the analyzer, but as far as I
understand, it should be ok. I have made some screenshots with the results.
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1407/1412619772_0b697789cd_o.jpg
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1245/1412619774_3351b287bc_o.jpg
I find it strange
On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 13:33 +0200, Thierry Collogne wrote:
We are using this schema definition
Thierry, try to move the solr.ISOLatin1AccentFilterFactory up the filter
cue, like:
...
tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/
filter class=solr.ISOLatin1AccentFilterFactory/
...
for
On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 14:01 +0200, Thierry Collogne wrote:
I have entered the the matthé term in the the analyzer, but as far as I
understand, it should be ok. I have made some screenshots with the results.
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1407/1412619772_0b697789cd_o.jpg
On 9/20/07, Thierry Collogne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...Thank you very much. Moving the filter class=
solr.ISOLatin1AccentFilterFactory/ up in the chain fixed it
Yes, the problem was the EnglishPorterFilterFactory before the accents
removal: the stemmer doesn't know about accents, so no
Thorsten,
Thank you very much. Moving the filter class=
solr.ISOLatin1AccentFilterFactory/ up in the chain fixed it.
On 20/09/2007, Thorsten Scherler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 14:01 +0200, Thierry Collogne wrote:
I have entered the the matthé term in the the analyzer,
Not sure if this is in the same league or not, but Yahoo offers a term
extraction
web service.
http://developer.yahoo.com/search/content/V1/termExtraction.html
On 9/20/07, Grant Ingersoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You might investigate some tools like Alias-i's LingPipe or do some
searches
Thanks, Pieter. I'll go for that then.
Mark
On Sep 19, 2007, at 10:15 PM, Pieter Berkel wrote:
Sounds like you're on the right track, if your groups overap (i.e. a
document can be in group A and B), then you should ensure your
groups
field is multivalued.
If you are searching for foo in
We are indexing both french and dutch. I will take a look at
SnowballPorterFilterFactory later, but thanks for the advice.
On 20/09/2007, Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/20/07, Thierry Collogne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...Thank you very much. Moving the filter class=
On 9/19/07, Norberto Meijome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe I got this wrong...but isn't this what mapreduce is meant to deal with?
Not really... you could force a *lot* of different problems into
map-reduce (that's sort of the point... being able to automatically
parallelize a lot of different
On 9/19/07, Pieter Berkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, I'd like to be able to
analyze documents more intelligently to recognize phrase keywords such as
open source, Microsoft Office, Bill Gates rather than splitting each
word into separate tokens (the field is never used in search queries
On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 15:27 +0200, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On 9/20/07, Thierry Collogne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...Thank you very much. Moving the filter class=
solr.ISOLatin1AccentFilterFactory/ up in the chain fixed it
Yes, the problem was the EnglishPorterFilterFactory before
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 09:58:17 +0200
David Welton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That seems to be how Sphinx works:
http://www.sphinxsearch.com/doc.html#distributed
Of course, the details of this are far over my head for either system,
so I don't really know if that's a sensible way of doing
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 09:53:46 -0400
Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/19/07, Norberto Meijome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe I got this wrong...but isn't this what mapreduce is meant to deal
with?
Not really... you could force a *lot* of different problems into
map-reduce
I am running against 1.2. Where would I get the 1.3-dev version?
I will try different versions of Tomcat and/or Jetty. Thanks for all
your suggestions, I'll let you know.
-Original Message-
From: Ryan McKinley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 8:30 PM
To:
On 9/20/07, Thorsten Scherler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...Betrand, does the French Snowball work fine?...
I've seen some weirdnesses, like tennis and tenir (means to hold)
both stemmed to ten, but in all of our (simple) tests it was ok.
The application where we're using it does not require high
I have an index with several fields, but just one stored: ID (string,
unique).
I need to access that ID field for each of the tops nodes docs in my
results (this is done inside a handler I wrote), code looks like:
Hits hits = searcher.search(query);
for(int i=0; inodes; i++) {
At 5:30 PM +0200 9/20/07, Walter Ferrara wrote:
I have an index with several fields, but just one stored: ID (string,
unique).
I need to access that ID field for each of the tops nodes docs in my
results (this is done inside a handler I wrote), code looks like:
Hits hits =
About stored/index difference: ID is a string, (= solr.StrField) so
FieldCache give me what I need.
I'm just wondering, as this cached object could be (theoretically)
pretty big, do I need to be aware of some OOM? I know that FieldCache
use weakmaps, so I presume the cached array for the older
I've been struggling with this a bit so here goes:
I'm using faceting to get some results. I also want to get another field -
the id field along with it. Is it possible to get that somehow in the facet
results?
Thanks!
On 9/20/07, Walter Ferrara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm just wondering, as this cached object could be (theoretically)
pretty big, do I need to be aware of some OOM? I know that FieldCache
use weakmaps, so I presume the cached array for the older reader(s) will
be gc-ed when the reader is no
Ok, I should correct myself. For #1, I think we need to
1) config different port for each solr home dir (since they run on the same
host);
2) run rsync-start script under each of the solr home's bin dir.
(btw, just to make clear, we should run rsync-start after rsync-enable that
I understand.)
: 1) config different port for each solr home dir (since they run on the same
: host);
you mean a differnet rsync port right? ... yes the scripts as distributed
assume that each rsync daemon will be dedicated to a single solr
instance .. the idea beaing that even if you have 12 Solr intances
On 9/20/07, Walter Ferrara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have an index with several fields, but just one stored: ID (string,
unique).
I need to access that ID field for each of the tops nodes docs in my
results (this is done inside a handler I wrote), code looks like:
Hits hits =
Thanks, Hoss.
For the last question, yes I understand now it's referring to whatever solr
home we have named. However, there's still the last part of my question
that feels suspicious why the solr string is directly coded in the script
(unlike other cases they usually use ${solr_root} to get to
: I'm using faceting to get some results. I also want to get another field -
: the id field along with it. Is it possible to get that somehow in the facet
: results?
you're going to have to elaborate on what it is you are trying to do ... i
genuinely have no idea what you are asking (and i
You mean, when it says that facet term foo has 10 documents, you want
those 10 ids? I think that will require a further query from your
application.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Cric Digs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 12:43 PM
To:
ok. Hoss. I think I'll believe you since nobody raised any issue running the
script. And I'm about to try it out shortly with different solr home names.
So just to help my knowledge, where does this virtual setting of this solr
string happen? Should it be in some config file or sth?
thanks,
: So just to help my knowledge, where does this virtual setting of this solr
: string happen? Should it be in some config file or sth?
rsyncd-start creates an rsync config file on the fly ... much of it is
constants, but it fills in the rsync port using a variable from your
config.
-Hoss
The solr that you are referring to in your third question in the
name of the rsync area which is map to the solr data directory. This
is defined in the rsyncd configuration file which is generated on the
fly as Chris has pointed out. Take a look at rsyncd-start.
snappuller rsync the index from
That would be my bad. I noticed the problem while fixing SOLR-282
which is not related. I fixed both problems in stead of opening a
different bug for the response format issue. I will update the change
log.
Bill
On 9/20/07, Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:
: It seems there's a
Hi,
I need a clarification regarding the SOLR Ranking.
consider the scenario for searching for courses based on following
relevance:
a. Courses with the term in the courseTitle, courseTag and in the
courseDescription would appear first
b. Courses with the term in the courseTitle and
38 matches
Mail list logo
